Soft tissue coverage of the upper extremity: an overview

The Efficacy of Biodegradable Temporising Matrix for Upper Limb Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of the biodegradable temporising matrix (BTM) (NovoSorb; PolyNovo Biomaterials Pty Ltd, Port Melbourne, Victoria, Australia) in the reconstruction of complex upper extremity wounds. The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines assessing the efficacy of BTM in complex upper extremity wound reconstruction. The primary outcome measures were successful BTM integration and the proportion of wounds healed. Secondary outcomes analysed were the average time from BTM application to its integration, the proportion of wounds healed by secondary intention, graft take over BTM, as well as the incidence of infection. The rate of complications as well as scarring and outcomes in upper limb function were also evaluated. The inclusion criteria were met by 12 studies consisting of 164 complex upper extremity wounds. Successful BTM integration was reported in 92.1% (p<0.001) of cases, coupled with wound healing achieved in 90% (p<0.001) of cases overall. The average time to integration for BTM was 37.37 days (p<0.001). The average infection rate for upper extremity wounds with BTM application was 8.5% (p<0.001). Satisfactory scarring and functional outcomes were reported in the majority of the studies. The authors conclude that BTM offers good wound healing outcomes for upper extremity reconstruction. The studies analysed indicate good graft take rates and a low infection incidence; however, further prospective randomised studies are required to support the efficacy of BTM compared to other dermal matrices.

Microsurgical Reconstruction with and without Microvascular Anastomosis of Oncological Defects of the Upper Limb

INTRODUCTION

The choice of the most adequate surgical technique for upper limb defects remains challenging. The aim of this article is to discuss the main microsurgical (pedicled or free) reconstructive options for the post-oncological reconstruction of different anatomical areas of the upper extremity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed different reconstructive methods reported in the literature needing microsurgical expertise and compared them to our clinical experience, in order to provide further guidance in the choice of different flaps for upper limb soft tissue reconstruction. Six clinical cases, one for each anatomical district, are presented as examples of possible solutions.

RESULTS

We report the options available in the literature for post-oncologic upper limb reconstruction, dividing them by anatomical area and type of flap: local flaps, regional flaps, free flaps, and distant pedicled flaps. Our examples of the reconstruction of each anatomical area of the upper limb include one reverse ulnar pedicled perforator flap, one free Antero-Lateral Thigh (ALT) flow-through flap, one perforator-based lateral arm flap, two myocutaneous latissimus dorsi pedicled flaps, and one parascapular perforator-plus flap.

CONCLUSIONS

In oncological cases, it is important to consider reconstructive options that provide stable tissue and allow for the early healing of the donor and recipient site if the patient needs to undergo adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy. A wider range of flap options is essential when choosing the proper technique according to the patient's needs, surgeon's preference, and logistical possibilities. Perforator flaps combine the advantages of other flaps, but they require microsurgical expertise. Free flap reconstruction remains the gold standard to obtain a better overall and cosmetic outcome in complex and wide defects, where no suitable local pedicled flap option exists. The pedicled latissimus dorsi flap should still be included among the reconstructive options for its strong vascularization, size, and arc of transposition.

A single-center retrospective comparison of muscle versus cutaneous free flaps for posterior elbow defect reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Comparative data on free flap outcomes for elbow defect reconstruction are still lacking. This study aimed to compare complication rates of free muscle flaps (MFs) versus cutaneous flaps (CFs) for posterior elbow reconstruction.

METHODS

In a single-center retrospective analysis, patients who underwent posterior elbow reconstruction with free MFs and CFs from 2000 to 2021 were analyzed. Retrospective chart review included patient demographics, operative details, and post-operative complications. Outcomes of interest that were compared included microvascular complications, partial or total flap necroses, wound dehiscence, hematoma or flap infection, and donor-site complications.

