Native lung complications in single-lung transplant recipients and the role of pneumonectomy

Survival Tree Provides Individualized Estimates of Survival After Lung Transplant

INTRODUCTION

Identifying contributors to lung transplant survival is vital in mitigating mortality. To enhance individualized mortality estimation and determine variable interaction, we employed a survival tree algorithm utilizing recipient and donor data.

METHODS

United Network Organ Sharing data (2000-2021) were queried for single and double lung transplants in adult patients. Graft survival time <7 d was excluded. Sixty preoperative and immediate postoperative factors were evaluated with stepwise logistic regression on mortality; final model variables were included in survival tree modeling. Data were split into training and testing sets and additionally validated with 10-fold cross validation. Survival tree pruning and model selection was based on Akaike information criteria and log-likelihood values. Estimated survival probabilities and log-rank pairwise comparisons between subgroups were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 27,296 lung transplant patients (8175 single; 19,121 double lung) were included. Stepwise logistic regression yielded 47 significant variables associated with mortality. Survival tree modeling returned six significant factors: recipient age, length of stay from transplant to discharge, recipient ventilator duration post-transplant, double lung transplant, recipient reintubation post-transplant, and donor cytomegalovirus status. Eight subgroups consisting of combinations of these factors were identified with distinct Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival trees provide the ability to understand the effects and interactions of covariates on survival after lung transplantation. Individualized survival probability with this technique found that preoperative and postoperative factors influence survival after lung transplantation. Thus, preoperative patient counseling should acknowledge a degree of uncertainty given the influence of postoperative factors.

Native lung surgery after single lung transplantation: clinical characteristics and outcomes

PURPOSE

Single lung transplantation (SLT) is a viable option for patients with end-stage pulmonary parenchymal and vascular diseases. However, various diseases can occur in native lungs after SLT.

METHODS

Between January 2000 and December 2021, 35 patients underwent cadaveric SLT and survived for more than 30 days in our hospital. Among these 35 patients, 10 required surgery for diseases that developed in their native lungs. The clinical characteristics of these 10 patients and the outcomes of native lung surgery (NLS) were investigated.

RESULTS

Among these ten patients, the indications for lung transplantation were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and idiopathic interstitial pneumonia in three patients each, and lymphangioleiomyomatosis and collagen vascular disease-related interstitial pneumoniain two patients each. The causes of NLS included pneumothorax (n = 4), primary lung cancer (n = 2), native lung hyperinflation (n = 2), and pulmonary aspergilloma (n = 2). The surgical procedures were pneumonectomy (n = 7), lobectomy (n = 2), and alveolar-pleural fistula repair (n = 1). Only one postoperative complication, empyema, was treated with antibiotics. The 5-year overall survival rates after transplantation with and without NLS were 70.0% and 80.0%, respectively, and did not differ to a statistically extent (p = 0.56).

CONCLUSION

NLS is an effective treatment option for diseases that develop in the native lungs after SLT.

Native-lung complications following single-lung transplantation for interstitial lung disease: an in-depth analysis

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) represents a heterogeneous group of lung disorders characterized by fibrotic lung tissue changes. In regions with severe donor shortages, single-lung transplantation (SLTx) is often preferred over bilateral lung transplantation for advanced ILD. However, temporal changes and complications in the retained native lung remain poorly understood.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 149 recipients who had undergone SLTx was conducted, including 34 ILD SLTx recipients. Native-lung volume, radiological alterations, and perfusion were assessed at distinct post-SLTx time points. Statistical analyses compared ILD and non-ILD SLTx groups.

RESULTS

Our study revealed a progressive reduction in native-lung volume over time, accompanied by radiographic deterioration and declining perfusion. Complications in the retained native lung were observed, such as pneumothorax (29.4%), pulmonary aspergillosis (11.8%), and acute exacerbation (8.9%). Long-term survival rates were similar between ILD and non-ILD SLTx recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study illuminates the unique challenges and complications with respect to the native lung following SLTx for ILD. Ongoing monitoring and tailored management are essential. Despite limitations, this research contributes to our understanding of the temporal progression of native-lung complications post-SLTx for ILD, underscoring the need for further investigation.

Elderly lung transplant recipients show acceptable long-term outcomes for lung transplantation: A propensity score-matched analysis

PURPOSE

Although the performance lung transplantation (LTx) in the elderly (≥ 60 years) has increased globally, the situation in Japan remains quite different, because the age limit at registration for cadaveric transplantation is 60 years. We investigated the long-term outcomes of LTx in the elderly in Japan.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study. We divided the patients into two groups according to age: the younger group (< 60 years; Y group; n = 194) and the elderly group (≥ 60 years; E group; n = 10). We performed three-to-one propensity score matching to compare the long-term survival between the E and Y groups.

