Partial wrist denervation versus total wrist denervation: A systematic review of the literature

Patient reported and functional outcome measures after surgical salvage procedures for posttraumatic radiocarpal osteoarthritis - a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Posttraumatic wrist osteoarthritis is an irreversible and often progressive condition. Many surgical treatments, used in (daily) practice, aim to relieve symptoms like pain and restore function. The aim of this systematic review is to assess the patient reported and functional outcomes of the most common surgical interventions in patients with posttraumatic wrist osteoarthritis. This overview can help clinicians select the best treatment and manage patient's expectations.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane for articles published between 1990 and November 2022 according to the PRISMA guidelines. The study protocol has been registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42017080427). Studies that describe patient reported outcomes (pain and Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) -score) and functional outcomes (range of motion (ROM) and grip strength) after surgical intervention with a minimal follow-up of 1 year were included. The identified surgical procedures included denervation, proximal row carpectomy, interpositional- and total arthroplasty, and midcarpal-, radiocarpal- and total arthrodesis. The pre-and postoperative outcomes were pooled and presented per salvage procedure.

RESULTS

Data from 50 studies was included. Pain score improved after all surgeries except denervation. Flexion/extension decreased after radiocarpal arthrodesis, did not show significant changes after proximal row carpectomy, and improved for all other surgeries. DASH score improved after arthroplasty, proximal row carpectomy and midcarpal arthrodesis. Grip strength improved after interposition arthroplasty and partial arthrodesis.

CONCLUSION

Evidence from this review did not support the indication for denervation in this particular patient population. In patients with SLAC/SNAC II, proximal row carpectomy might be favourable to a midcarpal arthrodesis solely based on better FE ROM of the radiocarpal joint after proximal row carpectomy. In terms of radiocarpal mobility, total wrist arthroplasty might be preferred to radiocarpal arthrodesis in patients with osteoarthritis after a distal radius fracture. More uniform measurements of outcomes would improve the understanding of the effect of surgical treatments of the posttraumatic osteoarthritic wrist.

Use of Wrist Denervation in the Treatment of SLAC and SNAC Wrist by ASSH Members

Background  Scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) are common patterns of wrist arthritis, and surgical treatment options include partial and total wrist arthrodesis and wrist denervation, which maintains the current anatomy while relieving pain. Introduction  The purpose of this study is to elucidate current practices within the hand surgery community with respect to the use of anterior interosseous nerve/posterior interosseous nerve (AIN/PIN) denervation in the treatment of SLAC and SNAC wrists. Methods  An anonymous survey was distributed to 3,915 orthopaedic surgeons via the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) listserv. The survey collected information on conservative and operative management, indications, complications, diagnostic block, and coding of wrist denervation. Results  In total, 298 answered the survey. 46.3% ( N  = 138) of the respondents used denervation of AIN/PIN for every SNAC stage, and 47.7% ( N  = 142) of the respondents used denervation of AIN/PIN for every SLAC wrist stage. AIN and PIN combined denervation was the most common standalone procedure ( N  = 185, 62.1%). Surgeons were more likely to offer the procedure ( N  = 133, 55.4%) if motion preservation had to be maximized ( N  = 154, 64.4%). The majority of surgeons did not consider loss of proprioception ( N  = 224, 84.2%) or diminished protective reflex ( N  = 246, 92.1%) to be significant complications. 33.5%, 90 respondents reported never performing a diagnostic block prior to denervation. Conclusion  Both SLAC and SNAC patterns of wrist arthritis can result in debilitating wrist pain. There is a wide range of treatment for different stages of disease. Further investigation is required to identify ideal candidates and evaluate long-term outcomes.

The effects of partial wrist denervation in wrist osteoarthritis: patient-reported outcomes and objective function

This prospective longitudinal study aimed to analyse the effect of partial wrist denervation on patient-reported outcomes, quality of life and objective function in symptomatic wrist osteoarthritis during the first year after surgery. Sixty consecutive patients underwent an anterior and posterior interosseous neurectomy during 2018-2020. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, EuroQol-5D-3L, pain at rest and on load, and objective function were assessed preoperatively and 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Generalized estimating equations were used to analyse the effect on the outcome variables. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation and pain scores improved significantly postoperatively with no decline over time, but no patient reported outcome measure reached the minimal clinically important difference. Quality of life, strength and range of motion did not improve. We found no complications. Seventeen patients needed further surgery during the study period. More studies are needed to evaluate whether denervation is truly effective or not.Level of evidence: II.

Adaptive proximal scaphoid implant (APSI): a systematic review of the literature

Scapholunate advanced collapse collapse (SLAC) is a challenging topic for hand surgeons. The adaptative proximal scaphoid implant (APSI) (Bioprofile-Tornier) is a pyrocarbon ovoid shaped interpositional implant, that allows adaptive mobility during motion. The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the clinical and radiological outcomes of APSI implants and possible complications. We performed a literature search combining the following key-words: "APSI", "Scaphoid's proximal pole", "implant", "scaphoid avascular necrosis", "SLAC", "SNAC", "pyrocarbon", "prosthesis", and "spacer" with no limitations for year of publication. We selected seven studies considered relevant to our systematic review. All studies described an improvement in the grip strength and the flexion extension arch compared to pre-operative values. The percentage of patients who reported progression of osteoarthritis (OA) with APSI was 17.3%, and implant's mobilization has a rate 5.1% (8/156). In conclusion the APSI implant is a reliable alternative for the treatment of SNAC wrist and SLAC wrist.