Tendon transfers to restore elbow flexion

Distal insertion of the clavicular portion of pectoralis major muscle: anatomical study

PURPOSE

Several descriptions of the anatomy of the pectoralis major (PM) have been published. However, the precise description of its distal humeral insertion, which is involved in traumatic tears, remains controversial. The distal tendon is classically described as being made of two layers, one anterior (ALPM) and one posterior (PLPM), which regroup at their distal edge. The clavicular head (CH) participates in the ALPM according to most authors. However, others describe a more superficial termination in a close relationship with the deltoid humeral insertion. The objective of this anatomical work is to precisely describe the anatomy of the CH and its relationship with the rest of the distal PM tendon and the distal deltoid tendon.

MATERIALS

Twenty-three fresh cadaveric specimens were dissected (41 shoulders). The entire PM as well as the deltoid were exposed. Several measurements were collected to establish the relationships between the distal tendon of the CH and the PM, the deltoid and the bony landmarks.

RESULTS

In all cases, the CH muscular portion sits on the ALPM but does not participate in the connective structure of the PM distal tendon. The inferolateral part of its distal end gives a thin tendinous portion that inserts lower on the humerus in conjunction with the distal tendon of the deltoid. In 24.4%, this tendon was more difficult to isolate but was always observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The distal tendon of the PM only comes from the muscle fibres of its sternal head. The CH fibres do not contribute to this tendon but appear to terminate in a separate tendon fusing with the humeral insertion of the deltoid: the deltopectoral tendon. This could explain the different patterns of tears observed in clinical practice.

Triceps-to-Biceps Tendon Transfer for Restoration of Elbow Flexion in Brachial Plexus Injury

PURPOSE

Restoring elbow flexion is a reconstructive priority in patients with brachial plexus injuries. This study aimed to evaluate the results and assess factors contributing to outcomes of triceps-to-biceps tendon transfer in patients presenting with delayed or chronic upper brachial plexus injury.

METHODS

Patients with traumatic brachial plexus injuries undergoing triceps-to-biceps tendon transfer at a single institution's multidisciplinary brachial plexus center between 2001 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The entire triceps tendon was transferred around the lateral aspect of the arm, secured to the radius with a tenodesis button, and reinforced with a side-to-side tendon transfer to the biceps tendon. Primary outcomes include the modified British Medical Research Council (mBMRC) elbow flexion strength and active elbow range of motion.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (eight men and four women; mean age, 45.2 years) were included. The mean follow-up was 10.4 (range, 5-34) months. Nine patients achieved mBMRC ≥3. Five patients achieved mBMRC 4. Average active elbow flexion was 119°, with average extension deficit of 11°. There were three patients with unsatisfactory results, achieving mBMRC 2 elbow flexion.

CONCLUSIONS

Triceps-to-biceps tendon transfer is an excellent tendon transfer option for restoring elbow flexion in certain patients with an adequately functioning triceps muscle, who present with a delayed or chronic brachial plexus injury. Although most patients achieved mBMRC ≥3 elbow flexion, there was an expected permanent loss of elbow active extension with a residual elbow flexion contracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.