Risk of anastomotic dehiscence in patients with pulmonary fibrosis transplanted while receiving anti-fibrotics: Experience of the Australian Lung Transplant Collaborative

Treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and progressive pulmonary fibrosis: A position statement from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand 2023 revision

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive disease leading to significant morbidity and mortality. In 2017 the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ) and Lung Foundation Australia (LFA) published a position statement on the treatment of IPF. Since that time, subsidized anti-fibrotic therapy in the form of pirfenidone and nintedanib is now available in both Australia and New Zealand. More recently, evidence has been published in support of nintedanib for non-IPF progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). Additionally, there have been numerous publications relating to the non-pharmacologic management of IPF and PPF. This 2023 update to the position statement for treatment of IPF summarizes developments since 2017 and reaffirms the importance of a multi-faceted approach to the management of IPF and progressive pulmonary fibrosis.

Effect of antifibrotic agents on postoperative complications after lung transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Antifibrotic agents (AFAs) are now standard-of-care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Concerns have arisen about the safety of these drugs in patients undergoing lung transplantation (LTx).

METHODS

We performed a multi-centre, nationwide, retrospective, observational study of French IPF patients undergoing LTx between 2011 and 2018 to determine whether maintaining AFAs in the peri-operative period leads to increased bronchial anastomoses issues, delay in skin healing and haemorrhagic complications. We compared the incidence of post-operative complications and the survival of patients according to AFA exposure.

RESULTS

Among 205 patients who underwent LTx for IPF during the study period, 58 (28%) had received AFAs within 4 weeks before LTx (AFA group): pirfenidone in 37 (18.0%) and nintedanib in 21 (10.2%). The median duration of AFA treatment before LTx was 13.8 (5.6-24) months. The AFA and control groups did not significantly differ in airway, bleeding or skin healing complications (p = 0.91, p = 0.12 and p = 0.70, respectively). Primary graft dysfunction was less frequent in the AFA than control group (26% vs. 43%, p = 0.02), and the 90-day mortality was lower (7% vs. 18%, p = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

AFA therapy did not increase airway, bleeding or wound post-operative complications after LTx and could be associated with reduced rates of primary graft dysfunction and 90-day mortality.

Delayed healing of rectal mucosa after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with nintedanib use

Nintedanib is a novel antifibrotic agent used in the treatment of interstitial lung diseases. It has been associated with delayed wound healing and wound dehiscence in case reports after major surgeries when used perioperatively. This report presents an unprecedented case of a non-healing ulcer following an endorobotic submucosal dissection of a recurrent, adenomatous rectal polyp, likely due to nintedanib use. In this article, key components of the case were described with the aim to highlight a noteworthy differential diagnosis when suspecting recurrent rectal polyps as well as the need for further research on the effects of nintedanib on healing of polypectomy sites postoperatively.

Impact of ILD-Specific Therapies on Perioperative Course in Patients with Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease Undergoing Lung Transplantation

Immunosuppressants and antifibrotics are currently used to treat patients with various interstitial lung diseases, which may undergo lung transplantation (LTx). The retrospective study aimed to evaluate the potential effects of therapeutic regimen on the perioperative course in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) undergoing LTx. All patients with IPF and PPF undergoing LTx between January 2014 and December 2021 were included. We retrospectively screened for previous use of immunosuppressants and antifibrotic therapy. We analyzed perioperative courses, short-term outcomes, and safety retrospectively. In total, 286 patients with diagnosis of IPF or PPF were analyzed. According to the treatment regimen before LTx, the study cohort was divided into four groups and compared. No differences between antifibrotic monotherapy, combined antifibrotic and immunosuppressive therapy with regard to postoperative complications were observed. Length of mechanical ventilation was shorter in patients with antifibrotics prior to LTx. Pretreatment with antifibrotic monotherapy and a combination of antifibrotic drugs with immunosuppressive therapy, lower body mass index (BMI) and lower blood loss, were independently associated with primary graft dysfunction grades 0-3 72 hours after LTx (p < 0.001). Finally, patients with antifibrotic monotherapy developed significantly less de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) (p = 0.009). Higher intraoperative blood loss, etiology of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and older age were independently associated with shorter survival after LTx. Use of antifibrotic monotherapy and a combination of antifibrotic drugs with immunosuppressive therapy in IPF/PPF patients undergoing LTx, proved to be safe and might lead to beneficial effects after LTx.

