Complications of Elbow Trauma

3D-printing of the elbow in complex posttraumatic elbow-stiffness for preoperative planning, surgery-simulation and postoperative control

BACKGROUND

Restoration of mobility of the elbow after post-traumatic elbow stiffening due to osteophytes is often a problem.

METHODS

The anatomical structures were segmented within the CT-scan. Afterwards, the Multi Jet Fusion 3D-printing was applied to create the model made of biocompatible and steam-sterilizable plastic. Preoperative simulation of osteophyte resection at the 3D-model was performed as well as the direct comparison with the patient anatomy intraoperatively.

RESULTS

The patient-specific was very helpful for the preoperative simulation of the resection of elbow osteophytes. The 3D anatomical representation improved the preoperative plan its implementation. A high degree of fidelity was found between the 3D Printed Anatomical representation and the actual joint pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthrolysis of complex post-traumatic bony changes is an important indication for the use of 3D models for preoperative planning. Due to the use of 3D printing and software simulation, accurate resection planning is feasible and residual bony stiffening can be avoided. 3D printing models can lead to an improvement in surgical quality.

The development of a mouse model to investigate the formation of heterotopic ossification

BACKGROUND

Muscle injury and concomitant bone injury are important drivers to induce heterotopic ossification (HO). However, the related roles of muscle and concomitant bone injury in HO formation are still unclear. This study aims to develop a mouse model through the combination of hindlimb amputation (Am) and cardiotoxin (CTX) injection to investigate the mechanism of HO formation.

METHOD

The mice were randomly divided into Am group (Am of right hindlimb, n = 12), CTX group (CTX injection in the calf muscle of left hindlimb, n = 12) and Am + CTX group (the combination of Am of right hindlimb and CTX injection of left hindlimb, n = 18). MicroCT was used to evaluate the incidence of HO. Histology was used to investigate the progression of HO.

RESULTS

The MicroCT showed that only Am or CTX injection failed to induce HO while the combination of Am and CTX injection successfully induced HO. The incidence of HO was significant in Am + CTX group on day 7 (0% vs 0% vs 83.3%, p = 0.001) and day 14 (0% vs 0% vs 83.3%, p = 0.048). HO was located on the left hindlimb where CTX was injected. Moreover, the bone volume and bone density on day 14 were higher than those on day 7 in Am + CTX group. Histology revealed the evidence of calcification and expression of osteogenic markers in calcification sites in Am + CTX group.

CONCLUSION

In summary, the combination of Am and CTX injection could successfully induce dystrophic calcification/HO, which occurs in the location of muscle injury.

[Research progress of traumatic heterotopic ossification]

OBJECTIVE

To review and evaluate the research progress of traumatic heterotopic ossification (HO).

METHODS

The domestic and foreign related research literature on traumatic HO was widely consulted, and its etiology, pathogenesis, pathological progress, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment were summarized.

RESULTS

Traumatic HO is often caused by severe trauma such as joint operation, explosion injury, nerve injury, and burn. At present, it is widely believed that the occurrence of traumatic HO is closely related to inflammation and hypoxia. Oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and surgery are the main methods to prevent and treat traumatic HO.

CONCLUSION

Nowadays, the pathogenesis of traumatic HO is still unclear, the efficiency of relevant prevention and treatment measures is low, and there is a lack of specific treatment method. In the future, it is necessary to further study the pathogenesis of traumatic HO and find specific prevention and treatment targets.

Wound Dehiscence Following Cubital Tunnel Surgery

PURPOSE

Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common upper-extremity compressive neuropathy, and persistent symptoms can necessitate operative treatment. Surgical options include simple decompression and ulnar nerve transposition. The cause of wound dehiscence after surgery is not well known, and the factors leading to the development of these complications have not been previously described.

METHODS

Patients undergoing ulnar nerve surgery from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, were retrospectively evaluated for the development of wound dehiscence within 3 months of surgery. There were 295 patients identified who underwent transposition and 1,106 patients who underwent simple decompression. Patient demographics and past medical history were collected to evaluate the risk factors for the development of wound dehiscence.

RESULTS

The overall rate of wound dehiscence following surgery was 2.5%. In the simple decompression group, the rate of wound dehiscence was 2.7% (30/1,106), which occurred a mean of 21 days (range, 2-57 days) following surgery. In the transposition group, the rate of wound dehiscence was 1.7% (5/295), which occurred a mean of 20 days (range, 12-32 days) following surgery. The difference in rates of dehiscence between the decompression and transposition groups was not significant. Five patients in the simple decompression group and 1 patient in the transposition group required a secondary surgery for closure of the wound. Age, body mass index, smoking status, and medical comorbidities were not found to contribute to the development of wound dehiscence.

