1
|
Arasi S, Barni S, Caminiti L, Castagnoli R, Giovannini M, Liotti L, Mastrorilli C, Mori F, Pecoraro L, Saretta F, Gelsomino M, Klain A, Miraglia del Giudice M, Novembre E. Latex Allergy in Children. J Clin Med 2023; 13:124. [PMID: 38202131 PMCID: PMC10779698 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 11/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Notwithstanding the efforts made in the last decades to mitigate the consequences of natural rubber latex allergy, this disease continues to be a major health problem, especially in developing countries. The categories of patients with greater and frequent exposure to latex (such as health care professionals and, in the pediatric field, subjects who undergo repeated surgery, e.g., those suffering from spina bifida and urogenital malformations) have an increased risk of developing sensitization and allergy to latex. Herein we provide an overview of the current knowledge and practical recommendations with a focus on epidemiology, diagnostics, and management (including both prevention and therapy) in order to guide a correct recognition and containment of this potentially fatal condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Arasi
- Pediatric Allergology Unit, Allergy Diseases Research Area, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy;
| | - Simona Barni
- Allergy Unit, Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 50139 Florence, Italy; (S.B.); (M.G.); (F.M.); (E.N.)
| | - Lucia Caminiti
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, AOU Policlinico Gaetano Martino, 98124 Messina, Italy;
| | - Riccardo Castagnoli
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Mattia Giovannini
- Allergy Unit, Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 50139 Florence, Italy; (S.B.); (M.G.); (F.M.); (E.N.)
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy
| | - Lucia Liotti
- Pediatric Unit, Department of Mother and Child Health, Salesi Children’s Hospital, 60123 Ancona, Italy;
| | - Carla Mastrorilli
- Pediatric and Emergency Department, Pediatric Hospital Giovanni XXIII, AOU Policlinic of Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy;
| | - Francesca Mori
- Allergy Unit, Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 50139 Florence, Italy; (S.B.); (M.G.); (F.M.); (E.N.)
| | - Luca Pecoraro
- Pediatric Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy;
| | - Francesca Saretta
- Pediatric Department, Latisana-Palmanova Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, 33100 Udine, Italy;
| | - Mariannita Gelsomino
- Pediatric Allergy Unit, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Angela Klain
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy; (A.K.); (M.M.d.G.)
| | - Michele Miraglia del Giudice
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy; (A.K.); (M.M.d.G.)
| | - Elio Novembre
- Allergy Unit, Meyer Children’s Hospital IRCCS, 50139 Florence, Italy; (S.B.); (M.G.); (F.M.); (E.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Naranje N, Paul P, Parate KP, Reche A. Comparative Assessment of Hypersensitivity Reactions on Use of Latex and Nitrile Gloves Among General Dental Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Study. Cureus 2023; 15:e46443. [PMID: 37927733 PMCID: PMC10622736 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Latex gloves are used more frequently by dental, medical, and other health workers and their allergy has also increased as a result, dentists are frequently exposed to latex or nitrile gloves for extended periods. This prolonged exposure often leads to local symptoms such as itching and erythema rashes. However, some dentists experience more severe systemic reactions, including swelling, wheezing, breathlessness, and even an increase in blood pressure. Latex gloves have recently been replaced with nitrile gloves, powder-free latex gloves, and other preventive measures to avoid allergies. Latex allergies are more common than nitrile allergies, as they are hypoallergic with properties such as tear-resistant and provide an equivalent level of defense against various dental materials and procedures. Women experience more allergic reactions than men. Not only are dentists exposed to this allergy but the patient can also be exposed during the procedure. This study aimed to assess hypersensitive reactions to the use of latex and nitrile gloves among general dentist practitioners and dental students. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in Wardha, Maharashtra, India, to evaluate allergic reactions to latex and nitrile gloves among general dental practitioners and dental students at college. A questionnaire-based study was conducted with a sample size of 356. The self-administered survey inquiries about glove compliance, the time they wear the gloves, regular glove use, and problems related to latex or nitrile contact. In addition, dentists and dental students' personal histories of allergies to medications, dental materials, disinfectants, or other chemicals were noted, as well as signs and symptoms they experienced from prolonged contact with gloves. Result The total number of responses collected was 356. The investigated dentists were 274 and 82 were students, out of which 122 (34.3%) were male and 234 (65.7%) were female. Responses showed that 224 (62.92%) used latex gloves, and 132 (37.08%) used nitrile gloves. Among 356 participants 175 showed symptoms by the use of both latex and nitrile gloves, out of which 85.14% showed allergy to latex and 14.85% to nitrile gloves. All 175 individuals showed type IV hypersensitivity, and none of them showed type I. Conclusion Latex gloves are not the only option for dentists who experience itching when wearing gloves; they can also use powered-free latex gloves and nitrile gloves or take precautions such as not using oil-based cream, washing their hands, or taking pharmaceuticals such as cetirizine, pheniramine maleate, etc. However, when symptoms worsen and include erythema, swelling, wheezing, and in some cases, anaphylactic shock may occur they tend to use alternative gloves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naleen Naranje