A Narrative Review of Real-World Data on the Safety of Nintedanib in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Nintedanib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases. Placebo-controlled trials showed that the adverse event profile of nintedanib was characterised mainly by gastrointestinal events, particularly diarrhoea. We review the data from all published real-world studies of the safety of nintedanib in patients with IPF. These real-world data were consistent with the safety profile observed in clinical trials and described in the product label. The most common adverse events were diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting, but these infrequently led to permanent treatment discontinuation. Liver enzyme elevations were observed, supporting the recommendation for regular monitoring of liver enzymes, particularly in the first few months of treatment. Bleeding and cardiovascular adverse events were rarely reported. As in clinical trials, in real-world studies, reductions of the nintedanib dose, treatment interruptions and use of anti-diarrhoeal medications were frequently employed to manage adverse events. Few data are available on the use of nintedanib in patients who are elderly or have advanced disease, but there are some data to suggest a greater rate of treatment discontinuation in these patients. Effective management of adverse events associated with nintedanib is important to minimise their impact.

Impact of Antifibrotic Treatment on Postoperative Complications in Patients with Interstitial Lung Diseases Undergoing Lung Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Antifibrotic treatment has been approved for reducing disease progression in fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). As a result of increased bleeding risk, some experts suggest cessation of antifibrotics prior to lung transplantation (LT). However, extensive knowledge regarding the impact of antifibrotic treatment on postoperative complications remains unclear. We performed a comprehensive search of several databases from their inception through to 30 September 2021. Original studies were included in the final analysis if they compared postoperative complications, including surgical wound dehiscence, anastomosis complication, bleeding complications, and primary graft dysfunction, between those with and without antifibrotic treatment undergoing LT. Of 563 retrieved studies, 6 studies were included in the final analysis. A total of 543 ILD patients completing LT were included, with 161 patients continuing antifibrotic treatment up to the time of LT and 382 without prior treatment. Antifibrotic treatment was not significantly associated with surgical wound dehiscence (RR 1.05; 95% CI, 0.31-3.60; I² = 0%), anastomotic complications (RR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.37-2.12; I² = 31%), bleeding complications (RR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.33-1.76; I² = 0%), or primary graft dysfunction (RR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.59-1.29; I² = 0%). Finally, continuing antifibrotic treatment prior to LT was not significantly associated with decreased 1-year mortality (RR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.41-1.58; I² = 0%). Our study suggests a similar risk of postoperative complications in ILD patients undergoing LT who received antifibrotic treatment compared to those not on antifibrotic therapy.

Antifibrotics and lung transplantation: A Spanish multicentre case-controlled study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Antifibrotic drugs are the standard treatments for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). This study aims to assess the safety of antifibrotic treatment in IPF patients undergoing lung transplantation.

METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of IPF who received a lung transplant between January 2015 and June 2019 at four Spanish hospitals specialized in lung transplantation were retrospectively recruited. Cases were defined as patients receiving antifibrotic treatments at time of transplant. Each case was matched with a control who did not receive antifibrotic treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 164 patients were included in the study cohort (103 cases and 61 controls). There were no statistically significant differences between the cases and controls in any of the items studied related to transplantation except the time until the appearance of chest wall dehiscence: although there were no differences in the incidence of wall dehiscence in either group (12.3% vs. 13.7%; p = 0.318), the patients on antifibrotic drugs experienced it earlier (21 days [IQR = 12.5-41.5] vs. 63 days [IQR = 46.75-152.25]; p = 0.012). There were no differences in overall post-transplant survival between the two groups (p = 0.698) or in conditional survival at 30 days, 90 days, 3 years or 5 years. However, 1 year survival was significantly greater among controls (80.6% vs. 93.3%; p = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

There was evidence that chest wall dehiscences appeared earlier post-transplant in patients using antifibrotics, even though this factor did not significantly impact survival.

Outpatient Pharmacologic Management of Lung Transplant Candidates on the Waiting List

The medical care of patients awaiting lung transplantation is complex and requires the treatment of active medical conditions, including lung disease, while at the same time maintaining candidacy for transplantation. Some medications that would otherwise be considered routine may create undesirable challenges or complications in the perioperative setting. Therefore, a comprehensive assessment of the risks and benefits of these medications must take into account both their potential utility in managing a patient's current disease state, as well as the risks of compromising postlung transplant outcomes. In this review, we summarize the available data regarding several medications that are commonly used to treat patients with a variety of lung diseases, but that may impact a patient's course on the waiting list or in the posttransplant period.

