Utilization and costs of HIV antiretroviral drugs in Europe during the last ten years: Impact of generic antiretroviral drugs on cost reduction

Negative impact of a health insurer-mandated de-simplification from a single-tablet regimen to a two-tablet regimen

OBJECTIVES

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) accounts for a considerable proportion of HIV care expenses. In June 2021, a Dutch healthcare insurer implemented a mandatory policy to de-simplify branded RPV/TDF/FTC (Eviplera) into a two-tablet regimen containing rilpivirine (Edurant) and generic TDF/FTC as part of cost-saving measures. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the acceptance of this policy, the trends in ART dispensation, and cost developments.

DESIGN

A retrospective database study.

METHODS

In this study, medication dispensation data were obtained from the Dutch Foundation for Pharmaceutical Statistics (SFK). This database covers 98% of all medication dispensations from Dutch pharmacies including people with HIV who receive ART. We received pseudonymized data exclusively from individuals insured by the insurer for the years 2020-2022. Costs were calculated using Dutch drug prices for each year.

RESULTS

In June 2021, 128 people with HIV were on branded RPV/TDF/FTC. Following the policy implementation, 59 (46%) had switched to RPV + generic TDF/FTC, but after 1.5 years, only 17 of 128 individuals (13%) used the proposed two-tablet regimen. The other 111/128 used RPV/TDF/FTC with prescriptions for 'medical necessity' ( n  = 29), switched to RPV/TAF/FTC ( n  = 51), or other ART ( n  = 31). Despite expectations of cost-savings, costs increased from €72 988 in May 2021 to €75 649 in May 2022.

CONCLUSION

A mandatory switch from an STR to a TTR in people with HIV proved unsuccessful, marked by low acceptance, and increased costs after 1 year. This underscores the necessity of incorporating patient and prescriber involvement in changing medication policies.

Adverse drug reactions attributed to generic substitution of antiretroviral medications among HIV treatment and pre-exposure prophylaxis clients in British Columbia, Canada

BACKGROUND

In British Columbia, antiretrovirals (ARVs) for HIV treatment (HIV-Tx) and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) are free-of-charge through publicly-funded Drug Treatment Programs (DTPs). When available, less costly generics are substituted for brand-name ARVs. We describe the incidence and type of product substitution issue (PSI) adverse drug reactions (ADRs) attributed to generic ARVs.

METHODS

Cohorts included DTP clients ≥19 years who received generic ARVs for HIV-Tx (abacavir-lamivudine, emtricitabine-tenofovir DF, efavirenz-emtricitabine-tenofovir DF, atazanavir or darunavir between 01 Jun 2017 and 30 Jun 2022) or PrEP (emtricitabine-tenofovir DF, 01 Apr 2018 to 30 Jun 2022). Demographic, ARV and ADR data were extracted from DTP databases and summarized by descriptive statistics. PSI incidence was calculated for each product during the year following brand-to-generic and generic-to-generic transitions (first-year-post-rollout), and compared between generic versions using generalized estimating equations. For context, incidence of any ARV product-related ADR was calculated in the same 1-year periods.

RESULTS

During first-year-post-rollout periods, 5339 HIV-Tx (83% male, median age 52 years) and 8095 PrEP (99% male, median 33 years) clients received generic ARVs, and reported 78 and 23 generic PSIs, respectively. PSI incidence was <1% for most generic ARVs, with mild-moderate symptoms including gastrointestinal upset, headache, dizziness, fatigue/malaise and skin rash. In HIV-Tx clients, the efavirenz-containing product had higher PSI incidence than other ARVs (2.2%, p = .004), due to more neuropsychiatric adverse reactions. Any ADR incidence was stable across measurement periods, and generic PSIs represented less than one third of all product-related ADRs.

CONCLUSIONS

Generic substitution of antiretrovirals for HIV-Tx and PrEP was well tolerated, with ≤2% incidence of mild-moderate PSI ADRs.

