Intraoperative Epi-Aortic Scans Reduce Adverse Neurological Sequelae in Elderly, High Risk Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery - a Propensity Matched, Cumulative Sum Control Analysis

The brain-before-heart strategy for coronary artery bypass grafting in the severely atherosclerotic aorta: A single-institution experience

BACKGROUND

Severe atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta (SAA) in patients undergoing surgical revascularization by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is becoming an increasing problem as more elderly patients are diagnosed with coronary artery disease. Strokes and other neurologic insults are common complications in this group, with devastating impacts on outcomes and prognoses.

HYPOTHESIS

Early detection of the atherosclerotic aorta and the application of a stroke prevention protocol will reduce the risk of stroke in patients with SAA.

METHODS

In 2012, we adopted a protocol devised to preemptively detect and manage patients suspected of having SAA. From the time of the application of the protocol, we compared the immediate and late outcomes of CABG in SAA in the 8 years preceding the protocol in a "control" group (30 patients) and in the 8 years following the protocol in a "brain" group (69 patients).

RESULTS

More patients with SAA were detected after the initiation of the protocol. They had significantly more history of stroke, renal dysfunction, and left main coronary disease. The percutaneous coronary intervention was utilized more after the protocol (26% vs. 7%) and there was far less utilization of replacement of the ascending aorta (12% vs. 37%). Postoperative stroke rates were significantly less after the protocol (2% vs. 18%), with an almost twofold reduction in stroke associated with SAA even after risk adjustment. The composite endpoints of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke were significantly reduced after initiating the protocol at a median of 2.3 years from the time of revascularization.

CONCLUSION

Early detection of SAA and individualized therapeutic strategies for revascularization is effective in reducing athero-embolic brain injury and are associated with better prognosis.

Mortality Reduction After a Preincision Safety Check Before Cardiac Surgery: Is It the Aorta?

OBJECTIVES

The introduction and use of a preincision safety check were associated with lower mortality after mixed adult cardiac surgery; however, an explanatory mechanism is lacking. Stroke, one of the most severe complications after cardiac surgery, with high mortality, may be reduced by adapting the surgical handling of the ascending aorta. This study assessed the prevalence and predictors of this adaptation after a preincision safety check and the subsequent effect on outcome.

DESIGN

A prospective, single-center, observational study comparing adaptation with no-adaptation. The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of adaptation. To study the effect of adaptation on outcome, a propensity score-matched cohort was constructed in a 1:3 intervention:control ratio.

SETTING

At Isala Zwolle (NL), a large, nonacademic teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

All consecutive cardiac surgery procedures from 2012 until 2015, including 4,752 surgeries.

INTERVENTIONS

The adaptation of surgical handling of the ascending aorta.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In 283 cardiac surgeries (5.9%), adaptation was indicated. The most important independent predictors for adaptation were extracardiac atherosclerosis, current smoking, and increasing age. In the propensity score-matched cohort consisting of 1,069 procedures, there were no significant differences in outcome. After correction for propensity score, the hazard ratio of adaptation for 30-day mortality was 1.8 (0.85-3.79).

CONCLUSIONS

The adaptation of aortic surgical handling after a preincision safety check was necessary for 5.9% of cardiac surgeries, with extracardiac atherosclerosis as the strongest predictor. Outcome was not significantly different between patients with and without adaptation. Although promising, it remains unclear whether adaptation may fully explain mortality reduction after the use of a preincision safety check.