1
|
Tarride JE, Stennett D, Coronado AC, Moxam RS, Yong JHE, Carter AJE, Cameron C, Xie F, Grignon M, Seow H, Blackhouse G. Economic evaluation of the "paramedics and palliative care: bringing vital services to Canadians" program compared to the status quo. CAN J EMERG MED 2024; 26:671-680. [PMID: 39083199 PMCID: PMC11377656 DOI: 10.1007/s43678-024-00738-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2024] [Indexed: 09/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Based on programs implemented in 2011-2013 in three Canadian provinces to improve the support paramedics provide to people receiving palliative care, the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer and Healthcare Excellence Canada provided support and funding from 2018 to 2022 to spread this approach in Canada. The study objectives were to conduct an economic evaluation of "the Program" compared to the status quo. METHODS A probabilistic decision analytic model was used to compare the expected costs, the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the return on investment associated with the Program compared to the status quo from a publicly funded healthcare payer perspective. Effectiveness data and Program costs, expressed in 2022 Canadian dollars, from each jurisdiction were supplemented with literature data. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses varying key model assumptions were conducted. RESULTS Analyses of 5416 9-1-1 calls from five jurisdictions where paramedics provided support to people with palliative care needs between April 1, 2020 and March 31, 2022 indicated that 60% of the 9-1-1 calls under the Program enabled people to avoid transport to the emergency department and receive palliative care at home. Treating people at home saved paramedics an average of 31 min (range from 15 to 67). The Program was associated with cost savings of $2773 (95% confidence interval [CI] $1539-$4352) and an additional 0.00069 QALYs (95% CI 0.00024-0.00137) per 9-1-1 palliative care call. The Program return on investment was $4.6 for every $1 invested. Threshold analyses indicated that in order to be cost saving, 33% of 9-1-1 calls should be treated at home under the Program, the Program should generate a minimum of 97 calls per year with each call costing no more than $2773. CONCLUSION The Program was cost-effective in the majority of the scenarios examined. These results support the implementation of paramedic-based palliative care at home programs in Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E Tarride
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
- Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH), The Research Institute of St. Joe's Hamilton, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | - D Stennett
- Healthcare Excellence Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - A C Coronado
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - R Shaw Moxam
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - J H E Yong
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - A J E Carter
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Emergency Health Services Nova Scotia, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Schulich School of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - C Cameron
- Canadian Virtual Hospice, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- McNally Project for Paramedicine Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Paramedicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - F Xie
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - M Grignon
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health, Aging and Society, Faculty of Social Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - H Seow
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - G Blackhouse
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH), The Research Institute of St. Joe's Hamilton, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nummedal MA, King S, Uleberg O, Pedersen SA, Bjørnsen LP. Non-emergency department (ED) interventions to reduce ED utilization: a scoping review. BMC Emerg Med 2024; 24:117. [PMID: 38997631 PMCID: PMC11242019 DOI: 10.1186/s12873-024-01028-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emergency department (ED) crowding is a global burden. Interventions to reduce ED utilization have been widely discussed in the literature, but previous reviews have mainly focused on specific interventions or patient groups within the EDs. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify, summarize, and categorize the various types of non-ED-based interventions designed to reduce unnecessary visits to EDs. METHODS This scoping review followed the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and the PRISMA-SCR checklist. A comprehensive structured literature search was performed in the databases MEDLINE and Embase from 2008 to March 2024. The inclusion criteria covered studies reporting on interventions outside the ED that aimed to reduce ED visits. Two reviewers independently screened the records and categorized the included articles by intervention type, location, and population. RESULTS Among the 15,324 screened records, we included 210 studies, comprising 183 intervention studies and 27 systematic reviews. In the primary studies, care coordination/case management or other care programs were the most commonly examined out of 15 different intervention categories. The majority of interventions took place in clinics or medical centers, in patients' homes, followed by hospitals and primary care settings - and targeted patients with specific medical conditions. CONCLUSION A large number of studies have been published investigating interventions to mitigate the influx of patients to EDs. Many of these targeted patients with specific medical conditions, frequent users and high-risk patients. Further research is needed to address other high prevalent groups in the ED - including older adults and mental health patients (who are ill but may not need the ED). There is also room for further research on new interventions to reduce ED utilization in low-acuity patients and in the general patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Målfrid A Nummedal
