Clinical-radiomics predictors to identify the suitability of transarterial chemoembolization treatment in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter study

Development and validation of survival prediction models for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Due to heterogeneity of molecular biology and microenvironment, therapeutic efficacy varies among hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We examined combined models using clinicoradiological characteristics, mutational burden of signaling pathways, and radiomics features to predict survival prognosis.

METHODS

Two cohorts comprising 111 patients with HCC were used to build prognostic models. The training and test cohorts included 78 and 33 individuals, respectively. Mutational burden was calculated based on 17 cancer-associated signaling pathways. Radiomic features were extracted and selected from computed tomography images using a pyradiomics system. Models based on clinicoradiological indicators, mutational burden, and radiomics score (rad-score) were built to predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, Child-Pugh class, peritumoral enhancement, PI3K_AKT and hypoxia mutational burden, and rad-score were used to create a combined model predicting OS. C-indices were 0.805 (training cohort) and 0.768 (test cohort). The areas under the curve (AUCs) were 0.889, 0.900, and 0.917 for 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS, respectively. To predict PFS, alpha-fetoprotein level, tumor enhancement pattern, hypoxia and receptor tyrosine kinase mutational burden, and rad-score were used. C-indices were 0.782 (training cohort) and 0.766 (test cohort). AUCs were 0.885 and 0.925 for 6-month and 12-month PFS, respectively. Calibration and decision curve analyses supported the model's accuracy and clinical potential.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram models are hopeful to predict OS and PFS in patients with intermediate-advanced HCC treated with TACE plus TKIs, offering a promising tool for treatment decisions and monitoring patient progress.

Artificial intelligence in predicting recurrence after first-line treatment of liver cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the performance and methodological quality of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting recurrence after single first-line treatment for liver cancer.

METHODS

A rigorous and systematic evaluation was conducted on the AI studies related to recurrence after single first-line treatment for liver cancer, retrieved from the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CNKI databases. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity (SENC), and specificity (SPEC) of each study were extracted for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Six percutaneous ablation (PA) studies, 16 surgical resection (SR) studies, and 5 transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) studies were included in the meta-analysis for predicting recurrence after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment, respectively. Four SR studies and 2 PA studies were included in the meta-analysis for recurrence after intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) treatment. The pooled SENC, SEPC, and AUC of AI in predicting recurrence after primary HCC treatment via PA, SR, and TACE were 0.78, 0.90, and 0.92; 0.81, 0.77, and 0.86; and 0.73, 0.79, and 0.79, respectively. The values for ICC treated with SR and CRLM treated with PA were 0.85, 0.71, 0.86 and 0.69, 0.63,0.74, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates the comprehensive application value of AI in predicting recurrence after a single first-line treatment of liver cancer, with satisfactory results, indicating the clinical translation potential of AI in predicting recurrence after liver cancer treatment.

Applications of artificial intelligence in interventional oncology: An up-to-date review of the literature

Interventional oncology provides image-guided therapies, including transarterial tumor embolization and percutaneous tumor ablation, for malignant tumors in a minimally invasive manner. As in other medical fields, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in interventional oncology has garnered significant attention. This narrative review describes the current state of AI applications in interventional oncology based on recent literature. A literature search revealed a rapid increase in the number of studies relevant to this topic recently. Investigators have attempted to use AI for various tasks, including automatic segmentation of organs, tumors, and treatment areas; treatment simulation; improvement of intraprocedural image quality; prediction of treatment outcomes; and detection of post-treatment recurrence. Among these, the AI-based prediction of treatment outcomes has been the most studied. Various deep and conventional machine learning algorithms have been proposed for these tasks. Radiomics has often been incorporated into prediction and detection models. Current literature suggests that AI is potentially useful in various aspects of interventional oncology, from treatment planning to post-treatment follow-up. However, most AI-based methods discussed in this review are still at the research stage, and few have been implemented in clinical practice. To achieve widespread adoption of AI technologies in interventional oncology procedures, further research on their reliability and clinical utility is necessary. Nevertheless, considering the rapid research progress in this field, various AI technologies will be integrated into interventional oncology practices in the near future.

