Lung transplantation for ventilator-dependent respiratory failure

Clinical impact of pre-existing acute exacerbation in patients with interstitial lung disease who underwent lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Acute exacerbation of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD) significantly impacts prognosis, leading to high mortality rates. Although lung transplantation is a life-saving treatment for selected patients with ILD, its outcomes in those presenting with AE-ILD have yielded conflicting results compared with those with stable ILD. This study aims to investigate the impact of pre-existing AE on the prognosis of ILD patients who underwent lung transplantation.

METHOD

We conducted a single-center retrospective study by reviewing the medical records of 108 patients who underwent lung transplantation for predisposing ILD at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea, between 2008 and 2022. The primary objective was to compare the survival of patients with AE-ILD at the time of transplantation with those without AE-ILD.

RESULTS

Among the 108 patients, 52 (48.1%) experienced AE-ILD at the time of lung transplantation, and 81 (75.0%) required pre-transplant mechanical ventilation. Although the type of ILD (IPF vs. non-IPF ILD) did not affect clinical outcomes after transplantation, AE-ILD was associated with worse survival outcomes. The survival probabilities at 90 days, 1 year, and 3 years post-transplant for patients with AE-ILD were 86.5%, 73.1%, and 60.1%, respectively, while those for patients without AE-ILD were higher, at 92.9%, 83.9%, and 79.6% (p = 0.032). In the multivariable analysis, pre-existing AE was an independent prognostic factor for mortality in ILD patients who underwent lung transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although lung transplantation remains an effective treatment option for ILD patients with pre-existing AE, careful consideration is needed, especially in patients requiring pre-transplant mechanical respiratory support.

The Future of Cardiothoracic Surgical Critical Care Medicine as a Medical Science: A Call to Action

Cardiothoracic surgical critical care medicine (CT-CCM) is a medical discipline centered on the perioperative care of diverse groups of patients. With an aging demographic and an increase in burden of chronic diseases the utilization of cardiothoracic surgical critical care units is likely to escalate in the coming decades. Given these projections, it is important to assess the state of cardiothoracic surgical intensive care, to develop goals and objectives for the future, and to identify knowledge gaps in need of scientific inquiry. This two-part review concentrates on CT-CCM as its own subspeciality of critical care and cardiothoracic surgery and provides aspirational goals for its practitioners and scientists. In part one, a list of guiding principles and a call-to-action agenda geared towards growth and promotion of CT-CCM are offered. In part two, an evaluation of selected scientific data is performed, identifying gaps in CT-CCM knowledge, and recommending direction to future scientific endeavors.

Update on Lung Transplantation for Cystic Fibrosis

Lung transplantation provides a treatment option for many individuals with advanced lung disease due to cystic fibrosis (CF). Since the first transplants for CF in the 1980s, survival has improved and the opportunity for transplant has expanded to include individuals who previously were not considered candidates for transplant. Criteria to be a transplant candidate vary significantly among transplant programs, highlighting that the engagement in more than one transplant program may be necessary. Individuals with highly resistant CF pathogens, malnutrition, osteoporosis, CF liver disease, and other comorbidities may be suitable candidates for lung transplant, or if needed, multi-organ transplant. The transplant process involves several phases, from discussion of prognosis and referral to a transplant center, to transplant evaluation, to listing, transplant surgery, and care after transplant. While the availability of highly effective CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators for many individuals with CF has improved lung function and slowed progression to respiratory failure, early discussion regarding transplant as a treatment option and referral to a transplant program are critical to maximizing opportunity and optimizing patient and family experience. The decision to be evaluated for transplant and to list for transplant are distinct, and early referral may provide a treatment option that can be urgently executed if needed. Survival after transplant for CF is improving, to a median survival of approximately 10 years, and most transplant survivors enjoy significant improvement in quality of life.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Lung Transplantation

