Selective Neurectomy for the Spastic Upper Extremity

Efficacy of selective neurotomy for focal lower limb spasticity: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Selective neurotomy has been suggested as a permanent treatment for focal spasticity. A systematic literature review was performed to investigate the efficacy of selective neurotomy regarding focal lower limb spasticity.

METHODS

A systematic search in PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, and Embase databases was carried out. Studies were included if they reported on the following outcomes: muscle tone, muscle strength, pain, ankle range of motion and/or walking speed, after selective lower limb neurotomy in any type of upper motor neuron syndrome.

RESULTS

A total of 25 non-randomized and/or uncontrolled studies and 1 randomized controlled study were selected. The included studies reported improvements in terms of leg muscle tone, pain, passive range of ankle motion, and walking speed.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that selective neurotomy is effective for reducing lower limb spasticity, without any negative effects on walking speed. However, this conclusion is primarily based on uncontrolled case series, whereas conclusions on clinical efficacy should preferably be based on comparison with a reference treatment through (randomized) controlled trials. Future studies should also include quantitative, validated functional assessment tools to further establish the efficacy of selective neurotomy as long-lasting treatment for patients with focal lower limb spasticity.

Anatomical study of the motor branches of the tibial nerve and incision design for hyperselective neurectomy

PURPOSE

Selective tibial neurotomy (STN) is a surgical procedure for treating spastic equinovarus foot. Hyperselective neurectomy (HSN) of tibial nerve is a modified STN procedure, which was rarely discussed. This study aimed to describe the branching patterns of the tibial nerve and propose an optimal surgical incision of HSN for treatment of spastic equinovarus foot.

METHODS

Sixteen lower limbs were dissected to determine the various branching patterns of the tibial nerve and categorized according to these branching patterns. The mean distances from the nerve entry points to the tip of femur's medial epicondyle were measured, as well as their percentage to the overall length of the leg. The surgical incision was designed according to the range of these nerve entry points.

RESULTS

The tibial nerve sent out proximal and distal motor branches based on their position relative to the soleus muscle's tendinous arch. For proximal motor branches, the branches innervating the medial gastrocnemius, lateral gastrocnemius and proximal soleus were categorized into types I (9/16), II (5/16) and III (2/16). Measurements from the medial epicondyle to the nerve entry points into the medial gastrocnemius, lateral gastrocnemius and proximal soleus ranged from 14 to 33 mm (4-9% of leg length), 22-45 mm (6-12%) and 35-81 mm (10-22%), respectively. Distal motor branches including the distal soleus, posterior tibialis, flexor digitorum longus and flexor hallucis longus, were classified as types A (8/14), B (4/14) and C (2/14), with the distances from their respective terminal points to the medial epicondyle were 67-137 mm (19-39%), 74-125 mm (20-35%), 116-243 mm (33-69%) and 125-272 mm (35-77%).

CONCLUSIONS

The motor branches of tibial nerve were classified into two groups and each subdivided into three types. Detailed location parameters may serve as an anatomical basis for designing incision of HSN.

Nerve-Targeted Surgical Treatments for Spasticity: A Narrative Review

Spasticity is a potentially debilitating symptom of various acquired and congenital neurologic pathologies that, without adequate treatment, may lead to long-term disability, compromise functional independence, and negatively impact mental health. Several conservative as well as non-nerve targeted surgical strategies have been developed for the treatment of spasticity, but these may be associated with significant drawbacks, such as adverse side effects to medication, device dependence on intrathecal baclofen pumps, and inadequate relief with tendon-based procedures. In these circumstances, patients may benefit from nerve-targeted surgical interventions such as (i) selective dorsal rhizotomy, (ii) hyperselective neurectomy, and (iii) nerve transfer. When selecting the appropriate surgical approach, preoperative patient characteristics, as well as the risks and benefits of nerve-targeted surgical intervention, must be carefully evaluated. Here, we review the current evidence on the efficacy of these nerve-targeted surgical approaches for treating spasticity across various congenital and acquired neurologic pathologies.

Motor Branching Pattern of the Radial Nerve for Hyperselective Neurectomy: From Anatomy to Clinical Translation

PURPOSE

Predominant or isolated spasticity of the triceps following upper motor neuron injury is rare and often unmasked once the spastic elbow flexors are addressed. The purpose of this study was to delineate the motor branching pattern of the radial nerve to determine the feasibility of hyperselective neurectomies (HSN) for triceps spasticity.