RESULTS

In the E group, the survival rate was significantly worse (p = 0.003), and single-LTx was more frequent (p = 0.036). There was a significant difference in the indications for LTx between the two groups (p < 0.001). The 5-year survival rate after single-LTx in the E group was significantly lower than that in the Y group (p = 0.006). After propensity score matching, the 5-year survival rates of the two groups were comparable (p = 0.55). However, the 5-year survival rate after single-LTx in the E group was significantly lower than that in the Y group (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients showed acceptable long-term survival after LTx.

Single vs Bilateral Lung Transplant in the Management of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation is recommended for select patients with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, a consensus has not been reached regarding the optimal choice of lung transplantation: single lung transplants (SLTs) vs bilateral lung transplants (BLTs). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SLT compared with BLT in managing end-stage COPD.

METHODS

Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus were searched for articles by 2 independent reviewers using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis system. The review was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42022343408).

RESULTS

Seven studies of 311 screened met the eligibility criteria, with a total of 10,652 patients with end-stage COPD, SLT (n = 6233), or BLT (n = 4419). Overall survival rates of BLT group were more favorable than SLT group at 1 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.16, 1.43, I2 = 0%), 5 (OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.35, 1.58, I2 = 23%), and 10 years (OR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.57, 1.87, I2 = 12%) as well as the hazard ratio (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.70, 0.76, I2 = 40%). Subgroup analysis on survival rates of alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency also displayed a trend favoring BLT compared with SLT at 1 (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.24, 2.08, I2 = 28%), 5 (OR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.50, 2.26, I2 = 42%), and 10 years (OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.59, 2.48, I2 = 47%) as well as the HR (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.35, 1.28, I2 = 82%).

CONCLUSION

Compared with SLT, BLT seems to demonstrate more favorable trends in survival rates for the management of end-stage COPD. Despite the promising results, the groups have significant heterogeneity in baseline characteristics. Further prospective studies with extended follow-up periods are needed to ascertain the efficacy of treatment.

Prognosis of patients with systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease on the lung transplant waiting list: a retrospective study

Advanced systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) can be treated with lung transplantation. There is limited data on lung transplantation outcomes in patients with SSc-ILD, in non-Western populations.We assessed survival data of patients with SSc-ILD, on the lung transplant (LT) waiting list, and evaluated post-transplant outcomes in patients from an Asian LT center. In this single-center retrospective study, 29 patients with SSc-ILD, registered for deceased LT at Kyoto University Hospital, between 2010 and 2022, were identified. We investigated post-transplant outcomes in recipients who underwent LT for SSc-ILD, between February 2002 and April 2022. Ten patients received deceased-donor LT (34%), two received living-donor LT (7%), seven died waiting for LT (24%), and ten survived on the waiting list (34%). Median duration from registration to deceased-donor LT was 28.9 months and that from registration to living-donor LT or death was 6.5 months. Analysis of 15 recipients showed improved forced vital capacity with a median of 55.1% at baseline, 65.8% at 6 months, and 80.3% at 12 months post-transplant. The 5-year survival rate for post-transplant patients with SSc-ILD was 86.2%. The higher post-transplant survival rate at our institute than previously reported suggests that lung transplantation is acceptable in Asian patients with SSc-ILD.

Lung Transplant Procedure of Choice: Bilateral Transplantation Versus Single Transplantation Complications, Quality of Life, and Survival

This article examines the existing literature regarding single (SLT) and bilateral lung transplantation (BLT) to help answer the question of which approach is preferable. Specifically, this review highlights the following subjects: disease-specific indications for SLT versus BLT; the impact of procedure type on posttransplantation functional status; the impact of procedure type on posttransplantation quality of life; chronic rejection after lung transplantation; ethical challenges facing the choice between single and bilateral transplants; and, novel strategies in this arena.

Management of Native Lung Malignancy in a Lung Transplant Recipient

A 75-year-old male patient with a history of previous right lung transplant presented with left upper lobe squamous cell carcinoma. Endobronchial ultrasound and positron emission tomography displayed no mediastinal lymphadenopathy. A ventilation-perfusion scan displayed minimal perfusion to the native lung. Left robot-assisted lysis of adhesions, decortication, left upper lobectomy, and mediastinal lymphadenectomy were performed. The patient tolerated the procedure well. Final pathology displayed pT2a, n0, m0. Lobectomy is a safe and efficient treatment of native lung malignancy in the setting of previous lung transplant with minimally functioning native lung.

