Management of malunions of the distal radius

Volar fixed plating of distal radius fractures: optimizing plate position for enhanced clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

The precise influence of plate position on clinical outcomes in the context of volar fixed-angle plating for distal radius fractures is not fully understood. This article aims to investigate the influence of plate position on clinical results, and functional outcomes in patients treated with volar fixed plating for distal radius fractures.

METHODS

A total of 58 patients with 64 distal radius fractures were included in the study. Patient demographics, fracture characteristics, surgical details, and radiographic data were collected. Post-operative AP and Lat views of all patients taken on the first day after surgery were evaluated. Volar Tilt, Radial Inclination and Radial Height measurements were used as reduction criteria. In the follow-up, the patients were called for their last control, flexion and extension angles of the wrist and Mayo Wrist Scores, the distance of the plate to the joint line and the angle between the plate and the radial shaft were measured and recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 64 distal radius fractures, with a mean age of 46.9 years, and the mean follow-up period 24.9 months were included in this study. There was a significant relationship between the Radial Inclination and Plate-Shaft Angle variables and the Mayo Wrist Score at a 99% confidence interval. Additionally, a relationship was observed between the Radial Height variable and the Mayo Score at a 90% confidence interval. A significant positive association was observed between radial inclination and achieving a Good-to-Excellent Mayo score (OR = 1.28, 95% CI [1.08-1.51], p = 0.004). Plate distance to joint line demonstrated a marginally significant positive association with a Good-to-Excellent Mayo score (OR = 1.31, 95% CI [0.97-1.77], p = 0.077). Univariate analysis revealed a significant negative association between plate-shaft angle and achieving a Good-to-Excellent Mayo score (OR = 0.71, 95% CI [0.52-0.99], p = 0.045). This negative association remained statistically significant in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Radial inclination, plate distance to joint line, and angle between plate and radius shaft were identified as significant factors associated with improved Mayo Wrist Scores.

Three cases of posttraumatic wrist problems solved with 3D-printed patient-specific guides

Symptomatic malunion of the wrist is one of the most common posttraumatic wrist problems. This study demonstrates three patients with complex malunions of the wrist who benefited from a corrective osteotomy using preplanned 3D-printed patient-specific guides, by experiencing improvement in their wrist function, grip strength and a reduction in pain.

Managing the Intra-articular Distal Radius Malunion

Intra-articular malunion of the distal radius represents a difficult clinical problem. While not all patients require treatment, corrective osteotomy may significantly improve motion, grip strength, and patient-reported outcome measures. Meticulous planning and technical precision are required with the possible need for multiple surgical approaches and both volar and dorsal implants. Arthroscopic assistance may be used to visualize the joint and articular reduction. Custom 3-dimensional planning guides are helpful in addressing complex multiplanar deformities. Regardless, intervention may not change the natural history of these injuries and post-traumatic arthritis is to be expected.

Restoring Wrist Harmony: A Case Report of Ulnar Osteotomy for Correcting the Radius Malunion

A 41-year-old female patient sought medical attention due to a malunited distal radius fracture with a positive ulnar variance, experiencing wrist pain and limited range of motion. The patient was successfully treated with an isolated ulnar osteotomy and bone grafting, resulting in significant alleviation of symptoms and improved wrist mobility. Various surgical methods have been proposed to address malunited radius fractures, and ulnar osteotomy has shown promise as an effective technique for such cases.

Total Wrist Arthroplasty as a Motion-Sparing Option for Distal Radius Malunion in a Patient of Advanced Age: A Case Report

CASE

A 62-year-old woman presented with wrist pain secondary to a distal radius fracture malunion 4 months after a fall onto an outstretched hand. She was not an ideal candidate for osteotomy and bone graft because of the degree of displacement and osteoporosis, so after nonoperative treatment was unsuccessful, she was offered total wrist arthroplasty (TWA) or arthrodesis and opted for TWA.

CONCLUSION

At 14-month follow-up, the patient reported significant improvement in her pain and function. The current generation of TWA implants may allow use in the management of symptomatic distal radius malunions in older, low-demand patients.

Nascent Malunion of Distal Radius Fractures Treated with Fixed Angled Volar Plates without Using Bone Grafts

Purpose

Malunion of the distal radius is a common complication. Using bone grafts is common to restore the bone to an acceptable level. This study aimed to verify if it is necessary to use bone grafts in nascent malunion of distal radius fractures treated with fixed angled volar plates and which radiographic parameters are essential to obtain satisfactory outcomes.

Methods

This single-centered prospective study included 11 patients who underwent corrective osteotomy of the radius for malunion. Patients with a metaphyseal, extraarticular osteotomy stabilized by a volar fixed angle plate within 3 months after the fracture are included. Patients underwent a standard radiological evaluation at postoperative 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and annually thereafter. Radial inclination, radial height, ulnar variance, and palmar tilt were measured. Wrist ranges of motion are measured throughout follow-up with a goniometer. Grip strength is measured using a Jamar Hand Dynamometer. The function is evaluated via the Gartland-Werley (GW) score and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score.

