Demographic and psychological moderators of the relationship between neighborhood cigarette advertising and current smoking in New York City

Exposure to tobacco retail outlet tobacco marketing and initiation of cigarette and e-cigarette use: Depressive symptoms as a moderator

INTRODUCTION

While tobacco retail outlet (TRO) marketing exposure has been associated with tobacco use, little research has explored how this relationship may vary by the experience of depressive symptoms. The purpose of this study was to examine if the relationship between TRO tobacco marketing exposure and tobacco use initiation is moderated by depressive symptoms among young adults.

METHODS

Participants were drawn from 24 colleges in Texas who were participating in a multi-wave cohort study (2014-2019). The present study included 2020 cigarette or ENDS naïve participants at wave 2 (69.2% female; 32.1% white; m age=20.6 [SD=2.0] at wave 1). Generalized mixed-effects logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between cigarette and ENDS TRO marketing exposure and subsequent initiation for both products with depressive symptoms as a moderator.

RESULTS

The interaction between cigarette marketing and depressive symptoms was significant (OR=1.38 95% CI=[1.04,1.83]). Cigarette marketing did not impact cigarette initiation among participants with low depressive symptoms (OR=0.96 95% CI= [0.64,1.45]), but did impact cigarette initiation among participants with high depressive symptoms (OR=1.83 95% CI=[1.23,2.74]). There was no interaction effect for ENDS initiation. Main effects showed that ENDS marketing exposure predicted ENDS initiation (OR=1.43 95% CI=[1.10,1.87]).

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to tobacco marketing at TROs is an important risk factor for initiation of cigarette and ENDS use, particularly for cigarette initiation among those who experience greater levels of depressive symptoms. Future work is needed to better understand why this type of marketing is influential for this group.

Internalizing problems are associated with initiation and past 30-Day use of flavored tobacco products

OBJECTIVE

Tobacco use remains disproportionately common among adults with internalizing problems. The rising prevalence of flavored tobacco use among this population may be a contributing factor. Using data from Wave 4 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study, this study examined differences across adult ever tobacco users by severity of internalizing problems, in initiation of tobacco use with a flavored product and past 30-day (current) flavored tobacco use (n = 27,425). Severity of internalizing problems was measured using the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs-Short Screener Internalizing Disorder Screener. Tobacco use variables included initiation with or current use of a flavored product, assessed separately for each product. Weighted chi-square tests and multivariable modified Poisson regression models were used to examine the associations between severity of internalizing problems and each outcome.

RESULTS

Controlling for covariates, ever users with severe internalizing problems were more likely to have initiated with flavors for cigarettes (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR]: 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09,1.24), cigarillos (aPR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.16), electronic nicotine products (aPR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.13) and smokeless tobacco (aPR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.27), relative to those with low internalizing problems. Ever users with severe internalizing problems were more likely to currently use a flavored tobacco product for cigarettes (aPR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.24) and cigarillos (aPR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Flavored tobacco use seems disproportionately common among tobacco users with severe internalizing problems, across a variety of measures.

Spatial clusters of daily tobacco consumption before and after a smoke-free policy implementation

This study assessed the spatial dependence of daily tobacco consumption and how it is spatially impacted by individual and neighborhood socioeconomic determinants, and tobacco consumption facilities before and after a smoke-free implementation. Individual data was obtained from the Bus Santé, a cross-sectional survey in Geneva. Spatial clusters of high and low tobacco consumption were assessed using Getis-Ord Gi*. Daily tobacco consumption was not randomly clustered in Geneva and may be impacted by tobacco consumption facilities independently of socioeconomic factors and a smoking ban. Spatial analysis should be considered to highlight the impact of smoke-free policies and guide public health interventions.