2
|
Alzhrani F, Aljazeeri I, Abdelsamad Y, Alsanosi A, Kim AH, Ramos-Macias A, Ramos-de-Miguel A, Kurz A, Lorens A, Gantz B, Buchman CA, Távora-Vieira D, Sprinzl G, Mertens G, Saunders JE, Kosaner J, Telmesani LM, Lassaletta L, Bance M, Yousef M, Holcomb MA, Adunka O, Thomasen PC, Skarzynski PH, Rajeswaran R, Briggs RJ, Oh SH, Plontke S, O’Leary SJ, Agrawal S, Yamasoba T, Lenarz T, Wesarg T, Kutz W, Connolly P, Anderson I, Hagr A. International Consensus Statements on Intraoperative Testing for Cochlear Implantation Surgery. Ear Hear 2024; 45:1418-1426. [PMID: 38915137 PMCID: PMC11487033 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A wide variety of intraoperative tests are available in cochlear implantation. However, no consensus exists on which tests constitute the minimum necessary battery. We assembled an international panel of clinical experts to develop, refine, and vote upon a set of core consensus statements. DESIGN A literature review was used to identify intraoperative tests currently used in the field and draft a set of provisional statements. For statement evaluation and refinement, we used a modified Delphi consensus panel structure. Multiple interactive rounds of voting, evaluation, and feedback were conducted to achieve convergence. RESULTS Twenty-nine provisional statements were included in the original draft. In the first voting round, consensus was reached on 15 statements. Of the 14 statements that did not reach consensus, 12 were revised based on feedback provided by the expert practitioners, and 2 were eliminated. In the second voting round, 10 of the 12 revised statements reached a consensus. The two statements which did not achieve consensus were further revised and subjected to a third voting round. However, both statements failed to achieve consensus in the third round. In addition, during the final revision, one more statement was decided to be deleted due to overlap with another modified statement. CONCLUSIONS A final core set of 24 consensus statements was generated, covering wide areas of intraoperative testing during CI surgery. These statements may provide utility as evidence-based guidelines to improve quality and achieve uniformity of surgical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farid Alzhrani
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Isra Aljazeeri
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Aljaber Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology Specialized Hospital, Ministry of Health, Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
- Isra Aljazeeri shared first author
| | - Yassin Abdelsamad
- Research Department, Research Department, MED-EL GmbH, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulrahman Alsanosi
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ana H. Kim
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Angel Ramos-Macias
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Angel Ramos-de-Miguel
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Anja Kurz
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, Comprehensive Hearing Center, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Artur Lorens
- Word Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland
| | - Bruce Gantz
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery/Neurosurgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Craig A. Buchman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Dayse Távora-Vieira
- Division of Surgery, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Audiology, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Georg Sprinzl
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, University Hospital St. Poelten, St. Poelten, Austria
| | - Griet Mertens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - James E. Saunders
- Section of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Julie Kosaner
- Meders Speech and Hearing Clinic, Meders İşitme ve Konuşma Merkezi, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Laila M. Telmesani
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Luis Lassaletta
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital La Paz, IdiPAZ Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Rare Diseases, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Manohar Bance
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Medhat Yousef
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Audiology Unit, ENT Department, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
| | - Meredith A. Holcomb
- Hearing Implant Program, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Oliver Adunka
- Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Per Cayé- Thomasen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Piotr H. Skarzynski
- Department of Teleaudiology and Screening, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland
- Faculty of Dental Medicine, Heart Failure and Cardiac Rehabilitation Department, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
- Institute of Sensory Organs, Nadarzyn/Kajetany, Poland
- Center of Hearing and Speech “Medincus,” Nadarzyn/Kajetany, Poland
| | - Ranjith Rajeswaran
- Madras ENT Research Foundation MERF Institute of Speech and Hearing, Chennai, India
| | - Robert J. Briggs
- Department of Surgery, Otolaryngology, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Seung-Ha Oh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Stefan Plontke
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery; Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Stephen J. O’Leary
- Department of Surgery, Otolaryngology, The University of Melbourne, The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sumit Agrawal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tatsuya Yamasoba
- Tokyo Teishin Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Thomas Lenarz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Thomas Wesarg
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Walter Kutz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | | - Ilona Anderson
- Clinical Research Department, MED-EL GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Abdulrahman Hagr
