Comparing and modeling absolute auditory thresholds in an alternative-forced-choice and a yes-no procedure

Temporal integration of infrasound at threshold

Infrasounds are signals with frequencies below the classical audio-frequency range, i.e., below 20 Hz. Several previous studies have shown that infrasound is audible as well, provided that the sound level is high enough. Hence, the sound pressure levels at threshold are much higher than those in the classical audio-frequency range. The present study investigates how the duration and the shape of the temporal envelope affect thresholds of infrasound stimuli in quiet. Two envelope types were considered: one where the duration of the steady state was varied (plateau bursts) and one where the number of consecutive onset-offset bursts was varied (multiple bursts). Stimuli were presented monaurally to human listeners by means of a low-distortion sound reproduction system. For both envelope types, thresholds decrease with increasing duration, a phenomenon often referred to as temporal integration. At the same duration, thresholds for plateau-burst stimuli are typically lower than those for multiple-burst stimuli. The data are well described by a slightly modified version of a model that was previously developed to account for temporal integration in the classical audio-frequency range. The results suggest similar mechanisms underlying the detection of stimuli with frequencies in the infrasound and in the classical audio-frequency range. Since the model accounts for the effect of duration and, more generally, the shape of the envelope, it can be used to enhance the comparability of existing and future datasets of thresholds for infrasounds with different temporal stimulus parameters.

How to define thresholds for level and interaural-level-difference discrimination: Insights from scedasticities and distributions

Sensitivity to changes in the stimulus level at one or at both ears and to changes in the interaural level difference (ILD) between the two ears has been studied widely. Several different definitions of threshold and, for one of them, two different ways of averaging single-listener thresholds have been used (i.e., arithmetically and geometrically), but it is unclear which definition and which way of averaging is most suitable. Here, we addressed this issue by examining which of the differently defined thresholds yielded the highest degree of homoscedasticity (homogeneity of the variance). We also examined how closely the differently defined thresholds followed the normal distribution. We measured thresholds from a large number of human listeners as a function of stimulus duration in six experimental conditions, using an adaptive two-alternative forced-choice paradigm. Thresholds defined as the logarithm of the ratio of the intensities or amplitudes of the target and the reference stimulus (i.e., as the difference in their levels or ILDs; the most commonly used definition) were clearly heteroscedastic. Log-transformation of these latter thresholds, as sometimes performed, did not result in homoscedasticity. Thresholds defined as the logarithm of the Weber fraction for stimulus intensity and thresholds defined as the logarithm of the Weber fraction for stimulus amplitude (the most rarely used definition) were consistent with homoscedasticity, but the latter were closer to the ideal case. Thresholds defined as the logarithm of the Weber fraction for stimulus amplitude also followed the normal distribution most closely. The discrimination thresholds should therefore be expressed as the logarithm of the Weber fraction for stimulus amplitude and be averaged arithmetically across listeners. Other implications are discussed, and the obtained differences between the thresholds in different conditions are compared to the literature.

Towards a unifying basis of auditory thresholds: Thresholds for multicomponent stimuli

Sounds consisting of multiple simultaneous or consecutive components can be detected by listeners when the stimulus levels of the components are lower than those needed to detect the individual components alone. The mechanisms underlying such spectral, spectrotemporal, temporal, or across-ear integration are not completely understood. Here, we report threshold measurements from human subjects for multicomponent stimuli (tone complexes, tone sequences, diotic or dichotic tones) and for their individual sinusoidal components in quiet. We examine whether the data are compatible with the detection model developed by Heil, Matysiak, and Neubauer (HMN model) to account for temporal integration (Heil et al. 2017), and we compare its performance to that of the statistical summation model (Green 1958), the model commonly used to account for spectral and spectrotemporal integration. In addition, we compare the performance of both models with respect to previously published thresholds for sequences of identical tones and for diotic tones. The HMN model is similar to the statistical summation model but is based on the assumption that the decision variable is a number of sensory events generated by the components via independent Poisson point processes. The rate of events is low without stimulation and increases with stimulation. The increase is proportional to the time-varying amplitude envelope of the bandpass-filtered component(s) raised to an exponent of 3. For an ideal observer, the decision variable is the sum of the events from all channels carrying information, for as long as they carry information. We find that the HMN model provides a better account of the thresholds for multicomponent stimuli than the statistical summation model, and it offers a unifying account of spectral, spectrotemporal, temporal, and across-ear integration at threshold.