RESULTS

Sixty-six free flaps (CFs: n = 42; MFs: n = 24) were included, with a trend over time toward using CFs (64%). MFs were used for larger defects (CF: 175 ± 82 vs. MF: 212 ± 146 cm2; p = 0.13). Outcome analysis revealed an equal distribution of microvascular complications (10% vs. 13%; p = 0.7), partial flap necrosis (7% vs. 8%; p > 0.9), wound dehiscence (7% vs. 4%; p > 0.9), evacuation of hematoma (10% vs. 4%; p = 0.7), and infection (0% vs. 4%; p = 0.4). Total flap necrosis requiring additional flap surgery was necessary in one CF (2%) and in no MF (0%) (p > 0.9).

CONCLUSION

Surgical outcomes, flap necrosis rates, and microsurgical complications did not differ between CFs and MFs. Both flap types are safe and effective options. The free anterolateral thigh and latissimus dorsi flaps represent indispensable workhorses for the reconstruction of extensive elbow defects.

Novosorb Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix for Reconstruction of Complex Upper-Extremity Wounds

Purpose

Dermal matrices can be used in management of upper-extremity wounds to create vascularized wound beds in the setting of exposed bone or tendon. Early outcomes of Novosorb biodegradable temporizing matrix (BTM) demonstrated success when used in the treatment of complex wounds. We hypothesize that BTM is effective for reconstruction of upper-extremity wounds.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed for patients who underwent reconstruction of upper-extremity wounds with BTM between January 2017 and May 2022.

Results

In total, 51 patients (39 males and 12 females) were included. Wound etiology included trauma (n = 30), burn (n = 12), infection (n = 8), and vasopressor-related injury (n = 1). The average size of BTM was 162.5 cm2, and the average time from BTM application to wound closure was 90.1 days. Twenty-seven (52.9%) patients required skin grafting, whereas 20 (39.2%) did not and re-epithelialized spontaneously. Those who did not require skin grafting had significantly smaller wound sizes compared to those who required skin grafting (58.5 cm2 vs 248.6 cm2; P = .002). Complications occurred in 14 patients, including infection (n = 5), fluid collection (n = 5), and template dehiscence (n = 4). Wound closure was successful in 92% of patients.

Conclusions

Novosorb BTM is effective for the management of upper-extremity wounds with exposed bone and tendon.

Clinical relevance

In the management of complex upper-extremity wounds with exposed bone and tendon, even when devoid of paratenon or periosteum, Novosorb BTM provides a safe and effective alternative to more complex reconstructive options.

[Esthetic reconstruction of traumatic defects by plastic surgery]

INTRODUCTION

The primary goal is preservation of the affected extremity, which can be associated with limitations in tasks relevant for daily life and a distorted body image caused by the original trauma. Therefore, a secondary goal is to reduce the trauma sequelae.

RESULTS

For an esthetic outcome the choice of flap surgery is crucial. Factors such as tissue thickness, skin color, and hair covering need to be considered. The flap should blend seamlessly with the tissue surrounding the defect. The localization and closure of the defect are also important. The flaps undergo vascular, lymphatic and trophic postoperative changes caused by the so-called autonomization. Measures, such as compression therapy reshape the microcirculation and result in volume reduction of the transplant. It is important to preoperatively educate patients about this process. After completion of the conditioning surgical thinning procedures are available for persistent unattractive results, e.g., open surgical and liposuction techniques.

CONCLUSION

Microsurgical defect coverage of traumatic skin and soft tissue defects is a compromise between limb preservation and functionality. In cases of missing local soft tissue, secure closure of the defect should be prioritized but initial esthetic considerations should also influence the choice of tissue transplant. Patients should be informed early about the development of the flap surgery and undergo postoperative compression therapy for conditioning. Secondary operative corrections are also possible.

Outcomes of Pedicled Groin Flaps for Upper Extremity Injuries

BACKGROUND

Free flap reconstruction has become the more common treatment over pedicled groin flaps for reconstruction of upper extremity injuries in recent years. Groin flaps are still used for a variety of reasons, though limited literature is available to guide surgeons and patients regarding outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiology and outcomes of pedicled groin flaps for upper extremity pathology.

