Experimenting locally with a stepped-care approach for the treatment of mild to moderate mental disorders in France: Challenges and opportunities

Is the Norwegian stepped care model for allocation of patients with mental health problems working as intended? A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

Stepped care models are frameworks for mental health care systems in several countries. According to Norwegian guidelines, individuals with mental health problems of mild severity should be treated in community mental health services, moderate severity in specialist mental health services, while complex/severe problems are often a shared responsibility. This study investigated whether patients are allocated as intended.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, 4061 outpatients recruited from community- and specialist mental health services reported demographic variables, symptoms of anxiety/depression, functional impairment, health status, and sick leave status. The community sample consisted of two subsamples: mild/moderate problems and complex problems.

RESULTS

There was substantial overlap (80%-99%) of symptoms, impairment, and health between community- and specialist mental health services. More impairment, worse health, lower age, and being male were associated with treatment at specialist level compared to community mild/moderate. Better health, being in a relationship, and lower age were associated with specialized treatment compared to community complex group.

CONCLUSION

The limited association between treatment level and symptoms and functional impairment reveals inconsistencies between treatment guidelines and clinical practice. How the existing organization affects patient outcomes and satisfaction should be investigated further.

French mental health care system: Analysis of care utilisation patterns and the case for a stepped care approach

CONTEXT

In France, spending on mental health and psychiatric care, in proportion to GDP, is close to the EU average. However, there are complaints that the French system is overwhelmed and potentially underfunded.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the utilisation of psychiatric and mental health care in different settings to consider the appropriateness of care provision and resource allocation.

METHODS

For the year 2018, several national databases on the use of all type of psychiatric care provision (full and part-time hospitalisations, private and public, public ambulatory care, private office-based psychiatrists) were cross-tabulated with diagnosis categories for different age groups and illness severity in order to assess the use of resources and evaluate the appropriateness of resource allocation.

RESULTS

A sizable proportion of patients with mild and moderate mental disorders are treated in psychiatric care whilst there is insufficient continuity of care for patients with severe disorders, who are not adequately followed up after discharge from hospitals. This contributes to increase the rate of re-hospitalisations, the use of emergency departments, and longer stays in hospitals.

CONCLUSION

The several components of the French mental health care system are used inappropriately, not only in geographical terms but also in terms of service use. We argue that strengthening the access to affordable psychotherapy and the implementation of a stepped-care approach could contribute to solve this issue.

Care coordination for severe mental health disorders: an analysis of healthcare provider patient-sharing networks and their association with quality of care in a French region

BACKGROUND

For patients with multiple and complex health needs, such as those suffering from mental health disorders, outcomes are determined by the combined actions of the care providers they visit and their interactions. Care coordination is therefore essential. However, little is known on links between hospitals providing psychiatric care and community-based care providers which could serve as a basis for the creation of formal mental care networks supported by recent policies. In this context, we first aimed to identify and characterize existing types of healthcare provider patient-sharing networks for severe mental health disorders in one French region. Second, we aimed to analyse the association between their characteristics and the quality of the care they provide.

METHODS

Patient flows among healthcare providers involved in treating severe mental health disorders in the Provence-Alpes-Côte-d'Azur region were extracted from the French national health data system, which contains all billing records from the social health insurance. Healthcare provider networks that have developed around public and private non-profit hospitals were identified based on shared patients with other providers (hospitals, community-based psychiatrists, general practitioners and nurses). Hierarchical clustering was conducted to create a typology of the networks. Indicators of quality of care, encompassing multiple complementary dimensions, were calculated across these networks and linked to their characteristics using multivariable methods.

RESULTS

Three main types of existing healthcare provider networks were identified. They were either networks strongly organized around the main hospital providing psychiatric care; scattered networks involving numerous and diverse healthcare providers; or medically-oriented networks involving mainly physician providers. Few significant associations between the structure and composition of healthcare provider networks and indicators of quality of care were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide a basis to develop explicit structuring of mental care based on pre-existing working relationships but suggest that healthcare providers' patient-sharing patterns were not the main driver of optimal care provision in the context explored. The shift towards a stronger integration of health and social care in the mental health field might impact these results but is currently not observable in the administrative data available for research purpose which should evolve to include social care.