Cost of non‐communicable diseases in people living with HIV in the Central Denmark Region

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the economic burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in people living with HIV (PLWH) in Denmark.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study using population-based Danish medical registries including all adult residents of the Central Denmark Region registered with a first-time HIV-diagnosis during the period 2006-2017. For each PLWH, we matched 10 persons without HIV from the background population by birth year, sex and municipality of residence. Information on healthcare utilization and costs for the PLWH and non-HIV cohorts was retrieved from register data. For each cohort, we estimated the annual costs for major disease categories (HIV care, other somatic care, and psychiatric care) in the period from 3 years before to 9 years after diagnosis/matching date.

RESULTS

We identified 407 PLWH and 4070 persons from the background population. The total healthcare costs during the study period were approximately three times higher for PLWH compared to the non-HIV cohort (€76 198 vs. €23 692). Average annual cost of hospital care, primary care and selected prescription medicine was estimated to be €6987 per year in the years after the diagnosis compared to €2083 per year in the non-HIV cohort. In PLWH, the cost of NCDs and psychiatric care was approximately two times higher than the cost of HIV care.

CONCLUSION

PLWH have higher healthcare costs stemming from three areas: excess cost due to the HIV infection, the treatment of NCDs, and psychiatric care.

Consumption and cost trends of EGFR TKIs: influences of reimbursement and national price negotiation

Background

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been widely used in the treatment of EGFR mutation non-small-cell lung cancer. The Chinese government has made great efforts to improve the availability and affordability of these drugs. The aim of this study was to investigate the trends in the consumption and cost of EGFR TKIs in Nanjing, a developed city in China, and evaluate the influence of health insurance coverage and national price negotiation on drug consumption.

Methods

Data about EGFR TKIs applications in 2010–2019 were extracted from Jiangsu Medicine Information Institute. Five types of EGFR TKIs were included. Consumption was expressed in defined daily doses (DDDs) and expenditure. The correlation between defined daily cost (DDC) and DDDs was analyzed by Pearson's correlation test.

Results

The DDC, number of DDDs and expenditure of EGFR TKIs changed little from 2010 to 2015. National price negotiation was initiated as a policy and low-price generic gefitinib came into the market in 2016. Three types of EGFR TKIs moved into the coverage of the national health insurance since 2017. Hence, the DDC decreased, and the number of DDDs increased significantly year by year since 2016. The first generation TKIs always made up of comprised the majority of the total consumption. The predominantly prescribed TKIs were gefitinib and icotinib. DDC was negatively correlated with the number of DDDs. The number of DDDs increased significantly after health insurance enrollment, price negotiation and generic drug replacement.

Conclusion

The consumption of EGFT TKIs has increased and the DDC of EGFR TKIs has decreased since 2016. These trends may be attributed to drug reimbursement, price negotiation and generic drug replacement. Further efforts are needed to translate the high consumption of EGFR TKIs into clinical benefits.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07868-9.

What are the drivers of high-cost HIV patients?

We aimed to identify "high-cost" patients with HIV (PWH) and determine drivers behind higher costs. All PWH at the Southern Alberta HIV Clinic, Canada, and active in 2017 were included. Sociodemographic, clinical, and healthcare utilization data were collected. The direct care costs from the payers' perspective including antiretroviral drugs (ARV), outpatient visits, and hospital admissions were determined for 2017. Patients' annual total costs were grouped into top 5% (i.e., high-cost), top 20%, middle 60%, and bottom 20%. High-cost patients were older, Caucasian or indigenous Canadian, and more likely acquired HIV from intravenous drug use (all p < 0.05). High-cost patients had lower nadir CD4, more comorbidities, missed more clinic appointments, had more ARV interruptions, and developed more ARV resistance (p < 0.01). The overall median cost of HIV care was US$14,064 [IQR US$13,121-US$17,883] (2017 Cdn$). High-cost patients had a median cost of US$29,902 [IQR US$27,229-US$37,891] and accounted for 14% of total costs and 84% of all inpatient costs. Hospitalizations constituted 58% of costs for high-cost patients. Although heterogeneous, high-cost patients have distinct sociodemographic and clinical characteristics driving their healthcare utilization. Addressing these social determinants of health and using novel ARV administration approaches may preserve health and save costs.

