Upper-limb function in Brachial Plexus birth palsy: Does the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument correlate with the Brachial Plexus Outcome Measure?

Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument Scores Within Gross Motor Function Classification Scale Levels and Functional Mobility Scale Ratings in Individuals With Cerebral Palsy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) is a patient/parent-reported outcome measure used in children with cerebral palsy (CP). PODCI score variability has not been widely examined in patients of Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level IV or using the Functional Mobility Scale (FMS). The purpose of this study is to examine the distribution of PODCI scores within patients with CP GMFCS levels I-IV and FMS levels 1-6.

METHODS

Retrospectively identified patients with CP whose parent/caregiver had completed the PODCI at their visit were grouped based on GMFCS and FMS level. One-way ANOVA with pairwise Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc tests was performed to compare the effect of GMFCS and FMS levels (1, 2-4, 5, or 6) on PODCI scores.

RESULTS

Three hundred sixty-seven patients were included (128 female, 11.7 years, SD 3.6). Global, Sports, Transfer, and Upper Extremity scores differed among all GMFCS levels ( P ≤0.056) and were significantly lower for GMFCS IV compared with all other levels. Happiness, Expectations, and Pain scores did not differ significantly among GMFCS levels including level IV ( P >0.06). Similar trends were seen at all FMS distances (5, 50, and 500âm). At 50âm, Global, Sports, Transfer, and Upper Extremity scores differed significantly among all FMS levels ( P <0.001) except that Upper Extremity Scores were similar between levels 2-4 and level 5 ( P =1.00). Happiness and Pain scores were not different between FMS levels ( P >0.27). Expectations scores differed only between FMS 1 and FMS 6 with FMS 6 being higher at the 50-m distance only ( P =0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Parent-reported outcome measures are important for providing patient-centered care. Providers can examine these measures alongside functional classification systems to create a more complete clinical picture of the patient. Providers should be aware of the score trends seen in our results when evaluating the PODCI for individuals with CP to improve shared decision-making and better monitor their need for future care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective study.

Quality of upper extremity skills and disability inventory via manual ability classification in children with neonatal brachial plexus palsy

PURPOSE

The aim of study was to investigate the relationship between upper extremity skill quality and disability inventory according to manual ability classification system in children with neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Children with NBPP were included between the ages of 4-7.5 years. Children were classified in Manual Ability Classification System (MACS). Upper extremity skill quality was evaluated with Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST), disability status was assessed with Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI).

RESULTS

Total of 63 children (girls:31/boys:32), and mean age was 6.32 ± 1.73 years. 37 (58.73%) of children were at MACS Level-2. According to MACS classification, significant differences were noted in PEDI scores (p = 0.001), dissociated movements (p = 0.016) and grasp (p = 0.002) domains of QUEST. However, no significant differences between QUEST total scores (p = 0.079). PEDI (ROC; AuC = 0.762) and QUEST total score (ROC; AuC = 0.714) were sensitive to difference between groups across MACS in children with NBPP.

CONCLUSION

The PEDI and QUEST are sensitive in distinguishing the disability of children with NBPP at different MACS levels. Assessment of children with NBPP is not limited to functionality, disability, and quality of movement, it is multidimensional. Outcomes measures studies of movement's quality in children with NBPP are needed.

Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument into the Italian Language

(1) Background: The Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) is an English-language questionnaire specifically designed to assess health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with musculoskeletal disorders. This scoring system has been translated into several languages. Given the lack of an Italian version of the PODCI, this study aimed to translate, cross-culturally adapt, and assess the psychometric properties of the PODCI score in the Italian pediatric population. (2) Methods: The PODCI questionnaire was culturally adapted to Italian patients in accordance with the literature guidelines. The study included 59 participants from a single orthopedic institution who underwent orthopedic surgery for various skeletal conditions. The questionnaire was administered to participants at multiple time-points (T0, T1, T2). Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha. Reproducibility was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between T0 and T1 assessment. Criterion validity was assessed using Spearman’s correlation coefficients between PODCI and the Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (HSS Pedi-FABS). Responsiveness was evaluated by the difference between T0 and T2 using the effect size (ES) and the standardized response mean (SRM) calculation. (3) Results: Cronbach’s alpha was acceptable in both the self- and parent-reported versions with values of 0.78 (0.68–0.90) and 0.84 (0.60–0.92), respectively. The ICC fluctuated between 0.31 and 0.89 for self-reported and 0.49 to 0.87 for pediatrics. The Spearman’s r showed a moderate correlation between HSS Pedi-FABS and the “Sport & Physical Functioning” and “Global Functioning” domains. ES and SRM varied from small to moderate across all the domains. (4) Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the Italian version of the PODCI, translated following the international standardized guidelines, is reliable, valid, and responsive in pediatric patients who underwent orthopedic surgery.