- Public Health Dentistry, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Deemed to be University, Wardha, IND
| | - Priyanka Paul
- Public Health Dentistry, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Deemed to be University, Wardha, IND
| | - Kshitija P Parate
- Public Health Dentistry, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Deemed to be University, Wardha, IND
| | - Amit Reche
- Public Health Dentistry, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Deemed to be University, Wardha, IND
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kerner AM, Biedermann U, Bräuer L, Caspers S, Doll S, Engelhardt M, Filler TJ, Ghebremedhin E, Gundlach S, Hayn-Leichsenring GU, Heermann S, Hettwer-Steeger I, Hiepe L, Hirt B, Hirtler L, Hörmann R, Kulisch C, Lange T, Leube R, Meuser AH, Müller-Gerbl M, Nassenstein C, Neckel PH, Nimtschke U, Paulsen F, Prescher A, Pretterklieber M, Schliwa S, Schmidt K, Schmiedl A, Schomerus C, Schulze-Tanzil G, Schumacher U, Schumann S, Spindler V, Streicher J, Tschernig T, Unverzagt A, Valentiner U, Viebahn C, Wedel T, Weigner J, Weninger WJ, Westermann J, Weyers I, Waschke J, Hammer N. The chemicals between us-First results of the cluster analyses on anatomy embalming procedures in the German-speaking countries. ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION 2023; 16:814-829. [PMID: 37183973 DOI: 10.1002/ase.2285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
Hands-on courses utilizing preserved human tissues for educational training offer an important pathway to acquire basic anatomical knowledge. Owing to the reevaluation of formaldehyde limits by the European Commission, a joint approach was chosen by the German-speaking anatomies in Europe (Germany, Austria, Switzerland) to find commonalities among embalming protocols and infrastructure. A survey comprising 537 items was circulated to all anatomies in German-speaking Europe. Clusters were established for "ethanol"-, formaldehyde-based ("FA"), and "other" embalming procedures, depending on the chemicals considered the most relevant for each protocol. The logistical framework, volumes of chemicals, and infrastructure were found to be highly diverse between the groups and protocols. Formaldehyde quantities deployed per annum were three-fold higher in the "FA" (223 L/a) compared to the "ethanol" (71.0 L/a) group, but not for "other" (97.8 L/a), though the volumes injected per body were similar. "FA" was strongly related to table-borne air ventilation and total fixative volumes ≤1000 L. "Ethanol" was strongly related to total fixative volumes >1000 L, ceiling- and floor-borne air ventilation, and explosion-proof facilities. Air ventilation was found to be installed symmetrically in the mortuary and dissection facilities. Certain predictors exist for the interplay between the embalming used in a given infrastructure and technical measures. The here-established cluster analysis may serve as decision supportive tool when considering altering embalming protocols or establishing joint protocols between institutions, following a best practice approach to cater toward best-suited tissue characteristics for educational purposes, while simultaneously addressing future demands on exposure limits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Michael Kerner
- Division of Macroscopic and Clinical Anatomy, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Uta Biedermann
- Institute of Anatomy I, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Lars Bräuer
- Institute of Functional and Clinical Anatomy, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Svenja Caspers
- Institute for Anatomy I, Medical Faculty & University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Sara Doll
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maren Engelhardt
- Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
| | - Timm J Filler
- Institute for Anatomy I, Medical Faculty & University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Stefanie Gundlach
- Institute of Anatomy, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Stephan Heermann
- Institute for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Laura Hiepe
- Institute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Bernhard Hirt
- Institute of Clinical Anatomy and Cell Analysis, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Lena Hirtler
- Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Romed Hörmann
- Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Institute of Clinical and Functional Anatomy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Christoph Kulisch
- Institute of Functional Anatomy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tobias Lange
- Institute of Anatomy I, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rudolf Leube
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Annika Hela Meuser
- Division of Macroscopic and Clinical Anatomy, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | | | - Peter H Neckel
- Institute of Clinical Anatomy and Cell Analysis, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ute Nimtschke
- Institute of Anatomy, Technical University Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Friedrich Paulsen
- Institute of Functional and Clinical Anatomy, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Andreas Prescher
