Is Therapy Needed After Distal Radius Fracture Treatment, What Is the Evidence?

Distal Radius Fracture Rehabilitation

Distal radius fracture (DRF) is arguably the most common upper extremity fracture resulting from a fall accident. These clinical practice guidelines (CPG) were developed to guide all aspects of the management of DRF by physical therapists and other rehabilitation practitioners, such as certified hand therapists. This CPG employed a systematic review methodology to locate, appraise, and synthesize contemporary evidence while developing practice recommendations for determining the prognosis of outcomes, examination, and interventions while managing individuals with DRF. The quality of the primary studies found in the literature search was appraised using standardized tools. The strength of the available evidence for a particular practice domain (e.g., prognosis or intervention) was graded as strong, moderate, weak, or conflicting, where such gradings guided the level of obligation for each practice recommendation. Lastly, the CPG also provided the gaps in the evidence pool for the rehabilitation of DRF that future research efforts can address. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(9):CPG1-CPG78. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.0301.

Early Daily Activity: Development and description of an occupation-based intervention for surgically repaired distal radius Fractures

OBJECTIVE

To describe the theoretical development and structure of an occupation-based intervention for people with a surgically repaired distal radius fracture.

INTERVENTION DEVELOPMENT AND RATIONALE

The Early Daily Activity (EDA) intervention uses the performance of strategically selected daily activities as the primary rehabilitative strategy. Occupation-based interventions are recommended for hand injury rehabilitation but are often poorly described and lack explicit theoretical underpinnings. The EDA-intervention was developed from exploratory research that informed the theory and structure. The theoretical principles are that daily activity performance is (i) safe within defined parameters (ii) appropriately self-determined (iii) produces high ranges and amounts of therapeutic movement, and (iv) builds psychosocial competencies.

INTERVENTION DESCRIPTION

The EDA-intervention is designed to be commenced within 2 weeks of surgery. There are three key components. The first is activity-specific education to emphasise the safety, benefits, and therapeutic actions of activity performance. A set of parameters for defining safe activities is described to support education. The second component is patient-therapist collaboration to select a range of daily activities that provide a 'just-right' challenge. Collaboration occurs at regular intervals throughout the rehabilitation period to incrementally increase the challenge of activities. The third component is performance of activities at-home targeted at improving range of movement and function.

NEXT STEPS

The EDA-intervention can be used by hand therapists, but it has not yet undergone effectiveness evaluation. A planned study will explore clinician readiness to adopt the EDA-intervention, inform iterative changes to the protocol and the design of feasibility and effectiveness studies.

Employer-Sponsored Medicare Advantage Plans and the 2018 Therapy Cap Repeal: Reduced Overall Spending Does Not Constrain Out-of-Pocket Costs

BACKGROUND

Policy impacting traditional Medicare beneficiaries may have unintended effects for privately insured patients. After the repeal of a longstanding $1500 outpatient therapy cap in 2018, we aimed to evaluate if this policy change was associated with differences in use of cost of postoperative therapy after common hand surgeries, including carpal tunnel release, trigger finger release, ganglion cyst excision, De Quervain tenosynovitis release, carpometacarpal arthroplasty, and distal radius fracture open reduction/internal fixation or percutaneous pinning.

METHODS

The Medicare Supplement and Coordination of Benefits files from Marketscan were used. Frequency of therapy appointments, overall costs, and out-of-pocket costs were obtained. A segmented interrupted time series with Poisson and log-transformed linear regression was performed.

RESULTS

No significant monthly change in odds of therapy use was found in the postpolicy period for patients who underwent trigger finger release, carpal tunnel release, Ganglion cyst excision, De Quervain tenosynovitis release, carpometacarpal arthroplasty, or distal radius fracture, pinning, or open reduction/internal fixation. Overall cost decreased in the postpolicy period by 2% for comprehensive plans (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.03 to -0.01, P < 0.001), by 7% for those with exclusive provider organizations (95% CI: -0.10 to -0.04, P < 0.001), by 1% for HMOs (95% CI: -0.01 to 0.002, P = 0.01), and by 3% for preferred provider organizations (95% CI: -0.03 to -0.02, P < 0.001). In the postpolicy period, no monthly change in out-of-pocket cost was observed for patients with comprehensive, exclusive provider organization, health maintenance organization, preferred provider organization, or point of service with capitation insurance plans.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with employer-sponsored Medicare Advantage plans experienced increased out-of-pocket costs for therapy despite lower net costs. These data highlight an urgent need for policy ensuring that patients benefit when overall costs of care decrease.

