Management of Atrial Fibrillation in the Acute Setting—Findings from an Australasian Survey

Esmolol Compared with Amiodarone in the Treatment of Recent-Onset Atrial Fibrillation (RAF): An Emergency Medicine External Validity Study

BACKGROUND

Recent-onset atrial fibrillation (RAF) is the most frequent supraventricular dysrhythmia in emergency medicine. Severely compromised patients require acute treatment with injectable drugs OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this external validity study was to compare the short-term efficacy of esmolol with that of amiodarone to treat severe RAF in an emergency setting.

METHODS

This retrospective survey was conducted in mobile intensive care units by analyzing patient records between 2002 and 2013. We included RAF with (one or more) severity factors including: clinical shock, angina pectoris, ST shift, and very rapid ventricular rate. A blind matching procedure was used to constitute esmolol group (n = 100) and amiodarone group (n = 200), with similar profiles for age, gender, initial blood pressure, heart rate, severity factors, and treatment delay. The main outcome measure was the percentage of patients with a ventricular rate control defined as heart frequency ≤ 100 beats/min. More stringent (rhythm control) and more humble indicators (20% heart rate reduction) were analyzed at from 10 to 120 min after treatment initiation.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were comparable for both groups: age 66 ± 16 years, male 71%, treatment delay < 1 h 36%, 1-2 h 29%, > 2 h 35%, chest pain 61%, ST shift 62%, ventricular rate 154 ± 26 beats/min, and blood pressure 126/73 mm Hg. The superiority of esmolol was significant at 40 min (64% rate control with esmolol vs. 25% with amiodarone) and for all indicators from 10 to 120 min after treatment onset.

CONCLUSION

In "real life emergency medicine," esmolol is better than amiodarone in the treatment of RAF.

Pulmonary Congestion Complicating Atrial Fibrillation Cardioversion

Acute pulmonary congestion (APC) may occur within hours after electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF). There is scarce data about its incidence, risk factors, and the outcome. In the present study, data of consecutive patients admitted for first electrical cardioversion for AF between 2007 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. APC within the 48 hours following cardioversion was defined as dyspnea and at least one of the following: drop in saturation to <90%, administration of intravenous diuretic or an emergent chest X-ray with new pulmonary congestion. All-cause mortality was determined from the national registry. Total of 1,696 patients had first cardioversion for AF, of whom 66 (3.9%) had APC. In a multivariate logistic regression model independent predictors of APC included (OR [CI], p): older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 1.08, p = 0.001), rapid ventricular response (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.17 to 3.34, 0.010), previous heart failure (OR 3.53, 95% CI 2.09 to 5.97, p <0.001), Amiodarone loading (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.18 to 4.79, p = 0.016) and diabetes mellitus (OR 1.77 95% CI 1.05 to 3.00, p = 0.033). There was no difference in cardioversion success rate (overall 94%). In-hospital mortality was 1.5% within the APC group and 0.5% without (p = 0.301). Patients with APC had higher rate of 6-month readmissions (28.8% vs 18.1% p <0.028). Within a median follow-up of 2.9 years, APC following cardioversion was an independent predictor of overall mortality (hazard ratio 1.73, 95% CI (1.17 to 2.56) p = 0.006). In conclusion, APC occurs in 3.9% of hospitalized patients following electrical AF cardioversion. Risk factors include increased age, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, Amiodarone loading and rapid ventricular response. APC following cardioversion is associated with increased rates of readmissions and mortality.

Variation in practice patterns among specialties in the acute management of atrial fibrillation

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is commonly managed by a variety of specialists. Current guidelines differ in their recommendations leading to uncertainty regarding important clinical decisions. We sought to document practice pattern variation among cardiologists, emergency physicians (EP) and hospitalists at a single academic, tertiary-care center.

Methods

A survey was created containing seven clinical scenarios of patients presenting with AF. We analyzed respondent choices regarding rate vs rhythm control, thromboembolic treatment and hospitalization strategies. Finally, we contrasted our findings with a comparable Australasian survey to provide an international reference.