METHODS

The study was a single-institution retrospective case series at a level one trauma center including patients who underwent pedicled groin flaps for upper extremity soft tissue coverage between 1992 and 2022. The data collected included patient and injury characteristics, surgical management, and complication data. Ordinal logistic regression, univariate analysis, and bivariate analysis were performed to assess the relationship between the total number of groin flap surgeries and complications with patient and injury characteristics.

RESULTS

The analysis included 88 pedicled groin flaps performed for upper extremity injuries, with a median follow-up of 1.14 years after injury. Patients had a median age of 35 (interquartile range [IQR]: 22-49) years and underwent a median of 4 (IQR: 3-5.25) surgeries with stiffness (90.6%), partial flap loss (38%), and infection (32%) as the most common complications. High-energy injuries increased the risk of requiring more surgeries based on ordinal logistic regression. Univariate and bivariate analysis revealed no significant difference in wound complications based on patient or injury characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing pedicled groin flaps for upper extremity injuries can expect to undergo an average of 4 surgeries, and high-energy injuries predict the need for more surgeries.

Recent Advances in Upper Extremity Microsurgery: From Traditional to Perforator Flaps

The upper extremity has unique functional and aesthetic requirements. Reconstruction of upper extremity soft tissue defects should ideally provide coverage for vital structures, facilitate early mobilization, be thin and pliable to match its slim contour, and reestablish sensation. Perforator flaps can be raised on the superficial fascia, which creates a thin and pliable yet durable and supple flap option to match the contour and functional needs of the upper extremity. Comparisons to traditional reconstructive methods should be performed to assess whether these innovations in microsurgical reconstruction of upper extremity defects provide an improved functional and aesthetic benefit over traditional methods.

Delayed Abdominal Flap for Upper Extremity Soft Tissue Coverage

Unlike other body parts, the upper extremity has critical structures close to the skin, making soft tissue injuries more complex. These injuries can result from various causes, including trauma and necrotizing soft tissue infections, necessitating reconstruction. Historically, pedicled flaps from the groin and abdomen were commonly used for upper extremity reconstruction, but they had limitations, such as the need for flap division and debulking, patient discomfort, and stiffness. Free flap reconstruction has become the preferred method, but it still faces challenges like patient and facility issues, the absence of recipient vessels after injury, and multi-surface wounds. This case report describes a 67-year-old patient with a severe necrotizing soft tissue infection in the right upper extremity. After multiple debridement procedures, the patient underwent hand amputation and soft tissue coverage using an abdominal wall-based flap. The objectives of achieving stable soft tissue coverage while preserving maximal length of the upper extremity were successfully achieved, and the patient expressed satisfaction with the outcomes. Inadequate management of upper extremity wounds can lead to amputation and psychological distress. The reconstructive ladder is used to approach upper extremity soft tissue defects, with free tissue transfer being the standard for larger defects. However, abdominal flaps still have indications when free tissue transfer is not feasible or contraindicated. It is imperative that plastic surgeons have these techniques in their armamentarium to provide a service to the ever more complex patient with an upper extremity wound.

Reconstruction With Flow-Through Chimeric Anterolateral Thigh Flap Combining Vascularized Fibular Bone Graft for Extensive Composite Tissue Defect of the Forearm: A Case Report

ABSTRACT

The management of critical limb trauma is challenging because limb salvage is preferable to amputation. For upper limb reconstruction, the surgical restoration of functionality, and appearance, a multidisciplinary approach is needed. We report the case of an extensive composite tissue defect of the forearm caused by a machine-crushing injury that was repaired by a flow-through chimeric anterolateral thigh flap with a vascularized fibular graft. Reconstruction was performed as a single-stage procedure; no complications occurred, and both functional and aesthetic outcomes were satisfactory.