METHODS

Dissections of the motor branch to each triceps head were performed on 11 upper-extremity specimens. The numbers of trunks, branching patterns, and muscle entry points were recorded in reference to the acromion to interepicondylar line. Based on anatomic studies, 10 patients underwent a combined fractional lengthening and HSN procedure for triceps spasticity. Patient demographics, time from diagnosis, and complications were recorded. Preoperative and postoperative Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and total active elbow arc of motion were compared.

RESULTS

The first branch from the radial nerve was consistently a single trunk to the long triceps head. There were many variations in the branching pattern and number of trunks to the lateral and medial heads of the triceps with motor entry points between 31% and 95% of the acromion to interepicondylar line distance. Ten patients (six men and four women; mean age: 48.5 years) underwent the combined procedure. Mean total active elbow arc of motion improved from 78° before surgery to 111° after surgery, with a 17.5° increase in active elbow flexion. Compared with a mean preoperative triceps MAS of 2.75, nine patients had triceps MAS of 0 at a mean of 10.2 months of follow-up. There was no loss of functional elbow extension and no directly related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the variable motor entry points, HSN to each triceps head would require extensive dissection. Therefore, a combined approach consisting of fractional lengthening of the long head and lateral head with HSN of the triceps medial head is recommended to address triceps spasticity.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic V.

Hyperselective neurectomy in the treatment of elbow and wrist spasticity: an anatomical study and incision design

OBJECTIVE

Hyperselective neurectomy is used to treat spastic arm paralysis. The aim of the study was to analyze the nerve branching patterns of elbow and wrist flexors/pronator to inform hyperselective neurectomy approached.

METHODS

Eighteen upper extremities of fresh cadaver specimen were dissected. The number of motor branches from the musculocutaneous nerve to biceps brachii and brachialis, median nerve to pronator teres, flexor carpi radialis and ulnar nerve to flexor carpi ulnaris were counted. The origin site of each primary motor branch was documented.

RESULTS

Either biceps or brachialis was innervated by one or two primary motor branches. Pronator teres was innervated by one to three motor trunks and the pattern for flexor carpi radialis was a common trunk with other branches. The origin of the biceps and brachialis nerve trunk was located approximately 30% to 60% of the length of the arm. The median nerve branched to pronator teres and flexor carpi radialis at the region about 34mm (SD 18.8mm) above and 50mm (SD 14.9mm) below the medial epicondyle. Flexor carpi ulnaris was innervated by one to three motor trunks and the mean distance from the medial epicondyle to the origin of flexor carpi ulnaris nerve on ulnar nerve was 18.7 mm (SD 6.5mm).

CONCLUSION

Primary motor branches to elbow flexors, wrist flexors and pronators were various, while the regions of their origins were relatively settled. It was recommended the incisions be designed according to the location of the primary motor trunks.

Combined Hyperselective Neurectomy and Fractional Lengthening Technique for Triceps Spasticity

Triceps spasticity can occur in patients with upper motor neuron syndrome. It is often undetected when there is predominant elbow flexion spasticity and/or contracture. This condition can become apparent after surgery for elbow flexor spasticity, leading to impaired active elbow. Although triceps muscle-tendon lengthening procedures can be performed, these techniques do not directly address the issue of spasticity which is neurally mediated. This article presents a surgical technique for addressing triceps spasticity with a combined approach of hyperselective neurectomy of the medial head of the triceps and muscle-tendon lengthening of the long and lateral heads.

Surgical Treatment in Post-Stroke Spastic Hands: A Systematic Review

Background: For more than two decades, the surgical treatment of post-stroke spastic hands has been displaced by botulinum toxin therapy and is currently underutilized. Objectives: This article aimed to assess the potential of surgery for treating a post-stroke spastic upper extremity through a systematic review of the literature on surgical approaches that are adopted in different profiles of patients and on their outcomes and complications. Methods: Medline PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for observational and experimental studies published in English up to November 2022. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system. Results: The search retrieved 501 abstracts, and 22 articles were finally selected. The GRADE-assessed quality of evidence was low or very low. The results of the reviewed studies suggest that surgery is a useful, safe, and enduring treatment for post-stroke spastic upper extremities, although most studied patients were candidates for hygienic improvements alone. Patients usually require an individualized combination of techniques. Over the past ten years, interest has grown in procedures that act on the peripheral nerve. Conclusions: Despite the lack of comparative studies on the effectiveness, safety, and cost of the treatments, botulinum toxin has displaced surgery for these patients. Studies to date have found surgery to be an effective and safe approach, but their weak design yields only poor-quality evidence, and clinical trials are warranted to compare these treatment options.

