Potential application of ultrasound-guided thermal ablation in rare liver tumors

Efficacy of fusion imaging for immediate post-ablation assessment of malignant liver neoplasms: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous thermal ablation has become the preferred therapeutic treatment option for liver cancers that cannot be resected. Since ablative zone tissue changes over time, it becomes challenging to determine therapy effectiveness over an extended period. Thus, an immediate post-procedural evaluation of the ablation zone is crucial, as it could influence the need for a second-look treatment or follow-up plan. Assessing treatment response immediately after ablation is essential to attain favorable outcomes. This study examines the efficacy of image fusion strategies immediately post-ablation in liver neoplasms to determine therapeutic response.

METHODOLOGY

A comprehensive systematic search using PRISMA methodology was conducted using EMBASE, MEDLINE (via PUBMED), and Cochrane Library Central Registry electronic databases to identify articles that assessed the immediate post-ablation response in malignant hepatic tumors with fusion imaging (FI) systems. The data were retrieved on relevant clinical characteristics, including population demographics, pre-intervention clinical history, lesion characteristics, and intervention type. For the outcome metrics, variables such as average fusion time, intervention metrics, technical success rate, ablative safety margin, supplementary ablation rate, technical efficacy rate, LTP rates, and reported complications were extracted.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were included for review after fulfilling the study eligibility criteria. FI's immediate technical success rate ranged from 81.3% to 100% in 17/22 studies. In 16/22 studies, the ablative safety margin was assessed immediately after ablation. Supplementary ablation was performed in 9 studies following immediate evaluation by FI. In 15/22 studies, the technical effectiveness rates during the first follow-up varied from 89.3% to 100%.

CONCLUSION

Based on the studies included, we found that FI can accurately determine the immediate therapeutic response in liver cancer ablation image fusion and could be a feasible intraprocedural tool for determining short-term post-ablation outcomes in unresectable liver neoplasms. There are some technical challenges that limit the widespread adoption of FI techniques. Large-scale randomized trials are warranted to improve on existing protocols. Future research should emphasize improving FI's technological capabilities and clinical applicability to a broader range of tumor types and ablation procedures.

Efficacy of liver cancer microwave ablation through ultrasonic image guidance under deep migration feature algorithm

Objective:

To explore the therapeutic effects of ultrasound-guided microwave ablation and radio frequency ablation for liver cancer patients.

Methods:

Seventy-eight patients with microwave ablation were rolled into the experimental group and 56 patients with radio frequency ablation were in the control group. This study was conducted from March 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020 in our hospital. Based on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Migration feature (MF), a new ultrasound image diagnosis algorithm CNNMF was constructed, which was compared with AdaBoost and PCA-BP based on Principal component analysis (PCA) and back propagation (BP), and the accuracy (Acc), specificity (Spe), sensitivity (Sen), and F1 values of the three algorithms were calculated. Then, the CNNMF algorithm was applied to the ultrasonic image diagnosis of the two patients, and the postoperative ablation points, complications and ablation time were recorded.

Results:

The Acc (96.31%), Spe (89.07%), Sen (91.26%), and F1 value (0.79%) of the CNNMF algorithm were obviously larger than the AdaBoost and the PCA-BP algorithms (P< 0.05); in contrast with the control group. The number of ablation points in the experimental group was obviously larger, and the ablation time was obviously shorter (P<0.05); the experimental group had one case of liver abscess and two cases of wound pain after surgery, which were both obviously less than the control group (four cases; five cases) (P<0.05)

Conclusion:

In contrast with traditional algorithms, the CNNMF algorithm has better diagnostic performance for liver cancer ultrasound images. In contrast with radio frequency ablation, microwave ablation has better ablation effects for liver cancer tumors, and can reduce the incidence of postoperative complications in patients, which is safe and feasible.