Acute worsening of native lung fibrosis after single lung transplantation for pulmonary fibrosis: two case reports

BACKGROUND

In patients receiving single lung transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, worsening of fibrosis of the native lung is usually progressive over time, with no significant effects on gas exchange.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here, we describe the cases of two Caucasian male recipients of single lung transplants for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, 65 and 62 years of age, who exhibited acute worsening of lung fibrosis after an episode of serious viral infection (cytomegalovirus primo-infection in one case and COVID-19 in the other). In both cases, along with opacification of the native lung over several days, the patients presented acute respiratory failure that required the use of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy. Eventually, hypoxemic respiratory failure resolved, but with rapid progression of fibrosis of the native lung.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that acute worsening of fibrosis on the native lung secondary to a severe viral infection should be added to the list of potential complications developing on the native lung after single lung transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Single-lobe transplantation with contralateral pneumonectomy: Long-term survival

We report two cases of long-term survival after single living-donor lobar lung transplantation with contralateral pneumonectomy. An 8-year-old female with pulmonary graft-versus-host disease after cord-blood transplantation underwent single living-donor lobar lung transplantation with simultaneous contralateral pneumonectomy due to an oversized graft. She has been performing daily life activities for ≥11 years with limited physical development. A 41-year-old female with short stature underwent single living-donor lobar lung transplantation due to pulmonary graft-versus-host disease after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Contralateral pneumonectomy was required 7 years following living-donor lobar lung transplantation due to pneumonia in the native lung. Eleven years after living-donor lobar lung transplantation, she is able to perform daily life activities.

Factors affecting complications development and mortality after single lung transplant

Lung transplantation (LT) is a life-saving therapeutic procedure that prolongs survival in patients with end-stage lung disease. Furthermore, as a therapeutic option for high-risk candidates, single LT (SLT) can be feasible because the immediate morbidity and mortality after transplantation are lower compared to sequential single (double) LT (SSLTx). Still, the long-term overall survival is, in general, better for SSLTx. Despite the great success over the years, the early post-SLT period remains a perilous time for these patients. Patients who undergo SLT are predisposed to evolving early or late postoperative complications. This review emphasizes factors leading to post-SLT complications in the early and late periods including primary graft dysfunction and chronic lung allograft dysfunction, native lung complications, anastomosis complications, infections, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, renal, and metabolite complications, and their association with morbidity and mortality in these patients. Furthermore, we discuss the incidence of malignancy after SLT and their correlation with immunosuppression therapy.

Lung transplantation for interstitial lung disease

Lung transplantation (LTx) can be a life-extending treatment option for patients with advanced and/or progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD), especially idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, sarcoidosis and connective tissue disease-associated ILD. IPF is now the most common indication for LTx worldwide. Several unique features in patients with ILD can impact optimal timing of referral or listing for LTx, pre- or post-transplant risks, candidacy and post-transplant management. As the epidemiology of LTx and community practices have evolved, recent literature describes outcomes and approaches in higher-risk candidates. In this review, we discuss the unique and important clinical findings, course, monitoring and management of patients with IPF and other progressive fibrotic ILDs during pre-LTx evaluation and up to the day of transplantation; the need for co-management with clinical experts in ILD and LTx is emphasised. Some post-LTx complications are unique in these patient cohorts, which require prompt detection and appropriate management by experts in multiple disciplines familiar with telomere biology disorders and infectious, haematological, oncological and cardiac complications to enhance the likelihood of improved outcomes and survival of LTx recipients with IPF and other ILDs.

Impacts of single nucleotide polymorphisms in Fc gamma receptor IIA (rs1801274) on lung transplant outcomes among Japanese lung transplant recipients

This study aimed to analyze the influences of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in Fc gamma receptor IIA (FCGR2A) on postoperative outcomes after lung transplantation (LTx). We enrolled 191 lung transplant recipients (80 undergoing living-donor lobar lung transplants [LDLLTs] and 111 undergoing deceased-donor lung transplants [DDLTs]) in this study. We identified SNPs in FCGR2A (131 histidine [H] or arginine [R]; rs1801274) and reviewed the infectious complication-free survival after ICU discharge. The SNPs in FCGR2A comprised H/H (n=53), H/R (n=24), and R/R (n=3) in LDLLT, and H/H (n=67), H/R (n=42), and R/R (n=2) in DDLT. Recipients with H/H (H/H group) and those with H/R or R/R (R group) were compared in the analyses of infectious complications. In multivariate analyses, the R group of SNPs in FCGR2A was associated with pneumonia-free survival (HR: 2.52 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.35-4.71], p=0.004), fungal infection-free survival (HR: 2.50 [95% CI: 1.07-5.84], p=0.035), and cytomegalovirus infection-free survival (HR: 2.24 [95% CI: 1.07-4.69], p=0.032) in LDLLT but it was not associated with infectious complication-free survival in DDLT. Therefore, in LDLLT, more attention to infectious complications might need to be paid for LTx recipients with H/R or R/R than for those with H/H.

