Evaluation of the 8th AJCC staging system for pathologically versus clinically staged pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A time to revisit a dogma?

Biological risk based on preoperative serum CA19-9 and histological grade predicts prognosis and improves accuracy of classification in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 and histological grade can serve as indicators of the biological characteristics of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

AIMS

The aim of this study was to investigate the combined impact of preoperative CA19-9 levels and histological grade on prognosis and classification accuracy in PDAC patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 612 patients with PDAC who underwent curative pancreatectomy, and a biological risk model based on preoperative CA19-9 levels and histology grade was established. The prognostic importance of the biological risk model was evaluated, and its validity was confirmed through a validation cohort of 218 patients. The survival of patients with PDAC was independently associated with preoperative CA19-9 levels and histology grade, indicating a biological risk. This biological risk was incorporated into the eighth edition of the TNM staging system, leading to the development of a modified TNM (mTNM) staging system. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrated that the mTNM staging system had a significantly larger area under the curve (AUC) than the TNM staging system. The discriminatory capacity of the mTNM staging system was further validated in an independent cohort.

CONCLUSION

Biological risk based on preoperative CA19-9 and histological grade could predict the survival of patients with PDAC. The incorporation of biological risk into the TNM staging system has the potential to enhance the accuracy of patient classification in PDAC, predicting patient survival and enabling the development of individualized treatment plans.

A new staging system for postoperative prognostication in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

The current TNM staging system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has revised the definitions of T and N categories as well as stage groups. However, studies validating these modifications have yielded inconsistent results. The existing TNM staging system in prognostic prediction remains unsatisfactory. The prognosis of PDAC is closely associated with pathological and biological factors. Herein, we propose a new staging system incorporating distant metastasis, postoperative serum levels of CA19-9 and CEA, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular involvement, and perineural invasion to enhance the accuracy of prognosis assessment. The proposed staging system exhibited a strong correlation with both overall survival and recurrence-free survival, effectively stratifying survival into five distinct tiers. Additionally, it had favorable discrimination and calibration. Thus, the proposed staging system demonstrates superior prognostic performance compared to the TNM staging system, and can serve as a valuable complementary tool to address the limitations of TNM staging in prognostication.

Necrosis as a strong independent prognostic factor required in the implementation of pathological reporting for pancreatic adenocarcinoma resection specimens

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a major public health issue with an incidence/mortality ratio reaching 98 %. Only 15-20 % of patients with PDAC can undergo surgery. Following PDAC surgical resection, 80 % of patients will experience local or metastatic recurrence of this disease. pTNM staging is the gold standard for risk stratification but is not sufficient to recapitulate the prognosis. Several prognostic factors are known to impact survival after surgery when uncovered during pathological examination. However, necrosis has been poorly studied in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

MATERIALS & METHODS

We retrieved clinical data and reviewed all tumor slides from patients who had a pancreatic surgery between January 2004 and December 2017, in the Hospices Civils de Lyon, to assess the presence of histopathological prognosis factors associated with poor prognosis.

RESULTS

514 patients with complete clinico-pathological description were included. Necrosis was found in 231 PDAC (44.9 %) and had an important impact on overall survival with a double risk of death when present in tumor samples (HR: 1.871, 95 % CI [1.523; 2.299], p < 0.001). When integrated in the multivariate model, necrosis is the only morphological aggressive feature to retain high statistical significance associated with the TNM staging but independently of it. This effect is independent of the preoperative treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Despites improvement in treatment of PDAC, mortality rates remain relatively stable amongst the last years. There is a desperate need to better stratify patients. Here, we report the strong and prognostic impact of necrosis in surgical PDAC samples and encourage pathologists to report its presence in the future.

The diversity between curatively resected pancreatic head and body-tail cancers based on the 8th edition of AJCC staging system: a multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

To our knowledge, there are no studies to systematically compare the detailed clinical significance between curatively resected pancreatic head (ph) and body-tail (pbt) ductal adenocarcinoma based on the new 8th edition of AJCC staging system (8th AJCC stage) that was just applied in clinical practice in 2018.

METHODS

Three hundred fifty-one patients with curatively resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC) from three center hospitals were entered into this multicenter cohort study.

RESULTS

Increasing tumor size (P < 0.001), T stage (T1 + T2 vs T3 + T4, P = 0.003), frequent postoperative liver metastasis (PLM) (P = 0.002) and 8th AJCC stage (IA to VI, P < 0.001; I + II vs III + IV, P = 0.002) were closely associated with the progression of pbt cancers compared with that in ph cancer patients. Moreover, tumor size≥3 cm (P = 0.012), 8th AJCC stage (III + IV) (P = 0.025) and PLM (P = 0.010) were identified as independent risk factors in pbt cancers in logistic analysis. Patients with pbt cancers had a significantly worse overall survival compared with ph cancer patients (P = 0.003). Moreover, pbt was an independent unfavorable factor in multivariate analysis (P = 0.011). In addition to lymph nodes metastasis, 8th AJCC stage, vascular invasion and PLM, increasing tumor size and advanced T stage were also closely associated with the poor prognosis in 131 cases of pbt cancer patients compared with Ph cancer patients.

CONCLUSION

Pbt, as an independent unfavorable factor for the prognosis of PC patients, are much more aggressive than that in ph cancers according to 8th AJCC staging system. 8th AJCC staging system are more comprehensive and sensitive to reflect the malignant biology of pbt cancers.

Optimized modification of the eighth edition of AJCC TNM staging system for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Aim: To reassess the prognostic performance of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and optimize the categorization of PDAC staging. Patients & methods: A total of 11,858 patients with resected PDAC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database were retrospectively enrolled by sequential analyses. Results: There was no statistical significance between stage IIA and IIB tumors with hazard ratios of 2.065 and 2.184 (p = 0.620) for stages IIA and IIB, respectively. With the proposed modification, there was a significant difference between the hazard ratios of stages IIIA and IIIB which were 2.481 and 2.715, respectively (p = 0.009). The C-index of modified system was 0.609, slightly higher than AJCC 8th staging system 0.604. Conclusion: We proposed a modified eighth edition of the AJCC staging system by combining stage IIA with IIB and further subclassifying stage III patients in order to lead to better discriminative power.

Evaluation of the prognostic value of the new AJCC 8th edition staging system for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma; a need to subclassify stage III?

BACKGROUND

There have been several proposed changes for the 8th edition of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the new staging system for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, especially in stage III patients.

METHODS

We analysed the data of patients newly diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 2008 and 2016 at our hospital. Patients were staged according to 7th edition AJCC criteria, as well as the new 8th edition staging system. The pathologic stage was used in the surgical cases, and the clinical stage, determined by radiographic findings, was used in the unresectable cases.

RESULTS

Five hundred two patients were identified who met the inclusion criteria. In node-negative patients, there were no significant differences in survival among T 1, 2 and 3 groups according to the 8th edition. The survival rates of patients with N1 (1-3 positive nodes) and N2 (≥4 positive nodes) disease, according to 8th edition, were significantly different (p < 0.001). Although N2 and T4 patients are both stage III according to the new staging system, N2 patients had a better survival rate than T4 patients (p = 0.038). The new staging system stratifies patients more evenly across stages without sacrificing the prognostic accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

The AJCC 8th edition has some advantages over the previous version. However, patients with N2 and T4, who have been integrated into stage III, showed different treatment modalities and prognoses, and we proposed dividing stage III into IIIA (T1-3N2M0) and IIIB (T4N_anyM0).