De-simplifying single-tablet antiretroviral treatments for cost savings in France: From the patient perspectives to a 6-month follow-up on generics

In developed countries, most people living with HIV/AIDS are treated with costly brand single-tablet regimens. Given the economic impact, French guidelines recommend using generic antiretroviral therapy when possible to decrease antiretroviral therapy costs. We aimed to study HIV-infected patients’ acceptability to switch from a brand single-tablet regimens [abacavir/lamivudine/dolutegravir (Triumeq^®) or emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/rilpivirine (Eviplera^®)] to a treatment comprising of two pills: one is a fixed-dose generic combination of 2 Nucleoside Analogs and the second tablet is the third antiretroviral. This study was a prospective observational study in a French hospital. During their follow-up, patients on stable single-tablet regimens were made aware of the possible cost-saving. They were questioned about their willingness and barriers accepting the substitution. Participants chose between the two regimens, either to remain on single-tablet regimens or switch to the de-simplified regimen. Six months later, a second survey was given to the patient who chose to de-simplify and HIV viral load was controlled. The study included 98 patients: 60 receiving emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/rilpivirine (Eviplera^®) and 38 on abacavir/lamivudine/dolutegravir (Triumeq^®). Forty-five patients accepted the de-simplified treatment, 37 refused and 16 were undecided and followed the decision offered by their physician. The main reason for unwillingness to switch is the number of pills (77.3%). In multivariate model analysis, male patients (p = 0.001) who have taken antiretroviral therapy for over 20 years (p = 0.04) and who retrieve their treatment in their community hospital (p = 0.03) are more likely to accept the switch. Fifty-one patients accepted to replace their single-tablet regimens and six months later, the majority was satisfied; only four returned to single-tablet regimens because of suspected side effects. Half of the people living with HIV/AIDS in our cohort accepted to switch from brand single-tablet regimens to a two-tablet regimen containing generic drugs within a process that emphasizes health expenditure savings.

The challenges of pharmacoepidemiology of orphan drugs in rare diseases

Large electronic health records database available at a national level offer great opportunity for research in rare diseases and orphan drugs. Methods and data used in pharmacoepidemiology present a great potential for epidemiology, drug utilization studies, drug safety, drug effectiveness and pharmacoeconomics. This review presents the different sources of data in Europe, with a special focus on the French situation, with the recent implementation of SNDS (système national des données de santé [French national health data wharehouse]). Some examples are given. Development of rigorous and innovative methods must be encouraged in the future.

Comparison of adherence to generic multi-tablet regimens vs. brand multi-tablet and brand single-tablet regimens likely to incorporate generic antiretroviral drugs by breaking or not fixed-dose combinations in HIV-infected patients

Adherence to antiretroviral (ARV) is crucial to achieve viral load suppression in HIV-infected patients. This study aimed to compare adherence to generic multi-tablet regimens (MTR) vs. brand MTR likely to incorporate ARV drugs without breaking fixed-dose combinations (FDC) and brand single-tablet regimens (STR) likely to incorporate generics by breaking the FDC. Patients aged of 18 years or over exposed to one of the generic or the brand of lamivudine (3TC), zidovudine/lamivudine (AZT/TC), nevirapine (NVP), or efavirenz (EFV), or the brand STR of efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir (EFV/FTC/TDF). Adherence was measured by medication possession ratio (MPR) using both defined daily dose (DDD) and daily number of tablet recommended for adults (DNT). Adherence to generic MTR vs. brand MTR and brand STR was compared using Kruskal-Wallis. The overall median adherence was 0.97 (IQR 0.13) by DNT method and 0.97 (0.14) by DDD method. Adherence in patients exposed to generic MTR (n = 165) vs. brand MTR (n = 481) and brand STR (n = 470) was comparable by DNT and DDD methods. In conclusion, adherence to generic MTR was high and comparable with adherence to brand MTR and to STR. Utilization of DDD instead DNT to measure the MPR led to small but nonsignificant difference that has no clinical impact.