CONCLUSIONS

Wound dehiscence can occur following both simple decompression and transposition, even after postoperative evaluation demonstrates a healed wound. Surgeons should be aware of this possibility and specifically counsel patients about remaining cautious with, and protective of, their wound for several weeks after surgery. Dehiscence may be related to suboptimal vascularity in the soft tissue envelope in the posteromedial elbow. When it occurs, dehiscence can generally be treated by allowing healing by secondary intention.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Treatment methods for post-traumatic elbow stiffness caused by heterotopic ossification

HYPOTHESIS

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a common complication of surgically treated elbow fractures that can inhibit range of motion and impair quality of life. Although there are many treatment methods for HO, there is a lack of consensus as to the best option. We hypothesized that contracture release combined with Botox injection would lead to improved functional outcome scores when compared with current treatment methods.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of patients who presented to a single surgeon with HO secondary to elbow fracture between 2005 and 2018. A total of 59 patients were identified who met inclusion criteria. Data were classified into 3 groups: contracture release (control - CR), Botox injection with CR (Botox + CR), and radiation therapy with CR (CR + RT). Range of motion measurements were obtained, including flexion, extension, pronation, and supination.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients (30 of 59, 50.8%) received CR, 6 (6 of 59, 9.2%) were treated with CR + RT, and 23 (23 of 59, 40.0%) had CR + Botox. There was a significant difference between pre- and postoperative arc of motion for both CR + RT (P < .01) and CR + Botox (P < .01). In addition, there was a significant difference in pre- and postoperative extension for patients who received intraoperative Botox injections (P < .05). There was no significant difference between pre- and postoperative motion nor extension in the CR group.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative Botox injection with CR is an effective method in the treatment of post-traumatic elbow stiffness caused by HO.

Clinical application of individualized 3D-printed navigation template to children with cubitus varus deformity

Background

Cubitus varus deformity is a common sequela of elbow fractures in children. Cubitus varus deformity treatment is tending toward 3D correction, which is challenging for orthopedic surgeons. This study aims to explore whether individualized 3D-printed navigation templates can assist with accurate and effective corrective treatment of children with cubitus varus deformity.

Methods

Thirty-five patients were treated for cubitus varus deformity from June 2015 to April 2017, including 21 boys and 14 girls, aged 4.6–13.2 years (average, 7.5 years). Of these cases, 17 deformities were on the left side and 18 were on the right side. All were treated with wedge osteotomy of the lateral distal humerus. 3D-printed navigation templates were used in 16 cases, while traditional surgery was used in 19 cases. All patients underwent computed tomography scans before surgery. Computer software was used to analyze the measurements and design and print individualized navigation templates. The navigation templates were matched, and surgery was initially simulated. Intraoperative individualized navigation templates were used to assist with accurate osteotomy and Kirschner wire fixation. Operation times were recorded in all cases, the carrying angles before and after surgery were assessed by computer, and postoperative elbow joint function was evaluated using Bellemore criteria. All measurement data were presented as means ± SD, and Student’s t test was used to examine differences between groups. All count data between both groups were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test analysis.

Results

All individualized navigation templates matched well with the corresponding anatomical markers and were consistent with preoperative planning, simulated surgery, and intraoperative procedures. Average operation times from clear exposure to fixed Kirschner wire were 11.69 min (9.6–13.5 min) for the individualized navigation template group and 22.89 min (17.7–26.8 min) for the traditional operation group (p < 0.001). Average differences in postoperation carrying angles between affected and healthy sides were 1.13° (0–2.0°) and 4.21° (0–7.5°), respectively (p < 0.001). Follow-up 6–12 months postoperation showed that elbow function did not differ significantly between groups using the Bellemore criteria (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Individualized navigation templates simplify procedures, reduce operation time, and improve accuracy when used in orthopedic surgery to treat children with cubitus varus deformity.

A structured exercise programme combined with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching or static stretching in posttraumatic stiffness of the elbow: a randomized controlled trial

Objectives:

To compare the different stretching techniques, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching and static stretching, in patients with elbow stiffness after a treated elbow fracture.

Design:

Randomized-controlled, single-blind study.

Setting:

Department of physiotherapy and rehabilitation.

Subjects:

Forty patients with posttraumatic elbow stiffness (24 women; mean age, 41.34 ± 7.57 years).

Intervention:

PNF stretching group ( n = 20), hold-relax PNF stretching combined with a structured exercise programme (two days per week for six weeks); static stretching group ( n = 20), static stretching combined with a structured exercise programme (two days per week for six weeks).

Main measures:

The primary outcome is the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). The secondary outcomes are active range of motion (AROM), visual analogue scale (VAS), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Short Form-12 and Global Rating of Change. Participants were assessed at baseline, after a six-week intervention period and one-month later (follow-up).

