Anemia and Management of Heart Failure Patients

The effect of the four pharmacological pillars of heart failure on haemoglobin level

Anaemia, a condition characterized by low levels of haemoglobin, is frequently observed in patients with heart failure (HF). Guideline-directed medical therapy improves HF outcomes by using medications like beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers, along with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. In this study, we aimed to review the pathophysiology of anaemia in patients with HF and present the current evidence regarding the relationship between the main recommended medications for these patients and haemoglobin levels. The authors conducted a comprehensive search in the medical literature for relevant original clinical articles in which the four pharmacological pillars of HF were given to the patients; we, then, assessed whether the association of use of these medications and haemoglobin level or development of anaemia was provided. These common medications have been shown in the literature that may exacerbate or ameliorate anaemia. Besides, it has been shown that even in the case that they result in the development of anaemia, their use is associated with positive effects that outweigh this potential harm. The literature also suggests that among patients receiving medications with negative effects on the level of haemoglobin, there was no difference in the rate of mortality between anaemic and non-anaemic patients when both were on treatment for anaemia; this point highlights the importance of the detection and treatment of anaemia in these patients. Further research is needed to explore these relationships and identify additional strategies to mitigate the risk of anaemia in this population.

Hemoglobin albumin lymphocyte and platelet score and all-cause mortality in coronary heart disease: a retrospective cohort study of NHANES database

Aim

Anemia, inflammatory status, and malnutrition are all important factors in the prognosis of cardiovascular disease (CVD), and their interactions are also noteworthy. A recent scoring system, the hemoglobin albumin lymphocyte and platelet (HALP) score, combining multi-dimensional metrics, has been used in the prognoses of many diseases except coronary heart disease (CHD). Herein, this study aims to explore the association between HALP score and all-cause mortality in patients with CHD.

Methods

Demographic and clinical data of adult patients with CHD were extracted from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) database from 2003 to 2018 in this retrospective cohort study. Weighted univariate and multivariate COX proportional hazard models were used for covariates screening and exploration of the association between HALP score and all-cause mortality. The evaluation indexes were hazard ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve and the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve were used to assess the predictive performance of HALP on CHD prognosis. In addition, subgroup analyses of age and congestive heart failure (CHF) were also performed.

Results

Among the eligible patients, 657 died of all-cause mortality. After adjusting for the covariates including age, education level, PIR, marital status, smoking, physical activity, total energy intake, CHF, stroke, hypertension, DM, CKD, cancer or malignancy, monocyte, drug for CVD, treatment for anemia, anticoagulants drug, and adrenal cortical steroids, we found that HALP score was negatively associated with the risk of all-cause mortality [HR = 0.83, 95% CI: (0.74-0.93)]. Compared with patients with high HALP scores, those who had lower HALP scores seemed to have a higher risk of all-cause mortality (all P < 0.05). HALP score has a potential predictive value on CHD prognosis with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.61. Furthermore, in patients aged <65 years, with or without CHF, a lower HALP score was also associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions

HALP score has a potential predictive value on CHD prognosis; however, the causal association between HALP score and mortality in patients with CHD needs further exploration.

Prevalent and Incident Anemia in PARADIGM-HF and the Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan

BACKGROUND

Anemia is common in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Renin-angiotensin system blockers lower hemoglobin and may induce anemia.

OBJECTIVES

The authors investigated whether concomitant neprilysin inhibition might ameliorate this effect of renin-angiotensin system blockers in PARADIGM-HF (Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure).

METHODS

Anemia was defined as hemoglobin <120 g/L in women and <130 g/L in men at screening. The authors investigated the effect of randomized treatment on clinical outcomes according to anemia status, change in hemoglobin from baseline, and the incidence of anemia.

RESULTS

Of 8,239 participants with a baseline hemoglobin measurement, 1,677 (20.4%) were anemic. Patients with anemia had a more severe heart failure profile, worse kidney function, greater neurohormonal derangement, and worse clinical outcomes. Sacubitril/valsartan, compared with enalapril, decreased the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization similarly in patients with (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.71-1.00) and without anemia (HR: 0.78 [95% CI: 0.71-0.87]; P value for interaction = 0.478). Between baseline and 12 months, hemoglobin decreased by 1.5 g/L (95% CI: 1.2-1.7 g/L) with sacubitril/valsartan compared with 2.3 g/L (95% CI: 2.0-2.6 g/L) with enalapril: mean difference 0.8 g/L (95% CI: 0.5-1.2 g/L; P < 0.001). Patients assigned to sacubitril/valsartan were less likely to develop anemia at 12 months (321 of 2,806 [11.4%]) compared with patients randomized to enalapril (440 of 2,824 [15.6%]) (OR: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.60-0.81]; P < 0.001). These findings were similar in PARAGON-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ARB Global Outcomes in HF with Preserved Ejection Fraction) (sacubitril/valsartan vs valsartan). There was biomarker evidence of increased iron utilization with sacubitril/valsartan.

