Surgical Management of Spasticity of the Elbow

Management of the Spastic Elbow Deformity in Adult Patients With Upper Motor Neuron Syndrome

Spastic elbow deformity in patients with upper motor neuron injuries results from an imbalance of flexor and extensor forces across the ulnohumeral joint. Although not all deformities reflect the same underlying imbalances, the elbow most commonly rests in a flexed position. Patients may present with a combination of muscle spasticity, myostatic contracture, and/or joint contracture. A focused history and physical examination are essential for developing individualized surgical plans that account for variations in deformity severity and patient goals. Patients may present with or without volitional control; goals and treatment options differ depending on the degree of control present. Techniques include hyperselective neurectomy, tendon lengthening, muscle origin release, myotomy, tenotomy, periarticular soft tissue release, and skin rearrangement. This article presents a comprehensive review of the surgical approach to the volitional and nonvolitional spastic elbow deformities.

Elbow Flexor Release Combined With Selective Neurectomy of Musculocutaneous Nerve for Spastic Elbow Flexion Deformity in Children and Adolescents

BACKGROUND

Spasticity of the elbow flexors causes a dynamic and/or static elbow flexion deformity. This position interferes with the functional use of the hand, is aesthetically unpleasant and can cause problems with hygiene and comfort. A lengthening procedure of elbow flexor muscles can improve elbow posture and range of motion. However, causal spasticity is not addressed directly. Selective neurectomy of the musculocutaneous nerve has a direct effect on underlying spasticity but is not sufficient when contracture is present. In this study, we examine the long-term results of a combined surgical approach: a release procedure of the elbow flexors and selective neurectomy of the musculocutaneous nerve.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 14 patients with spastic flexion deformity of the elbow was performed. After a mean follow-up of 52.6 months (SD 33, range 12 to 113), the results of the combined surgical approach were evaluated. Spontaneous position of the elbow and active and passive range of motion were assesses using goniometry. Spasticity was assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale. Function of the affected upper limb before and after surgery was assessed by the House functional classification. Patient and caretaker's satisfaction were assessed using a visual analogue scale.

RESULTS

The mean decrease of passive elbow extension deficit was 34 degrees (SD 21.3, P <0.05). Active elbow extension increased with a mean of 41 degrees (SD 16.5, P <0.05). Spontaneous position elbow flexion decreased by a mean of 40 degrees (SD 21.1, P <0.05).The Modified Ashworth score decreased significantly ( P <0.05) from 3.27 (range 1 to 4) preoperatively to 0.64 (range 0 to 4) postoperatively.The difference between the House score preoperatively and postoperatively was not significant ( P =0.180). Mean patient satisfaction was 8.2/10 (SD 2.7, range 2 to 10) and mean caregiver satisfaction was 7.1/10 (SD 2.7, range 1 to 10).

CONCLUSION

A combined surgical approach to elbow flexion deformity in the form of a lengthening procedure and selective neurectomy of the elbow flexors result in a significant and sustained improvement of the spontaneous position, active and passive elbow extension and elbow flexor spasticity and high patient and caregiver satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series, level IV.

Surgical management of the spastic elbow

Background

We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing surgery for elbow spasticity. We present our findings and expected outcomes according to degree of elbow fixed flexion contracture.

Methods

Data collected included age, Modified Ashworth Score, pre and post-operative range of motion, indications for surgery and the Goal Attainment Score. Contracture severity was classified into five groups based on goniometric measurements. Surgical procedures were categorised into three groups.

Results

A total of 114 elbows underwent surgical release. The mean age at surgery was 18.5 years and the mean follow-up was 20 months. Preoperatively, the median Modified Ashworth Score was 2 and the mean contracture was 68° (35° fixed and 33° dynamic). The median number of structures released was 3 (range: 1-6). Surgical procedures were classified as biceps sparing (27%), biceps lengthening (53%) and extended releases (18%). Mean improvement in extension was 59°, and the mean improvement in Goal Attainment Score was 36 (mean attainment score 62). The mean residual contracture was 9°. Patient satisfaction was high with over 90% of surgical indications met.

Discussion

Contracture severity of the spastic elbow can be categorised by degree of fixed flexion deformity and therefore treatment can be allocated accordingly.

