Transarterial chemoembolization versus percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy for recurrent unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Development of a prognostic nomogram

Gamma-glutamyl transferase to aspartate aminotransferase ratio (GSR) predicts prognoses in patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastasis after microwave ablation

BACKGROUND

Microwave ablation (MWA) is widely used to eliminate colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). However, the risk of tumor recurrence is difficult to predict due to lack of reliable clinical and biological markers. Elevation of gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) provides signals for liver inflammation and cancer progression. The present study evaluated the association between pre-ablation GGT to AST ratio index (GSR) and hepatic recurrence in patients with CRLM after MWA.

METHODS

A retrospectively analyzed 192 CRLM patients who underwent MWA from January 2013 to December 2017. Pre-ablation GSR was classified into high (≤ 2.34) or low (> 2.34) using the upper quartile value. The prognostic value of GSR and other risk factors for liver progression-free survival (LPFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

High GSR was significantly associated with males (P = 0.041), the presence of cholelithiasis (P = 0.012), but not pre-ablation chemotherapy (P = 0.355), which caused significantly increased levels of GGT (P = 0.015) and AST (P = 0.008). GSR showed a significant association with LPFS and CSS through univariate analysis (P = 0.002 and 0.006) and multivariate analysis (P = 0.043 and 0.037). The subgroup analysis demonstrated no interaction between GSR and all variables except for distribution in the sub-analysis of LPFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the pre-ablation GSR can be considered as a promising prognostic indicator for poor prognosis of patients with CRLM underwent MWA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

Interventional Radiology Locoregional Therapies for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Surgical resection remains the cornerstone of curative treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), but this option is only available to a small percentage of patients. For patients with unresectable iCCA, systemic therapy with gemcitabine and platinum-based agents represents the mainstay of treatment; however, the armamentarium has grown to include targeted molecular therapies (e.g., FGFR2 inhibitors), use of adjuvant therapy, liver transplantation in select cases, immunotherapy, and locoregional liver-directed therapies. Despite advances, iCCA remains a challenge due to the advanced stage of many patients at diagnosis. Furthermore, given the improving options for systemic therapy and the fact that the majority of iCCA patients succumb to disease progression in the liver, the role of locoregional therapies has increased. This review will focus on the expanding role of interventional radiology and liver-directed therapies in the treatment of iCCA.

[The Russian consensus on the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma]

The Russian consensus on the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was prepared by the group of experts consisting of surgeons, interventional radiologists, radiation therapists and oncologists. The purposes of this consensus are clarification and consolidation of opinions of multidisciplinary team on the following issues of management of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: indications for surgical treatment, features of therapeutic tactics for mechanical jaundice, technical aspects of liver resection, prevention of post-resection liver failure, indications for liver resection using transplantation technologies, laparoscopic and robot-assisted liver resection, perioperative systemic chemotherapy, local non-resection/non-radiotherapy methods of treatment, radiotherapy, follow-up and choice of treatment for recurrence.

Percutaneous microwave ablation and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for serum tumor markers and prognostics of middle-late primary hepatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Primary hepatic carcinoma (PHC) has an insidious onset and is usually diagnosed in the middle and late stages. Although transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the preferred option for treating middle- and advanced-stage PHC, it has limited efficacy in killing tumor cells and poor long-term efficacy. TACE plus percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy (PMCT) is more effective than interventional therapy alone and can improve survival time. However, there are few reports on the effects of TACE and PMCT on serum marker levels and the prognosis of patients with advanced PHC.

AIM

To investigate the effect of PMCT + TACE on serum tumor markers and the prognosis of middle-late PHC.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 150 patients with middle-late PHC admitted to Zhongshan People's Hospital between March 2018 and February 2021. Patients were divided into a single group (treated with TACE, n = 75) and a combined group (treated with TACE + PMCT, n = 75). Before and after treatment, the clinical efficacy and serum tumor marker levels [carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)] of both groups were observed. The 1-year survival rates and prognostic factors of the two groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

The combined group had 21 and 35 cases of complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR), respectively. The single group had 13 and 25 cases of CR and PR, respectively. After 4 wk of treatment, the serum CA19-9, CEA, and AFP levels in the single and combined groups decreased, with the decrease in the combined group being more significant (P < 0.05). The 1-year survival rate of the combined group (80.00%) was higher than that of the single group (60.00%) (P < 0.05). The average survival time within 1 year in the combined group was 299.38 ± 61.13 d, longer than that in the single group (214.41 ± 72.97 d, P < 0.05). COX analysis revealed that tumor diameter, tumor number, and the treatment method were prognostic factors for patients with middle-late PHC (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TACE + PMCT is effective in treating patients with mid-late PHC. It reduces the levels of tumor markers, prolongs survival, and improves prognosis.

