Continuous Spinal Cord Stimulation Reduced Cardiac Ischaemia/Reperfusion Injury in a Rat Model

Spinal Cord Stimulation Reduces Ventricular Arrhythmias by Attenuating Reactive Gliosis and Activation of Spinal Interneurons

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated spinal cord neuronal and glial cell activation during cardiac ischemia-reperfusion (IR)-triggered ventricular arrhythmias and neuromodulation therapy by spinal cord stimulation (SCS).

BACKGROUND

Myocardial ischemia induces changes in cardiospinal neural networks leading to sudden cardiac death. Neuromodulation with SCS decreases cardiac sympathoexcitation; however, the molecular mechanisms remain unknown.

METHODS

Yorkshire pigs (n = 16) were randomized to Control, IR, or IR+SCS groups. A 4-pole SCS lead was placed in the T1-T4 epidural space with stimulation for 30 minutes before IR (50 Hz, 0.4-ms duration, 90% motor threshold). Cardiac electrophysiological mapping and Ventricular Arrhythmia Score (VAS) were recorded. Immunohistochemistry of thoracic spinal sections was used to map and identify Fos-positive neuronal and glial cell types during IR with and without SCS.

RESULTS

IR increased cardiac sympathoexcitation and arrhythmias (VAS = 6.2 ± 0.9) that were attenuated in IR + SCS (VAS = 2.8 ± 0.5; P = 0.017). IR increased spinal cellular Fos expression (#Fos+ cells Control = 23 ± 2 vs IR = 88 ± 5; P < 0.0001) in T1-T4, with the greatest increase localized to T3, and the greatest %Fos+ cells being microglia and astrocytes. Fos expression was attenuated by IR + SCS (62 ± 4; P < 0.01), primarily though a reduction in Fos+ microglia and astrocytes, as SCS also led to increase in Fos+ neurons in deep dorsal laminae.

CONCLUSIONS

In a porcine model, cardiac IR was associated with astrocyte and microglial cell activation. Our results suggest that preemptive thoracic SCS decreased IR-induced cardiac sympathoexcitation and ventricular arrhythmias through attenuation of reactive gliosis and activation of inhibitory interneurons in the dorsal horn of spinal cord.

Lack of Analgesic Synergy of the Cholecystokinin Receptor Antagonist Proglumide and Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain in Rats

OBJECTIVE

Neuropathic pain is difficult to manage and treat. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has become an established procedure for treating chronic neuropathic pain that is refractory to pharmacological therapy. In order to achieve better analgesia, a number of studies have evaluated the effectiveness of combining drug therapy with SCS. Cholecystokinin antagonists, such as proglumide, enhance the analgesic efficacy of endogenous opioids in animal models of pain. We previously reported that both systemic and spinal administration of proglumide enhances analgesia produced by both low- and high-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Since SCS produces analgesia through endogenous opioids, we hypothesized that the analgesic effect of SCS would be enhanced through co-administration with proglumide in animals with neuropathic pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 40) with spared nerve injury were given proglumide (20 mg/kg, i.p.) or saline prior to treatment with SCS (sham, 4 Hz, and 60 Hz). Mechanical withdrawal thresholds of the paw were measured before and after induction of nerve injury, and after SCS. Physical activity levels were measured after SCS.

RESULTS

Both proglumide and SCS when given independently significantly increased withdrawal thresholds two weeks after nerve injury. However, there was no additional effect of combining proglumide and SCS on mechanical withdrawal thresholds or activity levels in animals with nerve injury.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Proglumide may be a candidate for achieving analgesia for patients with refractory neuropathic pain conditions, but does not enhance analgesia produced by SCS.

Spinal cord stimulation reduces mechanical hyperalgesia and glial cell activation in animals with neuropathic pain

BACKGROUND

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is commonly used for neuropathic pain; the optimal variables and mechanisms of action are unclear. We tested whether modulation of SCS variables improved analgesia in animals with neuropathic pain by comparing 6-hour vs 30-minute duration and 50%, 75%, or 90% motor threshold (MT) intensity (amplitude). Furthermore, we examined whether maximally effective SCS reduced glial activation in the spinal cord in neuropathic animals.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley rats received the spared nerve injury model and were implanted with an epidural SCS lead. Animals were tested for mechanical withdrawal threshold of the paw before and 2 weeks after spared nerve injury, before and after SCS daily for 4 days, and 1, 4, and 9 days after SCS. Spinal cords were examined for the effects of SCS on glial cell activation.

RESULTS

The mechanical withdrawal threshold decreased, and glial immunoreactivity increased 2 weeks after spared nerve injury. For duration, 6-hour SCS significantly increased the mechanical withdrawal threshold when compared with 30-minute SCS or sham SCS; 30-minute SCS was greater than sham SCS. For intensity (amplitude), 90% MT SCS significantly increased the withdrawal threshold when compared with 75% MT SCS, 50% MT SCS, and sham SCS. Both 4 and 60 Hz SCS decreased glial activation (GFAP, MCP-1, and OX-42) in the spinal cord dorsal horn when compared with sham.

CONCLUSIONS

Six-hour duration SCS with 90% MT showed the largest increase in mechanical withdrawal threshold, suggesting that the variables of stimulation are important for clinical effectiveness. One potential mechanism for SCS may be to reduce glial activation at the level of the spinal cord.