The influence of the native lung on early outcomes and survival after single lung transplantation

Objective

To determine whether problems arising in the native lung may influence the short-term outcomes and survival after single lung transplantation (SLT), and therefore should be taken into consideration when selecting the transplant procedure.

Patients and methods

Retrospective review of 258 lung transplants performed between June 2012 and June 2019. Among them, 161 SLT were selected for the analysis. Complications in the native lung were recorded and distributed into two groups: early and late complications (within 30 days or after 30 days post-transplant). Donor and recipient preoperative factors, 30-day mortality and survival were analysed and compared between groups by univariable and multivariable analyses, and adjusting for transplant indication.

Results

There were 161 patients (126M/35F; 57±7 years) transplanted for emphysema (COPD) (n = 72), pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (n = 77), or other indications (n = 12). Forty-nine patients (30%) presented complications in the native lung. Thirty-day mortality did not differ between patients with or without early complications (6% vs. 12% respectively; p = 0.56). Twelve patients died due to a native lung complication (7.4% of patients; 24% of all deaths). Survival (1,3,5 years) without vs. with late complications: COPD (89%, 86%, 80% vs. 86%, 71%, 51%; p = 0.04); IPF (83%, 77%, 72% vs. 93%, 68%, 58%; p = 0.65). Among 30-day survivors: COPD (94%, 91%, 84% vs. 86%, 71%, 51%; p = 0.01); IPF (93%, 86%, 81% vs. 93%, 68%, 58%; p = 0.19). Native lung complications were associated to longer ICU stay (10±17 vs. 33±96 days; p<0.001), longer postoperative intubation (41±85 vs. 99±318 hours; p = 0.006), and longer hospital stay (30±24 vs. 45±34 days; p = 0.03). The presence of late native lung problems predicted survival in COPD patients (OR: 2.55; p = 0.07).

Conclusion

The native lung is a source of morbidity in the short-term and mortality in the long-term after lung transplantation. This should be taken into consideration when choosing the transplant procedure, especially in COPD patients.

Native lung complications after living-donor lobar lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) is viable for critically ill patients in situations of donor shortage. Because it is sometimes difficult to find 2 ideal living donors with suitable graft sizes, we developed native lung-sparing procedures, including single LDLLT and native upper lobe-sparing LDLLT. This study aimed to investigate native lung complications (NLCs) in native lung-sparing LDLLT.

METHODS

Between April 2002 and March 2019, 92 LDLLTs and 124 cadaveric lung transplantations (CLTs) were performed at the Kyoto University Hospital. Our prospectively maintained database and clinical records were reviewed to compare NLCs among recipients who underwent native lung-sparing LDLLT (n = 21) with those among recipients who underwent single CLT (n = 61).

RESULTS

Among 21 recipients who underwent native lung-sparing LDLLT, 11 NLCs occurred in 8 recipients. No fatal NLC was noted; however, 2 required surgical intervention. Post-transplant survival was not significantly different between native lung-sparing LDLLT recipients with NLCs and those without NLCs. The incidence of NLCs was comparable between native lung-sparing LDLLT recipients and single CLT recipients (8/21 vs 26/61, p = 0.80); however, NLCs occurred significantly later in LDLLT recipients than in CLT recipients (median: 665 vs 181.5 days after transplantation, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

NLCs after native lung-sparing LDLLT had favorable outcomes. Therefore, native lung-sparing LDLLT is a useful treatment option for severely ill patients who cannot wait for CLT. However, it is important to recognize that NLCs may occur later in LDLLT than in CLT.

Exacerbation of Secondary Pulmonary Hypertension by Flat Chest after Lung Transplantation

A 40-year-old woman with idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (IPPFE) and flat chest underwent left single lung transplantation (SLT). Although she had developed over-systemic pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) at transplantation, it was alleviated. However, her PAP gradually increased again. Her transplanted lung was well-inflated, but progression of fibrosis in her right native lung appeared to have caused a mediastinal shift, and her flat chest caused obstruction of the outflow tract of the pulmonary vein. She died of heart failure and associated infection 1.5 years after transplantation. An autopsy confirmed irreversible pulmonary arterial and venous changes in the transplanted lung, suggestive of chronic pressure overload. The flat chest associated with IPPFE can affect pulmonary circulation after SLT.

Pharmacological management of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: current and emerging options

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis is a chronic, progressive lung disease characterized by worsening lung scarring and the radiological/histological pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia. Substantial progress has been made in the clinical management of IPF in the last decade. The two novel antifibrotics, Nintedanib and Pirfenidone have changed the landscape of IPF, by hindering disease progression; however, the drugs have significant discontinuation rates, due to adverse events and do not offer a definitive cure, as such IPF remains a deleterious disease with poor survival.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors focus on the current and emerging pharmacological options in the treatment of IPF. They include a summary of the current approach including treatment of comorbidities and then discuss promising drugs in the drug pipeline.