- Trondheim Emergency Department Research Group (TEDRG), Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
| | - Sarah King
- Trondheim Emergency Department Research Group (TEDRG), Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Oddvar Uleberg
- Trondheim Emergency Department Research Group (TEDRG), Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- Clinic of Emergency Medicine and Prehospital Care, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Research and Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sindre A Pedersen
- The Medicine and Health Library, Library Section for Research Support, Data and Analysis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Lars Petter Bjørnsen
- Trondheim Emergency Department Research Group (TEDRG), Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- Clinic of Emergency Medicine and Prehospital Care, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wallis JA, Shepperd S, Makela P, Han JX, Tripp EM, Gearon E, Disher G, Buchbinder R, O'Connor D. Factors influencing the implementation of early discharge hospital at home and admission avoidance hospital at home: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 3:CD014765. [PMID: 38438114 PMCID: PMC10911892 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014765.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Worldwide there is an increasing demand for Hospital at Home as an alternative to hospital admission. Although there is a growing evidence base on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Hospital at Home, health service managers, health professionals and policy makers require evidence on how to implement and sustain these services on a wider scale. OBJECTIVES (1) To identify, appraise and synthesise qualitative research evidence on the factors that influence the implementation of Admission Avoidance Hospital at Home and Early Discharge Hospital at Home, from the perspective of multiple stakeholders, including policy makers, health service managers, health professionals, patients and patients' caregivers. (2) To explore how our synthesis findings relate to, and help to explain, the findings of the Cochrane intervention reviews of Admission Avoidance Hospital at Home and Early Discharge Hospital at Home services. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Global Index Medicus and Scopus until 17 November 2022. We also applied reference checking and citation searching to identify additional studies. We searched for studies in any language. SELECTION CRITERIA We included qualitative studies and mixed-methods studies with qualitative data collection and analysis methods examining the implementation of new or existing Hospital at Home services from the perspective of different stakeholders. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently selected the studies, extracted study characteristics and intervention components, assessed the methodological limitations using the Critical Appraisal Skills Checklist (CASP) and assessed the confidence in the findings using GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research). We applied thematic synthesis to synthesise the data across studies and identify factors that may influence the implementation of Hospital at Home. MAIN RESULTS From 7535 records identified from database searches and one identified from citation tracking, we included 52 qualitative studies exploring the implementation of Hospital at Home services (31 Early Discharge, 16 Admission Avoidance, 5 combined services), across 13 countries and from the perspectives of 662 service-level staff (clinicians, managers), eight systems-level staff (commissioners, insurers), 900 patients and 417 caregivers. Overall, we judged 40 studies as having minor methodological concerns and we judged 12 studies as having major concerns. Main concerns included data collection methods (e.g. not reporting a topic guide), data analysis methods (e.g. insufficient data to support findings) and not reporting ethical approval. Following synthesis, we identified 12 findings graded as high (n = 10) and moderate (n = 2) confidence and classified them into four themes: (1) development of stakeholder relationships and systems prior to implementation, (2) processes, resources and skills required for safe and effective implementation, (3) acceptability and caregiver impacts, and (4) sustainability of services. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Implementing Admission Avoidance and Early Discharge Hospital at Home services requires early development of policies, stakeholder engagement, efficient admission processes, effective communication and a skilled workforce to safely and effectively implement person-centred Hospital at Home, achieve acceptance by staff who refer patients to these services and ensure sustainability. Future research should focus on lower-income country and rural settings, and the perspectives of systems-level stakeholders, and explore the potential negative impact on caregivers, especially for Admission Avoidance Hospital at Home, as this service may become increasingly utilised to manage rising visits to emergency departments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason A Wallis
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Cabrini Health, Malvern, Australia
| | - Sasha Shepperd
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Petra Makela