Lung transplantation (LTx) has been a viable option for patients with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), with more than 20,000 procedures performed worldwide. Survival after LTx lags behind most other forms of solid-organ transplantation, with median survival for COPD recipients being a sobering 6.0 years. Given the limited supply of suitable donor organs, not all patients with end-stage COPD are candidates for LTx. We discuss appropriate criteria for accepting patients for LTx, as well as contraindications and exclusionary criteria. In the first year post-LTx, infection and graft failure are the leading causes of death. Beyond this chronic graft rejection-currently referred to as chronic lung allograft dysfunction-represents the leading cause of death at all time points, with infection and over time malignancy also limiting survival. Referral of COPD patients to a lung transplant center should be considered in the presence of progressing disease despite maximal medical therapy. As a rule of thumb, a forced expiratory volume in 1 second < 25% predicted in the absence of exacerbation, hypoxia (PaO₂ < 60 mm Hg/8 kPa), and/or hypercapnia (PaCO₂ > 50 mm Hg/6.6 kPa) and satisfactory general clinical condition should be considered the basic prerequisites for timely referral. We also discuss salient issues post-LTx and factors that impact posttransplant survival and morbidity such as infections, malignancy, renal insufficiency, and complications associated with long-term immunosuppression.

Improved survival after lung transplantation for adults requiring preoperative invasive mechanical ventilation: A national cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Early survival after lung transplantation has improved in the last decade. Mechanically ventilated recipients are known to be at greater risk for early post-transplant mortality. We hypothesized that post-transplant survival in mechanically ventilated recipients has improved over time.

METHODS

Using a national registry, we compared hazard of death at 30 days, 4 and 14 months, 3 and 5 years, and overall for adults on mechanical ventilation who underwent lung or heart-lung transplantation from May 4, 2011, to April 4, 2018 (modern group) with those undergoing transplantation from May 4, 2005, to May 3, 2011 (early group). We quantified the impact of mechanical ventilation on survival using population-attributable fractions. We also compared mechanically ventilated recipients with nonmechanically ventilated recipients.

RESULTS

Mechanically ventilated recipients from the modern group had lower hazard of death than recipients in the early group at all time-points, lowest at 30-days post-transplant (hazard ratio, 0.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.08). In the modern period, mechanically ventilated recipients had greater hazard of death than nonmechanically ventilated recipients at 30 days' post-transplant (9.53; 4.57-19.86). For mechanically ventilated recipients, the population attributable fraction was lower in the modern group compared to the earlier group (0.6% vs 5.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

While mechanically ventilated recipients remain at high risk, survival in this patient population has improved over time. This may reflect improvements in perioperative recipient management.

Lung transplantation: indications and contraindications

The selection of appropriate recipients for lung transplantation is an evolving discipline. As experience with the procedure has developed over the last decades, the identification of transplant candidates has also changed as transplant centers strive to safely provide the therapy to as many patients possible. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) has developed three editions of recipient selection guidelines. Published in 1998, 2006, and 2015, these guidelines represented the best information relevant to the appropriate selection of lung transplant candidates. A discussion of areas supported by the most robust scientific data will be undertaken, but in many aspects of recipient selection, there is a paucity of data upon which to rely. Therefore, it is ultimately the prerogative and responsibility of individual centers to determine, after carefully weighing the best evidence available, whether a patient is deemed a suitable candidate at a specific program. All possible indications and contraindications for transplantation will be reviewed with attention also given to the appropriate timing of referral and listing of patients with advanced lung disease to a transplant center.