EXPERT OPINION

IPF remains a disease with detrimental outcomes. The plethora of emerging pharmacological treatments brings hope for the future. The current pharmacological 'one fits all' approach has been proven effective in slowing disease progression. The future lies in an oncological approach with combination of therapies. We expect to see a change in clinical trial endpoints and a more inclusive approach for the diagnosis of IPF.

ABBREVIATION LIST

AE: Acute ExacerbationA-SMA: a smooth muscle actinATX: AutotaxinCOPD: Combined Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseCPFE: Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and EmphysemaGER: Gastro-esophageal refluxFVC: forced vital capacityECMO: extracorporeal membrane oxygenationILD: Interstitial Lung DiseaseIPF: Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisNAC: N-acetylcysteineLPA: Lysophosphatidic acidPH: Pulmonary RehabilitationPR: Pulmonary rehabilitationRCTs: randomized placebo-controlled trialsUIP: usual interstitial pneumonia.

Spontaneous pneumothorax in a single lung transplant recipient-a blessing in disguise: A case report

BACKGROUND

End-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the common lung diseases referred for lung transplantation. According to the international society of heart and lung transplantation, 30% of all lung transplantations are carried out for COPD alone. When compared to bilateral lung transplant, single-lung transplant (SLT) has similar short-term and medium-term results for COPD. For patients with severe upper lobe predominant emphysema, lung volume reduction surgery is an excellent alternative which results in improvement in functional status and long-term mortality. In 2018, endobronchial valves were approved by the Food and Drug Administration for severe upper lobe predominant emphysema as they demonstrated improvement in lung function, exercise capacity, and quality of life. However, the role of endobronchial valves in native lung emphysema in SLT patients has not been studied.

CASE SUMMARY

We describe an unusual case of severe emphysema who underwent a successful SLT 15 years ago and had gradual worsening of lung function suggestive of chronic lung allograft dysfunction. However, her lung function improved significantly after a spontaneous pneumothorax of the native lung resulting in auto-deflation of large bullae.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights the clinical significance of native lung hyperinflation in single lung transplant recipient and how spontaneous decompression due to pneumothorax led to clinical improvement in our patient.

Single vs. bilateral lung transplantation: when and why

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lung transplantation is a life-saving treatment for several end stage lung diseases. Over the last two decades, the number of lung transplantation performed worldwide has steadily increased but several thousand people still die every year waiting for lung transplantation. However, the optimal procedure for lung transplantation in non-septic lung conditions remains debatable.

RECENT FINDINGS

In pulmonary fibrosis and COPD, many recent studies suggest superiority of bilateral lung transplantation over single lung transplantation when long-term survival is evaluated; consequently, bilateral lung transplantation has been favored by many lung transplantation centers. However, the quality of evidence to support the superiority of bilateral lung transplantation remains low in the absence of prospective studies, and other available studies do not show differences in outcomes between the two types of procedure.

SUMMARY

In the absence of good high quality evidence, it is difficult to make strong general recommendations for the type of lung transplant, and the decision often has to be individualized. However, the number of recipients on the wait list continues to surpass the amount of available organs and due consideration needs to be given to single lung transplantation as an option whenever possible.

Transplant options for end stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the context of multidisciplinary treatments

Lung transplantation (LTx) in advanced stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients is associated with significant improvement in lung function and exercise capacity. However, demonstration that the procedure also provides a survival benefit has been more elusive compared to other respiratory conditions. Identification of patients with increased risk of mortality is crucial: a low forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) is perhaps the most common reason for referral to a lung transplant center, but in itself is insufficient to identify which COPD patients will benefit from LTx. Many variables have to be considered in the selection of candidates, time for listing, and choice of procedure: age, patient comorbidities, secondary pulmonary hypertension, the balance between individual and community benefit. This review will discuss patient selection, transplant listing, potential benefits and critical issues of bilateral (BLTx) and single lung (SLTx) procedure, donor-to-recipient organ size-matching; furthermore, it will describe LTx outcomes and its effects on recipient survival and quality of life.

Bilateral versus single lung transplantation: are two lungs better than one?