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Jia Xi Han
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Evie M Tripp
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Emma Gearon
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gary Disher
- New South Wales Ministry of Health, St Leonards, Australia
| | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Denise O'Connor
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fu BQ, Zhong CCW, Wong CHL, Ho FF, Nilsen P, Hung CT, Yeoh EK, Chung VCH. Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Interventions for Reducing Avoidable Hospital Readmission: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies. Int J Health Policy Manag 2023; 12:7089. [PMID: 37579466 PMCID: PMC10125127 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Avoidable hospital readmission is a major problem among health systems. Although there are effective peri-discharge interventions for reducing avoidable hospital readmission, successful implementation is challenging. This systematic review of qualitative studies aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing peri-discharge interventions from providers' and service users' perspectives. METHODS We searched four databases for potentially eligible qualitative studies from databases' inception to March 2020, and updated literature search for studies published between January 2020 to October 2021. Barriers and facilitators to implementing peri-discharge interventions were identified and mapped onto the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) constructs. Inductive analysis of the CFIR constructs was performed to yield thematic areas that illustrated the relationship between various facilitators and barriers, generating practical insights to key implementation issues. RESULTS Thirteen qualitative studies were included in this systematic review. Key issues were clustered in the CFIR constructs of Design Quality and Complexity of the intervention, strength of Network and Communication, being responsive to Patient Needs with sufficient Resource support, and External Incentives. The three thematic areas were rationality of the interventions, readiness and effort of multidisciplinary implementation teams, and influence of external stakeholders. Common barriers included (i) limited resources, (ii) poor communication among team members, (iii) incompatibility between the new intervention and existing work routine, (iv) complicated implementation process, (v) low practicality of supporting instruments, and (vi) lack of understanding about the content and effectiveness of the new interventions. Common facilitators were (i) information sharing via regular meetings on implementation issues, (ii) organizational culture that values quality and accountability, (iii) financial penalties for hospitals with high avoidable readmissions rates, (iv) external support offered via quality improvement programs and community resources, and (v) senior leadership support. CONCLUSION This study synthesized commonly-presenting barriers and facilitators to implementing peri-discharge interventions among different healthcare organizations. Findings may inform development of implementation strategies in different health systems after appropriate tailoring, based on a consensus-based formative research process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Becky Q Fu
- Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Claire CW Zhong
- Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Charlene HL Wong
- Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Fai Fai Ho
- School of Chinese Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Per Nilsen
- Department of Medicine, Health and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Chi Tim Hung
- Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Eng Kiong Yeoh
- Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Vincent CH Chung
- Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
- School of Chinese Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shannon B, Eaton G, Lanos C, Leyenaar M, Nolan M, Bowles K, Williams B, O'Meara P, Wingrove G, Heffern JD, Batt A. The development of community paramedicine; a restricted review. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e3547-e3561. [PMID: 36065522 PMCID: PMC10087318 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Community paramedic roles are expanding internationally, and no review of the literature could be found to guide services in the formation of community paramedicine programmes. For this reason, the aim of this restricted review was to explore and better understand the successes and learnings of community paramedic programmes across five domains being; education requirements, models of delivery, clinical governance and supervision, scope of roles and outcomes. This restricted review was conducted by searching four databases (CENTRAL, ERIC, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Google Scholar) as well as grey literature search from 2001 until 28/12/2021. After screening, 98 articles were included in the narrative synthesis. Most studies were from the USA (n = 37), followed by Canada (n = 29). Most studies reported on outcomes of community paramedicine programmes (n = 50), followed by models of delivery (n = 28). The findings of this review demonstrate a lack of research and understanding in the areas of education and scope of the role for community paramedics. The findings highlight a need to develop common approaches to education and scope of role while maintaining flexibility in addressing community needs. There was an observable lack of standardisation in the implementation of governance and supervision models, which may prevent community paramedicine from realising its full potential. The outcome measures reported show that there is evidence to support the implementation of community paramedicine into healthcare system design. Community paramedicine programmes result in a net reduction in acute healthcare utilisation, appear to be economically viable and result in positive patient outcomes with high patient satisfaction with care. There is a developing pool of evidence to many aspects of community paramedicine programmes. However, at this time, gaps in the literature prevent a definitive recommendation on the impact of community paramedicine programmes on healthcare system functionality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan Shannon
