Bilateral simultaneous endoscopic carpal tunnel release: Mean time to resume activities of daily living and return to work

Endoscopic carpal surgery in carpal tunnel syndrome: A systematic review

Objective

Endoscopic carpal tunnel release has become increasingly popular and has shown the advantage of early recovery of hand function with minimal morbidity. In this systematic review, we aimed to summarize the currently available data and describe the reported advantages and disadvantages of endoscopic carpal tunnel surgery for treating carpal tunnel syndrome.

Methods

In this study, we followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, which is a set of reporting requirements for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The search strategy with MeSH terms was "MeSH (carpal tunnel syndrome) AND (endoscopic)" Filters: in the last 5 years, English-on February 27th, 2022. A total of 131 articles fulfilled the first screening criteria. A detailed analysis of those articles identified 39 that matched the criteria, of which 14 were considered appropriate for this analysis after applying the complete inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results

A total of 14 studies met the eligibility criteria. Analysis of those studies found that all types of portals in endoscopic carpal tunnel release reduced postoperative pain at a short-term follow-up. There was no evidence to suggest the superiority of the single- or two-portal techniques in terms of outcomes. In terms of pain relief, symptom resolution, patient satisfaction, duration to return to work, and adverse events, this early use of endoscopic carpal tunnel release produced satisfactory outcomes. Further studies comparing the number of portals are needed.

Conclusion

Endoscopic carpal tunnel surgery for treating carpal tunnel syndrome is effective and both single- and dual-portal techniques provide advantages in terms of early recovery and minimal morbidity.

Factors affecting contralateral wrist surgery after one carpal tunnel release in bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) can be bilateral, with varying incidence. Carpal tunnel release (CTR) in one wrist may relieve the symptoms of the contralateral wrist, avoiding the need for second surgery; conversely, the symptoms may persist or worsen, requiring contralateral surgery in some cases. The present study investigated whether surgical treatment was finally required for the non-operated CTS wrist, and in what cases non-operative treatment was possible. We compared baseline characteristics, risk factors and electrodiagnostic data between CTS patients who underwent only unilateral CTR and those who subsequently underwent bilateral surgery at various time intervals. This single-center retrospective study included 188 patients with bilateral CTS managed between 2010 and 2020; 137 patients (group 1, 73%) underwent only unilateral CTR, and 51 (group 2, 27%) subsequently underwent contralateral CTR. In group 1, contralateral CTS symptoms were assessed in 4 categories and compared to the presenting symptoms in the index wrist. There were no significant differences in age, gender, preoperative symptom duration, body status, addictive behavior, electrodiagnostic study or comorbidities, other than a higher rate of dialysis in group 2. The contralateral wrist showed partial or complete symptom relief in 57% of patients undergoing unilateral CTR. High BMI and history of diabetes were risk factors for persistent severe CTS or subsequent contralateral CTR.

Return to Activities After Simultaneous Bilateral Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release

BACKGROUND

Approximately 56% of patients diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome present with bilateral symptoms; however, few studies have investigated bilateral simultaneous endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) and postoperative effect on return to activity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the length of recovery in patients who received bilateral simultaneous ECTR, including pain medication requirements, return to activities of daily living, return to work, and return to recreational activities.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent bilateral ECTR by a single hand fellowship-trained surgeon from 2013 to 2019. Demographic, operative, and clinical outcomes were collected via chart review and a telephone interview. Student t tests and χ² tests were conducted for analysis.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were included in the study; 40 were successfully contacted for telephone interview follow-up. Patients reported an average of 2 days of use of postoperative narcotic pain medication and an average of 5, 7, and 19 days of return to activities of daily living, work, and recreational activities, respectively. Female patients reported more days of narcotic pain medications (1 day vs 3 days, P = .0483) and an average of longer return to work than men (9 days vs 5 days, P = .0477). Manual laborers reported longer return to work (9 days vs 5 days, P = .0500). Older patients (aged >65 years) reported longer return to recreational activities (39 days vs 11 days, P = .0189).

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous bilateral ECTR is a successful procedure with shorter recovery times than reported previously. Female patients, manual laborers, and older patients experience a longer recovery and should be counseled appropriately.

Self-Reliance and Postoperative Hand Recovery After Simultaneous, Bilateral Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: A Prospective Study

PURPOSE

Outcomes and recovery of endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) have been broadly examined in studies. The total recovery time can potentially be reduced by performing simultaneous, bilateral ECTR. In this study we prospectively investigated days to self-reliance. As secondary outcomes, we investigated direct postoperative recovery of hand function and pre and postoperative symptom severity after simultaneous, bilateral ECTR.

METHODS

In this single-center prospective case series, we included all patients willing to participate after undergoing bilateral ECTR between December 2015 and July 2019. Every patient recorded days to self-reliance (when a patient could perform basic activities of daily living without the need for assistance from another person) and completed a preoperative and postoperative Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) evaluating postoperative hand function and pre and postoperative symptom severity.

RESULTS

In total, 81 patients received simultaneous, bilateral ECTR. Median days until self-reliance was 4; mean number of days was 4.9. Concerning BCTQ scores, postoperative functional status increased significantly each day, and mean BCTQ score decreased gradually from intense difficulty to little difficulty in daily tasks over a period of 7 days. Preoperative BCTQ symptom severity showed significant improvement compared to postoperative symptoms, evolving from medium to slight symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous, bilateral ECTR offers recovery to self-reliance in 4 to 5 days with a gradual and significant increase of hand function in the following postoperative days.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.