Mechanism of postoperative recurrence and metastasis of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma and clinical prevention and treatment strategy

Intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma is a primary adenocarcinoma originating from intrahepatic bile duct epithelial cells. The tumor has no capsule. At the early stage of the tumor, there are infiltration and metastasis along the lymphatic vessels, blood vessels, perineural space, and loose fibrous connective tissue, which are characterized by lymph node metastasis. Due to the absence of characteristic clinical manifestations and the lack of specific molecular markers for early diagnosis, the surgical resection rate is low and the postoperative tumor recurrence and metastasis rate is high. Low efficacy of chemoradiotherapy, molecular targeted drugs, and immunotherapy results in the poor prognosis. Further research of molecular pathology, gene function, and imaging technology can help elucidate the occurrence, recurrence, and metastasis mechanism of intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma to improve its early diagnosis rate and precise clinical staging. Individualized precision treatment and prevention for the risk factors to reduce the recurrence and metastasis rate postoperatively are key to improving the patient prognosis.

Locoregional Therapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: The Role of Intra-Arterial Therapies

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a rare disease with a rising incidence. While surgical resection is the only curative option, the disease process is often identified in advanced stages, as this malignancy often remains clinically silent in early development. Only one-third of patients are eligible for resection at the time of diagnosis. For patients who cannot undergo resection, intra-arterial therapies are reasonable palliative treatment options; in rare occasions, these may be bridging therapies, as well. The premise of bland embolization and most chemoembolization intra-arterial therapies is that the arterial supply of the tumor is occluded to induce tumor necrosis, while radioembolization utilizes the arterial flow of the tumor to deliver radiation therapy. In this review, we discuss the use of transarterial embolization, transarterial chemoembolization, and selective internal radiation therapy for the treatment of ICC. Phase III randomized controlled clinical trials are difficult to tailor to this extremely rare and aggressive disease, but ultimately, further investigation should be pursued to define the patient population that will derive the greatest benefit from each modality.

Locoregional Treatment in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Which Treatment for Which Patient?

For unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC), different locoregional treatments (LRT) could be proposed to patients, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or transarterial treatments, depending on patient and tumor characteristics and local expertise. These different techniques of LRT have not been compared in a randomized clinical trial; most of the relevant studies are retrospective and not comparative. The aim of this narrative review is to help clinicians in their everyday practice discuss the pros and cons of each LRT, depending on the individual characteristics of their patients.

Locoregional Therapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has a poor prognosis, and surgical resection (SR) offers the only potential for cure. Unfortunately, only a small proportion of patients are eligible for resection due to locally advanced or metastatic disease. Locoregional therapies (LRT) are often used in unresectable liver-only or liver-dominant ICC. This review explores the role of these therapies in the treatment of ICC, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy, irreversible electroporation (IE), and brachytherapy. A search of the current literature was performed to examine types of LRT currently used in the treatment of ICC. We examined patient selection, technique, and outcomes of each type. Overall, LRTs are well-tolerated in the treatment of ICC and are effective in improving overall survival (OS) in this patient population. Further studies are needed to reduce bias from heterogenous patient populations and small sample sizes, as well as to determine whether certain LRTs are superior to others and to examine optimal treatment selection.

Conventional and drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and pooled analysis

PURPOSE

Patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) have poor survival. Conventional transarterial chemoembolization (c-TACE) and drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) are two treatment options for ICC, and this systematic review describes the efficacy of each of these modalities for unresectable ICC to guide clinical practice.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases regarding transhepatic arterial chemoembolization for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment Scale (NOS) was used to assess the risk of bias. Tumor response, disease control, and 1-, 2-, 3-year overall survival rate were pooled for estimation.