- Department of ParamedicineMonash UniversityFrankstonVictoriaAustralia
| | - Georgette Eaton
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | | | - Matthew Leyenaar
- Department of Health and Wellness, Emergency Health ServicesGovernment of Prince Edward IslandPrince Edward IslandCanada
| | - Mike Nolan
- County of Renfrew Paramedic ServicePembrokeCanada
| | - Kelly‐Ann Bowles
- Department of ParamedicineMonash UniversityFrankstonVictoriaAustralia
| | - Brett Williams
- Department of ParamedicineMonash UniversityFrankstonVictoriaAustralia
| | - Peter O'Meara
- Department of ParamedicineMonash UniversityFrankstonVictoriaAustralia
| | - Gary Wingrove
- International Roundtable on Community ParamedicineDuluthMNUSA
| | - JD Heffern
- Indigenous Services Canada, Government of CanadaOttawaOntarioCanada
| | - Alan Batt
- Department of ParamedicineMonash UniversityFrankstonVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Misra-Hebert AD, Felix C, Milinovich A, Kattan MW, Willner MA, Chagin K, Bauman J, Hamilton AC, Alberts J. Implementation Experience with a 30-Day Hospital Readmission Risk Score in a Large, Integrated Health System: A Retrospective Study. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37:3054-3061. [PMID: 35132549 PMCID: PMC8821785 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-07277-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Driven by quality outcomes and economic incentives, predicting 30-day hospital readmissions remains important for healthcare systems. The Cleveland Clinic Health System (CCHS) implemented an internally validated readmission risk score in the electronic medical record (EMR). OBJECTIVE We evaluated the predictive accuracy of the readmission risk score across CCHS hospitals, across primary discharge diagnosis categories, between surgical/medical specialties, and by race and ethnicity. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients discharged from a CCHS hospital April 2017-September 2020. MAIN MEASURES Data was obtained from the CCHS EMR and billing databases. All patients discharged from a CCHS hospital were included except those from Oncology and Labor/Delivery, patients with hospice orders, or patients who died during admission. Discharges were categorized as surgical if from a surgical department or surgery was performed. Primary discharge diagnoses were classified per Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Classifications Software Level 1 categories. Discrimination performance predicting 30-day readmission is reported using the c-statistic. RESULTS The final cohort included 600,872 discharges from 11 Northeast Ohio and Florida CCHS hospitals. The readmission risk score for the cohort had a c-statistic of 0.6875 with consistent yearly performance. The c-statistic for hospital sites ranged from 0.6762, CI [0.6634, 0.6876], to 0.7023, CI [0.6903, 0.7132]. Medical and surgical discharges showed consistent performance with c-statistics of 0.6923, CI [0.6807, 0.7045], and 0.6802, CI [0.6681, 0.6925], respectively. Primary discharge diagnosis showed variation, with lower performance for congenital anomalies and neoplasms. COVID-19 had a c-statistic of 0.6387. Subgroup analyses showed c-statistics of > 0.65 across race and ethnicity categories. CONCLUSIONS The CCHS readmission risk score showed good performance across diverse hospitals, across diagnosis categories, between surgical/medical specialties, and by patient race and ethnicity categories for 3 years after implementation, including during COVID-19. Evaluating clinical decision-making tools post-implementation is crucial to determine their continued relevance, identify opportunities to improve performance, and guide their appropriate use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita D Misra-Hebert
- Healthcare Delivery and Implementation Science Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. .,Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue Suite G10, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. .,Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Christina Felix
- Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Alex Milinovich
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Michael W Kattan
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Marc A Willner
- Department of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kevin Chagin
- The Institute for H.O.P.E.TM, MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Janine Bauman
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Aaron C Hamilton
- Clinical Transformation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Hospital Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jay Alberts
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Center for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lai FTT, Wong ELY, Tam ZPY, Cheung AWL, Lau MC, Wu CM, Wong R, Ma HM, Yip BHK, Yeoh EK. Association of volunteer-administered home care with reduced emergency room visits and hospitalization among older adults with chronic conditions: a propensity-score-matched cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud 2021; 127:104158. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|