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), College of Medicine, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Callejón-Leblic MA, Lazo-Maestre M, Fratter A, Ropero-Romero F, Sánchez-Gómez S, Reina-Tosina J. A full-head model to investigate intra and extracochlear electric fields in cochlear implant stimulation. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:155010. [PMID: 38925131 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad5c38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Despite the widespread use and technical improvement of cochlear implant (CI) devices over past decades, further research into the bioelectric bases of CI stimulation is still needed. Various stimulation modes implemented by different CI manufacturers coexist, but their true clinical benefit remains unclear, probably due to the high inter-subject variability reported, which makes the prediction of CI outcomes and the optimal fitting of stimulation parameters challenging. A highly detailed full-head model that includes a cochlea and an electrode array is developed in this study to emulate intracochlear voltages and extracochlear current pathways through the head in CI stimulation.Approach.Simulations based on the finite element method were conducted under monopolar, bipolar, tripolar (TP), and partial TP modes, as well as for apical, medial, and basal electrodes. Variables simulated included: intracochlear voltages, electric field (EF) decay, electric potentials at the scalp and extracochlear currents through the head. To better understand CI side effects such as facial nerve stimulation, caused by spurious current leakage out from the cochlea, special emphasis is given to the analysis of the EF over the facial nerve.Main results.The model reasonably predicts EF magnitudes and trends previously reported in CI users. New relevant extracochlear current pathways through the head and brain tissues have been identified. Simulated results also show differences in the magnitude and distribution of the EF through different segments of the facial nerve upon different stimulation modes and electrodes, dependent on nerve and bone tissue conductivities.Significance.Full-head models prove useful tools to model intra and extracochlear EFs in CI stimulation. Our findings could prove useful in the design of future experimental studies to contrast FNS mechanisms upon stimulation of different electrodes and CI modes. The full-head model developed is freely available for the CI community for further research and use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Callejón-Leblic
- Otorhinolaryngology Department, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville 41009, Spain
- Oticon Medical, 28108 Madrid, Spain
- Dept. Signal Theory and Communications, Biomedical Engineering Group, University of Seville, Seville 41092, Spain
| | - M Lazo-Maestre
- Otorhinolaryngology Department, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville 41009, Spain
| | - A Fratter
- Oticon Medical, 06220 Vallauris, France
| | - F Ropero-Romero
- Otorhinolaryngology Department, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville 41009, Spain
| | - S Sánchez-Gómez
- Otorhinolaryngology Department, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville 41009, Spain
| | - J Reina-Tosina
- Dept. Signal Theory and Communications, Biomedical Engineering Group, University of Seville, Seville 41092, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rader T, Nachtigäller P, Linke T, Weißgerber T, Baumann U. Exponential fitting of spread of excitation response measurements in cochlear implants. J Neurosci Methods 2023; 391:109854. [PMID: 37031765 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2023.109854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hearing performance in cochlear implant (CI) users is variable. An objective measure which can allow a prediction of this performance is desirable. Spread of neural excitation (SoE) curves are an objective measure that can be obtained using the fitting software of cochlear implants and might be able to be used as a predictor. A novel method to interpret SoE curves is presented. New Method Spread of excitation measurements for three recording sites were fitted using two exponential functions. An asymmetric width measure was developed, defined as the distance in mm to the point, where 25% or 50% of peak normalized amplitude was reached, for each half of the SoE separately. Also, a novel population of subjects with MED-EL CIs is used. Furthermore, speech perception (speech reception threshold, SRT) was evaluated using a matrix sentence test in a multi-source noise field. RESULTS SoE width was narrowest for the basal recording site and widest for the apical recording site. Fitted SoE exponential functions were most asymmetric for the apical recording site. A significant positive correlation between sentence test SRT and SoE width at the apical recording site was found. Comparison with Existing Methods The use of an asymmetric width measure correlated strongly and positively with speech perception for apical recording sites, unlike the symmetric width measure used in previous studies. Presumably, longer electrodes allow stimulation of a more apical part of the cochlear. At the apical part of the cochlea, dendrites from a large region of the basilar membrane map to a narrow portion on the spiral ganglion, which might explain the observed asymmetry. CONCLUSIONS For subjects implanted with long electrode arrays, an asymmetric width measure correlates positively with apical SoE distance. However, due to lack of a sufficient amount of data, the results are currently less conclusive and need to be consolidated in a larger cohort of subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Rader
- Division of Audiology, Department for Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Pascal Nachtigäller
- Division of Audiology, Department for Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Theresa Linke
- Dermatology Bad Soden, Bad Soden, Germany; Division of Audiological Acoustics, Department for Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Tobias Weißgerber
- Division of Audiological Acoustics, Department for Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Uwe Baumann
- Division of Audiological Acoustics, Department for Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|