An Alternative Dermal Template for Reconstruction of Complex Upper Extremity Wounds

The management of upper extremity soft-tissue defects with full-thickness skin loss and denuded tendon and/or bone traditionally requires vascularized tissue reconstruction. Herein, we present patient outcomes utilizing Novosorb Bio-degradable Temporizing Matrix (PolyNovo, Wilmington, Del.), a novel bilaminar dermal regenerative template, followed by skin grafting, for reconstruction of complex upper extremity injuries with exposed tendon and/or bone. We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated at our Level I trauma center with upper extremity trauma and exposed tendon and/or bone who had application of Novosorb Bio-degradable Temporizing Matrix over a 1-year period. At the time of surgery, all nonviable tissue was debrided, and the product was applied according to the manufacturer’s instructions. If required, split thickness skin grafting was performed once neodermis appeared perfused, or after the sealing layer delaminated spontaneously. Six patients (four men, two women) with an average age of 49.8 (35–60) years were included in the study. Average defect size measured 97 cm² (10–440). Average time to complete healing was 45 days (27–57). Three patients reepithelialized spontaneously and did not require grafting; average defect size in these patients was 26 cm² (10–42). There were no infections and no loss of the dermal matrix or skin graft, when performed. All patients healed without complication after grafting and did not require further surgical treatment. Therefore, we contend that Novosorb BTM is a dermal regenerative template that shows potential as an alternative option to flap reconstruction in select patients after upper extremity trauma and soft-tissue defects with exposed tendon and/or bone. Further studies will be required to refine indications and evaluate outcomes.

Customized reconstruction of complex soft tissue defects in the upper extremities with variants of double skin paddle anterolateral thigh perforator flap

BACKGROUND

Complex soft tissue defects in the upper extremities are challenging to reconstruct. The purpose of this study was to share our experience with using four variants of double skin paddle Anterolateral Thigh Perforator (ALT) flap to achieve the customized reconstruction of the complex defects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2007 to December 2019, 15 patients (14 male and 1 female) aged 15-61 years underwent double skin paddle ALT flap reconstruction of the upper extremities. 10 wounds were located in the wrist or hand, while four wounds were located in the forearm, and one wound in the elbow. All the wounds were large with non-adjacent defects and with or without a dead space. Four variants of double skin paddle anterolateral thigh perforator flaps were harvested according to the patient's needs.

RESULTS

The flaps received were consisted of 7 classic double skin paddle ALT flap, 4 vastus lateralis muscle-chimeric double skin paddle ALT flap, 2 microdissected thin double skin paddle ALT flap, and 2 flow-through double skin paddle ALT flap. The size of the skin flap ranged from 6 × 6 cm² to 26 × 7 cm², and the size of the muscle segment ranged from 5 × 2 × 1 cm³ to 16× 6 × 2 cm³. Flap necrosis related to the pedicle kinking was observed in one patient, while the rest of the flaps survived without complications. The follow-up period ranged from 7 to 54 months, with a median of 15.6 months. The mean value of the qDASH scores at the last follow-up was 27.12 ± 16.51 (range, 11.4-59.1). None of the patients showed wrist flexion deformity. Postoperatively, three patients developed finger joint stiffness, which correlated with the severity of the injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Variants of double skin paddle ALT flaps provide versatile design and allow customized reconstruction of complex soft tissue defects in the upper extremities with limited donor site morbidity. We believe that the algorithm provided will help the surgeons with deciding among variants of double skin paddle ALT flap.

Upper limb traumatic injuries: A concise overview of reconstructive options

Different options for upper limb reconstruction are described in literature: advancement or rotation flaps, regional flaps and free flaps are the most common. Local and regional flaps can represent the reconstructive options for small defects while large wounds require the use of free flaps or distant pedicled flaps. In case of large wound, the use of free flaps rather than distant pedicle flaps is usually preferred. To choose the best reconstructive option, it is essential for the surgeon to have a general overview about the different methods.

In this review the Authors will refer to the most commonly used methods to cover soft tissues injuries affecting the dorsum and the palm of the hand and the forearm (excluding fingers). The aim is to show all flap reconstructive options so as to support the inexperienced surgeon during the management of traumatic injuries of the upper limb.

•

Reconstruction of traumatic injuries of the upper limbs can be challenging.

•

Small defects can be covered by local and regional flaps while large wounds need the use of free or distant pedicled flaps.