There is a long-standing debate over whether single or bilateral lung transplant provides better short and long-term clinical outcomes. We performed a detailed PubMed search on relevant clinical research publications on single (SLT) and bilateral lung transplantation (BLT). We included studies that were published before and after the implementation of the lung allocation score (LAS). We reviewed disease-specific short- and long-term outcomes associated with each transplantation technique. The majority of published studies are retrospective cohort studies that use institutional data or large patient registries. Outcomes associated with transplantation technique vary by disease specific indication, age, and patient severity. Over the past decade, the relative proportion of bilateral lung transplantation has increased. Increasing adoption of bilateral lung transplant likely reflects the general acceptance of several advantages associated with the technique. However, making a clear, evidence-based decision is difficult in light of the fact that there has never been and probably never will be a randomized trial. Our institutional preference is bilateral lung transplant. However, consideration for the technique should still be made on a case-by-case basis.

Lung cancer: a rare indication for, but frequent complication after lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is an effective and safe therapy for carefully selected patients suffering from a variety of end-stage pulmonary diseases. Lung cancer negatively affects prognosis, particularly in patients who are no longer candidates for complete resection. Lung transplantation can be considered for carefully selected and well staged lung cancer patients with proven, lung-limited, multifocal, (minimally invasive) adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) (previously called bronchioloalveolar cell carcinoma) causing respiratory failure. Despite a substantial risk of tumour recurrence (33-75%), lung transplantation may offer a survival benefit (50% at 5 years) with best palliation of their disease. Reports on lung transplantation for other low-grade malignancies are rare. Lung transplant candidates at higher risk for developing lung cancer [mainly previous smokers with chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or older patients] should be thoroughly and repeatedly screened for lung cancer prior to listing, and preferably also during waiting list time if longer than 1 year, including the use of PET-CT scan and EBUS-assisted bronchoscopy in case of undefined, but suspicious pulmonary abnormalities. Double-lung transplantation should now replace single-lung transplantation in these high-risk patients because of a 6-9% prevalence of lung cancer developing in the remaining native lung. Patients with unexpected, early stage bronchial carcinoma in the explanted lung may have favourable survival without recurrence. Early PET-CT (at 3-6 months) following lung transplantation is advisable to detect early, subclinical disease progression. Donor lungs from (former) smokers should be well examined at retrieval. Suspicious nodules should be biopsied to avoid grafting cancer in the recipient. Close follow-up with regular visits and screening test in all recipients is needed because of the increased risk of developing a primary or secondary cancer in the allograft from either donor or recipient origin.

Lung transplantation in IIP: A review

The idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIP) encompass a large and diverse subtype of interstitial lung disease (ILD) with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) being the most common types. Although pharmacologic treatments are available for most types of IIP, many patients progress to advanced lung disease and require lung transplantation. Close monitoring with serial functional and radiographic tests for disease progression coupled with early referral for lung transplantation are of great importance in the management of patients with IIP. Both single and bilateral lung transplantation are acceptable procedures for IIP. Procedure selection is a complex decision influenced by multiple factors related to patient, donor and transplant centre. While single lung transplant may reduce waitlist time and mortality, the long-term outcomes after bilateral lung transplantation may be slightly superior. There are numerous complications following lung transplantation including primary graft dysfunction, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), infections, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and airway disease that limit post-transplant longevity. The median survival after lung transplantation is 4.7 years in patients with ILD, which is less than in patients with other underlying lung diseases. Although long-term survival is limited, this intervention still conveys a survival benefit and improved quality of life in suitable IIP patients with advanced lung disease and chronic hypoxemic respiratory failure.

Significance of single lung transplantation in the current situation of severe donor shortage in Japan

OBJECTIVE

Although bilateral lung transplantation is the procedure of choice internationally, single lung transplantation is preferred in Japan because of the severe donor shortage except in cases of contraindications to single lung transplantation. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics of single lung transplant recipients and outcomes of this procedure at one of the largest lung transplant centers in Japan.

METHODS

Between April 2002 and May 2015, 57 cadaveric lung transplantations (33 single and 24 bilateral) were performed in Kyoto University Hospital. The clinical characteristics of the lung transplant recipients and outcomes of these procedures, including overall survival and postoperative complications, were investigated.

RESULTS

Overall, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 86, 77, and 72 %, respectively, with a median follow-up period of 1.9 years. There was no significant difference in survival between patients who underwent single lung transplantations and those who underwent bilateral lung transplantations (p = 0.92). The median waiting time was significantly shorter for single lung transplant patients than for bilateral lung transplant patients (p = 0.02). Native lung complications were seen in 14 out of 33 patients (42 %) who underwent single lung transplantation. There was no significant difference in survival between patients with and without postoperative native lung complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Single lung transplantation has been performed with acceptable outcomes in our institution. In the current situation of severe donor shortage in Japan, single lung transplantation can remain the first choice of treatment except in cases of contraindications to single lung transplantation.