RESULTS

The number of initial search results was 1035, and 19 articles met the inclusion criteria for this study after the screening. A total of 23 study cohorts and 1091 patients were provided. The pooled objective response rate (ORR) for c-TACE and DEB-TACE treating ICC was 29.4% (95% CI 11.6-50.8%) and 51.2% (95% CI 30.6-71.7%), respectively; disease control rate (DCR) was 72.8% (95% CI 55.6-87.3%) and 88.7% (95% CI 78.8-96.2%), respectively. The pooled survival rate at 1 year, 2 year, and 3 year was 49.7% (95% CI 39.1-60.3%), 24.0% (95% CI 12.6-37.3%), and 23.5% (95% CI 11.1-38.7%) for c-TACE; 58.6% (95% CI 44.2-72.3%), 26.7% (95% CI 18.1-36.3%), and 16.2% (95% CI 6.0-29.4%) for DEB-TACE.

CONCLUSION

The descriptive analysis suggested that DEB-TACE treatment for ICC may have better tumor response and disease control rates than c-TACE treatment, but the impact on overall survival was not demonstrated significantly by DEB-TACE treatment.

Liver-Directed Treatment Options Following Liver Tumor Recurrence: A Review of the Literature

Recurrence following curative-intent hepatectomy for colorectal cancer liver metastasis, hepatocellular carcinoma, or cholangiocarcinoma is unfortunately common with a reported incidence as high as 75%. Various treatment modalities can improve survival following disease recurrence. A review of the literature was performed using PubMed. In addition to systemic therapy, liver-directed treatment options for recurrent liver disease include repeat hepatectomy, salvage liver transplantation, radiofrequency or microwave ablation, intra-arterial therapy, and stereotactic body radiation therapy. Repeat resection can be consider for patients with limited recurrent disease that meets resection criteria, as this therapeutic approach can provide a survival benefit and is potentially curative in a subset of patients. Salvage liver transplantation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma is another option, which has been associated with a 5-year survival of 50%. Salvage transplantation may be an option in particular for patients who are not candidates for resection due to underlying liver dysfunction but meet criteria for transplantation. Ablation is another modality to treat patients who recur with smaller tumors and are not surgical candidates due to comorbidity, liver dysfunction, or tumor location. For patients with inoperable disease, transarterial chemoembolization, or radioembolization with Yttrium-90 are liver-directed intra-arterial therapy modalities with relatively low risks that can be utilized. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is another palliative treatment option that can provide a response and local tumor control for smaller tumors.

Image-Guided Local Treatment for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma-Role of Interventional Radiology

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a highly aggressive malignancy with an increasing incidence in recent years. Prognosis is poor and most patients are not eligible for resection at the time of initial diagnosis due to the anatomic location, inadequate hepatic reserve, limiting comorbidities or metastatic disease. Several locoregional therapies from the field of interventional radiology exist for patients who are not amenable for surgery, or in case of local recurrence as a single treatment modality or combined with systemic treatment. To date, evidence is limited, with most conclusions drawn from single-center studies with small patient cohorts, often treated in the salvage situation or for local recurrence after initial resection. Nevertheless, the results are promising and suggest a survival benefit in selected patients. This narrative review focuses on the use of different locoregional treatment options for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Recurrent Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma - Review

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second-most common primary liver malignancy after hepatocellular carcinoma. While surgical resection with negative margin is the only curative treatment, ICC has very high rate of recurrence, up to 60-70% after curative resection. We reviewed the current data available on risk factors for ICC recurrence, recurrence pattern (location and timing), treatment options, and future directions. The risk factors for recurrence include elevated preoperative CA19-9, presence of liver cirrhosis, nodal metastasis, positive margins, and vascular invasion. Understanding different recurrence patterns, timing course, and risk factors for early recurrence is important to tailor postoperative surveillance and select treatment strategies including systemic or locoregional therapy. Re-resection can be considered for a selected patient population at experienced centers, and can yield long-term survival. ICC remains a dismal disease given the high likelihood of recurrence. Advances in our understanding of the genomic landscape of ICC are beginning to identify targetable alterations in ICC in subsets of patients that allow for personalized treatment.

