|
1
|
Burton AE, Lindsay-Wiles I, Herron D, Owen A, Elliott J, Metcalfe A, Diwakar L. Hereditary Angioedema patient experiences of medication use and emergency care. Int Emerg Nurs 2023; 71:101339. [PMID: 37713946 DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2023.101339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare inherited illness characterised by recurrent swellings. Four percent of HAE attacks are life threatening throat swellings requiring urgent medical intervention. The aim of this study was to gain an in depth understanding of patient experiences of use of treatment and emergency care. METHODS 65 participants completed an online survey including open ended questions about their experiences and/or completed an in-depth interview. Interview participants were asked to share and talk about up to five images that they felt best represented their life experiences with HAE. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS Treatment experiences highlighted the life changing nature of new treatments and benefits for quality of life, but also illustrated common barriers to treatment administration. Emergency care experiences illustrated how throat attacks and fear of their future occurrence could be traumatic. DISCUSSION Findings indicate that HAE patients need psychological support to process fears and negative experiences. In addition, psychological barriers to treatment administration must be addressed to ensure treatment is used effectively. Education for emergency practitioners is also needed to improve emergency treatment and reduce the psychological burden of delayed emergency care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Daniel Herron
- Centre for Psychological Research, Staffordshire University, United Kingdom
| | - Alison Owen
- Centre for Psychological Research, Staffordshire University, United Kingdom
| | - Jade Elliott
- Centre for Psychological Research, Staffordshire University, United Kingdom
| | | | - Lavanya Diwakar
- University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Quinn KL, Krahn M, Stukel TA, Grossman Y, Goldman R, Cram P, Detsky AS, Bell CM. No Time to Waste: An Appraisal of Value at the End of Life. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2022; 25:S1098-3015(22)01966-0. [PMID: 35690518 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The use of economic evaluations of end-of-life interventions may be limited by an incomplete appreciation of how patients and society perceive value at end of life. The objective of this study was to evaluate how patients, caregivers, and society value gains in quantity of life and quality of life (QOL) at the end of life. The validity of the assumptions underlying the use of the quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) as a measure of preferences at end of life was also examined. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and PubMed were searched from inception to February 22, 2021. Original research studies reporting empirical data on healthcare priority setting at end of life were included. There was no restriction on the use of either quantitative or qualitative methods. Two reviewers independently screened, selected, and extracted data from studies. Narrative synthesis was conducted for all included studies. The primary outcomes were the value of gains in quantity of life and the value of gains in QOL at end of life. RESULTS A total of 51 studies involving 53 981 participants reported that gains in QOL were generally preferred over quantity of life at the end of life across stakeholder groups. Several violations of the underlying assumptions of the QALY to measure preferences at the end of life were observed. CONCLUSIONS Most patients, caregivers, and members of the general public prioritize gains in QOL over marginal gains in life prolongation at the end of life. These findings suggest that policy evaluations of end-of-life interventions should favor those that improve QOL. QALYs may be an inadequate measure of preferences for end-of-life care thereby limiting their use in formal economic evaluations of end-of-life interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kieran L Quinn
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; ICES, Toronto and Ottawa, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Murray Krahn
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; ICES, Toronto and Ottawa, ON, Canada; Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Thérèse A Stukel
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; ICES, Toronto and Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Yona Grossman
- Arts and Science Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Russell Goldman
- Interdepartmental Division of Palliative Care, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada; Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Cram
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; ICES, Toronto and Ottawa, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Allan S Detsky
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Chaim M Bell
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; ICES, Toronto and Ottawa, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Wong CHL, Wong W, Lin WL, Au DKY, Wu JCY, Leung TH, Wu IXY, Chung VCH. Prioritizing Chinese medicine clinical research questions in cancer palliative care from patient and caregiver perspectives. Health Expect 2021; 24:1487-1497. [PMID: 34107142 PMCID: PMC8369121 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chinese medicine (CM) modalities, including acupuncture and Chinese herbal medicine (CHM), are popular palliative interventions among patients with cancer, but further clinical research is required to assess their effectiveness and safety. OBJECTIVE To prioritize top ten important CM clinical research questions from patients with cancer, cancer survivors and caregivers' perspectives via a face-to-face prioritization workshop in Hong Kong. METHODS A list of 25 CM clinical research questions for cancer palliative care, which were identified from existing systematic reviews (SRs) and overview of SRs, was presented to 17 participants (patients with cancer [n = 5], cancer survivors [n = 6] and caregivers [n = 6]). The participants were then invited to establish consensus on prioritizing top ten research questions. RESULTS Among the top ten priorities, five (50%) focused on acupuncture and related therapies, while five (50%) were on CHM. The three most important research priorities were (i) manual acupuncture plus opioids for relieving pain; (ii) CHM for improving quality of life among patients receiving chemotherapy; and (iii) concurrent use of CHM plus loperamide for reducing stomatitis. CONCLUSION The top ten participant-endorsed CM clinical research priorities for cancer palliative care can guide local researchers on future direction. They can also inform local research funders on patient-centred allocation of limited funding. Under limited research funding, the most important co-prioritized research question from professional and patient perspectives may be addressed first. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Patients with cancer, cancer survivors and caregivers participated in conduct of the study to prioritize CM clinical research questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlene H. L. Wong
- Department of Medicine and TherapeuticsThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong
- Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary CareThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong
| | - Wendy Wong
- National Institution of TCM Constitution and Preventive MedicineBeijing University of Chinese MedicineBeijingChina
- Yat Hei Hong Kong Company LimitedCentralHong Kong
| | - Wai Ling Lin
- Hong Kong Institute of Integrative MedicineThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong
| | - David K. Y. Au
- Hong Kong Institute of Integrative MedicineThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong
| | - Justin C. Y. Wu
- Department of Medicine and TherapeuticsThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong
| | - Ting Hung Leung
- Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary CareThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong
- School of Chinese MedicineThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong
| | - Irene X. Y. Wu
- Department of Epidemiology and Health StatisticsXiangya School of Public HealthCentral South UniversityChangshaChina
| | - Vincent C. H. Chung
- Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary CareThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong
- School of Chinese MedicineThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong
| |
Collapse
|