Radiomics as a tool for prognostic prediction in transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is one of the predominant locoregional therapeutic modalities for addressing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, achieving precise prognostic predictions and effective patient selection remains a challenging pursuit. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of radiomics in forecasting the prognosis associated with TACE treatment.

METHODS

A comprehensive exploration of pertinent original studies was undertaken, encompassing databases of PubMed, Web of Science and Embase. The studies' quality was meticulously evaluated employing the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2 (QUADAS-2), the radiomics quality score (RQS) and the METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS). Pooled statistics, along with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), were computed for sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR). Additionally, a summary receiver operating characteristic curve (sROC) was generated. To discern potential sources of heterogeneity, meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The systematic review incorporated 29 studies, comprising a total of 5483 patients, with 14 studies involving 2691 patients qualifying for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The assessed studies exhibited commendable quality with regard to bias risk, with mean RQS of 12.90 ± 5.13 (35.82% ± 14.25%) and mean METRICS of 62.98% ± 14.58%. The pooled sensitivity was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.78-0.87), specificity was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.79-0.92), PLR was 6.13 (95% CI: 3.79-9.90), and NLR was 0.20 (95% CI: 0.15-0.27). The area under the sROC was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.93). Significant heterogeneity within all the included studies was observed, while meta-regression and subgroup analyses revealed homogeneous and promising findings in subgroups where principal methodological variables such as modeling algorithms, imaging modalities, and imaging phases were specified.

CONCLUSION

Radiomics models have exhibited robust predictive capabilities concerning prognosis subsequent to TACE, thereby presenting promising prospects for clinical translation.

Conversion therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of precision medicine: Current status, challenges and opportunities

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most prevalent malignancy of the digestive tract, is characterized by a high mortality rate and poor prognosis, primarily due to its initial diagnosis at an advanced stage that precludes any surgical intervention. Recent advancements in systemic therapies have significantly improved oncological outcomes for intermediate and advanced-stage HCC, and the combination of locoregional and systemic therapies further facilitates tumor downstaging and increases the likelihood of surgical resectability for initially unresectable cases following conversion therapies. This shift toward high conversion rates with novel, multimodal treatment approaches has become a principal pathway for prolonged survival in patients with advanced HCC. However, the field of conversion therapy for HCC is marked by controversies, including the selection of potential surgical candidates, formulation of conversion therapy regimens, determination of optimal surgical timing, and application of adjuvant therapy post-surgery. Addressing these challenges and refining clinical protocols and research in HCC conversion therapy is essential for setting the groundwork for future advancements in treatment strategies and clinical research. This narrative review comprehensively summarizes the current strategies and clinical experiences in conversion therapy for advanced-stage HCC, emphasizing the unresolved issues and the path forward in the context of precision medicine. This work not only provides a comprehensive overview of the evolving landscape of treatment modalities for conversion therapy but also paves the way for future studies and innovations in this field.

Machine Learning Combined with Radiomics Facilitating the Personal Treatment of Malignant Liver Tumors

In the realm of managing malignant liver tumors, the convergence of radiomics and machine learning has redefined the landscape of medical practice. The field of radiomics employs advanced algorithms to extract thousands of quantitative features (including intensity, texture, and structure) from medical images. Machine learning, including its subset deep learning, aids in the comprehensive analysis and integration of these features from diverse image sources. This potent synergy enables the prediction of responses of malignant liver tumors to various treatments and outcomes. In this comprehensive review, we examine the evolution of the field of radiomics and its procedural framework. Furthermore, the applications of radiomics combined with machine learning in the context of personalized treatment for malignant liver tumors are outlined in aspects of surgical therapy and non-surgical treatments such as ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, radiotherapy, and systemic therapies. Finally, we discuss the current challenges in the amalgamation of radiomics and machine learning in the study of malignant liver tumors and explore future opportunities.