1
|
Sprave T, Verma V, Fabian A, Rühle A, Baltas D, Grosu AL, Nicolay NH. Cost effectiveness and health-related quality of life of chemoradiotherapy versus radiation therapy alone in elderly head and neck cancer patients. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198:1008-1015. [PMID: 35833963 PMCID: PMC9581829 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01975-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Radiotherapy (RT) constitutes a mainstay in the treatment of elderly patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), but use of simultaneous chemoradiotherapy (CRT) remains controversial. We have conducted a prospective analysis based on real-world patient data to examine the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and cost effectiveness (CE) of CRT vs. RT in elderly HNC patients. Methods Eligible participants ≥ 65 years treated in a large tertiary cancer center between July 2019 and February 2020 who completed the validated EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (health state index [HI] and visual analog scale [VAS]) before and after RT were included. CE referred to direct medical costs, including diagnosis-related group (DRG)-based billings for inpatients and uniform assessment standard (EBM)-based costs for outpatients. The primary endpoint was cost (euros [€]) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. Costs and QALYs were not discounted for short overall survival (OS). Results Baseline HRQoL was 0.878 (±0.11) in the CRT group and 0.857 (±0.17) in the RT group. Upon completion of therapy, HRQoL amounted to 0.849 (±0.14) in the CRT and 0.850 (±0.13) in the RT group. The mean treatment-related cost in the CRT cohort was €22,180.17 (±8325.26) vs. €18,027.87 (±26,022.48) in the RT group. The corresponding QALYs amounted to 2.62 in the CRT and 1.91 in the RT groups. The ICER was €5848.31. Conclusion This is the first analysis from the German health care system demonstrating that the addition of chemotherapy to RT for selected elderly HNC patients is cost effective and not associated with a significant HRQoL decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alexander Fabian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dimos Baltas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg - Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Whom should we ask? A systematic literature review of the arguments regarding the most accurate source of information for valuation of health states. Qual Life Res 2020; 29:1465-1482. [PMID: 32016683 PMCID: PMC7253527 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02426-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
To determine and critically evaluate the arguments in the published literature regarding the most accurate source of information for valuation of health states: values based on experienced health states (patient values) or values based on described health states (general public values).
Collapse
|
3
|
Shen J, Breckons M, Vale L, Pickard R. Using Time Trade-Off Methods to Elicit Short-Term Utilities Associated with Treatments for Bulbar Urethral Stricture. PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2019; 3:551-558. [PMID: 31240689 PMCID: PMC6861395 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-019-0133-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrent urethral stricture is usually treated with either open urethroplasty or endoscopic urethrotomy. Both of the procedures cause short-term utility loss, which may not be captured by standard utility questionnaires due to the challenges of completing a standard instrument at the time of an acute episode of short duration, especially within a clinical trial setting. We propose to use time trade-off (TTO) methods to estimate these short-term utility losses. OBJECTIVE The aim was to compare the use of two alternative TTO methods to elicit patients' short-term utilities following surgical treatments for recurrent urethral stricture. METHOD Two variants of TTO (chained and conventional) were used. Six health profiles were developed-three for each procedure. Forty participants took part, with 20 randomly allocated to each TTO method. RESULTS Thirty-eight participants provided usable data for analysis. Estimated utility values decreased as the severity of the health profiles increased. There was no evidence that utility values differed between elicitation methods or procedures for mild {ranging from 0.79 (standard deviation [SD] 0.17) to 0.83 [SD 0.20]} and moderate (ranging from 0.54 [SD 0.24] to 0.67 [SD 0.21]) health states, although they appeared to differ for severe health states (ranging from 0.29 [SD 0.20] to 0.56 [SD 0.24]). CONCLUSION The study demonstrates the feasibility and value of eliciting patients' short-term utilities. Given the small sample size, the study findings are tentative. Further research with a larger sample size is needed to determine the appropriate TTO method to use and how the elicited utilities can be used in combination with standard cost-utility assessments to aid decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Shen
- Health Economics Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, NE2 4AX, UK.