Results:

After treatment, improvement in the mean DASH score was slightly better in the PNF stretching group (8.66 ± 6.15) compared with the static stretching group (19.25 ± 10.30) ( p = 0.03). The overall group-by-time interaction for the 2 × 3 mixed-model analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was also significant for elbow flexion AROM (mean change for PNF stretching group; static stretching group; 41.10, 34.42, p = 0.04), VAS-rest (–1.31, –1.08, p = 0.03) and VAS-activity (–3.78, –3.47, p = 0.01) in favour of PNF stretching group. The other outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups.

Conclusion:

The study demonstrated that the structured exercise programme combined with PNF stretching might be effective in patients with posttraumatic elbow stiffness with regard to improving function, elbow flexion AROM, pain at rest and during activity.

Manipulation Under Anesthesia as a Treatment of Posttraumatic Elbow Stiffness

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the safety and efficacy of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for posttraumatic elbow stiffness.

DESIGN

Retrospective, case series.

SETTING

Single institution; level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Chart review of 45 patients over a 10-year period treated with MUA for posttraumatic elbow stiffness after elbow injuries treated both operatively and nonoperatively.

INTERVENTION

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change in total flexion arc pre- to postmanipulation; time to manipulation; complications.

RESULTS

Average time from most recent surgical procedure or date of injury to MUA was 115 days. Average premanipulation flexion arc was 57.9 degrees; average flexion arc at the final follow-up was 83.7 degrees. The improvement in elbow flexion arc of motion was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Post hoc analysis of the data revealed 2 distinct groups: 28 patients who underwent MUA within 3 months of their most recent surgical procedure (early manipulation), and 17 patients who underwent MUA after 3 months (late manipulation). Average improvement in elbow flexion arc in the early MUA group was 38.3 degrees (P < 0.001); improvement in the late MUA group was 3.1 degree. Comparison of improvement between the early and late MUA groups found a significant difference (P < 0.001) in mean flexion arc improvement from premanipulation to postmanipulation, favoring the early group. One patient had a complication directly attributable to MUA. Nineteen patients required additional procedures on the injured extremity after MUA.

CONCLUSIONS

MUA is a safe and effective adjunct to improving motion in posttraumatic elbow stiffness when used within 3 months from the original injury or time of surgical fixation. After 3 months, MUA does not reliably increase elbow motion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Risk factors for development of severe post-traumatic elbow stiffness

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare different grades of elbow stiffness and investigate demographic, injury, and treatment factors potentially associated with the development of severe elbow stiffness.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study involving 169 patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness between June 2014 and June 2016. Patient demographics, injury, and treatment details were reviewed. Patients were classified into three groups according to the elbow motion. Ordinal regression analyses were performed to examine the independent factors.

RESULTS

Patients were classified into: mild (49 patients), moderate (59 patients), and severe (61 patients) groups. Patients with severe stiffness had a significantly worse elbow functional performance. Univariate ordinal regression revealed that severe elbow stiffness was associated with high-energy injury (odds ratio [OR] 4.73), olecranon fracture (OR 1.92), fracture-dislocation (OR 2.28), and open fracture (OR 3.24). Multivariate regression showed that higher-energy injuries were associated with severe stiffness (OR 4.45, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Elbow stiffness after fracture surgery often results in joint stiffness. Severe stiffness often resulted in more significant functional impairment. Our study suggested that high-energy injuries were associated with the development of severe elbow stiffness.

The traumatic bone: trauma-induced heterotopic ossification

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a common occurrence after multiple forms of extensive trauma. These include arthroplasties, traumatic brain and spinal cord injuries, extensive burns in the civilian setting, and combat-related extremity injuries in the battlefield. Irrespective of the form of trauma, heterotopic bone is typically endochondral in structure and is laid down via a cartilaginous matrix. Once formed, the heterotopic bone typically needs to be excised surgically, which may result in wound healing complications, in addition to a risk of recurrence. Refinements of existing diagnostic modalities, like micro- and nano-CT are being adapted toward early intervention. Trauma-induced HO is a consequence of aberrant wound healing, systemic and local immune system activation, infections, extensive vascularization, and innervation. This intricate molecular crosstalk culminates in activation of stem cells that initiate heterotopic endochondral ossification. Development of animal models recapitulating the unique traumatic injuries has greatly facilitated the mechanistic understanding of trauma-induced HO. These same models also serve as powerful tools to test the efficacy of small molecules which specifically target the molecular pathways underlying ectopic ossification. This review summarizes the recent advances in the molecular understanding, diagnostic and treatment modalities in the field of trauma-induced HO.