Fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the long fingers: Report of an unusual case requiring open surgery

Management of Pediatric Volar Plate Avulsion Fractures of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Sudden, forced hyperextension injuries to the proximal interphalangeal joint leading to volar plate avulsion fractures are common hand injuries in children. Suboptimal management of these fractures can lead to the development of long-term complications such as stiffness and flexion contracture.

METHODS

MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were systematically searched, and additional studies were found through reference of articles up to June 15, 2023. Identified articles were assessed using predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty-five articles were included, involving 268 patients with ages from 3 to 17 years. Fractures with less than 30% joint involvement, classified as Eaton type I or II, or designated as "Stable" in the Keifhaber-Stern classification, were treated through nonsurgical means. Surgical interventions, encompassing open reduction and internal fixation, were reserved for fractures with more than 30% joint involvement and/or meeting criteria such as Eaton type IIIa or IIIb and Keifhaber-Stern "Tenuous" or "Unstable." Positive outcomes were seen in 99.5% of patients receiving nonsurgical treatment, compared with 85.7% in the surgical cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature demonstrated positive outcomes for fractures presenting with less than 30% joint involvement that were managed nonsurgically. In fractures with more than 30% joint involvement, surgical interventions yielded positive results. To further substantiate these findings, larger prospective studies with uniform measures are needed to validate the results of this study.

Ratio of dislocation types of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the fingers: A new classification system for initial therapy

BACKGROUND

We proposed a new system named the sagittal, coronal, axial, rotational and fracture (SCARF) classification, which can simply explain any condition of proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint dislocations of the fingers. The purpose of this study was to verify that this classification would contribute to management of PIP joint dislocations at the initial therapy. We determined ratios of five factors in PIP dislocations with SCARF by interpreting radiographs and assessed the interobserver and intraobserver variability.

METHODS

In total, 68 fingers in 67 consecutive patients were studied. The SCARF classification is composed of five factors: (1) sagittal plane displacement is rated by dorsal (D), volar (V), or neutral (N); (2) coronal plane displacement, by ulnar (U), radial (R), or neutral (N); (3) axial force, by compression (C), traction (T), or no (N); (4) rotational displacement, by supine (S), prone (P), or neutral (N); and (5) fracture concomitance, by minus (-) or plus (+). The row of the five characters explains each condition of PIP joint dislocations. Interobserver and intraobserver variability was determined after six orthopedic surgeons independently classified the same radiographs twice.

RESULTS

All 68 dislocations were classified into 14 types, unless fracture concomitance was considered. The most common type was DUNN (35%). In coronal plane displacements, the two ulnar fingers showed a higher tendency to the ulnar position. Ring finger fracture concomitance was higher than in middle fingers or little fingers. In interobserver analysis, mean kappa coefficient for each factor was 0.63, 0.75, 0.68, 0.33, and 0.84, respectively. In intraobserver analysis, that was 0.73, 0.79, 0.71, 0.41, and 0.81, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Even other than hand specialists can specify the type of every PIP dislocation by using the SCARF classification and will have better understanding of the disorder. It would contribute to management of PIP dislocations at the initial therapy.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic II.