Cadaveric study of flexor digitorum profundus and superficialis and flexor pollicis longus innervation patterns for application in selective neurectomy

PURPOSE

Spasticity management in finger flexors (flexor digitorum profundus and superficialis and flexor pollicis longus) is a challenge. Recent studies demonstrated the short- and long-term efficacy of selective and hyperselective neurectomy for the spastic upper limb. However, hyperselective neurectomy of flexor digitorum profundus and flexor digitorum superficialis branches was incomplete, without impairing their muscular body and function. This cadaveric study describes a novel medial approach in the forearm, to reach all the muscular branches: flexor digitorum superficialis and profundus and flexor pollicis longus.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fourteen cadaveric fresh frozen upper limbs were used. The feasibility of the medial surgical approach was studied, as well as the number, length and point of emergence of the muscular branches from the median and ulnar nerves to the flexor pollicis longus, flexor digitorum profundus and flexor digitorum superficialis.

RESULTS

The medial approach to the forearm gave access to all the muscular branches from the median and ulnar nerves to the flexor pollicis longus, flexor digitorum superficialis and flexor digitorum profundus, in all cases. A Martin Gruber communicating branch was found in 7 cases out of 14.

CONCLUSION

The medial approach to the forearm gave access to all the muscular branches from the median and ulnar nerve to the flexor pollicis longus, flexor digitorum superficialis and flexor digitorum profundus, without extensive transmuscular dissection of the pronator teres or flexor digitorum superficialis muscles. This approach opens the way for selective neurectomy of the flexor pollicis longus, flexor digitorum profundus and flexor digitorum superficialis muscles.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Recommendations for Ultrasound Guidance for Diagnostic Nerve Blocks for Spasticity. What Are the Benefits?

The diagnostic nerve block (DNB) for spasticity is the percutaneous application of an anesthetic to an individual peripheral nerve trunk (mixed motor sensory nerve), nerve branch to a muscle or an intramuscular branch. The DNB causes a temporary paralysis to assess the contribution of muscle(s) on the spastic pattern and may unmask a fully or partially increased joint range of motion. The anesthetic literature supports the use of ultrasound (US) guidance to improve nerve blocks for sensory targets. This communication summarizes the potential advantages that support the use of US to improve DNB technique. Nerves are much smaller than muscle targets and have various known innervation patterns. US allows for rapid localization of the target before injection, particularly in complex anatomy patterns. The nerve trunks are typically found adjacent to or encapsulating blood vessels, which can be quickly identified with or without color Doppler, allowing the clinician to scan from the vessels to the target and avoid intravascular injection. Lower stimulation levels can be used as the targeted muscle(s) can be seen stimulating rather than only on the surface. A shorter needle insertion time and lower stimulation levels should cause less discomfort to the patient. Smaller volumes of anesthetic may be used as the fluid is seen reaching its target and cessation of stimulation is observed. Further study is needed to identify evidence supporting US utilization with electrical stimulation in DNBs for spasticity management, as US use during nerve blocks for perineurial anesthesia has demonstrated improved patient safety and procedural efficiency.

Hyperselective neurectomy of thoracodorsal nerve for treatment of the shoulder spasticity: anatomical study and preliminary clinical results

BACKGROUND

Hyperselective neurectomy is a reliable treatment for spasticity. This research was designed to quantify the surgical parameters of hyperselective neurectomy of thoracodorsal nerve for shoulder spasticity through anatomical studies, as well as to retrospectively assess patients who underwent this procedure to provide an objective basis for clinical practice.

METHODS

On nine embalmed adult cadavers (18 shoulders), we dissected and observed the branching patterns of thoracodorsal nerve, counted the number of nerve branches, measured the distribution of branch origin point, and determined the length of the surgical incision. Next, we selected five patients who underwent this procedure for shoulder spasticity and retrospectively evaluated (ethic committee: 2022-37) their shoulder function with active/passive range of motion (AROM/PROM) and modified Ashworth scale (MAS).