Incidence, Risk Factors and Outcomes of Delayed-onset Cytomegalovirus Disease in a Large Retrospective Cohort of Lung Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) replication and disease commonly occur in lung transplant recipients after stopping anti-CMV prophylaxis. The epidemiology of CMV disease is not well studied, given the difficulties in assembling representative study populations with prolonged follow-up. We hypothesized that delayed-onset CMV disease (>100 days after transplantation) occurs more commonly than early-onset CMV disease in lung transplant recipients, and is associated with an increased risk of death.

METHODS

We assembled a large cohort of lung transplant recipients using 2004 to 2010 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification billing data from 3 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality State Inpatient Databases, and identified demographics, comorbidities, CMV disease coded during hospital readmission and inpatient death. We used Cox proportional hazard multivariate analyses to assess for an independent association between delayed-onset CMV disease and death.

RESULTS

In the cohort of 1528 lung transplant recipients from 12 transplant centers, delayed-onset CMV disease occurred in 13.7% (n = 210) and early-onset CMV disease occurred in 3.3% (n = 51). Delayed-onset CMV pneumonitis was associated with inpatient death longer than 100 days after transplantation (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.1-2.5), after adjusting for transplant failure/rejection (aHR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5-4.1), bacterial pneumonia (aHR, 2.8; 95% CI, 2.0-3.9), viral pneumonia (aHR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1), fungal pneumonia (aHR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.3), single lung transplant (aHR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.7), and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (aHR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-1.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed-onset CMV disease occurred more commonly than early-onset CMV disease among lung transplant recipients. These results suggest that delayed-onset CMV pneumonitis was independently associated with an increased risk of death.

Thoracoscopic native lung pneumonectomy after single lung transplant: initial experience with 2 cases†

Single lung transplants (SLTs) leave in place a diseased lung, a potential source of complications. Native lung pneumonectomy is occasionally indicated. We present 2 cases of native lung complications (NLCs) managed with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pneumonectomy at our institution, a procedure never reported in this context before. Case 1 involves a 59-year old gentleman with refractory, invasive pulmonary aspergillosis of the native lung, 5 years after SLT for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Case 2 involves a 66-year old gentleman with α-1 antitrypsin deficiency who developed severe haemoptysis and intraparenchymal haemorrhage in the native lung 12 years after SLT. A VATS pneumonectomy was performed in both cases because we believed it would facilitate wound healing and hasten recovery in immunosuppressed patients. Our short-term results align with this hypothesis. We conclude that VATS pneumonectomy is a feasible, adequate and safe procedure in this patient population; larger series are needed to draw definitive conclusions.

Right native lung pneumonectomy due to over inflation three years after left single lung transplantation for pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis

Native lung hyperinflation (NLH) is one of the known complications after single lung transplantation (SLT). Generally, satisfactory results are achieved in patients undergoing SLT when simultaneous (or second stage) volume reduction of the contralateral native lung is performed. Contralateral native lung pneumonectomy after SLT is rarely reported. In this article, we report a case of a successful, right pneumonectomy of the native lung, 3 years after a left single lung transplant for pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis (PLAM). The patient's pulmonary function and quality of life improved significantly after a right pneumonectomy of the native lung.

Lung transplant infection

Lung transplantation has become an accepted therapeutic procedure for the treatment of end‐stage pulmonary parenchymal and vascular disease. Despite improved survival rates over the decades, lung transplant recipients have lower survival rates than other solid organ transplant recipients. The morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation is largely due to infection‐ and rejection‐related complications. This article will review the common infections that develop in the lung transplant recipient, including the general risk factors for infection in this population, and the most frequent bacterial, viral, fungal and other less frequent opportunistic infections. The epidemiology, diagnosis, prophylaxis, treatment and outcomes for the different microbial pathogens will be reviewed. The effects of infection on lung transplant rejection will also be discussed.

Lung transplant for interstitial lung disease: outcomes for single versus bilateral lung transplantation

This study was undertaken to evaluate outcomes for single (SLT) vs. bilateral lung transplantation (BLT) in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). One hundred and eleven patients with ILD who underwent lung transplantation between January 1993 and March 2009 were evaluated. Recipients with BLT were younger (43 ± 12 vs. 57 ± 7 years), and significantly more patients with non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) received BLT (50%) vs. patients with IPF (18%). BLT recipients had a significantly longer mean waitlist time (240 vs. 125 days), significantly higher systolic (51 ± 18 vs. 40 ± 11 mmHg) pulmonary artery pressures, were placed on cardiopulmonary bypass more frequently (67 vs. 31%), had a higher incidence of primary graft dysfunction (63 vs. 17%), more frequently were given prolonged peri-operative inhaled nitric oxide and more frequently required prolonged post-operative mechanical ventilatory support (6.0 vs. 1.7 days). Additionally, BLT recipients had a significantly longer intensive care unit (8 vs. 4 days) and hospital (24 vs. 15 days) length of stay. We did not detect a difference in survival (Kaplan-Meier) for SLT vs. BLT. Our findings suggest that outcomes for SLT for patients with ILD are comparable or somewhat superior to those for BLT, and short- and long-term survival are not significantly different for the two procedures.