•

The literature shows different opinions whether to use pedicled flaps (regional or distant) or free flaps.

•

Dermal substitutes can be considered in patients who are not suitable for flaps reconstruction.

•

Patient related factors and surgical background can significantly interfere with the surgical reconstructive solution.

A Retrospective Comparative Functional and Aesthetic Outcome Study of Muscle versus Cutaneous Free Flaps for Distal Upper Extremity Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

 Function and cosmesis are crucial in upper extremity reconstruction. Yet, there persists a lack of outcome evaluations, particularly regarding differences between free flap types.

METHODS

 In a single-center retrospective analysis, outcomes were compared between patients with cutaneous or muscle free flaps for distal upper extremity reconstruction between 2008 and 2018. The Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand -Score, Michigan-Hand (MHQ), and Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Questionnaires were assessed, motor function was quantified, and self-reported measures of cosmesis were compared, including the Vancouver Scar-Scale (VSS), MHQ aesthetics-subscale (MAS), and Moscona's cosmetic validation-score (CVS).

RESULTS

 One-hundred forty-one cases were identified, with a shift toward cutaneous flaps over the study period. Muscle flaps were used for larger defects (251 vs. 142 cm², p = 0.008). Losses, thromboses, and donor-site complications were equally distributed. Partial necroses were more frequent in muscle flaps (11 vs. 1%, p = 0.015). Seventy patients with 53 cutaneous versus 17 muscle flaps were reexamined. There was no difference in the timing of flap coverage (after 16 vs. 15 days, p = 0.79), number of preceding (2 vs. 1.7, p = 0.95), or subsequent operations (19/53 vs. 5/17, p = 0.77). Patients with cutaneous flaps showed higher grip strength (25 vs. 17 kg, p = 0.046) and reported better hand function (MHQ: 58 vs. 47, p = 0.044) and general health (SF-36: 70 vs. 61, p = 0.040), as well as more favorable appearance (MAS: 71 vs. 57, p = 0.044, CVS: 77 vs. 72, p = 0.048), and scar burden (VSS: 0 vs. 3, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

 Cutaneous flaps yielded better motor function, self-perceived cosmesis, patient satisfaction, and quality of life in our cohort of distal upper extremity reconstructions.

Complex Microsurgical Reconstruction After Tumor Resection in the Trunk and Extremities

Reconstruction of soft tissue defects following tumor ablation procedures in the trunk and extremities can challenge the microsurgeon. The goal is not just to provide adequate soft tissue coverage but also to restore form and function and minimize donor site morbidity. Although the principles of the reconstructive ladder still apply in the trunk and extremities, free tissue transfer is used in many cases to optimally restore form and function. Microsurgery has changed the practice in soft tissue tumors, and amputation is less frequently necessary.

Soft tissue coverage of the upper limb: A flap reconstruction overview

Different opinions about the reconstructive choice for upper limb are described in literature: advancement or rotation flaps, regional flaps and free flaps are the most common reconstructive options. Local and regional flaps can be used to cover small defects while large wounds require the use of free flaps or distant pedicled flaps. The coverage of large wounds opens a discussion about when to use free flaps and when distant pedicled flaps. This review will describe the different methods used for the coverage of soft tissues injuries affecting hand and/or forearm (excluding fingers). The aim is to show all flap reconstructive options in order to support the inexperienced surgeon during the management of traumatic injuries of the upper limb.

Reconstructive microsurgery in upper limb reconstruction: 30 years' experience of a single surgeon

The reconstruction of compound tissue defects in upper extremity injuries often represents a challenge. The goal of reconstruction is to obtain not only a good cosmetic result, but also the best possible function. Microsurgery highly contributes to the management of upper limb simple or complex defects by offering a large number of surgical possibilities. Due to advances in understanding of blood supply to tissues and microsurgical techniques in the last 50 years, microsurgeons have renounced more and more to the use of traditional flaps in favour of the more reliable perforator flaps. This article presents the experience of a single surgeon performing post-traumatic upper limb reconstructive microsurgery over the last 30 years.