Mechanical Ventilation and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as a Bridging Strategy to Lung Transplantation: Significant Gains in Survival

Mechanical ventilation (MV) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are increasingly used to bridge patients to lung transplantation. We investigated the impact of using MV, with or without ECMO, before lung transplantation on survival after transplantation by performing a retrospective analysis of 826 patients who underwent transplantation at our high-volume center. Recipient characteristics and posttransplant outcomes were analyzed. Most lung transplant recipients (729 patients) did not require bridging; 194 of these patients were propensity matched with patients who were bridged using MV alone (48 patients) or MV and ECMO (49 patients). There was no difference in overall survival between the MV and MV+ECMO groups (p = 0.07). The MV+ECMO group had significantly higher survival conditioned on surviving to 1 year (median 1,811 days ([MV] vs. not reached ([MV+ECMO], p = 0.01). Recipients in the MV+ECMO group, however, were more likely to require ECMO after lung transplantation (16.7% MV vs. 57.1% MV+ECMO, p < 0.001). There were no differences in duration of postoperative MV, hospital stay, graft survival, or the incidence of acute rejection, renal failure, bleeding requiring reoperation, or airway complications. In this contemporary series, the combination of MV and ECMO was a viable bridging strategy to lung transplantation that led to acceptable patient outcomes.

Physical rehabilitation for lung transplant candidates and recipients: An evidence-informed clinical approach

Physical rehabilitation of lung transplant candidates and recipients plays an important in optimizing physical function prior to transplant and facilitating recovery of function post-transplant. As medical and surgical interventions in lung transplantation have evolved over time, there has been a demographic shift of individuals undergoing lung transplantation including older individuals, those with multiple co-morbidites, and candidates with respiratory failure requiring bridging to transplantation. These changes have an impact on the rehabilitation needs of lung transplant candidates and recipients. This review provides a practical approach to rehabilitation based on research and clinical practice at our transplant centre. It focuses on functional assessment and exercise prescription during an uncomplicated and complicated clinical course in the pre-transplant, early and late post-transplant periods. The target audience includes clinicians involved in pre- and post-transplant patient care and rehabilitation researchers.

Recipient risk factors and lung transplant outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Scientific and technical developments in the field of lung transplantation have allowed it to become a successful treatment option for various end-stage lung diseases. As the demand for lung allografts increases and waitlists expand, it is vital that lung transplant centers optimize use of this limited resource by selecting recipients who have the best prospects of positive long-term outcomes. Recipient selection criteria vary across transplant selection committees. We review the most recent body of literature for recipient consideration and describe potential effects on morbidity and mortality posttransplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although prior guidelines for contraindications to lung transplantation have been described, the benchmarks for recipient selection are constantly being challenged. Age, weight, and psychologic condition of recipients pretransplant have more recently been shown to have significant influence on posttransplant outcomes. Advancements in human leukocyte antigen antibody testing and use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation have additionally impacted recipient selection standards.

SUMMARY

Recipient selection criteria continue to evolve because of advances in mechanical bridging to transplant and postoperative management. This review will cover some of the new concepts in lung transplant recipient selection and their potential effect on posttransplant outcomes.

Extracorporeal life support as bridge to lung transplantation: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Patients with acute respiratory failure requiring respiratory support with invasive mechanical ventilation while awaiting lung transplantation are at a high risk of death. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been proposed as an alternative bridging strategy to mechanical ventilation. The aim of this study was to assess the current evidence regarding how the ECMO bridge influences patients' survival and length of hospital stay.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review by searching PubMed, EMBASE and the bibliographies of retrieved articles. Three reviewers independently screened citation titles and abstracts and agreement was reached by consensus. We selected studies enrolling patients who received ECMO with the intention to bridge lung transplant. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), case-control studies and case series with ten or more patients. Outcomes of interest included survival and length of hospital stay. Quantitative data summaries were made when feasible.