Distal Radius Fracture Therapy Utilization Following Traditional Open Reduction and Internal Fixation and Dorsal Bridge Plate Fixation

Background Many distal radius fractures are treated with a volar locking plate, but a minority undergo dorsal bridge plate fixation. This study's primary purpose was to compare therapy utilization following distal radius fractures treated with traditional open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) versus dorsal bridge plate fixation. Secondary outcomes were time to first and last therapy visits and therapy costs. Methods Patients over 18 years old who underwent distal radius ORIF between January 2021 and August 2022 at a single regional orthopedic practice were identified. Patients who underwent post-operative hardware removal were retrospectively reviewed to identify dorsal bridge plate fixation patients. This resulted in "traditional ORIF" and "dorsal bridge plate" groups. Therapy visit number, cost, and payor (insurance type including Medicare, private insurance, worker's compensation, automobile policy, and private pay) were collected. Results In total, 1,376 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 713 of the 1,283 (55.6%) patients in the traditional ORIF group and 25 of the 44 patients (56.8%) in the dorsal bridge plate group attended therapy at our institution. Traditional ORIF and dorsal bridge plate patients averaged 12.6(±10) and 24(±18.7) therapy visits in the one-year following ORIF, respectively. Time to last therapy visit was 90.9(±60) and 175.2(±72.1) days in the traditional ORIF and dorsal bridge plate groups, respectively. Total therapy cost was $1,219(±$1,314) and $2,015(±$1,828) in the traditional ORIF and dorsal bridge plate groups with similar out-of-pocket costs. Conclusions Dorsal bridge plate fixation patients attended a greater number of therapy sessions, had a longer time from surgery until therapy end, and had a higher therapy total cost relative to traditional ORIF, but both groups had similar patient out-of-pocket therapy costs.

Distal radius fractures: Classifications concordance among orthopedic residents on a teaching hospital

BACKGROUND

Several classification systems have been developed to support orthopedic surgeons regarding diagnostic, treatment, or prognostic outcomes of distal radius fracture (DRF). However, the best classification system for this fracture remains controversial. We aimed to identify the reliability of three different DRF classifications among orthopedists in training (medical residents).

METHODS

Orthopedic residents (n = 22) evaluated thirty cases of DRF in anteroposterior and lateral projections in three different periods (0, 6, 12 months). Each radiography was sorted with three different classifications: Frykman, AO/OTA, and Jupiter-Fernandez. All assessments were blinded to the investigators. The inter- and intra-observer reliability was evaluated using the Cohen's kappa coefficient. An additional analysis was performed for a simpler sub-classification of the AO/OTA (27, 9, or 3 groups).

RESULTS

Inter-observer agreement for AO/OTA, Frykman, and Jupiter-Fernandez classifications was slight (k = 0.15), fair (k = 0.31), and fair (k = 0.30), respectively. Intra-observer agreement showed similar results: AO/OTA, k = 0.14; Frykman, k = 0.28; and Jupiter-Fernandez, k = 0.28. When the AO/OTA classification was simplified (9 or 3 descriptions), the inter-observer agreement improved from slight (k = 0.16) to fair (k = 0.21 and k = 0.30, respectively). A similar improvement from slight (k = 0.14) to fair (k = 0.32 and k = 0.21) was detected for intra-observer agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

The more complex the DRF classification system, the more complex is to reach reliable inter- and intra-observer agreements between orthopedic trainees. Senior residents did not necessarily show greater kappa values in DRF classifications.

An evaluation of wrist and forearm movement during purposeful activities and range of movement exercises after surgical repair of a distal radius fracture: A randomized crossover study

PURPOSE

Following surgical repair of distal radius fractures, range of movement (ROM) exercises are the primary approach for restoring movement during early rehabilitation. Specified purposeful activities can also be used, but the movement produced by activities is not well-understood. The study aimed to evaluate and compare movement during purposeful activity and ROM exercises METHODS: Thirty-five adults with a surgically repaired distal radius facture undertook two 10-minutes interventions: purposeful activity (PA) and active ROM exercises (AE), separated by a 60 minute washout, in random order. Data collection occurred during a single session on the same day. Electrogoniometry was used to measure time-accumulated position (TAP), a global metric of movement range and amount, maximum active end range, movement repetitions, excursions >75% of available ROM, and active time. Data were analyzed using linear mixed and generalized linear mixed regression models.

RESULTS

Purposeful activities selected were predominantly household or food preparation. TAP was significantly higher during AE than PA: -1878 [-2388, -1367], p ≤.001, for wrist extension/flexion. PA produced significantly greater movement repetitions for wrist extension/flexion and deviation, excursions beyond 75% of available ROM, and active time, than AE. During PA the wrist was extending/flexing a mean of 97% [92, 101], of the time, compared with 43% [40, 47], during AE. There were no significant differences in maximum end range for wrist extension between PA, 33.7° [29.8, 37.5] and AE, 34.5° [30.7, 38.4], or for ulnar deviation.

CONCLUSIONS

ROM exercises produced higher volumes of sustained joint position than purposeful activity but activities, selected for importance and challenge, produced significantly higher volumes of continuous, repetitious motion in equivalent ranges of movement as exercise repetitions. The study challenges therapists to consider the rehabilitative potential of movement produced by activity for restoring movement and function in the early postoperative weeks.