CONCLUSIONS

Irrespective of anemia status, sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril, decreased mortality and hospitalization. Hemoglobin decreased less with sacubitril/valsartan and the incidence of new anemia was lower with sacubitril/valsartan. (Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure [PARADIGM-HF] trial; NCT01035255).

Trends in prevalence and treatment rate of anemia in the U.S. population: cross-sectional study using data from NHANES 2005-2018

OBJECTIVES

To determine the trends in anemia prevalence, treatment rates, and their associated demographic and socioeconomic status factors in the U.S. nationally representative population.

METHODS

We extracted data from individuals ≥20-year-old from the NHANES from 2005 to 2018. The trends of anemia prevalence and treatment were assessed by Cochran-Armitage test. The association between two dependent variables (anemia status and treatment) and demographic were examined by multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

The general anemia prevalence has a significant increasing trend from 5.71% to 6.86% (P trend<.001) from 2005 to 2018, whereas the trend in general anemia treatment rate was not significant (p = .148). Logistic regression showed that age groups (OR: 2.15for 60 or older vs. 20-39 years old), sex (0.47 for male vs. female), race (0.22 for NHW vs. NHB), education (0.80for some college or AA degree vs. less than high school), PIR (0.60 for ≥3.5 vs.≤1.3), and birthplace (0.88 for U.S. vs. other) were significantly associated with anemia. The factors significantly associated with anemia treatment were age group (1.51 for 60 years and older vs. 20-39 years old), sex (0.53 male vs. female), birthplace (1.88 U.S. vs. other), and insurance (1.80 for Yes vs. No).

CONCLUSION

While there was no significant increase in anemia treatment between 2005 and 2018, the anemia prevalence increased significantly, particularly among individuals with lower income, less education, and born outside the U.S. Moreover, the high anemia prevalence among NHB compared to other races indicated that more resources are needed to reduce disparities.

The prevalence and survival of pulmonary hypertension due to left heart failure: A retrospective analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study

Background

Pulmonary hypertension due to left heart failure (PH-LHF) is currently the most common form of pulmonary hypertension (PH) encountered in clinical practice. Despite significant advances that have improved our understanding of PH-LHF over the past two decades, the mortality is still high in recent decades. This study aimed to describe the prevalence and survival of patients with PH-LHF, and explored the potential risk factors which may predict the prognosis of PH-LHF.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort study of left heart failure (LHF) patients who underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) between January 2013 and November 2016 was performed. The endpoint was all-cause mortality. Follow-ups were performed every 6 months ± 2 weeks.

Results

A total of 480 patients with LHF were enrolled, with 215 (44.8%) having PH-LHF. The proportion of PH-LHF was significantly lower in coronary artery disease (CAD) group than without CAD (41.3 vs. 57.8%, p = 0.003). However, multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that CAD was not associated with PH-LHF (Adjusted OR: 1.055, 95% CI: 0.576 – 1.935, p = 0.862). 75 of 215 (34.9%) patients with PH-LHF died during a median follow-up period of 84.6 months. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 8-year survival rates of all PH-LHF patients were 94.3, 76.9, 65.8, and 60.2%, respectively. New York Heart Association Functional Class (NYHA FC), hemoglobin, and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) were associated with mortality of PH-LHF in multivariate Cox analysis.

Conclusion

PH is commonly identified in patients with LHF, with a prevalence of approximately 45%. The mortality is still high in patients with PH-LHF. NYHA FC, hemoglobin, and sPAP are independent risk predictors of mortality for PH-LHF. These findings may be useful for risk stratification in future clinical trial enrollment.

When Heart Failure Collides with Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: Challenges and Opportunities

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF), diabetes mellitus (DM), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are commonly occurring and interlinked conditions. Approximately 25% to 40% of patients with HF have DM, and approximately 40% to 50% of patients with HF have CKD. Both DM and CKD are associated with increased risk of incident HF. Further, 40% of people with DM develop CKD, making DM the leading cause of kidney failure globally. Importantly, 16% of patients with HF have both comorbid DM and CKD, and the combination of these 3 comorbidities is associated with substantially increased risk for hospitalization and mortality. Mechanisms that underlie the relationships between HF, DM, and CKD are complex but likely relate to shared cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors, as well as downstream effects on inflammation, oxidative stress, and neurohormonal pathways.

SUMMARY

This review outlines the epidemiology and links between HF, DM, and CKD, as well as current clinical evidence for the treatment of individuals with a combination of these comorbidities. A case study of a patient with concomitant HF, DM, and CKD is discussed to explore potential treatment approaches for patients in whom all 3 comorbidities exist. Key Messages: Treatment plans for patients with a combination of these 3 comorbidities should consider the available clinical evidence.