RESULTS

We identified 82 studies, of which 14 were included in the final analysis. All 14 were retrospective studies which enrolled 441 patients in total. Because of the broad heterogeneity among the studies we did not perform a meta-analysis. The mortality rate of patients on ECMO before lung transplant and the one-year survival ranged from 10% to 50% and 50% to 90%, respectively. The intensive care and hospital length of stay ranged between a median of 15 to 47 days and 22 to 47 days, respectively. There was a general paucity of high-quality data and significant heterogeneity among studies in the enrolled patients and technology used, which confounded analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In most of the studies, patients on ECMO while awaiting lung transplantation also received invasive mechanical ventilation. Therefore, whether ECMO as an alternative, rather than an adjunction, to invasive mechanical ventilation is a better bridging strategy to lung transplantation still remains an unresolved issue. ECMO support as a bridge for these patients could provide acceptable one-year survival. Future studies are needed to investigate ECMO as part of an algorithm of care for patients with end-stage lung disease.

A consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: 2014--an update from the Pulmonary Transplantation Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation

The appropriate selection of lung transplant recipients is an important determinant of outcomes. This consensus document is an update of the recipient selection guidelines published in 2006. The Pulmonary Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) organized a Writing Committee of international experts to provide consensus opinion regarding the appropriate timing of referral and listing of candidates for lung transplantation. A comprehensive search of the medical literature was conducted with the assistance of a medical librarian. Writing Committee members were assigned specific topics to research and discuss. The Chairs of the Writing Committee were responsible for evaluating the completeness of the literature search, providing editorial support for the manuscript, and organizing group discussions regarding its content. The consensus document makes specific recommendations regarding the timing of referral and of listing for lung transplantation. These recommendations include discussions not present in previous ISHLT guidelines, including lung allocation scores, bridging to transplant with mechanical circulatory and ventilator support, and expanded indications for lung transplantation. In the absence of high-grade evidence to support decision making, these consensus guidelines remain part of a continuum of expert opinion based on available studies and personal experience. Some positions are immutable. Although transplant is rightly a treatment of last resort for end-stage lung disease, early referral allows proper evaluation and thorough patient education. Subsequent waiting list activation implies a tacit agreement that transplant offers a significant individual survival advantage. It is both the challenge and the responsibility of the transplant community globally to ensure organ allocation maximizes the potential benefits of a scarce resource, thereby achieving that advantage.

Active rehabilitation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Patients with end-stage lung disease often progress to critical illness, which dramatically reduces their chance of survival following lung transplantation. Pre-transplant deconditioning has a significant impact on outcomes for all lung transplant patients, and is likely a major contributor to increased mortality in critically ill lung transplant recipients. The aim of this report is to describe a series of patients bridged to lung transplant with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and to examine the potential impact of active rehabilitation and ambulation during pre-transplant ECMO.

METHODS

This retrospective case series reviews all patients bridged to lung transplantation with ECMO at a single tertiary care lung transplant center. Pre-transplant ECMO patients receiving active rehabilitation and ambulation were compared to those patients who were bridged with ECMO but did not receive pre-transplant rehabilitation.

RESULTS

Nine consecutive subjects between April 2007 and May 2012 were identified for inclusion. One-year survival for all subjects was 100%, with one subject alive at 4 months post-transplant. The 5 subjects participating in pre-transplant rehabilitation had shorter mean post-transplant mechanical ventilation (4 d vs 34 d, P = .01), ICU stay (11 d vs 45 d, P = .01), and hospital stay (26 d vs 80 d, P = .01). No subject who participated in active rehabilitation had post-transplant myopathy, compared to 3 of 4 subjects who did not participate in pre-transplant rehabilitation on ECMO.

CONCLUSIONS

Bridging selected critically ill patients to transplant with ECMO is a viable treatment option, and active participation in physical therapy, including ambulation, may provide a more rapid post-transplantation recovery. This innovative strategy requires further study to fully evaluate potential benefits and risks.