Single-lung transplantation: does side matter?

OBJECTIVE

Single-lung transplantation (SLTx) is a valid treatment option for patients with non-suppurative end-stage pulmonary disease. This strategy helps to overcome current organ shortage. Side is usually chosen based on pre-transplant quantitative perfusion scan, unless specific recipient considerations or contralateral lung offer dictates opposite side. It remains largely unknown whether outcome differs between left (L) versus right (R) SLTx.

METHODS

Between July 1991 and July 2009, 142 first SLTx (M/F=87/55; age=59 (29-69) years) were performed from 142 deceased donors (M/F=81/61; age=40 (14-66) years) with a median follow-up of 32 (0-202) months. Indications for SLTx were emphysema (55.6%), pulmonary fibrosis (36.6%), primary pulmonary hypertension (0.7%), and others (7.0%). Recipients of L-SLTx (n=72) and R-SLTx (n=70) were compared for donor and recipient characteristics and for early and late outcome.

RESULTS

Donors of L-SLTx were younger (37 (14-65) vs 43 (16-66) years; p=0.033). R-SLTx recipients had more often emphysema (67.1% vs 44.4%; p=0.046) and replacement of native lung with ≥ 50% perfusion (47.1% vs 23.6%; p=0.003). The need for bypass, time to extubation, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, and 30-day mortality did not differ between groups. Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 78.4%, 60.5%, and 49.4%, respectively, with a median survival of 60 months, with no significant differences between sides. Forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV₁) improved (p<0.01) in both groups to comparable values up to 36 months. Complications overall (44.4% vs 50.0%) or in allograft (25.0% vs 24.3.0%) as well as time to bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) (35 months) and 5-year freedom from BOS (68.9% vs 75.0%) were comparable after L-SLTx versus R-SLTx, respectively. There were no differences in all causes of death (p=0.766). On multivariate analysis, BOS was a strong negative predictor for survival (hazard ratio (HR) 6.78; p<0.001), whereas side and mismatch for perfusion were not.

CONCLUSION

The preferred side for SLTx differed between fibrotic versus emphysema recipients. Transplant side does not influence recipient survival, freedom from BOS, complications, or pulmonary function after SLTx. Besides surgical considerations in the recipient, offer of a donor lung opposite to the preferred side should not be a reason to postpone the transplantation until a better-matched donor is found.

Pulmonary complications of lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is an effective treatment option for select patients with a variety of end-stage lung diseases. Although transplant can significantly improve the quality of life and prolong survival, a myriad of pulmonary complications may result in significant morbidity and limit long-term survival. The recognition and early treatment of these complications is important for optimizing outcomes. This article provides an overview and update of the pulmonary complications that may be commonly encountered by pulmonologists caring for these patients.

Advances in lung transplantation: the year in review

This article introduces a new offering from the Journal, with analysis of the key publications in lung transplantation (LTx) over the past year. To assemble the list of citations, a MEDLINE search was performed using the keyword "lung transplantation" with dates of publication from July 2009 through June 2010. In addition, tables of contents for major journals covering organ transplantation, respiratory diseases and thoracic surgery were reviewed to identify any reports not picked up by the MEDLINE search. Articles were chosen by the authors for their perceived impact on the care of LTx patients or their relevance to understanding the pathophysiology of complications after LTx.

Anatomic distortion of the right coronary artery as a complication of lung transplantation

Lung transplantation for end-stage chronic obstructive lung disease is now considered the standard of care. We report a case of perioperative myocardial ischemia and cardiovascular compromise in a single lung transplant recipient due to right coronary artery occlusion from mediastinal shift and repositioning of the heart.

Lung

Experiments with animals in the 1940 and 1950s demonstrated that lung transplantation was technically possible [33]. In 1963, Dr. James Hardy performed the first human lung transplantation. The recipient survived 18 days, ultimately succumbing to renal failure and malnutrition [58]. From 1963 through 1978, multiple attempts at lung transplantation failed because of rejection and complications at the bronchial anastomosis. In the 1980s, improvements in immunosuppression, especially the introduction of cyclosporin A, and enhanced surgical techniques led to renewed interest in organ transplantation. In 1981, a 45-year-old-woman received the first successful heart–lung transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) [106]. She survived 5 years after the procedure. Two years later the first successful single lung transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) [128] was reported, and in 1986 the first double lung transplantation for emphysema [25] was performed.