Neuromuscular effects of dorsiflexor training with and without blood flow restriction

Acute Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Movement Velocity and Neuromuscular Signal during the Back Squat Exercise

The aim of this study was to verify the effects of blood flow restriction on movement velocity and muscle activity during the back squat exercise.

METHODS

Twenty-four university students participated in this study. In two randomized sessions 72 h apart, participants performed a 4-set protocol consisting of 30-15-15-15 repetitions performed at 30% of their one-repetition maximum in the back squat exercise. In both sessions, neuromuscular function was monitored by surface electromyography (EMG) and movement velocity (mean propulsive velocity (MPV), peak concentric velocity (Vmax), and the effort index (EI)). Blood flow restriction (BFR) was applied during exercise in one of the experimental sessions with 80% of full arterial occlusion pressure over lower limbs.

RESULTS

The BFR condition showed higher (p < 0.05) EI, peak, and rooted mean square normalized EMG in Set 1 compared to Set 2. Similar MPV and Vmax were observed in each set for both the BFR and control conditions. No significant differences were observed between conditions in any set.

CONCLUSIONS

BFR did not imply changes in neuromuscular performance during low-intensity resistance training, but it might induce greater intra-series velocity loss and less excitation of the muscles involved.

Acute effects of low load resistance training with blood flow restriction on serum growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor-1, and testosterone in patients with mild to moderate unilateral knee osteoarthritis

Objective

To investigate the acute effects of blood flow restriction (BFR) with single-leg low load resistance exercise and high load resistance exercise on serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), growth hormone (GH), and testosterone in patients with unilateral knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

This study recruited 18 postmenopausal female patients with mild to moderate unilateral knee OA, which was then followed by randomly conducting three resistance exercise protocols by drawing lots: 1. A 30% 1-repetition maximum (1-RM) resistance exercise with BFR of 70% arterial occlusive pressure (AOP) (BFR group); 2. A 70% 1-RM resistance exercise without BFR (RES group); 3. A 30% 1-RM resistance exercise without BFR (CON group). Blood lactate (BLA) and muscle growth related hormone levels were tested at 4-time points: before exercise, immediately after exercise, 15 min after exercise, and 30 min after exercise.

Results

There was no statistical difference between the indexes in each group before exercise, but the different exercise had different effects on each index and also an interactive effect (P < 0.05). The increase of rating of perceived exertion in the BFR and RES groups, which were of similar magnitude, was greater compared to the levels in the CON group (P < 0.05). Post-exercise BLA levels were lower in the CON group in comparison to the BFR and RES groups (P < 0.05). Rather than the RES group, GH levels of the BFR group were also significantly higher than the CON group (P < 0.05) at 15 min post-exercise. At post- and 15 min after exercise, the CON group recorded significantly lower IGF-1 levels compared to the BFR and RES groups (P < 0.05). At post- and 15 min after exercise, the CON group (P < 0.05) reflected the lowest testosterone levels, followed by the RES group (P < 0.05), and the highest in the BFR group (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Myogenesis-related hormones in women with unilateral knee OA could be increased by high load resistance exercise and low load resistance exercise with BFR on unaffected limb.

Effects of a blood flow restriction exercise under different pressures on testosterone, growth hormone, and insulin-like growth factor levels

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the changes in serum growth hormone (GH), testosterone, and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) during low-intensity resistance exercise under different cuff pressures.

METHODS

We performed a single-blind, cross-over design study. Twenty-five healthy young men performed three exercise protocols as follows: 1) no blood flow restriction exercise (control group), 2) resistance exercise at 40% of arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) (low group), and 3) resistance exercise at 70% of AOP (high group). Blood lactate, GH, testosterone, and IGF-1 levels were measured at four time points.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the indices before exercise. The blood flow restriction exercise under different pressures had different effects on each index and there was an interactive effect. GH levels were significantly higher in the high group than in the other groups after exercise. Immediately after exercise, IGF-1 and testosterone levels were significantly higher in the high group than in the other groups. At 15 minutes after exercise, testosterone levels were significantly higher in the high group than in the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-intensity resistance exercise combined with blood flow restriction effectively increases GH, IGF-1, and testosterone levels in young men. Increasing the cuff pressure results in greater levels of hormone secretion.

Effects of low-load blood flow restriction exercise to failure and non-failure on myoelectric activity: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the short- and long-term effects of low load blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) versus low- (LL-RT) or high-load (HL-RT) resistance training with free blood flow on myoelectric activity, and investigate the differences between failure and non-failure protocols.

DATA SOURCE

We identified sources by searching the MEDLINE/PUBMED, CINAHL, WEB OF SCIENCE, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, SPORTDiscus, and PEDro electronic databases.

STUDY SELECTION

We screened titles and abstracts of 1048 articles using our inclusion criteria. A total of 39 articles were selected for further analysis.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of each study and extracted data from studies. A meta-analytic approach was used to compute standardized mean differences (SMD ± 95% confidence intervals (CI)). Subgroup analyses were conducted for both failure or non-failure protocols.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The search identified n = 39 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Regarding the short-term effects, LL-BFR increased muscle excitability compared with LL-RT during non-failure exercises (SMD 0.61, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.88), whereas HL-RT increased muscle excitability compared with LL-BFR regardless of voluntary failure (SMD -0.61, 95% CI -1.01 to 0.21) or not (SMD -1.13, CI -1.94 to -0.33). Concerning the long-term effects, LL-BFR increased muscle excitability compared with LL-RT during exercises performed to failure (SMD 1.09, CI 0.39 to 1.79).

CONCLUSIONS

Greater short-term muscle excitability levels are observed in LL-BFR than LL-RT during non-failure protocols. Conversely, greater muscle excitability is present during HL-RT compared with LL-BFR, regardless of volitional failure. Furthermore, LL-BFR performed to failure increases muscle excitability in the long-term compared with LL-RT.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Neural Adaptations Following Blood Flow Restriction Training: What We Know and What We Don't Know

Objective: To summarize the existing evidence on the long-term effects of low-load (LL) blood flow restricted (BFR) exercise on neural markers including both central and peripheral adaptations. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was performed independently by two reviewers in the following electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and CENTRAL. The systematic review included long-term trials investigating the effects of LL-BFR training in healthy subjects and compared theses effects to either LL or high-load (HL) training without blood flow restriction. Results: From a total of N = 4499 studies, N = 10 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and N = 4 studies in a meta-analysis. The findings indicated that LL-BFR resulted in enhanced levels of muscle excitation compared to LL training with pooled effect sizes of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.38-1.36). Compared to HL training, muscle excitation following LL-BFR was reported as either similar or slightly lower. Differences between central activation between LL-BFR and LL or HL are less clear. Conclusion: The summarized effects in this systematic review and meta-analysis highlight that BFR training facilitates neural adaptations following LL training, although differences to conventional HL training are less evident. Future research is urgently needed to identify neural alterations following long-term blood flow restricted exercise.