Effects of simvastatin on pulmonary C-fiber sensitivity in rats with monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension

Statins may be beneficial for patients with pulmonary hypertension secondary to lung diseases

BACKGROUND

Previous animal studies and clinical trials report inconsistent findings regarding the role of statins in pulmonary hypertension (PH). Systematic reviews have shown no use of statins on pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This is the first meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) determining the clinical impacts of statin therapy on patients with PH secondary to lung diseases.

METHODS

Electronic databases and manual bibliographical searches were conducted. Eligible studies included RCTs of at least 3 months that evaluated statin therapy as compared with control in adult patients with PH due to pulmonary diseases. Statistical analyses were performed to calculate mean difference, relative risks (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effect model.

RESULTS

A total of 6 RCTs were identified and included in this study. Five trials reported the effects of statins in patients with both chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and PH, and the remaining 1 was based on PH due to pneumoconiosis. We found that statin therapy was associated with increased 6-minute walk distance and reduced pulmonary artery systolic pressure. There was no observed difference in the incidence of death, drug withdrawal, and adverse event between statin and control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that statins might be safe and beneficial for patients with PH due to chronic lung diseases. However, larger RCTs with more patients and longer observational duration are needed.

Efficacy and Safety of Statins for Pulmonary Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a serious disease, and treatment is a continuing challenge. Some in vitro and in vivo studies identified that statins were effective for PH. However, results of some randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been controversial. The objective of our study was to clarify whether statins are effective and safe for pulmonary hypertension.

METHODS

We systematically searched for eligible RCTs from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library during January 2016. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Standard mean differences (SMDs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for continuous data (exercise capacity cardiac, pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP), cardiac index, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)). Risk ratios (RRs) were estimated for dichotomous data (adverse events and clinical deterioration).

RESULTS

A total of 496 patients from six RCTs were included. Low-density lipoprotein in the statin group decreased significantly compared with the placebo group (WMD = -22.79; 95% CI: -34.33 ∼ -11.24). However, we did not find a statistically significant effect on exercise capacity (SMD = 0.18; 95% CI: -0.34 - 0.71), PAP (WMD = -3.01; 95% CI: -8.68 - 2.65), or CI (WMD = -0.04; 95% CI: -0.15 - 0.23). Additionally, there was no difference between statins and placebo with respect to hepatic injury (RR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.43 - 2.92), myalgia (RR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.32 - 2.03), or clinical deterioration (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.58 - 1.67).

CONCLUSIONS

Statin treatment appears to be safe but may have no effect on PH.