Results

The mean age of 11 patients, 9 (81.82%) males, included in the study was 41.45 ± 14.89 years. The mean post-fracture admission time is 39.3 ± 15.1 days. Radial inclination, radial length, and ulnar variance improved significantly after surgery (p = 0.0023, 0.0002, 0.0037). Radial inclination values are within normal limits for all patients at admission. The radial length was in the normal range for 72.73%, the ulnar variance was in the normal range for 72.73%, and palmar tilt was in the normal range for 100% of the patients. Extension 54.55%, flexion 72.73%, radial deviation 81.82%, ulnar deviation 63.64%, pronation 90.91%, and supination 72.73% were achieved after surgery. GW average was 3.09 ± 3.24 DASH score average was 12.24 ± 13.48. The mean grip strength was 29.27 ± 7.21 on the operated side, while it was 34.91 ± 5.32, on the healthy side, with a significant difference (p = 0.0108).

Conclusion

It is possible to get good results without using bone grafts in corrective osteotomy of distal radius malunions.

Forearm bone mineral density as a predictor of reduction loss in distal radius fractures treated with cast immobilization

Objective

Many potential predictors have been identified and proposed for predicting late reduction loss in distal radius fractures. However, no report exists on whether the bone mineral density (BMD) of the forearm correlates with the loss of reduction in distal radius fractures. This study aimed to investigate whether forearm BMD can be used as a predictor of reduction loss in distal radius fractures treated with cast immobilization.

Methods

Ninety patients with distal radius fractures were divided into two groups according to the maintenance or loss of reduction evaluated from radiographs taken at least 6 weeks after their injury. Lumbar and forearm BMD (total and metaphysis) T-scores were measured and compared between the maintenance of reduction (MOR) group and the loss of reduction (LOR) group. Additionally, serologic markers (C-terminal telopeptide, osteocalcin, vitamin D) and radiologic risk factors (intra-articular fracture, ulnar fracture, dorsal comminuted fracture, volar hook) were evaluated and a logistic multiple regression analysis was performed to know the main risk factors of reduction loss.

Results

Reduction loss was observed in 38 patients (42.2%). The total and metaphyseal BMD of the forearm was less in the LOR group than in the MOR group. However, the difference was not statistically significant [−2.9 vs. −2.5 for total (p = 0.18), −2.3 vs. −2.0 for metaphysis (p = 0.17)]. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed initial dorsal comminution (p = 0.008) and ulnar variance (p = 0.01) were the main risk factors for reduction loss.

Conclusions

Forearm BMD was not a valuable prognostic factor for reduction loss in distal radius fractures. Initial dorsal comminution and ulnar variance rather than forearm BMD should be considered preferentially when predicting which patients are at high risk of reduction loss in distal radius fractures.

Clinical Features and Surgical Strategies of Distal Radius Posttraumatic Deformity

Objective

To investigate the clinical features and surgical strategies of distal radius posttraumatic deformity.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on the data of 30 patients with distal radius posttraumatic deformity treated by osteotomy and orthopedic surgery in the department of orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, from February 2016 to November 2018. All the patients underwent preoperative anterior and lateral X-ray plain scanning of bilateral wrist joints, showing different degrees of radius shortening, inferior ulnar and radial mismatch, palmar angle, and ulnar deviation angle, among which 11 patients had an uneven joint surface. After a full evaluation, osteotomy and orthopedic surgery were performed to restore the original anatomical structure, plaster fixation was performed for two weeks after surgery, and regular outpatient follow-up was conducted. The function of the wrist was evaluated by the MMWS (wrist joint improvement) scoring scale before and after surgery, and the changes in the wrist joint-related treatment parameters were evaluated according to X-ray.

Results

All 30 patients had no neurological symptoms after surgery, and all wounds healed within the first stage. All patients were followed up for 6–12 months, with an average healing time of 3.5 months. There was no reduction loss, internal fixation loosening, or fracture in the regular postoperative review. Postoperative MMWS (wrist joint improvement) score scale data were significantly higher than those before surgery, and there were differences between groups (P < 0.05). Postoperative treatment parameters of wrist joints such as palmar inclination angle, ulnar deviation angle, radius height, and lower ulnar and radial matching were significantly improved, and there were differences between groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The patients with distal radius posttraumatic deformity have the clinical characteristics of shortening of radius, mismatch of lower ulnar and radius, an abnormal inclination of palm, and ulnar declination. For patients with distal radius posttraumatic deformity, osteotomy and orthopedic surgery can effectively improve wrist function and improve patients' quality of life, which is worthy of clinical reference.

Reconstruction of intraarticular distal radius malunion with 3D printed guide and arthroscopic assisted intraarticular osteotomy

INTRODUCTION

Distal radius fractures are one the most common upper extremity injuries, accounting for 25 % of pediatric fractures and up to 18 % of elderly fractures. Intraarticular malunion is one major complication of distal radius fractures and was reported in 0 to 33 % of total cases. It usually causes pain, deformity, limited range of motion (ROM), and loss of strength. Therefore, proper surgical management to satisfactorily unite the fragment is necessary. Case Illustrations: This is a case series of three adult male and female patients diagnosed with intraarticular distal radius fracture with malunion. They had been diagnosed based on clinical and radiological examinations. Preoperative and postoperative QuickDASH and ROM were measured. Three-dimensional printing was created for planning the osteotomy. Osteotomy was performed using arthroscopy. All patients showed QuickDASH and ROM improvement in all wrist movements.