RESULTS

The anatomical study revealed that the main trunk of thoracodorsal nerve sends out one to three medial branches, with the pattern of only one medial branch being the most common (61.1%); there were significant variations in the branch numbers and nerve distributions; the location of thoracodorsal nerve branches' entry points into the muscle varied from 27.2 to 67.8% of the length of the arm. Clinical follow-up data showed significant improvement in shoulder mobility in all patients. AROM of shoulder abduction increased by 39.4° and PROM increased by 64.2° (P < 0.05). AROM and PROM of shoulder flexion increased by 36.6° and 54.4°, respectively (P < 0.05). In addition, the MAS of shoulder abduction (1.8) and flexion (1.2) was both significantly reduced in all patients (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Hyperselective neurectomy of thoracodorsal nerve is effective and stable in the treatment of shoulder spasticity. Intraoperative attention is required to the numbers of the medial branch of thoracodorsal nerve. We recommend an incision in the mid-axillary line that extends from 25 to 70% of the arm length to fully expose each branch.

Hyper-selective neurectomy for knee flexion spasticity: anatomic bases and surgical technique

PURPOSE

Spasticity may result from damage to neurons of the corticospinal tracts and loss of inhibitory supraspinal influences following head trauma. Traditionally, peripheral nerve surgeries for spasticity in lower limbs were limited to selective neurectomies. Here we used hyper-selective neurectomy (HSN) to release hamstring spasticity at the muscle spindle level.

METHODS

This study describes anatomic bases and surgical technique of HSN and its results in treating spastic knee flexion in a 23-year-old male who developed severe spasticity following severe brain injury. The spasticity was prominent in the left knee. The surgical technique including resection of over one centimeter of three-quarters of the overstimulated nerve rami at the entry point of the nerve into the muscle is shown in the video 1.

RESULTS

After the surgery Visual Analog Scale and Modified Ashworth Score reduced from 7 to 3 and 4 to 1, respectively. Popliteal angle improved from 118° to 73° at the second months after the surgery.

CONCLUSION

Hyper-selective neurectomy is a safe and reliable therapeutic option for the treatment of permanent trauma induced spasticity in the lower limb.

Barriers to Upper Extremity Reconstruction for Patients With Cerebral Palsy

BACKGROUND

Reconstructive surgery for upper extremity manifestations of cerebral palsy (CP) has been demonstrated to be safe and effective, yet many potential candidates are never evaluated for surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine barriers to upper extremity reconstruction for patients with CP in a cohort of upper extremity surgeons and nonsurgeons.

METHODS

We sent a questionnaire to 4167 surgeons and nonsurgeon physicians, aggregated responses, and analyzed for differences in perceptions regarding surgical efficacy, patient candidacy for surgery, compliance with rehabilitation, remuneration, complexity of care, and physician comfort providing care.

RESULTS

Surgeons and nonsurgeons did not agree on the literature support of surgical efficacy (73% vs 35% agree or strongly agree, respectively). Both surgeons and nonsurgeons felt that many potential candidates exist, yet there was variability in their confidence in identifying them. Most surgeons (59%) and nonsurgeons (61%) felt comfortable performing surgery and directing the associated rehabilitation, respectively. Neither group reported that patient compliance, access to rehabilitation services, and available financial resources were a major barrier, but surgeons were more likely than nonsurgeons to feel that remuneration for services was inadequate (37% vs 13%). Both groups agreed that surgical treatments are complex and should be performed in the setting of a multidisciplinary team.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons and nonsurgeons differ in their views regarding upper extremity reconstructive surgery for CP. Barriers to reconstruction may be addressed by performing higher level research, implementing multispecialty educational outreach, developing objective referral criteria, increasing surgical remuneration, improving access to trained upper extremity surgeons, and implementing multidisciplinary CP clinics.

Surgical Approaches to Upper Limb Spasticity in Adult Patients: A Literature Review

Introduction: Spasticity is the main complication of many upper motor neuron disorders. Many studies describe neuro-orthopedic surgeries for the correction of joint and limb deformities due to spasticity, though less in the upper extremity. The bulk of care provided to patients with spasticity is provided by rehabilitation clinicians, however, few of the surgical outcomes have been summarized or appraised in the rehabilitation literature.

Objective: To review the literature for neuro-orthopedic surgical techniques in the upper limb and evaluate the level of evidence for their efficacy in adult patients with spasticity.