Barriers to Upper Extremity Reconstruction for Patients With Cerebral Palsy

BACKGROUND

Reconstructive surgery for upper extremity manifestations of cerebral palsy (CP) has been demonstrated to be safe and effective, yet many potential candidates are never evaluated for surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine barriers to upper extremity reconstruction for patients with CP in a cohort of upper extremity surgeons and nonsurgeons.

METHODS

We sent a questionnaire to 4167 surgeons and nonsurgeon physicians, aggregated responses, and analyzed for differences in perceptions regarding surgical efficacy, patient candidacy for surgery, compliance with rehabilitation, remuneration, complexity of care, and physician comfort providing care.

RESULTS

Surgeons and nonsurgeons did not agree on the literature support of surgical efficacy (73% vs 35% agree or strongly agree, respectively). Both surgeons and nonsurgeons felt that many potential candidates exist, yet there was variability in their confidence in identifying them. Most surgeons (59%) and nonsurgeons (61%) felt comfortable performing surgery and directing the associated rehabilitation, respectively. Neither group reported that patient compliance, access to rehabilitation services, and available financial resources were a major barrier, but surgeons were more likely than nonsurgeons to feel that remuneration for services was inadequate (37% vs 13%). Both groups agreed that surgical treatments are complex and should be performed in the setting of a multidisciplinary team.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons and nonsurgeons differ in their views regarding upper extremity reconstructive surgery for CP. Barriers to reconstruction may be addressed by performing higher level research, implementing multispecialty educational outreach, developing objective referral criteria, increasing surgical remuneration, improving access to trained upper extremity surgeons, and implementing multidisciplinary CP clinics.

The Spastic Upper Extremity in Children: Multilevel Surgical Decision-making

Multilevel surgery for upper extremity spasticity is the current surgical standard. While the literature details surgical techniques and outcomes, a comprehensive guide to surgical planning is lacking. Patients commonly present with posturing into shoulder internal rotation, elbow flexion, forearm pronation, wrist flexion with ulnar deviation, finger flexion, and thumb adduction, although variations exist. Multiple surgical options exist for each segment; therefore, repeated examinations for contracture, pathologic laxity, and out of phase activity are necessary to optimize the surgical plan. To avoid decreasing function, one must carefully balance the benefits of contracture release and tendon transfers with their weakening effects. In certain cases, stability from joint fusion outweighs the loss of motion. Failure to recognize dynamic posturing, grasp and release requirements, or hand intrinsic spasticity can worsen function and cause new deformities. Surgical indications are formulated for individual deformity patterns and severity along with personal/family goals. General comprehension, voluntary control, and sensation, although not modifiable, influence decision making and are prognostic indicators. Functional improvement is unlikely without preexisting voluntary control, but appearance and visual feedback may be improved by repositioning nonetheless. Appropriate interventions and management of expectations will optimize limb appearance and function while avoiding unexpected sequelae.

Analysis of dynamic elbow flexion deformity in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy

BACKGROUND

Cerebral palsy affects 1 per 1.000 children, and in 83% of the cases upper extremity is involved. Dynamic elbow flexion deformity is a movement disorder observed in individuals with hemiparesis secondary to cerebral palsy. We sought to determine whether children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy exhibit dynamic elbow flexion deformity during daily activities and its influence to reaching function.

METHODS

Sixteen children with upper limb hemiparesis and cerebral palsy (age 11y 7mo (SD 3y 2mo); 11 boys, 5 girls; Gross Motor Function Classification System level I or II) were included in this observational descriptive study. Manual Ability Classification System, Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire and Shriners Hospital for Children Upper Extremity Evaluation were used to evaluate affected upper extremity function. Spasticity was assessed with Modified Ashworth scale. Involuntary elbow flexion was recorded in eight daily activities. Elbow motion during reach function was measured.

FINDINGS

Fifteen out of 16 individuals showed dynamic elbow flexion deformity. There was a significative increase of involved median elbow flexion in all the activities studied, except for "high speed stairs climbing" evaluation. Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire showed that children were independent in most of the daily activities (21 out of 29). Correlation between dynamic elbow flexion deformity and Shriners Hospital for Children Upper Extremity Evaluation was observed only in sitting-standing activity (Spearman's ρ 0.549, P = 0.028).

INTERPRETATION

Dynamic elbow flexion deformity is very common in hemiplegic cerebral palsy and occurs proportionally to the degree of the effort demanded by the activities. Despite of presenting this movement disorder, it does not affect in children participation in daily activities.