DISCUSSION

The primary goal of the procedure was to restore normal anatomic alignment to improve wrist function and reduce pain. Osteotomy guided by arthroscopy planned by 3D printed surgical guide successfully reduced the malunion fracture.

CONCLUSION

Osteotomy assisted by arthroscopy combined with the 3D-printed surgical guide is a promising technique to restore challenging intraarticular distal radius malunion.

Radiographic Predictors of Delayed Carpal Tunnel Syndrome After Distal Radius Fracture in the Elderly

BACKGROUND

Delayed-onset carpal tunnel syndrome (DCTS) can develop weeks and months after distal radius fracture (DRFx). A better understanding of the risk factors of DCTS can guide surgeon's decision making regarding the management of DRFx and also provides another discussion point to be had with elderly patients when discussing outcomes of nonoperative management.

METHODS

We reviewed 216 nonoperatively managed DRFx between June 2015 and January 2019 at a single level 1 trauma center and senior author's office. We identified 26 patients who developed DCTS at a minimum of 6 weeks after DRFx, which constituted our case group. The remaining 190 patients served as the control group (non-carpal tunnel syndrome [CTS]). Differences between case and control group were evaluated through univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The prevalence of DCTS among nonoperatively managed DRFx was 12%. In univariate analysis, volar tilt (VT) and teardrop angle (TDA) were significant independent predictors of development of DCTS. Multivariate logistic regression analysis determined that the odds of developing CTS increased by 12% and 24% for each degree of decrease in VT and TDA, respectively. No other significant risk factors were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Decreasing VT and TDA are the most significant risk factors associated with DCTS in nonoperatively managed DRFx. These are simple and reliable radiographic measurements that provide significant prognostic value. These parameters can be used to guide surgeon decision making regarding management of DRFx in the elderly while aiding patient expectations and outcomes following nonoperative management of DRFx.

Outcomes following Distal Radius Fractures with Preexisting Ulnocarpal Abutment

Background  Due to the commonality of distal radius fractures (DRFs), the potential impact of ulnocarpal abutment (UA) on patient outcomes is significant, whether it developed after or prior to injury. It is, therefore, important to consider whether preexisting UA has any impact on outcomes after an acute DRF. Questions/Purpose  The aims of this study were to determine if differences were present in (1) pain at final follow-up, (2) complications, and (3) unintended operations in patients with DRFs and either without or with preexisting radiographic UA. Methods  A single institution retrospective cohort study comparing patients treated either nonoperatively (43 patients) or operatively (473 patients) for DRFs between 5/1/2008 to 5/1/2018 was performed. Data included demographics, prior wrist pain or surgery, ulnar variance, select treatment data, and presence of pain, complication, or unintended operation by final follow-up. Statistical testing used Fisher's exact test and chi-squared test, with a significance level of 0.05. Results  The prevalence of preexisting UA was 14.0 and 15.6% in the nonoperatively- and operatively treated groups, respectively. In nonoperatively treated patients without or with UA, no differences in pain (37.8 vs. 33.3%, p  = 1.00) or complications were seen (13.5 vs. 50.0%, p  = 0.07). A higher unintended operation rate for nonoperatively treated DRFs with UA, compared with those without, UA was seen (5.4 vs. 50.0%, p  = 0.01). No differences in pain, complications, or unintended operations were seen between those without and with UA in the operatively treated group. Conclusion  Preexisting UA is not associated with pain, complications, or unintended operations after operative treatment of DRFs. Prospective studies further evaluating outcomes in nonoperatively treated DRFs with UA may be beneficial.

Outcome Measurement for Distal Radius Fractures

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are among the most common upper extremity injuries. Multiple medical conditions now are evaluated by standardized outcome sets that enable comparability. Recent international working groups have provided consensus statements for outcomes measurement after DRFs. These statements emphasized the growing importance of patient-reported outcome measures as well as traditional measures, including pain assessment, radiographic alignment, performance, and assessment of complications. A standardized instrument and timeline for measuring outcomes following DRFs offers clinicians, researchers, and health care economists a powerful tool. This article reviews the current evidence and provides recommendations for a DRF standardized outcome set.

Distal radius malunion in adults

Distal radius malunion (DRMU) consists in a non-anatomical consolidation of a distal radius fracture. The resulting alteration of the articular or extra-articular radial anatomy impairs wrist function to a greater or lesser degree: Restricted ranges of motion, loss of strength, pain. There may also be nerve or tendon involvement. Adaptive carpal malalignment and ulnar-carpal impingement are also possible. Imaging assessment should at least include X-ray and CT; CT-arthrography is essential in intra-articular DRMU, which regularly progresses toward radiocarpal osteoarthritis. Surgical indications are guided by clinical assessment. Restoring distal radial anatomy requires osteotomy, according to type of DRMU: anterior or posterior opening or closing wedge. Bone or bone-substitute graft may need to be associated. Computerisation has improved planning and should be implemented, whenever possible. Ulnar osteotomy may be performed, isolated or associated to distal radial osteotomy. Palliative partial fusion or bone resection is possible in case of joint involvement or in patients with low functional demand.

