Ventricular assist device support for complex congenital heart disease: Inspiration from history of surgical evolution

International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024

The "International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024" updates and replaces the "Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2006" and the "2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: A 10-year Update." The document aims to provide tools to help integrate the numerous variables involved in evaluating patients for transplantation, emphasizing updating the collaborative treatment while waiting for a transplant. There have been significant practice-changing developments in the care of heart transplant recipients since the publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines in 2006 and the 10-year update in 2016. The changes pertain to 3 aspects of heart transplantation: (1) patient selection criteria, (2) care of selected patient populations, and (3) durable mechanical support. To address these issues, 3 task forces were assembled. Each task force was cochaired by a pediatric heart transplant physician with the specific mandate to highlight issues unique to the pediatric heart transplant population and ensure their adequate representation. This guideline was harmonized with other ISHLT guidelines published through November 2023. The 2024 ISHLT guidelines for the evaluation and care of cardiac transplant candidates provide recommendations based on contemporary scientific evidence and patient management flow diagrams. The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association modular knowledge chunk format has been implemented, allowing guideline information to be grouped into discrete packages (or modules) of information on a disease-specific topic or management issue. Aiming to improve the quality of care for heart transplant candidates, the recommendations present an evidence-based approach.

Ventricular assist device support for failing Glenn circulation: Impact of concomitant Fontan completion in select patients

BACKGROUND

Ventricular assist device (VAD) support for failing Glenn circulation represents a unique challenge.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of clinical outcomes in patients with VAD support for failing Glenn circulation between 2010 and 2020 at a tertiary pediatric institution.

RESULTS

Ten patients were included: INTERMACS profiles were 1 in 3 patients and 2 in 7 patients. The median age, weight, and body surface area were 3.2 years, 13.0 kg, and 0.5 m², respectively. Seven patients (70%) were implanted with continuous-flow devices and 3 with para-corporeal devices. Nine patients (90%) received heart transplant, with a median support duration of 77 days. Four (67%) out of 6 patients supported with discharge-capable devices were managed as outpatients. Post-transplant survival was 100%, with a median (range) follow up duration of 3.5 (1.8-11.9) years. There were 3 neurologic complications in 3 patients (0.9 events per patient-year); 2 intraoperative events (fatal hypoxia and symptomatic embolic stroke) and 1 postoperative (asymptomatic subarachnoid hemorrhage). Pump thrombosis occurred in one patient (0.3 events per patient-year), requiring pump exchange at day 65. Five patients (50%) received concomitant Fontan completion (fenestrated in 1). The Fontan-upgraded patients (vs Glenn) tended to be larger (median (range): 15.9 (12.6-22.9) vs 9.1 (7.7-22.8) kg), older (4.7 (3.1-6.5) vs 1.1 (0.9-10.1) years) and had a higher PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio (192 (52-336) vs 76 (59-78) mm Hg) on postoperative day 1.

CONCLUSION

Our experience suggests the feasibility of durable VAD support for failing Glenn circulation. Concomitant Fontan completion may be considered in select patients to improve oxygen delivery.

Perioperative Outcomes in Patients With Failing Single-Ventricle Physiology Undergoing Ventricular Assist Device Placement: A Single Institutional Experience

OBJECTIVE

To address the current lack of specified data existing regarding the perioperative characteristics and outcomes in a novel patient population, which may bridge the current understanding of how patient characteristics and perioperative management may influence the postoperative hospital course before cardiac transplantation.

DESIGN

A retrospective electronic chart review included all patients with failing single- ventricle (SV) physiology receiving ventricular assist device (VAD) support at a high-volume pediatric VAD center between April 5, 2010, and December 1, 2020, using institution-based electronic medical records for retrospective analysis.

SETTING

At a single pediatric hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Fourteen pediatric patients with failing SV physiology receiving ventricular assist device therapy (SVAD).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative patient demographic and medical data were obtained from prior inpatient progress notes, laboratory values, anesthetic records, cardiac catheterization reports, echocardiography reports, and postoperative surgical notes entered during inpatient encounters at the time of SVAD placement. Between April 5, 2010, and December 1, 2020, 16 VAD device implants supported 14 pediatric patients with failing SV physiology. Most patients presented with a preoperative diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome (N = 9, 64.3%). A total of 6 patients expired on VAD therapy (43%), 7 (50%) survived to receive a cardiac transplant, and 1 patient currently remains on device therapy.

CONCLUSION

Although our institutional approach represents a single perspective, we anticipate that our experience institutional experience may prove helpful to others caring for peditric patients with single ventricle physiology undergoing ventricular assist device placement and promote collaborative efforts to improve their care.

A Review of Physiologic Considerations and Challenges in Pediatric Patients With Failing Single- Ventricle Physiology Undergoing Ventricular Assist Device Placement

Advances in surgical techniques and outpatient cardiac care have led to a growing population of pediatric patients surviving well into adulthood with previous single-ventricle palliation. Continued improvement in survival has resulted in subsequent increases in the number of patients with single-ventricle physiology listed for heart transplantations. Some of these patients require mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to transplantation, although establishing successful mechanical circulatory support in these complex patients remains challenging. Only limited published data exist describing the perioperative anesthetic management and key considerations dedicated to patients with failing single-ventricle physiology presenting for ventricular assist devices. This clinical review aims to provide a focused evaluation of the vital perioperative considerations encountered in this novel population.

Mechanical Support for The Failing Single Ventricle at Pre-Fontan Stage: Current State of The Field and Future Directions

With the substantial growth of pediatric ventricular assist device (VAD) support, there has been an expansion of the target population towards more complex patients, including congenital heart disease (CHD) with single ventricle (SV) physiology. The outcomes of Stage I and Stage II SV-CHD patients on VAD support from the Pedimacs database are poor, with less than 50% survival on VAD by the 3-month mark in both. The primary objective of this article is to describe the current state of VAD support for the failing Stage I and II SV-CHD circulation, to provide insight into potential areas of outcome improvement. We reviewed the published literature in the form of database and registry reports as well as single-center studies to discuss the outcomes of Stage I and Stage II SV-CHD patients on VAD support. Registry-based studies suggest that VAD support for the failing Stage I and Stage II SV-CHD circulations is challenging. However, the more promising outcomes in several single-institutional reports for both Stage I and Stage II SV-VAD indicate that the grim picture from the databases does not reflect the best outcomes that are possible to be achieved, potentially at experienced centers with higher volumes. Areas of future study and potential improvement including timely initiation of VAD support in the cohort of patients expected to not be a candidate for standard SV palliations, pump selection and the benefits of continuous-flow devices, and the decision-making for setting up the optimum circulation for VAD support, be it Fontan completion if feasible or takedown to shunt physiology.