Association of periarterial neovascularization with progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy and long-term clinical outcomes in heart transplant recipients

Invasive Intracoronary Imaging of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: Established Modalities and Emerging Technologies

Despite advances in the care of heart transplant recipients during the past 5 decades, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) continues to be a major barrier to long-term survival. The early diagnosis and treatment of CAV is crucial for improving long-term outcomes. Coronary angiography, the current gold standard for CAV screening, has low sensitivity for detecting early CAV. Increasingly, invasive intracoronary imaging modalities that provide a more detailed analysis of vessel anatomy and allow for plaque characterization are being used to detect CAV earlier after transplant and uncover mechanistic insights. Studies validating these emerging imaging platforms are needed before their widespread adoption.

Invasive Coronary Imaging Assessment for Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: State-of-the-Art Review

Heart transplantation is the standard of care treatment for end-stage heart failure. Therapeutic advances including enhanced immunosuppression and aggressive infectious prophylaxis have led to increased life-expectancy following transplantation; however, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Although coronary angiography is the current guideline-recommended diagnostic modality for invasive CAV screening, it is limited in its ability to detect early and/or diffuse disease. Efforts to improve outcomes for heart transplant recipients with CAV have focused on developing diagnostic tools with greater sensitivity to capture early CAV in order to better understand the pathobiology and implement treatment to slow disease progression sooner after transplant. The contemporary invasive imaging armamentarium for CAV surveillance includes coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and newer technologies including optical coherence tomography and near-infrared spectroscopy. The present review outlines the use of and data in support of these imaging platforms in the CAV arena and highlights the potential advantages and limitations of each of these modalities.

Evaluation of cardiac allograft vasculopathy by positron emission tomography

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains one of the most important late occurring complications in heart transplant (HT) recipients significantly effecting graft survival. Recently, there has been tremendous focus on the development of effective and safe non-invasive diagnostic strategies for the diagnosis of CAV employing a wide range of imaging technologies. During the past decade multiple studies have been published using positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging, establishing the value of PET myocardial blood flow quantification for the evaluation of CAV. These independent investigations demonstrate that PET can be successfully used to establish the diagnosis of CAV, can be utilized for prognostication and may be used for serial monitoring of HT recipients. In addition, molecular imaging techniques have started to emerge as new tools to enhance our knowledge to better understand the pathophysiology of CAV.

Angiogenesis on coronary angiography is a marker for accelerated cardiac allograft vasculopathy as assessed by intravascular ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Errant neovascularization and coronary artery fistulae (CAF) are frequently observed after cardiac transplantation. The relationship between angiographic neovascularization/CAF and coronary plaque progression is unknown.

METHODS

Angiography and intravascular ultrasound were routinely performed at 4-6 weeks and 1-year post-transplant. Pts were divided into three groups: no angiographic angiogenesis (Group 1), neovascularization only (Group 2), and CAF (Group 3). First-year changes in maximal intimal thickness (MIT), maximal intimal area (MIA), and percent atheroma volume (PAV) were compared between groups.

RESULTS

The 106 pts were included, 40/106 in Group 1, 42/106 in Group 2, and 24/106 in Group 3. Respectively, first-year ΔMIT was 0.14 ± 0.13 mm, 0.32 ± 0.26 mm, and 0.50 ± 0.34 mm, P < .001. ΔMIA was 0.6 ± 0.6 mm² , 1.7 ± 1.8 mm² , and 3.0 ± 2.6 mm² , P < .001. ΔPAV was 2.3 ± 2.5%, 6.0 ± 5.1%, and 9.6 ± 9.0%, P < .001. Rapid plaque progression occurred in 1/40 (2.5%) pts in Group 1, 12/42 (28.6%) in Group 2, and 12/24 (50%) in Group 3, P < .001. Multivariate analysis identified both antithymocyte globulin and presence of CAF as independently associated with rapid plaque progression: OR 0.29 (P = .038) and 4.04 (P = .014).

CONCLUSION

Neovascularization and CAF are commonly present on surveillance angiography after cardiac transplantation and may signify amplified angiogenesis. Their presence is associated with accelerated coronary plaque progression by IVUS.