Deactivating cochlear implant electrodes to improve speech perception: A computational approach

Survey of selective electrode deactivation attitudes and practices by cochlear implant audiologists

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to explore clinician attitudes regarding selective electrode deactivation and to investigate the primary methodology used to identify poorly encoded electrodes, deactivate identified electrodes, and measure outcomes.

METHODS

An online survey consisting of 32 questions was administered to certified clinical and research cochlear implant (CI) audiologists. Questions asked participants about their demographic information, device programming patterns, and attitudes regarding selective electrode deactivation.

RESULTS

Fifty-four audiologists completed the survey. When asked whether they believed selectively deactivating poorly encoded electrodes could improve speech perception outcomes, 43% of respondents selected 'Probably Yes,' 39% selected 'Definitely Yes,' and 18% selected 'Might or Might Not.' Of those who reported deactivating electrodes as part of CI programming, various methodology was reported to identify and deactivate poorly encoding electrodes and evaluate effectiveness of deactivation. General reasons against deactivation were also reported.

DISCUSSION

CI audiologists generally believed selective electrode deactivation could be used to improve speech perception outcomes for patients; however, few reported implementing selective electrode deactivation in practice. Among those who do perform selective electrode deactivation, the reported methodology was highly variable.

CONCLUSION

These findings support the need for clinical practice guidelines to assist audiologists in performing selective electrode deactivation.

Predictors of Postoperative Electrode Deactivation Among Adult Cochlear Implantees

OBJECTIVE

To characterize postoperative electrode functionality after adult cochlear implantation; to identify rationale and risk factors for electrode deactivation.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Chart Review.

SETTING

Academic Cochlear Implant Center.

SUBJECT POPULATION

Five hundred nineteen cochlear implants in 433 adult patients over 5 years.

INTERVENTIONS

Unilateral or bilateral cochlear implantation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rate of electrode deactivation after adult cochlear implantation.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty (27.7%) patients experienced electrode deactivation postoperatively, involving a total of 447 electrodes. The most common reasons for deactivation were bothersome nonauditory symptoms (n = 170, 38.0%), perceived benefit by patients (n = 64, 14.3%), and bothersome auditory symptoms (n = 60, 13.4%). Four hundred nineteen (93.7%) of involved electrodes remained deactivated at most recent follow-up, whereas 28 (6.3%) were able to be reactivated. Deactivation was most likely to occur within the first 4 weeks after activation (n = 90 patients,75.0%; p < 0.01). Among affected patients, the average number of electrodes deactivated was 3.44 (range 1-13; SD 2.50). Age was not associated with electrode deactivation.

CONCLUSIONS

While 98% of cochlear implants had full insertions, more than a quarter of implantees may experience electrode deactivation postoperatively for a multitude of reasons, with bothersome nonauditory symptoms most prevalent. Deactivation of five or more electrodes and simultaneous deactivation of two or three electrodes seems to increase the odds of subsequent device failure. However, deactivation encompasses a wide range of issues that likely include patient factors, surgical technique, and device-specific issues. Prognosis varies greatly at the individual level and further evaluation is required to better identify the issues underlying deactivation and identify true predictors of failure.

Using the electrically-evoked compound action potential (ECAP) interphase gap effect to select electrode stimulation sites in cochlear implant users

Studies in cochlear implanted animals show that the IPG Effect for ECAP growth functions (i.e., the magnitude of the change in ECAP amplitude growth function (AGF) slope or peak amplitude when the interphase gap (IPG) is increased) can be used to estimate the densities of spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) near the electrode stimulation and recording sites. In humans, the same ECAP IPG Effect measures correlate with speech recognition performance. The present study examined the efficacy of selecting electrode sites for stimulation based on the IPG Effect, in order to improve performance of CI users on speech recognition tasks. We measured the ECAP IPG Effect for peak amplitude in adult (>18 years old) CI users (N= 18 ears), and created experimental programs to stimulate electrodes with either the highest or lowest ECAP IPG Effect for peak amplitude. Subjects also listened to a program without any electrodes deactivated. In a subset of subject ears (11/18), we compared performance differences between the experimental programs to post-operative computerized tomography (CT) scans to examine underlying factors that might contribute to the efficacy of an electrode site-selection approach. For sentences-in-noise, average performance was better when subjects listened to the experimental program that stimulated electrodes with the highest rather than the lowest IPG Effect for ECAP peak amplitude. A similar pattern was noted for transmission and perception of consonant place cues in a consonant recognition task. However, on average, performance when listening to a program with higher IPG Effect values was equal to that when listening with all electrodes activated. Results also suggest that scalar location (scala tympani or vestibuli) should be considered when using an ECAP-based electrode site-selection procedure to optimize CI performance.

Advances in Neuroscience, Not Devices, Will Determine the Effectiveness of Visual Prostheses

Background: Innovations in engineering and neuroscience have enabled the development of sophisticated visual prosthetic devices. In clinical trials, these devices have provided visual acuities as high as 20/460, enabled coarse navigation, and even allowed for reading of short words. However, long-term commercial viability arguably rests on attaining even better vision and more definitive improvements in tasks of daily living and quality of life. Purpose: Here we review technological and biological obstacles in the implementation of visual prosthetics. Conclusions: Research in the visual prosthetic field has tackled significant technical challenges, including biocompatibility, signal spread through neural tissue, and inadvertent activation of passing axons; however, significant gaps in knowledge remain in the realm of neuroscience, including the neural code of vision and visual plasticity. We assert that further optimization of prosthetic devices alone will not provide markedly improved visual outcomes without significant advances in our understanding of neuroscience.