Aesthetic functional reconstruction of the mutilated hand: Indications and selection of reconstructive techniques

Advances in microsurgery together with improvements in reconstructive surgical techniques over recent decades have enlarged the scope of available techniques for mutilated hand reconstruction, shifting the reconstructive paradigm from restoring hand function to providing the best functional and aesthetic results with minimal donor-site morbidity. Successful reconstruction of a mutilated hand should no longer be measured only by the degree of improvement of hand function but also by a more aesthetic hand appearance as well as by improved psychological well-being. In this article, the authors present their concept of aesthetic functional reconstruction of the mutilated hand with a focus on the indications and selection of reconstructive techniques. They emphasize that in order to select the most appropriate technique, providing the best functional and aesthetic outcomes with minimal donor-site morbidity for each individual patient, it is imperative for the reconstructive hand surgeon to possess perfect mastery of all available surgical techniques, thorough understanding of functional and aesthetic requirements and accurate appreciation of multidimensional reconstruction of a given defect of the hand. They have concluded that in precisely indicated cases, successful replantation of an amputated hand or digits remains the best reconstructive procedure designed to obtain a more functional and more normal-appearing hand, whereas, toe-to-hand transplantation, in cases of failed or impossible digit replantation, provides better results than any other digit reconstruction techniques aimed at achieving functioning digits with good appearance. Although skin graft and various distant pedicled flaps and free flaps may be valid options for coverage of some soft tissue defects of the hand, reverse flow forearm flaps, especially those based on the secondary arteries of the forearm, are often the best-suited reconstructive options for like-with-like hand reconstruction. They can provide the best matching of color, texture, soft-tissue volume, donor-recipient tissue interface and fulfill all the aesthetic and functional reconstruction requirements of moderate-sized or even large soft tissue defects of the hand, with acceptable donor site morbidity.

Management of complex forearm defects: A multidisciplinary approach

Complex forearm defects with significant damage to, or loss of skin, tendon, muscle, bone and neurovascular structures represent a great challenge for surgeons. The management of such injuries, whether a result of trauma or tumor resection, is focused on preservation of the damaged limb and restoration of hand function. A multidisciplinary approach combining plastic and orthopedic surgical expertise in a coordinated team is proposed to address these challenging cases. The authors have laid emphasis on adequate debridement for wound bed preparation, bone stabilization and reconstruction for a stable bony framework, vascular repair for early revascularization, musculotendinous and nerve reconstruction as well as vascularized tissue coverage on a case-to-case basis to facilitate optimal functional recovery. They also maintain that besides expedient surgical treatment, early mobilization based on an individualized rehabilitation program as well as psychological and socio-professional supports are necessary means of achieving rapid and successful social integration.

Negative pressure wound therapy as a definitive treatment for upper extremity wound defects: A systematic review

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) represents one of the many solutions for complex wounds of the upper extremity. The goal of this study was to investigate the most common indications for definitive treatment of wound defects in the upper extremity with NPWT and to report revision surgery outcomes after its use. A systematic review of the literature was performed. The following keywords and their combinations were used: "upper extremity," "arm," "forearm," "wrist," "hand," "finger" AND "negative-pressure wound therapy," "VAC therapy," "vacuum assisted closure." A total of 45 articles were included, regrouping 404 cases of NPWT in the upper extremity. The forearm was involved in 53% of cases, followed by hand (36%), fingers (10%), and arm (1%). Seventeen different indications were cited, the most common of which were radial forearm flap reconstruction (23%), burn wounds (18%), and compartment syndromes (17%). Of the cases, 90% did not require any subsequent surgical procedure, as opposed to 6% considered partial failures requiring minor revisions and 4% total failures requiring major revisions. Closure of radial forearm flap donor site required the most revision procedures when treated with NPWT. NPWT can be used for several indications pertaining to the reconstruction of the upper extremity. Positive outcomes as a definitive treatment are demonstrated in this systematic review, which reaffirms NPWT as a potent tool for reconstructive endeavours.