| | - Matthew Breckons
- Health Economics Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, NE2 4AX, UK
| | - Luke Vale
- Health Economics Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, NE2 4AX, UK
| | - Robert Pickard
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cubi-Molla P, Shah K, Burström K. Experience-Based Values: A Framework for Classifying Different Types of Experience in Health Valuation Research. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2018; 11:253-270. [PMID: 29305706 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017-0292-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Whether health values should be elicited from the perspective of patients or the general public is still an open debate. The overall aim of this paper is to increase knowledge on the role of experience in health preference-based valuation research. The objectives of this paper are threefold. First, we elaborate the idea of experience-based (EB) values under the informed value or knowledge viewpoint. We think the whole scope of knowledge about the health states involved in valuation exercises is not fully integrated in the previous literature. For instance, personal knowledge based on past experiences, contemplating the health state as a likely future condition, knowing someone who is currently experiencing the state, or just receiving detailed information about the health states; all these situations capture different nuances of health-related experience which are not explicitly referred to in valuation tasks. Second, we propose a framework where the extended factor of experience is detached from other factors interwoven into the valuation exercise. Third, we examine how experience is tackled in different value sets (EB or non-EB) identified via a literature review. We identified the following elements (and items) in a value set: health state (without description, described using a multi-attribute instrument, described using other method), reference person (the respondent; other person, similar/known/hypothetical), time frame (past, present, future), raters (public, representative/convenience; vested interest, patients/other) and experience (personal experience, past/present/future; vicarious experience, affective/non-affective; no experience). Forty-nine valuation exercises were extracted from 22 reviewed papers and classified following our suggested set of elements and items. The results show that the role of experience reported in health valuation-related papers is frequently disregarded or, at most, minimised to the item of personal experience (present)-linked to self-reported health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kristina Burström
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Health Outcomes and Economic Evaluation Research Group, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Equity and Health Policy Research Group, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stoniute J, Mott DJ, Shen J. Challenges in Valuing Temporary Health States for Economic Evaluation: A Review of Empirical Applications of the Chained Time Trade-Off Method. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2018; 21:605-611. [PMID: 29753359 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.08.3015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2016] [Revised: 06/08/2017] [Accepted: 08/18/2017] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The time trade-off (TTO) technique is commonly used to elicit health state utilities. Nevertheless, when the health states being valued are temporary, the TTO approach may be unsuitable. A variant of TTO- chained TTO-has been suggested to be used when the health states are temporary, but little research has been done on how chained TTO should be conducted. OBJECTIVES To systematically review the use of chained TTO in valuing temporary health states. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted using the following major databases: Ovid MEDLINE(R), Embase, EBM Reviews, and PsycINFO. Abstracts (full articles if necessary) were screened by two independent reviewers, with a third reviewer resolving any disagreements. RESULTS The resulting number of articles for review was low (n = 9). All the reviewed studies used face-to-face interviews, most had small sample sizes (<100), and all studies valued a small number of health states (<7), with time horizons typically ranging from 4 weeks to 1 year. All studies discussed methodological issues of using chained TTO, and some compared the results with those generated using other preference elicitation methods. CONCLUSIONS Chained TTO appears to be feasible, consistent, and responsive and allows the valuation of temporary health states that would improve the efficiency and accuracy of decision making in health and health care. Nevertheless, the evidence is limited due to the low number of relevant studies in the literature. Further research is needed to examine the performance and validity of chained TTO compared with conventional TTO in the valuation of temporary health states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julija Stoniute