Distal radius fracture malunion in an adolescent patient treated with osteotomy and autologous iliac bone grafting: A case report

RATIONALE

Adolescent wrist trauma can cause epiphyseal dysplasia and even distal radius deformity malunion. At present, there is no uniform treatment standard for the malunion of the distal radius of adolescents. Osteotomy and autologous bone grafting are currently one of the effective ways to treat the disease. We treated an adolescent patient with distal radius deformity malunion, and used this surgical method to treat the patient and achieved satisfactory results.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 16-year-old boy suffered from a serious distal radius deformity after trauma of the left wrist 8 years ago.

DIAGNOSES

Physical examination, X-rays examination, high-resolution computed tomography scan, and 3-dimensional reconstruction images of the affected limb helped us diagnose the distal radius fracture malunion.

INTERVENTIONS

The fracture malunion was treated by osteotomy and autologous iliac bone grafting.

OUTCOMES

At the 2-year follow-up, wrist flexion returned to 68°, wrist dorsiflexion to 55°, radial deviation to 14°, ulnar deviation to 12°, forearm pronation to 75°, supination to 67°. Grip strength increased to 35.1 kg after 2 years of operation, recovered to 87% of the uninjured side. Quick DASH score at 2-year follow-up was 9. No complication, such as nonunion or infection, was observed.

LESSONS

This rare case provides valuable insights for hand surgeons. High-resolution computed tomography scan and 3-dimensional reconstruction can help us effectively diagnose wrist diseases. Small lesions on the articular surface of the distal radius will change the position and function of the wrist joint, and cause traumatic arthritis of the wrist joint. Therefore, it is very important to reconstruct the normal structure of the distal radius articular surface. Osteotomy and autologous iliac bone grafting are effective treatments for serious distal radius fracture malunion in the adolescent patient. During the operation, care should be taken to protect the osteoepiphysis to avoid bone dysplasia.

Arthroscopic treatment of chronic wrist pain after distal radius fractures

We report the arthroscopic and clinical findings of patients with chronic wrist pain following distal radius fracture (DRF) who underwent diagnostic arthroscopy and arthroscopically-assisted tailored treatment.We retrospectively analyzed the records of 15 patients with chronic wrist pain following DRF, who underwent diagnostic arthroscopy and arthroscopically-assisted tailored treatment from 2010 to 2017. The average patient age was 44 years (range, 20-68 years), average time from injury to treatment 21 ± 23.46 months (range, 3-96 months) and average follow up period 20.13 ± 8.71 months (range, 12-39 months). The functional outcome was evaluated by comparing the preoperative and final follow up values of the range of motion, grip strength, pinch strength, visual analogue scale for pain and quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score.Based on the arthroscopic findings, synovitis was found in all cases and the pathologic intra-articular lesions were classified into 4 patterns. Triangular fibrocartilage complex rupture was seen in 14 cases, intercarpal and radiocarpal ligament ruptures in 9 cases, ulnar impaction syndrome in 5 cases, and cartilage lesion in 9 cases. In terms of surgical treatment, 15 patients underwent arthroscopic synovectomy, 7 foveal or capsular repair of TFCC, 7 intercarpal Kirschner wires fixation or intercarpal thermal shrinkage, 1 intercarpal ligament reconstruction, 2 Sauve-Kapandji procedure, and 2 unlar shortening osteotomy. Postoperatively, the average range of motion, grip strength, and pinch strength increased significantly. From preoperative to final follow up values, the average visual analogue scale and quick disabilities of the arm score decreased from 5.93 ± 1.58 (range, 3-8) to 1.33 ± 1.29 (range, 0-3) (P = .001) and from 49.38 ± 19.09 to 12.63 ± 7.63 (P = .001), respectively.Diagnostic arthroscopy and arthroscopically-assisted tailored treatment of chronic wrist pain following DRF can provide an accurate diagnosis, significant pain relief, and functional improvement.

Recent advances in the surgical treatment of malunions in hand and forearm using three-dimensional planning and patient-specific instruments

Malunions of the forearm and hand cause significant disability. Moreover, intraarticular deformities may contribute to early onset osteoarthritis. Such conditions require precise surgical correction in order to improve functional outcomes and prevent early or late complications. The purpose of this study was to describe the technical advantages of accurate anatomical reconstruction using 3D guided osteotomies and patient specific instruments (PSI) in multiple joints of the hand and forearm. Acquisition of three-dimensional (3D) datasets and surgical implementation of PSI was performed in a series of patients between December 2014 and July 2017. Patients had intra- or extra-articular malunions of the forearm, radiocarpal joint, trapeziometacarpal joint, or proximal interphalangeal joint. A previously described 3D surface model that incorporates CT data was used for segmentation (Mimics®, Materialise™, Belgium). For all the cases, CT scans of both forearms were acquired to use the contralateral uninjured side as the anatomic reconstruction template. Computer-assisted assessment of the deformity, the preoperative plan, and the design of PSI are described. Outcomes were determined by evaluating step-off correction, fusion, changes in range of motion (ROM) and grip strength. Six patients were included in the study; all achieved fusion. Improved clinical outcomes including pain reduction, better ROM and grip strength were obtained. Complete correction of intraarticular step-off was achieved in all cases with intraarticular malunions. 3D guided osteotomies are an established surgical treatment option for malunions of the hand and forearm. 3D analysis is a helpful diagnostic tool that provides detailed information about the underlying deformity. PSI can be developed and used for surgical correction with maximal accuracy for both intraarticular step-off and angular deformity.