Results

There was a 78% response rate (124 of 158), 37% hospitalists, 31.5% cardiologists, and 31.5% EP. Most respondents chose rate over rhythm control (92.2%; 95% CI, 89.1% - 94.5%) and thromboembolic treatment (67.8%; 95% CI, 63.8% - 71.7%). Compared to both hospitalists and EPs, cardiologists were more likely to choose thromboembolic treatment for new and paroxysmal AF (adjusted OR 2.38; 95% CI, 1.05 - 5.41). They were less likely to favor hospital admission across all types of AF (adjusted OR 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17 - 0.79) but thought cardiology consultation was more important (adjusted OR 1.88, 95% CI, 0.97 - 3.64). Australasian physicians were more aggressive with rhythm control for paroxysmal AF with low CHADS2 score compared to US physicians.

Conclusions

Significant variation exists among specialties in the management of acute AF, likely reflecting a lack of high quality research to direct the provider. Future studies may help to standardize practice leading to decreased rates of hospitalization and overall cost.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12872-015-0009-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Supporting Treatment decision making to Optimise the Prevention of STROKE in Atrial Fibrillation: the STOP STROKE in AF study. Protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Suboptimal uptake of anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation has persisted for over 20 years, despite high-level evidence demonstrating its effectiveness in reducing the risk of fatal and disabling stroke.

METHODS

The STOP STROKE in AF study is a national, cluster randomised controlled trial designed to improve the uptake of anticoagulation in primary care. General practitioners from around Australia enrolling in this 'distance education' program are mailed written educational materials, followed by an academic detailing session delivered via telephone by a medical peer, during which participants discuss patient de-identified cases. General practitioners are then randomised to receive written specialist feedback about the patient de-identified cases either before or after completing a three-month posttest audit. Specialist feedback is designed to provide participants with support and confidence to prescribe anticoagulation. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with atrial fibrillation receiving oral anticoagulation at the time of the posttest audit.

DISCUSSION

The STOP STROKE in AF study aims to evaluate a feasible intervention via distance education to prevent avoidable stroke due to atrial fibrillation. It provides a systematic test of augmenting academic detailing with expert feedback about patient management.

Acute atrial fibrillation in emergency surgery: Is it rare?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia with an estimated clinical prevalence of approximately 1% in the general population and as high as 9% in individuals by the age of 80 years. The aetiology is multifactorial. Systemic disease, e.g., inflammatory processes, sarcoidosis, autoimmune disorders, has also been linked to the development of AF. Myocardial dysfunction observed in sepsis could contribute to arrhythmias and inflammation per se could induce or provoke AF. We describe the successful management of an acute AF in an elderly patient scheduled for emergency laparotomy and closure of hollow viscous perforation.

Attitudes of physicians regarding anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

the efficacy of warfarin for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is well established, but many people with AF who would benefit from warfarin are not receiving it. This systematic review aims to determine physicians' attitudes to the prescription of warfarin for AF, and identify reasons for its underuse.

METHODS

an electronic search of MEDLINE (1950-present), EMBASE (1980-present), CINAHL (1994-present), PsycINFO (1987-present) and Web of Knowledge (1970-present) was performed in November 2010 to identify all studies which addressed, via survey, physicians' attitudes regarding anticoagulation for patients with AF.

RESULTS

a total of 1,375 citations were identified. Of these citations, 44 full text studies were obtained for scrutinisation; 14 of these studies were rejected leaving 30 studies which were included in the review. All included studies were cross-sectional surveys and addressed physicians' opinions of anticoagulation in AF as a primary or secondary aim. Increasing age, increased bleeding risk, previous bleeds, falls risk, co-morbidities and ability to comply with treatment influenced whether physicians would prescribe anticoagulation for AF.

CONCLUSION

physicians are reticent to recommend warfarin for elderly patients in AF, despite evidence of increased benefit in these patients compared with younger patients. Risk of falls and previous bleeding were also shown to be disproportionate barriers to warfarin prescription. Further studies are required to determine how best to overcome these perceived barriers to appropriate anticoagulation.