Is chronological age still a hard selection criterion for lung transplantation?

Donor and Recipient Age in Interstitial Lung Disease: Types of Lung Transplant Survival Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Lung transplantation is the last option for patients with end-stage interstitial lung disease (ILD), yet organ allocation remains a challenge. This single-center study investigated the correlation of procedure type and donor and recipient age with survival outcomes in patients with ILD.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of lung recipients diagnosed with ILD who were transplanted in our center. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests according to the following variables: double lung transplant (DLT) or single lung transplant (SLT), recipient age <65 and ≥65, recipient sex, donor sex, and donor age. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed using the same variables. P values < 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Of 969 lung recipients transplanted at our center, 648 (66.8%) were diagnosed with ILD. There was no significant difference in survival for patients <65 or ≥65 when compared by DLT versus SLT. There were no significant differences in survival based on donor age. Survival at 5 y was significantly higher for recipient age <65 versus ≥65 (P = 0.0014). For DLT patients <65 or ≥65, there was no significant survival difference. However, for SLT patients, survival at 5 y was significantly higher for patients <65 (P = 0.0109).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that donor age did not have a significant association with survival of patients with ILD posttransplant. In older patients with ILD, there was no significant difference for DLT versus SLT. However, within the SLT group, younger patients with ILD showed better survival compared to older patients.

Current Status and Trends in Lung Transplant Research Funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to analyze research projects on lung transplant funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China from 1986 to 2022 and to provide a scientific reference for lung transplant research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified research hotspots and frontiers in the field of lung transplant research using CiteSpace visualization.

RESULTS

From 1986 to 2022, the National Natural Science Foundation of China funded 93 projects related to lung transplant, with an average of 2.51 projects and ¥0.94 million annually. The National Natural Science Foundation of China funded 30 institutions across 20 provinces, with general and youth science foundation projects comprising 45.16% and 41.93% of the total projects, respectively. The main categories of disciplines included H0113 respiratory intervention, tracheal reconstruction, and lung transplantation; H1105 organ transplantation and transplant immunization; and H0109 acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. The research hotspots mainly included ischemia-reperfusion injury, gene regulation, obliterative bronchiolitis, rejection reaction, T cells, and stem cells. The 6 main research clusters were ischemia-reperfusion injury, immune tolerance, obliterative bronchiolitis, stem cells, pulmonary fibrosis, and rejection reaction. The main key word bursts in the past 5 years were "vein endothelial" and "ex vivo lung perfusion."

CONCLUSIONS

In the past 37 years, National Natural Science Foundation of China-funded projects have significantly advanced the clinical application and basic research of lung transplantation. However, compared with developed countries and other solidorgan transplantations, several problems still require attention and improvements in lung transplant research in China.

Outcomes after lung transplantation in recipients aged 70 years or older

BACKGROUND

The proportion of lung transplant (LTx) recipients older than 70 years is increasing, thus we assessed long-term survival after LTx in this cohort relative to younger counterparts.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients who underwent LTx between 2012 and 2016 at our center and divided patients by age: group A (<65 years), B (65-69 years), and C (≥70 years). Survival statistics were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression.

RESULTS

The study included 375 LTx recipients: 221 (58.9%) in group A, 109 (29.1%) in group B, and 45 (12.0%) in group C. Group C was mostly men (37/45 [82.2%]; P = 0.003) and had the highest mean serum creatinine at listing (P = 0.02). Survival at 1, 3, and 5 years after transplant in group A (93.2%, 70.1%, 58.8%) was significantly higher than group B (83.5%, 59.6%, 44.0%; P = 0.005, 0.028, 0.006, log-rank test) and was similar to group C (86.7%, 64.4%, 57.8%), although trended higher at 1 year (P = 0.139, 0.274, 0.489, log-rank test). Groups B and C had comparable survival at all time points.

CONCLUSIONS

Although survival decreased after age 65, long-term survival was comparable between LTx recipients aged 65-69 years and recipients ≥70 years.

Lung transplantation for interstitial lung disease

Lung transplantation (LTx) can be a life-extending treatment option for patients with advanced and/or progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD), especially idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, sarcoidosis and connective tissue disease-associated ILD. IPF is now the most common indication for LTx worldwide. Several unique features in patients with ILD can impact optimal timing of referral or listing for LTx, pre- or post-transplant risks, candidacy and post-transplant management. As the epidemiology of LTx and community practices have evolved, recent literature describes outcomes and approaches in higher-risk candidates. In this review, we discuss the unique and important clinical findings, course, monitoring and management of patients with IPF and other progressive fibrotic ILDs during pre-LTx evaluation and up to the day of transplantation; the need for co-management with clinical experts in ILD and LTx is emphasised. Some post-LTx complications are unique in these patient cohorts, which require prompt detection and appropriate management by experts in multiple disciplines familiar with telomere biology disorders and infectious, haematological, oncological and cardiac complications to enhance the likelihood of improved outcomes and survival of LTx recipients with IPF and other ILDs.