Interaction of auditory and pain pathways: Effects of stimulus intensity, hearing loss and opioid signaling

Effect of noise isolation using noise-cancelling headphones during laparoscopic surgery for postoperative pain reduction: A randomized clinical trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Most laparoscopic surgeries under general anesthesia are performed in noisy environments, although the effect of intraoperative noise reduction on postoperative pain remains uncertain. This study aimed to explore whether postoperative pain could be reduced through the intraoperative use of noise-cancelling headphones.

DESIGN

This study was conducted as a prospective parallel-group randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

Operating room and surgery room.

PATIENTS

Ninety patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia.

INTERVENTIONS

In the intervention group, noise-cancelling headphones were used to reduce noise intensity during laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was the maximum movement-evoked pain intensity within 24 h post-surgery, measured using a 10-point numeric rating scale. Secondary outcomes included the maximum resting pain score and total opioid consumption during the 24-h period post-surgery. Mean intraoperative noise and the proportion of intraoperative time with noise intensity ≥70 dB were recorded.

MAIN RESULTS

The maximum movement-evoked pain score was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (mean score [SD], 2.7 [1.0] and 4.0[1.0], respectively; P < 0.001). The intervention group required significantly fewer opioids than the control group (mean [SD], 44.2 [12.8] and 51.3[17.5] mg, respectively; P = 0.032). In the control group, but not the intervention group, all postoperative pain scores were significantly associated with the proportion of intraoperative time with noise intensity ≥70 dB, which was an independent risk factor for postoperative pain.

CONCLUSION

During laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia, intraoperative noise isolation using noise-cancelling headphones is a safe and effective strategy for relieving postoperative pain and decreasing total opioid analgesic consumption.

Effect of intraoperative noise on postoperative pain in surgery patients under general anesthesia: evidence from a prospective study and mouse model

BACKGROUND

Most patients are in a noisy environment during abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. This study included patients who underwent abdominal surgery under general anesthesia and established an animal model to determine whether intraoperative noise affects postoperative pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study included 200 patients who underwent abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. Intraoperative noise and electroencephalograms were continuously recorded, and the mean level and time proportion of noise intensity of greater than 70 dB were calculated. Maximum postoperative pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale at 0-12 h and 12-24 h after surgery, and postoperative analgesia consumption in patients receiving patient-controlled intravenous analgesia was recorded. Postoperative pain intensity and electroencephalogram amplitude were compared between patients with high-noise exposure (time proportion of noise intensity greater than 70 dB ≥40%) and low-noise exposure (<40%). Mechanical pain sensitivity was tested in two groups of mice with plantar incisions exposed to 40 dB or 70-100 dB.

RESULTS

The time proportion of noise intensity greater than 70 dB was identified as an independent risk factor for postoperative pain intensity ( P <0.001). P ain numerical rating scale 0-12 h (4.5±1.5 vs. 3.7±1.3, P =0.001) and 12-24 h (3.9±1.5 vs. 3.2±1.1, P =0.004) after surgery in patients with high-noise exposure was significantly higher than in patients with low-noise exposure. The electroencephalogram amplitude of patients with high-noise exposure was significantly lower than that of patients with low-noise exposure ( P <0.05). In the mouse model, mechanical hyperalgesia in the 70-100 dB group was significantly greater than that in the 40 dB group ( P <0.001).

CONCLUSION

High-level intraoperative noise exposure aggravates the degree of postoperative pain and analgesic needs of patients undergoing abdominal surgery, which may be related to the impact of noise on the neurophysiological activity of the brain and postoperative hyperalgesia.

Bilateral sensorineural hearing loss after opioid overdose in an adolescent male

Opioid-induced hearing loss has been described as a form of sudden sensorineural hearing loss that can occur with chronic or acute opioid use. Here, we report a case of a 16-year-old patient with sudden onset hearing loss after opioid overdose requiring prolonged intubation with fentanyl sedation.

Opening a window into the riddle of misophonia, sensory over-responsiveness, and pain

Introduction

Misophonia and sensory over-responsiveness (SOR) share physiological and psychological symptoms. While individuals with SOR demonstrate pain perception alterations, these were not explored in misophonia.

Methods

This exploratory study comprised thirty healthy adults with (n = 15; based on the Misophonia Questionnaire) and without misophonia. The Sensory Responsiveness Questionnaire (SRQ) was used for evaluating sensory responsiveness. In addition, psychophysical tests were applied for quantification of: (i) stimulus-response function of painful stimuli, (ii) the individual perceived pain intensity, (iii) pain modulation efficiency, (iv) auditory intensity discrimination capability, and (v) painful and unpleasantness responses to six ecological daily sounds using the Battery of Aversiveness to Sounds (BAS).

Results

Individuals with misophonia reported higher scores in the SRQ-Aversive (p = 0.022) and SRQ-Hedonic (p = 0.029) scales as well as in auditory (p = 0.042) and smell (p = 0.006) sub-scales, indicating higher sensory responsiveness. Yet they were not identified with the SOR type of sensory modulation dysfunction. Groups did not differ in the pain psychophysical tests, and in auditory discrimination test scores (p > 0.05). However, in the misophonia group the BAS evoked higher pain intensity (p = 0.046) and unpleasantness (p <0.001) ratings in the apple biting sound, and higher unpleasantness rating in the scraping a dish sound (p = 0.007), compared to the comparison group.

Conclusion

Findings indicate increased sensory responsiveness in individuals with misophonia, yet not defined as SOR. Thus, this suggests that misophonia and SOR are two distinct conditions, differing in their behavioral responses to painful and non-painful stimuli.