Method: Electronic databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for English, French as well as Farsi languages human studies from 1980 to July 2, 2020. After removing duplicated articles, 2,855 studies were screened and 80 were found to be included based on the criteria. The studies were then divided into two groups, with 40 in each trial and non-trial. The results of the 40 trial articles were summarized in three groups: shoulder, elbow and forearm, and wrist and finger, and each group was subdivided based on the types of intervention.

Results: The level of evidence was evaluated by Sackett's approach. There were no randomized control trial studies found. About, 4 studies for shoulder, 8 studies for elbow and forearm, 26 studies for wrist and finger (including 4 for the thumb in palm deformity), and 2 systematic reviews were found. Around, two out of 40 trial articles were published in the rehabilitation journals, one systematic review in Cochrane, and the remaining 38 were published in the surgical journals.

Conclusion: Most surgical procedures are complex, consisting of several techniques based on the problems and goals of the patient. This complexity interferes with the evaluation of every single procedure. Heterogenicity of the participants and the absence of clinical trial studies are other factors of not having a single conclusion. This review reveals that almost all the studies suggested good results after the surgery in carefully selected cases with goals of reducing spasticity and improvement in function, pain, hygiene, and appearance. A more unified approach and criteria are needed to facilitate a collaborative, evidence-based, patient referral, and surgical selection pathway.

What can be expected from tendon transfers in the upper limb in central nervous system disorders?

In addition to motor deficits, central nervous system disorders combine major alterations in the motor pattern with spasticity and over time, contractures. Their varied clinical presentation makes their assessment and the therapeutic strategy more complex. For these reasons, tendon transfers in this population will have more limited indications and above all, will have to be integrated into a complex surgical program combining other procedures such as tendon lengthening, selective neurotomies and joint stabilization. The surgical strategy is far from being obvious. When faced with clinical presentations having very different objectives - functional or comfort only - it is difficult at first sight to build a standardized surgical program. We therefore propose a method to evaluate these patients, thanks to a score (INOM) that integrates prognostic factors and parameters to be corrected surgically. Three components guide this program: a prognostic factor (proximal motor control of the shoulder and elbow), correction of abnormal limb postures and restoration of active elbow, wrist and finger extension. The surgical strategy can be constructed from the INOM score which establishes the priorities for care. Nerve blocks and botulinum toxin injections are essential tools for this analysis. They help distinguish between spasticity and contracture, and can unmask certain antagonistic muscles. A tendon transfer in this population will be just as effective by the function it restores as by the action it suppresses in a malpositioned limb. For each joint, we describe the indications for tendon transfers and their relative role among the techniques with which they must be combined.

Nerve transfer in the spastic upper limb: anatomical feasibility study

PURPOSE

Nerve transfers represent an innovative tool in the surgical treatment of upper limb paralysis. Well-documented for brachial plexus sequalae and under evaluation for tetraplegic patients, they have not yet been described for spastic upper limbs. The typical spastic deformity involves active and spastic flexor, adductor and pronator muscles, associated with paralysed extensor and supinator muscles. Experience with selective neurectomy has shown an effective decrease in spasticity together with preservation of muscle strength. We conceptualized a combination of neurectomy and nerve transfer, by performing a partial nerve transfer from a spastic elbow flexor muscle to a paralyzed wrist extensor muscle, hypothesizing that this would reduce the spasticity of the former and simultaneously activate the latter.

METHODS

Ten cadaveric dissections were performed in order to establish the anatomic feasibility of transferring a motor branch of the brachioradialis (BR) onto the branch of the extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL) or brevis (ECRB). We measured the emergence, length, muscle entry point and diameter of each branch, and attempted the transfer.

RESULTS

We found 1-4 motor nerve for the BR muscle and 1-2 for the ECRL muscle. In all cases, the nerve transfer was achievable, allowing a satisfactory coaptation. The ECRB branch emerged too distally to be anastomosed to one of the BR branches.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that nerve transfers from the BR to the ECRL are anatomically feasible. It may open the way to an additional therapeutic approach for spastic upper limbs.

Highly Selective Partial Neurectomies for Spasticity: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Sedating antispastic medications and focal therapies like botulinum toxin are the most common therapies for spasticity but are temporary and must be performed continuously for a principally static neurological insult. Alternatively, highly selective partial neurectomies (HSPNs) may reduce focal spasticity more permanently.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the change in spasticity after HSPN and assess patient satisfaction.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with upper- and/or lower-extremity spasticity treated with HSPN from 2014 to 2018. Only cases with a modified Ashworth scale (MAS) score independently determined by a physical therapist were included. Pre- and postoperative MAS, complications, and patient satisfaction were evaluated.