An Intention-to-treat View of Lung Transplantation for Interstitial Lung Disease: Successful Strategies to Minimize Waiting List and Posttransplant Mortality

BACKGROUND

Access to lung transplantation (LTx) and rates of waiting list and posttransplant mortality for patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) remain problematic. We evaluated the outcomes of ILD patients listed for LTx at our institution.

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2018, adult patients with ILD were listed and transplanted from a donor-pool that included extended criteria and donation after circulatory-determined death donors. Patients were categorized as experiencing 1 of 4 competing events: transplant, waitlist death, delisting, or alive on waitlist. Multivariable competing risk regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of waitlist death/delisting. Posttransplant survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

Among 187 patients listed, 82% (153 of 187) underwent LTx (median time-to-transplant, 2.0 mo), whereas 16% (30 of 187) died or were delisted (median time-to-event, 1.6 mo). At 90 d, 6 mo, and 12 mo after listing, 51%, 63%, and 78% of patients had been transplanted, whereas 10%, 14%, and 16% had died or were delisted. Multivariable predictors of waitlist death/delisting were: blood group O compared to A (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR]: 6.43, P < 0.001), shorter height (per 1 cm, SHR: 1.11, P < 0.001), hospitalization at listing (SHR: 3.98, P = 0.002), and reduced 6-min-walk test distance (per 50 m, SHR: 1.28, P = 0.001). Among LTx recipients, 24% (36 of 153) underwent single LTx. Donor lungs were 58% (88 of 153) extended-criteria, inclusive of 24% (37 of 153) circulatory-determined death. Ninety-day and 1-, 3-, and 5-y retransplant free survival were 97% ± 1%, 92% ± 2%, 81% ± 4%, and 69% ± 6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ILD require a rapid transit to LTx after listing. Despite this, the vast majority of ILD patients in this study reached LTx with excellent early and midterm outcomes.

Airway complications in lung transplant recipients with telomere-related interstitial lung disease

INTRODUCTION

Patients with short telomere-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) have worse outcomes after lung transplantation. We hypothesized that post-transplant airway complications, including dehiscence and bronchial stenosis, would be more common in the short telomere ILD lung transplant population.

METHODS

We conducted a multi-institutional (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Groupe de Transplantation de la SPLF) retrospective cohort study of 63 recipients between 2009 and 2019 with ILD and short telomeres, compared to 4359 recipients from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients with ILD and no known telomeropathy.

RESULTS

In the short telomere cohort, six recipients (9.5%) developed dehiscence and nine recipients (14.3%) developed stenosis, compared to 60 (1.4%) and 149 (3.4%) in the control, respectively. After adjusting for age, sex, and bilaterality, the presence of short telomeres was associated with higher odds of dehiscence (odds ratio (OR) = 8.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.34 20.29, p < .001) and stenosis (OR = 4.63, 95% CI 2.21 9.69, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

The association between the presence of short telomeres and post-transplant dehiscence and stenosis suggest that airway complications may be a contributor to increased morbidity and mortality in patients with telomere-related ILD.

Preoperative Management of Gastrointestinal and Pulmonary Medications: Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI) Consensus Statement

Perioperative medication management is integral to preoperative optimization but remains challenging because of a paucity of literature guidance. Published recommendations are based on the expert opinion of a small number of authors without collaboration from multiple specialties. The Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI) recognized the need for consensus recommendations in this area as well as the unique opportunity for its multidisciplinary membership to fill this void. In a series of articles within this journal, SPAQI provides preoperative medication management guidance based on available literature and expert multidisciplinary consensus. The aim of this consensus statement is to provide practical guidance on the preoperative management of gastrointestinal and pulmonary medications. A panel of experts with anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, hospital medicine, general internal medicine, and medical specialty experience was drawn together and identified the common medications in each of these categories. The authors then used a modified Delphi approach to review the literature and to generate consensus recommendations.

Effect of antifibrotic therapy in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis undergoing lung transplant in the peri and post-operative period

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease with high mortality. Lung transplant remains a cornerstone of treatment despite the advent of antifibrotic therapy. In light of the increasing number of patients on antifibrotic therapy prior to lung transplantation it is paramount to demonstrate these medications do not augment postoperative complications following transplant.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does antifibrotic therapy increase perioperative complications and mortality in lung transplant recipients?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients actively listed for lung transplant at Temple University Hospital from June 2014 to April 2017 with a listing diagnosis of IPF. Subjects who received treatment with antifibrotic therapy (either pirfenidone or nintedanib) up until the time of lung transplantation were compared to subjects not on therapy. Data was collected regarding baseline demographics, pulmonary function tests, IPF exacerbations, perioperative bleeding and cardiac events, and outcomes in the postoperative period.