- Health Economics Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - David John Mott
- Health Economics Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Office of Health Economics, London, UK
| | - Jing Shen
- Health Economics Group, Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gabbe BJ, Lyons RA, Simpson PM, Rivara FP, Ameratunga S, Polinder S, Derrett S, Harrison JE. Disability weights based on patient-reported data from a multinational injury cohort. Bull World Health Organ 2016; 94:806-816C. [PMID: 27821883 PMCID: PMC5096353 DOI: 10.2471/blt.16.172155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2016] [Revised: 06/21/2016] [Accepted: 06/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To create patient-based disability weights for individual injury diagnosis codes and nature-of-injury classifications, for use, as an alternative to panel-based weights, in studies on the burden of disease. Methods Self-reported data based on the EQ-5D standardized measure of health status were collected from 29 770 participants in the Injury-VIBES injury cohort study, which covered Australia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America. The data were combined to calculate new disability weights for each common injury classification and for each type of diagnosis covered by the 10th revision of the International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. Weights were calculated separately for hospital admissions and presentations confined to emergency departments. Findings There were 29 770 injury cases with at least one EQ-5D score. The mean age of the participants providing data was 51 years. Most participants were male and almost a third had road traffic injuries. The new disability weights were higher for admitted cases than for cases confined to emergency departments and higher than the corresponding weights used by the Global Burden of Disease 2013 study. Long-term disability was common in most categories of injuries. Conclusion Injury is often a chronic disorder and burden of disease estimates should reflect this. Application of the new weights to burden studies would substantially increase estimates of disability-adjusted life-years and provide a more accurate reflection of the impact of injuries on peoples’ lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belinda J Gabbe
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, The Alfred Centre, Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
| | - Ronan A Lyons
- Farr Institute, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, Wales
| | - Pamela M Simpson
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, The Alfred Centre, Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
| | - Frederick P Rivara
- The Harbourview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, United States of America
| | - Shanthi Ameratunga
- Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Sarah Derrett
- Injury Prevention Research Unit, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - James E Harrison
- Research Centre for Injury Studies, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hussain AI, Garratt AM, Beitnes JO, Gullestad L, Pettersen KI. Validity of standard gamble utilities in patients referred for aortic valve replacement. Qual Life Res 2015; 25:1703-12. [PMID: 26603737 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-1186-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/15/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Standard gamble (SG) is the preferred method of assessing preferences in situations with uncertainty and risk, which makes it relevant to patients considered for aortic valve replacement (AVR). The present study assesses SG preferences in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS All patients >18 years old with severe AS referred for AVR to our institution were invited to enroll in the study. The SG was administered by a clinical research nurse. The SF-36, EQ-5D 3L, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and AS symptoms were administered by self-completed questionnaire. We hypothesized that SG utilities would have low-to-moderate correlations with physical and mental aspects of health based on our pathophysiological understanding of severe AS. No correlations were expected with echocardiographic measures of the aortic valve. RESULTS The response rate for SG was 98 %. SG moderately correlated with physical aspects of SF-36 (PCS, role-physical, vitality), health transition, AS symptoms, and EQ-VAS (ρ S = 0.31-0.39, p < 0.001) and had low correlation with mental aspects of SF-36 and EQ-5D (ρ S = 0.17-0.28, p < 0.001). No correlation was found between SG and HADS, echocardiographic measures, age, gender, or education level (ρ S = 0.01-0.06). CONCLUSIONS SG is an acceptable and feasible method of assessing preferences in patients with severe AS that has evidence for validity. The inclusion of uncertainty lends the SG face validity in this population as a direct approach to assessing preferences and basis for QALY calculations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amjad I Hussain