RESULTS

The 38 patients identified (24 male, 14 female; mean age 49 yr) underwent a total of 88 procedures for focal spasticity (73% upper extremity, 27% lower extremity). MAS scores were adjusted to a 6-point scale for evaluation. The mean preoperative and final postoperative follow-up adjusted MAS scores were 3.6 and 1.7, respectively (P < .001), which represents average MAS less than 1+. Positive, neutral, and worse results were described by 91%, 6%, and 3% of patients, respectively. Four patients requested revision surgery. No perioperative complications were encountered.

CONCLUSION

This is the first North American series to analyze HSPN for spasticity and the only series based on independent evaluation results. HSPN surgery demonstrated objective short- and long-term reduction in spasticity with minimal morbidity and excellent patient satisfaction.

Neuromodulation Therapies for Spasticity Control: Now and Beyond

Spasticity is a major cause of disability following upper motor neuron (UMN) injury. The diagnosis and treatment of spasticity has been a focus of clinicians and researchers alike. In recent years, there have been significant advances both in strategies for spasticity assessment and in the development of novel treatments. Currently, several well-established spasticity management techniques fall into the major categories of physiotherapy, pharmacotherapy, and surgical management. The majority of recent developments in all of these broad categories have focused more on methods of neuromodulation instead of simple symptomatic treatment, attempting to address the underlying cause of spasticity more directly. The following narrative review briefly discusses the causes and clinical assessment of spasticity and also details the wide variety of current and developing treatment approaches for this often-debilitating condition.

The Spastic Upper Extremity in Children: Multilevel Surgical Decision-making

Multilevel surgery for upper extremity spasticity is the current surgical standard. While the literature details surgical techniques and outcomes, a comprehensive guide to surgical planning is lacking. Patients commonly present with posturing into shoulder internal rotation, elbow flexion, forearm pronation, wrist flexion with ulnar deviation, finger flexion, and thumb adduction, although variations exist. Multiple surgical options exist for each segment; therefore, repeated examinations for contracture, pathologic laxity, and out of phase activity are necessary to optimize the surgical plan. To avoid decreasing function, one must carefully balance the benefits of contracture release and tendon transfers with their weakening effects. In certain cases, stability from joint fusion outweighs the loss of motion. Failure to recognize dynamic posturing, grasp and release requirements, or hand intrinsic spasticity can worsen function and cause new deformities. Surgical indications are formulated for individual deformity patterns and severity along with personal/family goals. General comprehension, voluntary control, and sensation, although not modifiable, influence decision making and are prognostic indicators. Functional improvement is unlikely without preexisting voluntary control, but appearance and visual feedback may be improved by repositioning nonetheless. Appropriate interventions and management of expectations will optimize limb appearance and function while avoiding unexpected sequelae.

Chirurgische Therapieoptionen bei spastischen Bewegungsstörungen der Extremitäten

Hintergrund

Schäden des 1. Motoneurons führen zu spastischen Lähmungen an den Extremitäten, die bei Kindern und Erwachsenen einschneidende Veränderungen der Bewegungsfähigkeit zur Folge haben und Lebensqualität sowie -teilhabe durch Funktionsverlust und Schmerzen einschränken.

Methode

Auf Grundlage eigener Behandlungserfahrungen in Verbindung mit einer PubMed-Literaturrecherche werden aktuelle Diagnose- und Behandlungsverfahren sowie deren Kombinationen vorgestellt.

Ergebnisse

Prinzipiell stehen Physio- und Ergotherapie mit vereinbarten alltagsrelevanten Therapiezielen, Medikamente (Botulinumtoxin und Baclofen) und Orthetik im Vordergrund. Chirurgische Maßnahmen an Muskeln, Sehnen, Gelenken und Knochen können dem betroffenen Patienten zu verbesserter Beweglichkeit, Wachstumskorrektur und vereinfachter Alltagsbewältigung verhelfen. Die selektive Neurektomie bei fokaler Spastik erlebt derzeit eine Renaissance. Die intrathekale Baclofentherapie kann bei entsprechend hoher Katheterlage auch eine Tonusreduktion an der oberen Extremität erreichen.