1
|
Athlani L, Cholley-Roulleau M, Blum A, Teixeira PAG, Dap F. Intercarpal arthrodesis: A systematic review. HAND SURGERY & REHABILITATION 2023; 42:93-102. [PMID: 36642245 DOI: 10.1016/j.hansur.2022.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Intercarpal arthrodesis is a well-established option to treat various disorders of the carpus, such as localized osteoarthritis, carpal instability, and Kienböck's disease. This is a non-conservative procedure aimed at obtaining a stable and congruent interface between the radius and the proximal carpal row, which restores wrist function by minimizing pain and restoring grip strength. These procedures generally yield good predictable results that are maintained over time. However, all intracarpal arthrodesis procedures cause a loss of wrist range of motion. To optimize outcomes and minimize complications, especially nonunion, this surgery may require a learning curve. A precise surgical technique for preparing the bone surfaces, bringing enough bone graft, and using reliable fixation is essential. Since the late 1960s, several intracarpal arthrodesis procedures have been described. Commonly used fusions target the scaphotrapeziotrapezoid, scaphocapitate, four corners, capitolunate or capitohamatolunate regions. Lesser used fusions focus on specific lesions such as the scapholunate, scapholunocapitate, lunotriquetral and triquetrohamate. Here, we propose a systematic review of the various types of intercarpal arthrodesis procedures described in the literature. After having described each arthrodesis, we specify their indications, the variations of the surgical techniques, and then present an overview of the results and complications. Finally, we discuss how these surgeries affect wrist biomechanics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lionel Athlani
- Department of Hand Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Centre Chirurgical Emile Gallé, Nancy University Hospital, 49 rue Hermite, 54000 Nancy, France; Université de Lorraine, IADI Laboratory, INSERM, CIC-IT Nancy, Nancy, France.
| | - M Cholley-Roulleau
- Department of Hand Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Centre Chirurgical Emile Gallé, Nancy University Hospital, 49 rue Hermite, 54000 Nancy, France.
| | - A Blum
- Guilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, Nancy University Hospital, 29 avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 54035 Nancy, France.
| | - P A Gondim Teixeira
- Guilloz Imaging Department, Central Hospital, Nancy University Hospital, 29 avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 54035 Nancy, France; Université de Lorraine, IADI Laboratory, INSERM, CIC-IT Nancy, Nancy, France.
| | - F Dap
- Department of Hand Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Centre Chirurgical Emile Gallé, Nancy University Hospital, 49 rue Hermite, 54000 Nancy, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Musilová Z, Dzetkuličová V, Joukal M. Proximal- or radial-based dorsal capsulotomy? The importance of a proper cadaver study. HAND SURGERY & REHABILITATION 2021; 40:808-809. [PMID: 34358736 DOI: 10.1016/j.hansur.2021.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Z Musilová
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - V Dzetkuličová
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - M Joukal
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|