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Pb. 4950, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Andrew M Garratt
- The Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jan Otto Beitnes
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Pb. 4950, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lars Gullestad
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Pb. 4950, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kjell I Pettersen
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Pb. 4950, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Canning D. Axiomatic foundations for cost-effectiveness analysis. HEALTH ECONOMICS 2013; 22:1405-1416. [PMID: 23440955 DOI: 10.1002/hec.2889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2010] [Revised: 10/04/2012] [Accepted: 10/31/2012] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
We show that individual utilities can be measured in units of healthy life years. Social preferences over these life metric utilities are assumed to satisfy the Pareto principle, anonymity, and invariance to a change in origin. These axioms generate a utilitarian social welfare function implying the use of cost-effectiveness analysis in ordering health projects, based on maximizing the healthy years equivalents gained from a fixed health budget. For projects outside the health sector, our cost-effectiveness axioms imply a form of cost-benefit analysis where both costs and benefits are measured in equivalent healthy life years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Canning
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
PURPOSE To estimate Swedish experience-based value sets for EQ-5D health states using general population health survey data. METHODS Approximately 45,000 individuals valued their current health status by means of time trade off (TTO) and visual analogue scale (VAS) methods and answered the EQ-5D questionnaire, making it possible to model the association between the experience-based TTO and VAS values and the EQ-5D dimensions and severity levels. The association between TTO and VAS values and the different severity levels of respondents' answers on a self-rated health (SRH) question was assessed. RESULTS Almost all dimensions (except usual activity) and severity levels had less impact on TTO valuations compared with the UK study based on hypothetical values. Anxiety/depression had the greatest impact on both TTO and VAS values. TTO and VAS values were consistently related to SRH. The inclusion of age, sex, education and socioeconomic group affected the main effect coefficients and the explanatory power modestly. CONCLUSIONS A value set for EQ-5D health states based on Swedish valuations has been lacking. Several authors have recently advocated the normative standpoint of using experience-based values. Guidelines of economic evaluation for reimbursement decisions in Sweden recommend the use of experience-based values for QALY calculations. Our results that anxiety/depression had the greatest impact on both TTO and VAS values underline the importance of mental health for individuals' overall HRQoL. Using population surveys is in line with recent thinking on valuing health states and could reduce some of the focusing effects potentially appearing in hypothetical valuation studies.
Collapse
|
10
|
Cost-effectiveness of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies: a systematic review of the literature. Autoimmune Dis 2012; 2012:784364. [PMID: 23304459 PMCID: PMC3523130 DOI: 10.1155/2012/784364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2012] [Accepted: 10/31/2012] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective. To provide a current and comprehensive understanding of the cost-effectiveness of DMTs for the treatment of MS by quantitatively evaluating the quality of recent cost-effectiveness studies and exploring how the field has progressed from past recommendations. Methods. We assessed the quality of studies that met our systematic literature search criteria using the Quality of Health Economic Studies validated instrument. Results. Of the 82 studies that met our initial search criteria, we included 22 in this review. Four studies (18%) achieved quality category 2, three studies (14%) achieved quality category 3, and 15 studies (68%) achieved the highest quality category 4. 91% of studies were simulation models. 13 studies (59%) had quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as the primary outcome measure, included a societal perspective in the analysis, and utilized time horizons of 10 years to lifetime. Conclusions. To continue to improve the cost-effectiveness evidence of DMTs, we recommend: lifetime horizons, societal perspectives, and QALYs; supplemental evidence with shorter horizons, payer perspectives, and clinical outcomes to inform multiple decision makers; development of modeling and input standards for comparability; head-to-head RCTs between DMTs and long-term prospective studies; and comprehensive cost-effectiveness studies that compare all appropriate DMTs.
