Maximizing Survival Potential in Very High Risk Cardiac Surgery

Acute Kidney Injury: A Frequently Underestimated Problem in Perioperative Medicine

BACKGROUND

Surgical patients are getting older with increasing comorbidity. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a commonly underesti- mated perioperative complication. 2-18% of hospitalized patients and 22-57% of patients in the intensive care unit develop AKI. Even though it has a major impact on patients' outcomes, it goes unrecognized in 57-75.6% of cases.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent papers retrieved by a selective search in PubMed and the Cochrane Library employ- ing the searching terms "acute kidney injury," "biomarker," "perioperative," "renal function," and "KDIGO."

RESULTS

The pathophysiology of AKI is complex. Conventional biomarkers are either not specific enough (urine output) or not sensitive enough (serum creatinine) for timely diagnosis. In view of the pathophysiology of the condition and the limited treat- ment options for it, the early detection of subclinical AKI (kidney damage without functional impairment) would seem to be a reasonable first step toward the prevention of worsening or permanent renal injury. New biomarkers of damage enable the early initiation of nephroprotective interventions. According to the "Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes" (KDIGO) statement, a multimodal treatment approach is needed, including, among other things, optimization of hemodynamics and the discontinu- ation of nephrotoxic drugs.

CONCLUSION

It is essential to identify patients at risk and sensitize the treating personnel to the implementation of the guidelines. The incorporation of new biomarkers into routine clinical practice is also reasonable and necessary. Future clinical trials must show in what form these biomarkers should be used (singly or collectively).

New technique of local ischemic preconditioning induction without repetitive aortic cross-clamping in cardiac surgery

Background

Several studies have demonstrated that local ischemic preconditioning can reduce myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury in cardiac surgery patients; however, preconditioning has not become a standard cardioprotective intervention, primarily because of the increased risk of atheroembolism during repetitive aortic cross-clamping. In the present study, we aimed to describe and validate a novel technique of preconditioning induction.

Methods

Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (12 women and 78 men; mean age, 56 ± 11 years) were randomized into 3 groups: (1) Controls (n = 30), (2) Perfusion (n = 30), and (3) Preconditioning (n = 30). All patients were operated under cardiopulmonary bypass using normothermic blood cardioplegia. Preconditioning was induced by subjecting the hemodynamically unloaded heart to 2 cycles of 3 min of ischemia and 3 min of reperfusion with normokalemic blood prior to cardioplegia. In the Perfusion group, the heart perfusion remained unaffected for 12 min. Troponin I (TnI) levels were analyzed before surgery, and 12, 24, 48 h, and 7 days after surgery. The secondary endpoints included the cardiac index, plasma natriuretic peptide level, and postoperative use of inotropes.

Results

Preconditioning resulted in a significant reduction in the TnI level on the 7th postoperative day only (0.10 ± 0.05 and 0.33 ± 0.88 ng/ml in Preconditioning and Perfusion groups, respectively, P < 0.05). In addition, cardiac index was significantly higher in the Preconditioning group than in the Control and Perfusion groups just after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass. The number of patients requiring inotropic support with ≥ 2 agents after surgery was significantly lower in the Preconditioning and Perfusion group than in the Control group (P < 0.05). No complications of the procedure were recorded in the Preconditioning group.

Conclusions

The preconditioning procedure described can be performed safely in cardiac surgery patients. The application of this technique of preconditioning was associated with certain benefits, including improved left ventricular function after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass and a reduced need for inotropic support. However, the infarct-limiting effect of preconditioning in the early postoperative period was not evident. The procedure does not involve repetitive aortic cross-clamping, thus avoiding possible embolic complications.

Influence of levosimendan on organ dysfunction in patients with severely reduced left ventricular function undergoing cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVES

Levosimendan is an inotropic drug with organ-protective properties due to its activation of mitochondrial K(ATP) channels. This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated whether administration of levosimendan prior to cardiopulmonary bypass could reduce organ dysfunction and influence subsequent secondary endpoints.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <30% scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass surgery (with or without valve surgery) received either levosimendan (12.5 mg, 0.1 µg kg(-1) per min; n = 17) or placebo (n = 16) central venous infusion, immediately after anaesthesia induction, as add-on medication to a goal-orientated treatment algorithm.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients completed the study. There were no statistically significant differences in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores, survival, haemodynamic parameters, time to extubation, time in intensive care unit, need for haemodialysis or health-related quality-of-life at 6 months post operation. The levosimendan group compared with the placebo group had significantly lower use of epinephrine (35% versus 81%) and nitroglycerine (6% versus 44%) 24 h postoperation, and significantly less frequent serious adverse events (13% versus 47%).

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary results show that timely perioperative levosimendan treatment is feasible, has a favourable safety profile safe and may help to prevent low cardiac output syndrome. However, organ function was not preserved. Further studies, using larger sample sizes, are required.

Update on acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVES

To review the current state of clinical practice and discuss recent advances in the diagnosis and management of acute kidney injury (AKI) in the context of cardiac surgery.

METHODS

A review of the published data pertaining to AKI in the setting of cardiac surgery and cardiothoracic surgical critical care medicine was conducted, and the relevant data were synthesized from appropriate interventional and observational study reports.

RESULTS

Significant advances have occurred in the diagnosis of AKI, and consensus has been reported on a system of diagnosis using the serum creatinine and urine output. New biomarkers of injury and function are available that are likely to improve the interval to diagnosis of AKI after cardiac surgery. The adverse effect on outcome of small changes in serum creatinine is appreciated. Novel prevention and rescue therapies are now entering phase I and II studies. Urinary alkalinization was effective in a phase II blinded clinical trial and is now the subject of a multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial of cardiac surgery patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In 2011, the field of AKI could be emerging from a period of stagnation that has lasted more than 2 decades. The failure to translate successful animal model interventions to the clinic might have resulted from delays in diagnosis that might now be avoidable with the advent of novel diagnostic biomarkers.

Management of acute cardiac failure by intracoronary administration of levosimendan

Acute cardiac failure caused by myocardial infarction or inadequate cardioprotection during heart surgery is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Levosimendan is a new drug used in heart failure though it is limited by the systemic hypotension, which develops with intravenous administration. Intracoronary (IC) administration however should affect systemic circulation less while maintaining the beneficial cardiac effects of the drug. We herewith report the results from the first such clinical series. Levosimendan was administered IC in 33 consecutive patients who developed cardiogenic shock during heart surgery and were unable to wean off cardiopulmonary bypass despite maximal support. Preadministration/postadministration coronary graft flows, hemodynamic parameters, left ventricular function, and metabolic requirements were measured and compared. Levosimendan significantly increased graft flows and improved hemodynamic parameters. Systolic blood pressure (93 ± 26.4 vs. 106 ± 18.2 mm Hg, P < 0.05) and cardiac index (2.0 ± 0.5 vs. 3.1 ± 0.2, P < 0.001) were increased, whereas systemic vascular resistance (1470.7 ± 114 vs. 1195.8 ± 112, P < 0.01) was reduced. Better myocardial perfusion improved metabolic requirements, with myocardial oxygen extraction and glucose uptake increasing by 72% and 74%, respectively, whereas lactate production was reduced by 64%. Echocardiography demonstrated additional ventricular segment recruitment. Therefore, IC Levosimendan administration in acute heart failure is safe and efficacious producing improved cardiac function without significant detrimental hypotension.