1
|
Bagot KL, Bladin CF, Vu M, Bernard S, Smith K, Hocking G, Coupland T, Hutton D, Badcock D, Budge M, Nadurata V, Pearce W, Hall H, Kelly B, Spencer A, Chapman P, Oqueli E, Sahathevan R, Kraemer T, Hair C, Dion S, McGuinness C, Cadilhac DA. Factors influencing the successful implementation of a novel digital health application to streamline multidisciplinary communication across multiple organisations for emergency care. J Eval Clin Pract 2024; 30:184-198. [PMID: 37721181 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE Delivering optimal patient health care requires interdisciplinary clinician communication. A single communication tool across multiple pre-hospital and hospital settings, and between hospital departments is a novel solution to current systems. Fit-for-purpose, secure smartphone applications allow clinical information to be shared quickly between health providers. Little is known as to what underpins their successful implementation in an emergency care context. AIMS To identify (a) whether implementing a single, digital health communication application across multiple health care organisations and hospital departments is feasible; (b) the barriers and facilitators to implementation; and (c) which factors are associated with clinicians' intentions to use the technology. METHODS We used a multimethod design, evaluating the implementation of a secure, digital communication application (Pulsara™). The technology was trialled in two Australian regional hospitals and 25 Ambulance Victoria branches (AV). Post-training, clinicians involved in treating patients with suspected stroke or cardiac events were administered surveys measuring perceived organisational readiness (Organisational Readiness for Implementing Change), clinicians' intentions (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology) and internal motivations (Self-Determination Theory) to use Pulsara™, and the perceived benefits and barriers of use. Quantitative data were descriptively summarised with multivariable associations between factors and intentions to use Pulsara™ examined with linear regression. Qualitative data responses were subjected to directed content analysis (two coders). RESULTS Participants were paramedics (n = 82, median 44 years) or hospital-based clinicians (n = 90, median 37 years), with organisations perceived to be similarly ready. Regression results (F(11, 136) = 21.28, p = <0.001, Adj R2 = 0.60) indicated Habit, Effort Expectancy, Perceived Organisational Readiness, Performance Expectancy and Organisation membership (AV) as predictors of intending to use Pulsara™. Themes relating to benefits (95% coder agreement) included improved communication, procedural efficiencies and faster patient care. Barriers (92% coder agreement) included network accessibility and remembering passwords. PulsaraTM was initiated 562 times. CONCLUSION Implementing multiorganisational, digital health communication applications is feasible, and facilitated when organisations are change-ready for an easy-to-use, effective solution. Developing habitual use is key, supported through implementation strategies (e.g., hands-on training). Benefits should be emphasised (e.g., during education sessions), including streamlining communication and patient flow, and barriers addressed (e.g., identify champions and local technical support) at project commencement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen L Bagot
- Public Health and Health Services Research, Stroke theme, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Chris F Bladin
- Public Health and Health Services Research, Stroke theme, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Ambulance Victoria, Doncaster, Victoria, Australia
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michelle Vu
- Public Health and Health Services Research, Stroke theme, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephen Bernard
- Ambulance Victoria, Doncaster, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Karen Smith
- Ambulance Victoria, Doncaster, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paramedicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Research and Innovation, Silverchain Group, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - Debra Hutton
- Grampians Health Ballarat, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Marc Budge
- Bendigo Health, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Wayne Pearce
- Ambulance Victoria, Doncaster, Victoria, Australia
| | - Howard Hall
- Ambulance Victoria, Doncaster, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ben Kelly
- Grampians Health Ballarat, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
| | - Angie Spencer
- Grampians Health Ballarat, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Ernesto Oqueli
- Grampians Health Ballarat, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ramesh Sahathevan
- Grampians Health Ballarat, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Ballarat Clinical School, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Ballarat, Australia
| | - Thomas Kraemer
- Grampians Health Ballarat, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
| | - Casey Hair
- Grampians Health Ballarat, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stub Dion
- Ambulance Victoria, Doncaster, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Connor McGuinness
- Public Health and Health Services Research, Stroke theme, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dominique A Cadilhac
- Public Health and Health Services Research, Stroke theme, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Crimmins S, Baumer S, Theodoru A, Driscoll CH. Impact of Obstetric Communication on Decision-to-Delivery Time. Am J Perinatol 2022; 39:1389-1395. [PMID: 35613929 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In obstetric emergencies, care coordination is critical in achieving a "decision-to-delivery" time of 30 minutes. Reliable communication is essential to optimize coordinated care of mother and baby. Clinical mobility (CM) platforms have been shown to improve communication during medical emergencies; however, their impact on improving decision-to-delivery times has not been shown. This study aimed to determine the impact of a new CM platform on decision-to-delivery time. STUDY DESIGN A multidisciplinary team designed a CM platform that employs a wall-mounted panel paired with mobile technology to alert all relevant clinical staff. This new platform uses in-room preprogrammed messages that alert predetermined responders matching the emergency. For example, the "STAT section" button summons doctors (obstetrics, anesthesiology, and neonatology), obstetric nurses, and newborn resuscitation staff via smartphones. Impact of this platform was assessed with process and outcome data: cord artery pH, 5-minute Apgar's score; and decision for cesarean section to time of: skin incision, uterine incision, and delivery. This pre- and postimplementation study (October-September 2018 vs. January-December 2019) centered on the opening of our new Obstetric Care Unit. Data were analyzed with Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS Emergent cesarean delivery was performed in 172 women pre- and 124 postimplementation of the new CM platform. In postimplementation, we observed a 7.4-minute reduction in time from decision-to-delivery (26 pre- vs. 18.6 minutes postimplementation, p = 0.001). Delivery within 30 minutes improved by 15.2% (p = 0.018). Times to skin and uterine incision were also significantly reduced. The two groups had similar neonatal outcomes: birth weight, Apgar's score at 5 minutes, and cord artery pH did not differ, but the study was underpowered to compare these outcomes. CONCLUSION This new CM platform significantly reduced decision-to-delivery time, in turn improving compliance with the "30-minute rule." All relevant personnel were contacted specifically, while avoiding overhead paging and other unnecessary messages. KEY POINTS · Obstetric communication via a clinical mobility platform shortens the delivery to delivery interval. · Obstetric communication systems via an information technology (IT)-system results in a higher frequency of deliveries within 30 minutes.. · Communication systems may be a useful tools to synchronously call multiple services to respond..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Crimmins
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sarah Baumer
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Andrea Theodoru
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Colleen H Driscoll
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|