Collapse
|
11
|
WOODWARD R, MENZIN J, NEUMANN P. Quality-adjusted life years in cancer: pros, cons, and alternatives. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2012; 22:12-9. [DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
12
|
Heijink R, van Baal P, Oppe M, Koolman X, Westert G. Decomposing cross-country differences in quality adjusted life expectancy: the impact of value sets. Popul Health Metr 2011; 9:17. [PMID: 21699675 PMCID: PMC3146826 DOI: 10.1186/1478-7954-9-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2011] [Accepted: 06/23/2011] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The validity, reliability and cross-country comparability of summary measures of population health (SMPH) have been persistently debated. In this debate, the measurement and valuation of nonfatal health outcomes have been defined as key issues. Our goal was to quantify and decompose international differences in health expectancy based on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We focused on the impact of value set choice on cross-country variation. Methods We calculated Quality Adjusted Life Expectancy (QALE) at age 20 for 15 countries in which EQ-5D population surveys had been conducted. We applied the Sullivan approach to combine the EQ-5D based HRQoL data with life tables from the Human Mortality Database. Mean HRQoL by country-gender-age was estimated using a parametric model. We used nonparametric bootstrap techniques to compute confidence intervals. QALE was then compared across the six country-specific time trade-off value sets that were available. Finally, three counterfactual estimates were generated in order to assess the contribution of mortality, health states and health-state values to cross-country differences in QALE. Results QALE at age 20 ranged from 33 years in Armenia to almost 61 years in Japan, using the UK value set. The value sets of the other five countries generated different estimates, up to seven years higher. The relative impact of choosing a different value set differed across country-gender strata between 2% and 20%. In 50% of the country-gender strata the ranking changed by two or more positions across value sets. The decomposition demonstrated a varying impact of health states, health-state values, and mortality on QALE differences across countries. Conclusions The choice of the value set in SMPH may seriously affect cross-country comparisons of health expectancy, even across populations of similar levels of wealth and education. In our opinion, it is essential to get more insight into the drivers of differences in health-state values across populations. This will enhance the usefulness of health-expectancy measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Heijink
- Scientific centre for care and welfare (Tranzo), Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, 5037 AB Tilburg, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Miller TR, Dickerson JB, Smith ML, Ory MG. Assessing costs and potential returns of evidence-based programs for seniors. Eval Health Prof 2010; 34:201-25. [PMID: 21196430 DOI: 10.1177/0163278710393955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The authors describe the customary tools used by health services researchers to conduct economic evaluations of health interventions. Recognizing the inherent challenges of these tools for utilization in contemporary public health practice, we recommend a practical cost-benefit analysis (PCBA) to allow public health practitioners to assess the economic merits of their existing public health programs. The PCBA estimates what health effects and corresponding medical cost avoidance would be required to support the costs associated with implementing a community-based prevention program. We apply the PCBA to evaluate a statewide evidence-based falls prevention program for seniors in Texas. We estimate a positive return on realized costs due to avoided direct and indirect medical expenses if the program averts 7 falls among 140 participants within the first year. While acknowledging the demonstrated health-related benefits of public health interventions, we provide a practical ex-post economic evaluation methodology to assess return on investment as a more simplistic yet effective alternative for public health practitioners versus contemporary analyses of health services researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas R Miller
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Rural Public Health, Texas A&M Health Science Center, College Station, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rehm J, Frick U. Valuation of health states in the US study to establish disability weights: lessons from the literature. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2010; 19:18-33. [PMID: 20191661 PMCID: PMC3306052 DOI: 10.1002/mpr.300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2008] [Revised: 01/05/2009] [Accepted: 03/13/2009] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The metric of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) has become the global standard of measuring burden of disease. DALYs are comprised of years of life lost due to premature mortality and years of healthy life lost due to living with disability. In order to calculate the second part of the DALY equation, disease specific disability weights have to be established, i.e. measures for the decline of health associated with these disease states, which vary between zero for perfect health and one for death. Although these disability weights are key for estimating DALYs, there have not been many comprehensive studies with empirical determinations of them. This article describes a systematic review on the state of the art with respect to empirically determining disability weights. Based on this review, a multi-method approach is outlined, which has also been implemented in a US study to measure burden of disease. This approach involves the use of psychometric methodology as well as economic trade-off methods for determining the value of health states. It is conceptualized as a disaggregated approach, where the disability weight of any health state can be calculated if the attributes of this health state are known. The US study received the collaboration of experts from more than 20 institutes of the National Institutes of Health and of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. First results will be available by the end of this year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jürgen Rehm
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|