Thermal ablation in the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the efficacy and safety of thermal ablation for the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochran Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies reporting outcomes in patients with ICC treated with thermal ablation. Meta-analyses of cumulative overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), Kaplan-Meier survival rates according to time to local tumor progression (TTLTP), technical efficacy, and incidence of complications were analyzed. Pooled hazard ratios of common variables were calculated to explore factors associated with OS.

RESULTS

Twenty observational studies comprising 917 patients were reviewed (primary ICC [n = 502]; post-surgical recurrent ICC [n = 355]; information not available [n = 60]). The pooled proportion of technical efficacy was 91.9% (95% CI, 87.3-94.9%). The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 82.4% (95% CI, 75.1-88.9%), 42.1% (95% CI, 36.0-48.4%), and 28.5% (95% CI, 21.2-36.2%). Primary tumors showed higher 3-year OS rates than recurrent ones, with borderline significance (p = 0.072). The pooled 1- and 3-year RFS rates were 40.0% (95% CI, 33.6-46.4%) and 19.2% (95% CI, 8.4-32.7%). The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year TTLTP rates were 79.3% (95% CI, 65.1-90.9%), 59.5% (95% CI, 49.1-69.4%), and 58.2% (95% CI, 44.9-70.9%). The pooled incidence of major complications was 5.7% (95% CI, 4.1-7.8%). Tumor size (> 3 cm), multiple tumors, and age (> 65 years) were factors associated with shorter OS.

CONCLUSION

Thermal ablation is a successful alternative with a good safety profile, especially for a single ICC smaller than 3 cm.

KEY POINTS

• The pooled 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates following thermal ablation for the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were 82.4%, 42.1%, and 28.5%. • The pooled incidence of major complications was 5.7%. • A tumor size > 3 cm (HR: 2.12, p = 0.006), multiple tumors (HR: 1.67, p = 0.004), and age > 65 years (HR: 1.67, p = 0.006) were factors associated with shorter OS.

Transarterial Chemoembolization and Radioembolization for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma-a Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has a poor prognosis, when unresectable; therefore, intra-arterial therapies (IAT) such as trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) have been employed. With the present systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to analyse published studies to understand if one IAT can be superior to the alternative.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed and Web of Science databases was performed for articles published until 1 March 2020 relevant to IAT for ICC. Overall survival was the primary end point. Occurrence of clinical adverse events and tumour overall response were secondary outcome measures.

RESULTS

A total of 31 articles (of 793, n.1695 patients) were selected for data extraction, 13 were on TACE (906 patients) and 18 were on TARE (789 patients). Clinical and tumour characteristics showed moderate heterogeneity between the two groups. The median survival after TACE was 14.2 months while after TARE was 13.5 months (95%C.I.: 11.4-16.1). The survival difference was small (d = 0.112) at 1 year and negligible at 2 years (d = 0.028) and at 3 years (d = 0.049). The radiological objective response after TACE was 20.6% and after TARE was 19.3% (d = 0.032). Clinical adverse events occurred in 58.5% after TACE, more frequently than after TARE (43.0%, d = 0.314).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, IATs are promising treatments for improving outcomes for patients with unresectable ICC. To date, TACE and TARE provide similar good outcomes, except for adverse events. Therefore, the decision about techniques is determined by ability to utilize these resources and patient specific factors (liver function or lesion dimension).

Surgical Approach to Recurrent Cholangiocarcinoma

Background

For recurrent cholangiocarcinoma, systemic chemotherapy is the standard of care. Repeated resection is a potential curative treatment, but data are scarce and outcomes are not well defined so far.

Summary

In the last decade there has been an increasing number of reports suggesting a survival benefit and even cure after repeated surgery. This is particularly true for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, where repeated resections offer similar or even better results than the first resection. In selected cases even a third liver resection is possible. In contrast, in perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma, repeated resection is only rarely possible. Although the improved outcome might be attributed to a careful patient selection and a favorable tumor biology, repeated surgical treatment should be attempted whenever possible. This necessitates a structured follow-up after resection.

Key Message

Surgical resection offers the chance for prolonged survival and even for cure in recurrent cholangiocarcinoma. Hence, it is of the utmost importance to better understand the routes of metastases and to define factors qualifying for resection. Whether different patterns of recurrence reflect biological heterogeneity requires further investigation.