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Michael Pretterklieber
- Division of Macroscopic and Clinical Anatomy, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Stefanie Schliwa
- Institute of Anatomy, Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Katja Schmidt
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Andreas Schmiedl
- Functional and Applied Anatomy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christof Schomerus
- Institute of Anatomy, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Gundula Schulze-Tanzil
- Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg and Salzburg, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Udo Schumacher
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sven Schumann
- Institute of Anatomy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Volker Spindler
- Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Johannes Streicher
- Department of Anatomy and Biomechanics, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria
| | - Thomas Tschernig
- Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | - Axel Unverzagt
- Chair of Vegetative Anatomy, Institute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ursula Valentiner
- Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Thilo Wedel
- Institute of Anatomy, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Janet Weigner
- Institute of Veterinary Anatomy, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolfgang J Weninger
- Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Imke Weyers
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Jens Waschke
- Chair of Vegetative Anatomy, Institute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Niels Hammer
- Division of Macroscopic and Clinical Anatomy, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Division of Biomechatronics, Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nettis E, Casella R, Incorvaia C, Miniello A. Secondary prevention of latex allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2022; 22:250-256. [PMID: 35852898 DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000000838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The present review addresses the secondary prevention in healthcare worker, healthcare setting, and in patients outside the healthcare setting. RECENT FINDINGS There is sufficient knowledge of the broad aetiology of latex allergy for secondary preventive programmes to be widely adopted. Currently, avoidance of latex-containing surgical products is mandatory in the care of sensitized patients. They should also have a list of occult sources of natural rubber latex exposure and cross-reacting fruits. During all health-care procedures latex allergic patients should be treated in a 'latex-free' environment. Specific sublingual immunotherapy has been suggested as a suitable therapeutic option. It can be offered, in addition to symptomatic treatment, to selected patients, when avoidance measures are not feasible or effective. The use of omalizumab could also be extended as an adjunct to latex immunotherapy. SUMMARY Despite of the progress made in the secondary prevention of latex allergy, the disease still continues to be a global health problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eustachio Nettis
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, School of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Policlinico di Bari, Bari
| | - Rossella Casella
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, School of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Policlinico di Bari, Bari
| | | | - Andrea Miniello
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, School of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Policlinico di Bari, Bari
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Critchley E, Pemberton MN. The use of latex and non-latex gloves and dental equipment in UK and Irish dental hospitals. Br Dent J 2021:10.1038/s41415-021-3330-3. [PMID: 34489545 DOI: 10.1038/s41415-021-3330-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Aim To identify glove usage within UK and Ireland dental hospitals as well as the use of latex- and non-latex-containing dental equipment.Method A self-completed questionnaire was disseminated to 16 dental hospitals in the summer of 2017. The survey concerned their current use of latex and non-latex gloves and dental equipment. In addition, information was sought regarding any problems associated with non-latex and latex gloves.Results The questionnaire response rate was 13/16 (81%), of which 100% reported the use of non-latex examination gloves. The majority were using nitrile gloves. Twelve of the 13 dental hospitals would use examination gloves for simple extractions and 11 would use sterile gloves for minor oral surgery. In ten hospitals (77%), the sterile gloves were always non-latex, and again, the majority were nitrile. Latex-containing dental equipment including orthodontic bands, prophylactic polishing cups and dental dam was still being used within some dental hospitals, but to a much lesser extent than non-latex.Conclusion All dental hospitals were using latex-free examination gloves and were showing a move towards latex-free dental equipment. This usage is comparable to what has been seen in general dental practice and follows the trend towards latex-free dentistry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Critchley
- Speciality Registrar Special Care Dentistry, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M15 6FH, UK.
| | - Michael N Pemberton
- Consultant in Oral Medicine, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M15 6FH, UK
| |
Collapse
|