RESULTS

A total of 94 subjects were included in the study: 42 subjects on antifibrotic therapy (28 pirfenidone, 14 nintedanib) and 52 subjects not on therapy in the pre-transplant period. Baseline characteristics were similar between study groups. Subjects treated with antifibrotic therapy pre-transplant were noted to have less FVC decline, fewer hospitalizations, and greater weight loss while on the transplant waiting list. No difference in post-transplant airway anastomosis complications, bleeding or mortality was observed between study groups.

INTERPRETATION

Subjects with IPF on antifibrotic therapy prior to lung transplantation had better preservation of lung function in the pre-transplant period, and similar outcomes in the postoperative period compared to those not on antifibrotic therapy before lung transplant.

Does continuation of antifibrotics before lung transplantation influence post-transplant outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis?

A best evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: ‘Does continuation of antifibrotics before lung transplantation (LTx) influence post-transplant outcomes in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) with regard to mortality, bronchial anastomotic dehiscence, reoperation for bleeding and wound complications, primary graft dysfunction or longer-term survival and allograft rejection?’ A total of 261 articles were found using the reported search strategy, of which 7 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. Six out of 7 studies demonstrated equivalent post-transplant survival among IPF patients on antifibrotics before LTx compared with controls. Five out of 6 studies showed no increase in the risk of major bleeding, wound or bronchial anastomotic complications. One bi-institutional study found a higher incidence of early bronchial anastomotic dehiscence, but this difference was not statistically significant after longer term follow-up. In a study that only included IPF patients who underwent single LTx, a lower incidence of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction was reported in the antifibrotic group compared with controls. Overall, to date, only small (N < 40 in the antifibrotic group), non-risk-adjusted, retrospective observational studies have been published. Notwithstanding, the summation of available evidence suggests that, in IPF patients, continuation of antifibrotic therapy before LTx is likely safe, and the rates of perioperative bleeding, wound or bronchial anastomotic complications, as well as 30-day and 1-year survival, are similar to patients not on antifibrotics before LTx.

Lung transplantation for interstitial lung disease

Lung transplantation (LTx) can be a life-extending treatment option for patients with advanced and/or progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD), especially idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, sarcoidosis and connective tissue disease-associated ILD. IPF is now the most common indication for LTx worldwide. Several unique features in patients with ILD can impact optimal timing of referral or listing for LTx, pre- or post-transplant risks, candidacy and post-transplant management. As the epidemiology of LTx and community practices have evolved, recent literature describes outcomes and approaches in higher-risk candidates. In this review, we discuss the unique and important clinical findings, course, monitoring and management of patients with IPF and other progressive fibrotic ILDs during pre-LTx evaluation and up to the day of transplantation; the need for co-management with clinical experts in ILD and LTx is emphasised. Some post-LTx complications are unique in these patient cohorts, which require prompt detection and appropriate management by experts in multiple disciplines familiar with telomere biology disorders and infectious, haematological, oncological and cardiac complications to enhance the likelihood of improved outcomes and survival of LTx recipients with IPF and other ILDs.

Antifibrotic drugs in lung transplantation and chronic lung allograft dysfunction: a review

This review aims to provide an overview of pre-transplant antifibrotic therapy on peri-transplant outcomes and to address the possible role of antifibrotics in lung transplant recipients with chronic lung allograft dysfunction.Lung transplantation is an established treatment modality for patients with various end-stage lung diseases, of which idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and other progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases are growing indications. Theoretically, widespread use of antifibrotics prior to lung transplantation may increase the risk of bronchial anastomotic complications and impaired wound healing.Long-term graft and patient survival are still hampered by development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, on which antifibrotics may have a beneficial impact.Antifibrotics until the moment of lung transplantation proved to be safe, without increasing peri-transplant complications. Currently, best practice is to continue antifibrotics until time of transplantation. In a large multicentre randomised trial, pirfenidone did not appear to have a beneficial effect on lung function decline in established bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. The results of antifibrotic therapy in restrictive allograft syndrome are eagerly awaited, but nonrandomised data from small case reports/series are promising.