Outcomes and temporal trends among high-risk patients after lung transplantation in the United States

INTRODUCTION

Although several studies have evaluated risk factors for death after lung transplantation (LTx), few studies have focused on the highest-risk recipients. We undertook this study to evaluate the effect of high lung allocation scores (LAS), ventilator support, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support on outcomes after LTx.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all LTx recipients in the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Primary stratification was by recipient acuity at the time of LTx. The 3 strata consisted of (1) recipients in the highest LAS quartile (LAS ≥ 48.4), (2) those requiring ventilator support, and (3) those requiring ECMO support. The primary outcome was 1-year mortality. Sub-group analysis focused on temporal trends.

RESULTS

From May 2005 to June 2011, 9,267 adults underwent LTx. Before LTx, 1,874 (20.2%) were in the highest LAS quartile, 526 (5.7%) required ventilator support, and 122 (1.3%) required ECMO support. Unadjusted analysis showed decreased 1-year survival associated with ventilator (67.7%) and ECMO support (57.6%) compared with the highest LAS quartile (81.0%; p < 0.001 for each comparison). These differences persisted on adjusted analysis for ventilator support (hazard ratio, 1.99, p < 0.001) and ECMO support (hazard ratio, 3.03; p < 0.001). Increasing annual center volume was associated with decreased mortality. In patients bridged to LTx with ECMO support, 1-year survival improved over time (coefficient, 8.03% per year; p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

High-acuity LTx recipients, particularly those bridged with ventilator or ECMO support, have increased short-term mortality after LTx. However, since the introduction of the LAS, high-risk patients have demonstrated improving outcomes, particularly at high-volume centers.

The impact of pretransplant mechanical ventilation on short- and long-term survival after lung transplantation

Lung transplantation in mechanically ventilated (MV) patients has been associated with decreased posttransplant survival. Under the Lung Allocation Score (LAS) system, patients at greatest risk of death on the waiting list, particularly those requiring MV, are prioritized for lung allocation. We evaluated whether pretransplant MV is associated with poorer posttransplant survival in the LAS era. Using a national registry, we analyzed all adults undergoing lung transplantation in the United States from 2005 to 2010. Propensity scoring identified nonventilated matched referents for 419 subjects requiring MV at the time of transplantation. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Risk of death was estimated by hazard ratios employing time-dependent covariates. We found that pretransplant MV was associated with decreased overall survival after lung transplantation. In the first 6 months posttransplant, ventilated subjects had a twofold higher risk of death compared to nonventilated subjects. However, after 6 months posttransplant, survival did not differ by MV status. We also found that pretransplant MV was not associated with decreased survival in noncystic fibrosis obstructive lung diseases. These results suggest that under the LAS, pretransplant MV is associated with poorer short-term survival posttransplant. Notably, the increased risk of death appears to be strongest the early posttransplant period and limited to certain pretransplant diagnoses.

[Long-term outcome of lung transplantation]

Lung transplantation (LTx) nowadays is an established therapeutic option for various end-stage lung diseases in despite of an optimal medical therapy in selected patients affected with various pathologies such as emphysema/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis (CF) and various forms of bronchiectasis, pulmonary fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension. Progress and refinement over the last two decades in both surgical techniques and medical management including especially the introduction of cyclosporine A, have been impressive. Patient survival improved significantly over time. According to the most recent data of the International Registry of Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), actuarial survival is 79%, 63%, 52% and 29% at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years respectively, with a current overall survival half-life of 5.3 years, and more than 7 years for those who survived 1 year or more. However, survival depends on different parameters such as the underlying disease, data relative to the donor, the recipient and/or the transplant procedure. Major limitation of long-term survival is still chronic allograft dysfunction, which is histologically represented by an obliterative bronchiolitis and functionally by the bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). In uncomplicated cases near-normalization of pulmonary function is the rule, with more than 80% of survivors at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years reporting no activity limitations. Functional results after single LTx remain lower than those of the bilateral LTx, and depend on the potential worsening of the underlying disease and complications arising on the native lung. Exercise performance usually is approximately 50% of predicted, suggesting extrapulmonary causes such as side effects of immunosuppressive drugs. Quality of life improves significantly in all domains including employment status.