Functional outcome after corrective osteotomy for malunion of the distal radius: a randomised, controlled, double-blind trial

Purpose

The purpose of this randomised, controlled, double-blind trial was to evaluate functional outcome during the first year after corrective osteotomy for malunited distal radius fractures, with or without filling the osteotomy void.

Method

Patients were randomised to receive a HydroSet bone substitute or no graft. Cortical contact was maintained and stabilisation of the osteotomy was carried out with a DiPhos R- or RM Plate. To evaluate subjective functional outcome, the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (Q-DASH), the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and the RAND-36 were used. Moreover, range of motion and grip strength were measured by blinded evaluators. Evaluations were made pre-operatively and three, six and 12 months post-operatively.

Results

There were no significant differences between the groups at any time point post-operatively with respect to any of the PROMs that were used or range of motion or grip strength (p > 0.05). In both groups, there was a significant improvement at the 12-month follow-up compared with pre-operatively for the PRWE, the Q-DASH and the COPM satisfaction scores. The RAND-36 revealed no significant differences except for two domains, in which there was an improvement in the treatment group (p < 0.05). For grip strength and for range of motion in all movement directions, except dorsal extension, there was a significant improvement in both groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

There is no significant difference in functional outcome during the first year after corrective open-wedge distal radius osteotomy, where cortical contact is maintained, regardless of whether or not bone substitute to fill the void is used.

Distal Radius Malunion

Malunion remains the most common complication of nonsurgical treatment of fractures of the distal radius and represents a common clinical entity. Symptomatic treatment often involves corrective osteotomy. Surgical correction is a challenging problem with unpredictable clinical outcomes. Prevention of malunion of a distal radius fracture is the best course of action. With maintenance of volar cortical contact and the use of volar fixed-angle devices, bone grafting may not be necessary in certain cases of malunion correction. New technologies such as 3-dimensional modeling and computer-generated osteotomy guides are likely to have a positive impact on the outcomes of surgical treatment.

Corrective osteotomy after malunited distal radius fractures

Posttraumatic malunion or secondary dislocation can cause wrist joint incongruency. Uncorrected malalignment increases the risk of secondary degenerative changes and chronic pain. Therefore, early correction using the available fixed-angle devices, cancellous bone grafting only becomes necessary in larger bony defects. Premounting the plate through a palmar approach with regard to the desired correction angles leads to predictable results by precise correction. In case of posttraumatic growth arrest with larger discrepancy of the radius and the ulna, a two-staged procedure is advisable.

Early Correction of Distal Radius Partial Articular Malunion Leads to Good Long-term Functional Recovery at Mean Follow-up of 4 Years

Background: Distal radius articular step-off or deformity may cause posttraumatic arthritis and poor functional outcome. The purpose of this study was to evaluate pain and functional outcomes in patients with malunited partial articular distal radius fractures who underwent corrective osteotomy. We hypothesized that anatomic restoration of distal radius articular surface after a malunited partial articular distal radius fracture results in improvement in pain and functional measures and delays the development of posttraumatic arthritis. Methods: Seven consecutive patients with mean age of 38 years underwent corrective osteotomy via either a standard dorsal approach or combined dorsal and volar approach. Mean time from injury to corrective osteotomy was 10 weeks. Patients were assessed with respect to Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), forearm and wrist range of motion, pain, and grip strength. Results: At mean follow-up of 44 months, significant improvements in pain scores (7.1-0.9, P < .001), QuickDASH (38.7-11.6, P < .001), grip strength (21.4-30.0 kg, P = .01) were achieved. All range of motion measurements demonstrated significant improvements except forearm pronation. One patient demonstrated radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis but had no pain at final follow-up. No patients required secondary surgery for removal of symptomatic hardware. Conclusions: Based on these findings, we recommend that early corrective osteotomies should be considered in young patients with intra-articular distal radius malunions before considering salvage procedures such as partial or complete wrist arthrodesis.