Free Tissue Transfer for Upper Extremity Reconstruction

With the advent of the Industrial Revolution, traumatic injuries of the upper extremity increased exponentially. As a result, surgeons began to reevaluate amputation as the standard of care. Following the Second World War, local and regional pedicled flaps became common forms of traumatic upper extremity reconstruction. Today, microsurgery offers an alternative when options lower on the reconstructive ladder have been exhausted or will not produce a desirable result. In this article, the authors review the use of free tissue transfer for upper extremity reconstruction. Flaps are categorized as fasciocutaneous, muscle, and functional tissue transfers. The thin pliable nature of fasciocutaneous flaps makes them ideal for aesthetically sensitive areas, such as the hand. The radial forearm, lateral arm, scapula, parascapular, anterolateral thigh, and temporoparietal fascia flaps are highlighted in this article. Muscle flaps are utilized for their bulk and size; the latissimus dorsi flap serves as a "workhorse" free muscle flap for upper extremity reconstruction. Other muscle flaps include the rectus abdominis and serratus anterior. Lastly, functional tissue transfers are used to restore active range of motion or bony integrity to the upper extremity. The innervated gracilis can be utilized in the forearm to restore finger flexion or extension. Transfer of vascularized bone such as the fibula may be used to correct large defects of the radius or ulna. Finally, replacement of "like with like" is embodied in toe-to-thumb transfers for reconstruction of digital amputations.

Versatility of Free Cutaneous Flaps for Upper Extremity Soft Tissue Reconstruction

The goals of upper extremity soft tissue reconstruction should go well beyond providing coverage and restoring function. As the field of reconstructive microsurgery has evolved, free cutaneous flaps (FCFs) are gaining wider application. The advantages of FCF include minimizing donor-site morbidity by preserving the muscle and fascia, improving versatility of flap design, and superior aesthetic results. This review highlights the application of anterolateral thigh, superficial circumflex iliac artery, deep inferior epigastric perforator, superficial inferior epigastric artery, and flow-through flaps for reconstruction of upper extremity defects. These flaps share several qualities in common: well-concealed donor sites, preservation of major arteries responsible of providing inflow to distal extremity, and potential for a two-team approach (donor and recipient sites). While the choice of flaps should be decided based on individual patient and defect characteristics, FCF should be considered as excellent options to achieve the goals of upper extremity reconstruction.

Complex Microsurgical Reconstruction After Tumor Resection in the Trunk and Extremities

Reconstruction of soft tissue defects following tumor ablation procedures in the trunk and extremities can challenge the microsurgeon. The goal is not just to provide adequate soft tissue coverage but also to restore form and function and minimize donor site morbidity. Although the principles of the reconstructive ladder still apply in the trunk and extremities, free tissue transfer is used in many cases to optimally restore form and function. Microsurgery has changed the practice in soft tissue tumors, and amputation is less frequently necessary.

Skin Coverage Considerations in a Mutilating Hand Injury

The foremost goal of managing a mutilated hand is provision of adequate skin coverage. The most suitable method is free tissue transfer. The specific role of volar surface requires replacement tissue to have similar texture for aesthetically satisfactory and functionally acceptable outcomes. Hand surgeons must approach mutilating hand injuries with the recognition that no 2 injuries are ever the same. The injured hand must be evaluated on the individual demand and characteristics of hand use. Optimal function and aesthetic outcomes require appropriate selection of skin coverage. Lost tissues must be replaced like with like tissue.

The Importance of Hand Appearance as a Patient-Reported Outcome in Hand Surgery

Hand appearance is meaningful to patients because hands are an essential part of human interactions, communication, and social integration. Recent literature indicates that hand aesthetics is an important, measurable patient-reported outcome. In hand surgery, several outcome instruments exist that accurately measure functional outcomes, but aesthetics is often overlooked or imprecisely measured. This makes comparison of disease burden and effectiveness of therapies, as they pertain to aesthetics, difficult. This special topic article outlines the aesthetic features of the hand, how literature is evaluating the appearance of the hand in outcomes research, and proposes a novel approach to assessing hand aesthetics.