Results of a special interdisciplinary hand therapy program for work-related injuries

[The complexity of hand-surgical procedures in the context of cross-sector care concepts: a consensus recommendation of the German Society of Hand Surgery]

Overboarding politcal influence in Germany concerning medical issues has come to a new peak. The report by the IGES Institute published in 2022 made an important contribution in this regard. Unfortunately, only that part of the recommendations of this report were implemented in a new version of the contract for outpatient surgery according to Section 115b SGB V (AOP contract), that called for an expansion of outpatient surgery. In particular, those aspects that are important from a medical point of view for a patient-specific adjustment of outpatient surgery (e. g. old age, frailty, comorbidities) as well as the important structural requirements for outpatient postoperative care were included in the new AOP contract at best in a rudimentary manner. For this reason, the German Society for Hand Surgery felt compelled to give its members a recommendation as to which medical aspects must be taken into account, especially when performing hand surgery operations, in order to ensure the highest level of safety for the patients entrusted to us while performing outpatient surgery. An expert group of experienced hand surgeons and hand therapists who work in hospitals of all levels of care as well as resident surgeons was formed in order to formulate mutually agreed recommendations for action.

Hand characteristics and functional abilities in predicting return to work in adult workers with traumatic hand injury

BACKGROUND: Hand injuries affect a person’s functioning, thus impeding their abilities to return to work. There is a limited understanding in return to work of the overall predictors when including hand characteristics and functional abilities. Therefore, it is essential to identify the most relevant predictors in return to work among individuals with a hand injury. OBJECTIVES: (1) To compare hand function characteristics and functional abilities of injured workers who have or have not returned to work. (2) To estimate hand function characteristics and functional abilities as predictors to return to work. METHODS: One hundred and fifteen adult workers with hand injuries aged 18– 59 years old from five general hospitals in Malaysia participated in a cross-sectional study. Predictors were estimated using logistic regression. RESULTS: There was a significant association between occupational sector (p = 0.012), injury duration (p = 0.024), occupational performance (p = 0.009) and satisfaction with performance (p <  0.001), grip strength of injured hand (p = 0.045– 0.002) and the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) disability/symptom (p = 0.001) with the person’s return to work status. Significant predictors of return to work were identified using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) satisfaction’s score, DASH disability/symptoms’ score and duration of the injury. CONCLUSION: As two main predictors of return to work were COPM satisfaction and DASH disability/symptoms, occupational therapists working in rehabilitation should focus on achieving functional performance and satisfaction within the optimal time.

[Input of the start on the result of a special interdisciplinary rehabilitation program for work-related injuries of the hand]

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcome of a special interdisciplinary hand therapy program depending on the time interval between trauma and rehabilitation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

With use of self-assessed scores (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score [DASH-Score], European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions [EQ-5D]) and objective functional parameters (TAM = Total Active Motion for finger injuries, ROM = Range of Motion for wrist injuries, grip strength) the outcome of 76 patients with injuries of the fingers, wrist or a complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) was analysed at the begin and end of an inpatient rehabilitation and at a follow-up examination after 12 to 16 weeks. The patients were divided into groups with an early (< 120 days after trauma) or late beginning of their rehabilitation.

RESULTS

At the follow-up examination early beginners had a significant better DASH-Score as well as a ROM. At the end of the rehabilitation program and at the time of the follow-up examination significant more patients with an early as patients with a late start of the rehabilitation were back to work. Especially patients with CRPS and finger injuries benefit from an early start of the rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

Compared to a late start an early start of a rehabilitation program after finger and hand injuries and a CRPS leads to better functional with special benefit for patients with a CRPS.