Complications of Corrective Osteotomies for Extra-Articular Distal Radius Malunion

PURPOSE

Osteotomy of the distal radius for a fracture malunion is a challenging procedure. The purpose of this study was to review a series of osteotomies to determine the type and risk of complications.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed, including all Kaiser Permanente Southern California patients who were aged 18 years or older between January 1, 2007, and September 25, 2015, and underwent osteotomy for an extra-articular distal radius fracture malunion. Charts were reviewed for demographic data, comorbidities, osteotomy type (hinged vs distraction), implant, and bone graft type. Complications including infection, nonunion, loss of reduction, implant failure, nerve injury, tendon injury, and complex regional pain syndrome were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 60 patients who underwent extra-articular osteotomy of the distal radius for malunion during the study period. The mean age was 54 years (range, 21-83 years). There were 24 distraction-type (intervening bone graft) and 36 hinge-type (volar cortical contact maintained) osteotomies. Twenty-five of 60 patients had complications related to the procedure requiring 13 subsequent procedures. There were 7 nonunions and 3 cases of delayed healing at the osteotomy site. One extensor carpi radialis longus tendon laceration resulted from the use of an osteotome. There were 3 delayed extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon ruptures after surgery. The distraction-type osteotomy was associated with a greater risk of major complications including nonunion and delayed union.

CONCLUSIONS

A complication rate of nearly 50% was observed in distal radius osteotomies. Surgeons should be aware of the risk of injury to, or delayed rupture of the EPL tendon associated with these procedures. The risk of nonunion or delayed union is higher in distraction-type compared with hinge-type osteotomies. Low surgeon volume with this procedure may be a contributing factor to the high rate of complications.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Corrective osteotomy of distal radius malunion after IIIB open fracture: Palmar approach - Case report

BACKGROUND

Despite the fact that distal radius fractures are the most common, open fractures are relatively uncommon. The aim of this study is to present the case with severe malunion of extra-articular left distal radius after open fracture grade IIIB (Gustillo). The treatment was done with open correctuve osteotomy and ostosynthesis with volar low profile plate.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 32-years old man was admitted to our departement because of severely malunited left distal radius extra-articular metaphyseal fracture after treatment of an open fracture. He was primary treated in a Regional Hospital with irrigation, debridement, antimicrobial cover, and immediate skeletal management through fixation with Kirschner's wires. No external fixator was used. He developed volar metaphyseal angulation after loss of primary reduction of K-wires fixation; therefore it required corrective surgical treatment. Because of malunion, open corrective osteotomy and bone grafting of distal radius with volar plating were done. Follow-up 20 months after surgery show deformity correction of radial volar inclination, height, and restitution of distal radioulnar joint.

CONCLUSION

This case report offers an informative overview on this uncommon case of distal radius open fracture malunion treated successfully with volar approach corrective osteotomy. Corrective surgery is the primary therapy of choice in the this case. This method have shown to be safe and effective in treatment of distal radius malunion with volar angulation.

Best Approaches in Distal Radius Fracture Malunions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Malunion remains a common complication in the treatment of distal radius fractures. The purpose of this review was to discuss the various approaches in planning and surgical management for extra- and intra-articular distal radius malunions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several recent studies have reported good results with surgical correction of distal radius malunions utilizing a number of preoperative planning methods and surgical approaches. Three-dimensional models and custom cutting guides have recently become more popular, but their benefit in comparison to other methods remains unclear. Regardless of preoperative planning method or surgical approach, good results can be achieved with correction of distal radius malunion with careful attention to patient selection, indications, and surgical technique.

Complications in the Management of Distal Radius Fractures: How Do We Avoid them?

PURPOSE OF THIS REVIEW

Distal radius fractures are one of the most common fractures in the upper extremity. The purpose of this review is to outline common complications that may arise when caring for distal radius fractures and to describe the treatment strategies when faced with such complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Tendon complications are not uncommon after distal radius fractures. Recent literature highlights new plating technology for dorsal plating techniques. Moreover, new literature has outlined parameters for flexor tendon complications when using volar locking plates in an effort to avoid flexor tendon irritation and rupture. In summary, it is important to understand the various complications that can arise when treating distal radius fractures in an effort to avoid suboptimal outcomes.

Solitary ulnar shortening osteotomy for malunion of distal radius fractures: experience of a centre in the UK and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Isolated ulnar shortening osteotomies can be used to treat ulnocarpal abutment secondary to radial shortening following distal radius fractures. Given the increase of fragility distal radius fractures awareness of treating the sequelae of distal radius fractures is important. We present the largest reported case series in the UK of ulnar shortening osteotomies for this indication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients with previous distal radial fractures were included, who presented with wrist pain and radiologically evident positive ulnar variance secondary to malunion of the distal radius with no significant intercalated instability. Patients were treated with a short oblique ulnar shortening osteotomy, using a Stanley jig and small AO compression plate system. Pre- and postoperative radiographical measurements of inclination, dorsal/volar angulation and ulnar variance were made. Patients were scored pre- and postoperatively using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation scores by two orthopaedic surgeons. Mean follow-up was 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Radiographical analysis revealed a change in the ulnar variance with an average reduction of 5.74 mm. Mean preoperative scores were 61.1 (range 25-95.5) for QuickDASH and 70.4 (range 33-92) for Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation. At the latest follow-up, mean postoperative QuickDASH scores were 10.6 (range 0-43.2) and 17.2 (range 0-44) for Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation. Differences in scores after surgery for both QuickDASH and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation were statistically significant (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The ulnar shortening osteotomy is a relatively simple procedure compared with corrective radial osteotomy, with a lower complication profile. In our series, patients showed significant improvement in pain and function by correcting the ulnar variance thus preventing ulna-carpal impaction.

Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use Among Opioid-Naïve Patients Following Common Hand Surgery Procedures

PURPOSE

To evaluate prolonged opioid use in opioid-naïve patients after common hand surgery procedures in the United States.

METHODS

We studied insurance claims from the Truven MarketScan databases to identify opioid-naïve adult patients (no opioid exposure 11 months before the perioperative period) who underwent an elective (carpal tunnel release, carpometacarpal arthroplasty/arthrodesis, cubital tunnel release, or trigger finger release) or trauma-related (closed distal radius fracture fixation, flexor tendon repair, metacarpal fracture fixation, or phalangeal fracture fixation) hand surgery procedure between 2010 and 2012 (N = 77,573 patients). Patients were observed for 6 months to determine the number, timing, duration, and oral morphine equivalent dosage of postoperative opioid prescriptions. We assessed prolonged postoperative opioid use, defined as patients who filled a perioperative opioid prescription followed by a prescription between 90 and 180 days after surgery, and evaluated associated risk factors using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

In this cohort, 59,725 opioid-naïve patients (77%) filled a perioperative opioid prescription. Of these, 13% of patients continued to fill prescriptions between 90 and 180 days after surgery. Elective surgery patients were more likely to continue to fill opioid prescriptions after 90 days compared with trauma patients (13.5% vs 10.5%). Younger age, female gender, lower income, comprehensive insurance, higher Elixhauser comorbidity index, mental health disorders, and tobacco dependence or abuse were associated with prolonged opioid use.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 13% of opioid-naïve patients continue to fill opioid prescriptions after hand surgery procedures 90 days after surgery. Preoperative interventions centered on opioid alternatives and early cessation, particularly among patients at risk for long-term use, is critical to addressing the prescription opioid crisis in the United States.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The current national opioid use epidemic requires an assessment of the prevalence of hand surgery patients who receive and fill opioid prescriptions after common hand surgery procedures.

Determinants of Functional Outcome in Distal Radius Fractures in High-Functioning Patients Older Than 55 Years

OBJECTIVES

To determine the influence of treatment and radiographic parameters on patient-reported functional outcomes on a population of non-frail elderly with distal radius fractures.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Patients older than 55 years presenting with a distal radius fracture and a Canadian Study of Health and Aging Clinical Frailty Scale score of 1 or 2.

INTERVENTION

Closed reduction and casting or open reduction and internal fixation as per the treating surgeons' decision.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Radiographic scores at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks, as well as Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, Short Form 36, and Patient-Reported Wrist Evaluation scores up to 1 year after injury. Univariate analysis and linear regression analysis were performed on outcome measures.

RESULTS

No difference exists in outcomes based on treatment choice. Patients with ulnar positivity greater than 2 mm at baseline, after treatment, and at final follow-up had worse patient-reported scores at 1 year. Persistent articular gaps and/or steps greater than 2 mm after treatment were also associated with worse patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Even in high-functioning patients older than 55 years, there was no difference in patient-reported outcomes at 1 year in the open reduction group as compared with the closed reduction group. Instead, physicians should pay particular attention to radial shortening and persistent articular gaps following their chosen treatment plan for distal radial fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A Unified Approach to Outcomes Assessment for Distal Radius Fractures

Distal radius fractures are one of the most common upper extremity injuries. Currently, outcome assessment after treatment of these injuries varies widely with respect to the measures that are used, timing of assessment, and the end points that are considered. A more consistent approach to outcomes assessment would provide a standard by which to assess treatment options and best practices. In this summary, we review the consensus regarding outcomes assessment after distal radius fractures and propose a systematic approach that integrates performance, patient-reported outcomes, pain, complications, and radiographs.

In Vivo Contact Characteristics of Distal Radioulnar Joint With Malunited Distal Radius During Wrist Motion

PURPOSE

To determine whether distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) contact characteristics were altered in patients with malunited distal radius fractures.

METHODS

We obtained computed tomography scans at 5 positions of both wrists of 6 patients who had unilateral malunited distal radius fractures with dorsal angulation from 10° to 20° and ulnar variance less than 3 mm. We reconstructed 3-dimensional images and mapped contact regions of DRUJ by calculating the shortest distance between the 2 opposing bones. The contact areas of the DRUJ were measured and the contact region centers were calculated and analyzed. The values of the malunited side were compared with those of the contralateral uninjured side.

RESULTS

In the uninjured wrist, the contact areas of the DRUJ increased slightly from wrist flexion to extension and ulnar deviation. In the malunited wrist, we found the contact areas of DRUJ to be progressively reduced from 20° flexion to neutral, 40° extension, and 20° extension, to ulnar deviation. The centroid of this area on the sigmoid notch moved to distal from flexion to extension. Compared with the contralateral uninjured wrist, the contact area significantly decreased during wrist extension and ulnar deviation, and significantly increased during wrist flexion. The centroids of this area on sigmoid notch all moved volarly in all selected wrist positions.

CONCLUSIONS

The contact areas of the DRUJ and the centroid of contact area on sigmoid notch are altered in patients with malunited distal radius fractures. The contact area of the DRUJ increases during wrist flexion and decreases during wrist extension and ulnar deviation. The centroids of the contact area on sigmoid notch move volarly during wrist flexion-extension and ulnar deviation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The in vivo findings suggest that alterations in joint mechanics may have an important role in the dysfunction associated with these injuries.

Is Bone Grafting Necessary in the Treatment of Malunited Distal Radius Fractures?

Background Open wedge osteotomy with bone grafting and plate fixation is the standard procedure for the correction of malunited distal radius fractures. Bone grafts are used to increase structural stability and to enhance new bone formation. However, bone grafts are also associated with donor site morbidity, delayed union at bone-graft interfaces, size mismatch between graft and osteotomy defect, and additional operation time. Purpose The goal of this study was to assess bone healing and secondary fracture displacement in the treatment of malunited distal radius fractures without the use of bone grafting. Methods Between January 1993 and December 2013, 132 corrective osteotomies and plate fixations without bone grafting were performed for malunited distal radius fractures. The minimum follow-up time was 12 months. Primary study outcomes were time to complete bone healing and secondary fracture displacement. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs during follow-up were compared with each other, as well as with radiographs of the uninjured side. Results All 132 osteotomies healed. In two cases (1.5%), healing took more than 4 months, but reinterventions were not necessary. No cases of secondary fracture displacement or hardware failure were observed. Significant improvements in all radiographic parameters were shown after corrective osteotomy and plate fixation. Conclusion This study shows that bone grafts are not required for bone healing and prevention of secondary fracture displacement after corrective osteotomy and plate fixation of malunited distal radius fractures. Level of evidence Therapeutic, level IV, case series with no comparison group.

In Vivo changes in the lengths of carpal ligaments after mild dorsal angulation of distal radius fractures

The need for surgical correction in patients with malunion with mild dorsal angulation after a distal radius fracture is controversial. We specifically investigated in vivo changes in the lengths of carpal ligaments in a group of patients with mild-degree dorsal angulation following a distal radial fracture. We obtained computed tomography scans of both wrists in eight patients, whose distal radius on one side had united with dorsal angulation from 10° to 20°. The three-dimensional images of the carpus were reconstructed and the lengths of wrist ligaments were measured based on known anatomical landmarks. Compared with the contralateral uninjured side, the dorsal radiocarpal ligament and ulnotriquetral ligament were substantially lengthened (p < 0.05) and the long radiolunate ligament was substantially shortened (p < 0.05) at most wrist positions except extension. However, five other ligaments that we measured did not show significant differences in length compared with those of the uninjured side (p > 0.05). The lengths of some ligaments are substantially altered even by mild dorsal angulation of the distal radius, while the lengths of most other ligaments are not substantially affected.

Management of complications of distal radius fractures

Treating a fracture of the distal radius may require the surgeon to make a difficult decision between surgical treatment and nonsurgical management. The use of surgical fixation has recently increased because of complications associated with conservative treatment. However, conservative action may be necessary depending on certain patient factors. The treating surgeon must be aware of the possible complications associated with distal radius fracture treatments to prevent their occurrence. Prevention can be achieved with a proper understanding of the mechanism of these complications. This article discusses the most recent evidence on how to manage and prevent complications following a fracture of the distal radius.

Current concepts in the treatment of distal radial fractures

Distal radial fractures are among the most commonly encountered traumatic fractures of the upper extremity. Initial trauma mechanism, fracture pattern, associated injuries, and patient age influence treatment and outcome. Although stable fractures are commonly treated conservatively, the past decade has seen changes in surgical practice and techniques. Indications for surgery have been extended and refined based on new insight into the pathophysiology of the distal end of the forearm and technological advances in implant design. Despite the frequency of this fracture, only limited higher-level evidence exists to guide practitioners in decision making for this injury. This article highlights key concepts in the treatment of distal radial fractures and summarizes current evidence.

Radiographs late in the follow up of uncomplicated distal radius fractures: are they worth it? Clinical outcome and financial implications

Fractures of the distal radius are common. Displacement can quickly lead to secondary osteoarthritis. Early follow up radiographs are subsequently paramount to facilitate for early attempts at reduction. Developing callus eventually makes this impractical. In the absence of complications we propose that radiographs may become obsolete at the later stages of follow up. We investigate whether clinical deformity, range of wrist movement and grip strength are independent of radiographs taken later than 2 weeks into the follow up of uncomplicated cases. Local cases between May 2009 and December 2011 were reviewed. Devised criteria regulated case selection. Data was collected from radiological software and occupational therapy clinical notes. Fractures were placed in short or term follow up groups dependant on whether they were imaged later than 2 weeks into follow up. T-tests compared our outcomes measures between these groups. 138 cases were included; 77 short term; 61 long term. No cases reported visible clinical deformity. There were no significant differences between grip strength or range of wrist movement for the short and long term groups. No cases required intervention for late displacement. Although complications may justify delayed imaging, our results suggest radiographs late in the follow up of uncomplicated distal radius fractures have no impact on our outcome measures. Further studies are required to confirm this. Financial regulation means any potential benefits from the removal of these unnecessary radiographs should be recognised. Established radiological follow up regimes need to be devised.