Unilateral Versus Bilateral Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

Safety and limitations of line pressure-targeted cerebral perfusion strategy in aortic arch surgery

OBJECTIVES

The optimal flow rate for selective antegrade cerebral perfusion during aortic arch surgery is unknown. While 10-15 ml/kg/min is generally recommended, our centre has adopted a line pressure-targeted, relatively low-flow antegrade cerebral perfusion strategy. We aimed to evaluate the effect of flow rate on neurological outcomes.

METHODS

Patients without preoperative neurological deficits who underwent aortic arch surgery between January 2018 and May 2023 were enrolled. Under moderate hypothermia, an initial cerebral ischaemia period of 15-20 min was permitted. Following a brief retrograde cerebral perfusion, bilateral selective antegrade cerebral perfusion was performed using balloon-tipped perfusion catheters. The flow rate was determined using a line pressure of 200 mmHg. Risk factor analysis for postoperative permanent and temporary neurological deficits was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 262 patients were included. The median selective antegrade cerebral perfusion flow rate was 5.7 ml/kg/min. Permanent neurological deficits occurred in 2 patients (0.8%), while temporary neurological deficits occurred in 30 patients (11.5%). The low antegrade cerebral perfusion flow rate was not a risk factor for permanent or temporary neurological deficits. Prolonged cerebral ischaemia time was the only significant risk factor for temporary neurological deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

Under moderate hypothermia and with the assistance of retrograde cerebral perfusion, the line pressure-targeted, relatively low-flow selective antegrade cerebral perfusion strategy at our centre achieved favourable neurological outcomes. However, prolonged cerebral ischaemia time was a significant risk factor for temporary neurological deficits.

Anesthetic Management for Proximal Aortic Repair

Surgical repair of the proximal aorta is a complex endeavor, requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and often the use of hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA). In addition to the normal considerations for patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass, additional challenges include cerebral and end-organ protection during periods of circulatory arrest. This review aims to provide an up-to-date, evidence-based review on anesthetic management for proximal aortic repair.

Trilateral versus Bilateral Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion in Frozen Elephant Trunk: A Propensity Score Analysis

OBJECTIVE

 Spinal cord injury (SCI) with subsequent paraplegia and/or stroke after arch repair with frozen elephant trunk (FET) remain the most devastating complications. In this study, we aim to examine the impact of different cerebral perfusion strategies on the neurological outcome comparing bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (bACP) and trilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (tACP).

METHODS

 Between 2009 and 2021, 88 patients underwent total arch replacement using a hybrid prosthesis in FET technique for acute (40.4%) and chronic (59.6%) aortic pathologies. After excluding 14 patients who underwent FET with unilateral ACP the remaining 74 patients were divided into two groups. Propensity score matching was performed based on pre- and perioperative patient characteristics resulting in 22 patients in each group. The primary endpoint was a combination of major cerebral event and SCI. Secondary end point was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

 Major cerebral events occurred in 9% of the patients in bACP versus 13.6% in tACP group (p = 0.63). No postoperative SCI was observed in patients with bACP and only one patient suffered SCI with tACP (p = 0.31). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the two groups (22.7% in bACP vs. 13.6% in tACP; p = 0.43).

CONCLUSION

 In patients undergoing total aortic arch repair using FET technique, both perfusion strategies (bilateral and trilateral ACP) are safe and effective. The rates of neurological complications as well as mortalities are acceptably low in both groups. Further studies with larger patient cohorts are warranted.

Non-invasive assessment of cerebral perfusion pressure: Applied towards preoperative planning of aortic arch surgery with selective antegrade cerebral perfusion

Selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (SACP) is a protective procedure to ascertain adequate brain perfusion during aortic arch surgeries requiring moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest. SACP entails catheterization of arteries feeding the brain, which can be done bilaterally (bSACP) or unilaterally (uSACP), but there is no consensus on when to use each approach. bSACP may increase the risk of embolization, while uSACP risks hypoperfusion due to insufficient perfusion pressure in the contralateral hemisphere, since a single catheter must perfuse both hemispheres. We developed and tested the feasibility of a new method for predicting cerebral perfusion pressures (CPP) during SACP, which could potentially aid clinicians in preoperatively identifying which SACP approach to use. Feasibility of the method was evaluated in five patients eligible for aortic arch surgery (65 ± 7 years, 3 men). Patients were investigated preoperatively with computed tomography angiography (CTA) and 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess patient-specific arterial anatomy and blood flows. From the imaging, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations estimated the patients' vascular resistances. Applying these resistances and intraoperative SACP pressure/flow settings to the model's boundary conditions allowed for predictions of contralateral CPP during SACP. Predicted pressures were compared to corresponding intraoperative pressure measurements. The method showed promise for predicting contralateral CPP during both uSACP (median error (range): 2.4 (-0.2-18.0) mmHg) and bSACP (0.8 (-3.3-5.4) mmHg). Predictions were most sensitive to collateral artery size. This study showed the feasibility of CPP predictions of SACP, and presents key features needed for accurate modelling.

Association of Cerebral Oximetry With Brain Ischemic Lesions and Functional Outcomes in Arch Repair

BACKGROUND

This exploratory analysis of the randomized controlled Aortic Surgery Cerebral Protection Evaluation CardioLink-3 trial sought to determine if cerebral oximetry desaturation during elective proximal arch repair is associated with detrimental postoperative neuroradiologic and neurofunctional outcomes.

METHODS

Cerebral oximetry and pre- and postoperative brain magnetic resonance imaging data from 101 participants were analyzed. Oximetry data from the trial allocation groups were compared; the relationships between cerebral oximetry indices and new ischemic cerebral lesions on magnetic resonance imaging and neurologic outcomes were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Total cerebral desaturation events (>20% decrease from baseline) on the left (median [interquartile range], 1 [1-3] vs 1.5 [0.5-3] with innominate and axillary cannulation; P = .80) were comparable to those on the right (1 [1-3] vs 1 [0-3]; P = .75) as were the total area under the curve of desaturation (left, P = .61; right, P = .84). Seventy patients had new ischemic lesions, among whom 36 had new severe lesions. Total desaturation events and area under the curve of desaturation were similar in patients with and without new ischemic lesions or severe lesions. The nadir regional cerebral saturation was lower on the left (49% [41-56]) than the right (53% [44-59]); left desaturation episodes were associated with lower postoperative cognitive test scores (P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

The innominate and axillary cannulation techniques for elective proximal arch repair with unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion were associated with similar occurrences of cerebral oximetry desaturation and neither were associated with new ischemic lesions.

Frozen elephant trunk technique for aortic arch surgery: the Bordeaux University Hospital experience with Thoraflex hybrid prosthesis

BACKGROUND

Aortic arch surgery still represents a challenge, and the frozen elephant trunk (FET) allows a one-step surgery for complex aortic diseases. The aim of the study was to analyze the results of patients undergoing FET procedure for aortic arch surgery at Bordeaux University Hospital.

METHODS

Patients undergoing FET procedure for multisegmented aortic arch pathologies were analyzed in this single-center retrospective study. Further subgroup analyses were performed according to the degree of urgency of the operation (elective versus emergent surgery) and cerebral protection technique: bilateral selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (B-SACP) versus the unilateral one (U-SACP), regardless of the degree of urgency.

RESULTS

From August 2018 to August 2022, 77 consecutive patients (64.1±9.9 years, 54 males) were enrolled: 43 (55.8%) for elective surgery and 34 (44.2%) in emergency. Technical success was 100%. 30-day mortality was 15.6% (N.=12, 7% elective vs. 26.5% emergent, P=0.043). Six (7.8%) non-disabling strokes occurred (1.9% B-SACP vs. 20% U-SACP, P=0.021). Median follow-up was 1.11 years (interquartile range, 0.62-2.07). The 1-year overall survival was 81.6±4.45%. The elective group showed a survival trend when compared to the emergency one (P=0.054). However, further examination at landmark analysis elective surgery showed a better survival trend compared to emergency surgery up to 1.78 years (P=0.034), after which significance was lost (P=0.521).

CONCLUSIONS

Thoraflex hybrid prosthesis for FET technique demonstrated feasibility and satisfactory short-term clinical outcomes, even in emergent settings. In our practice B-SACP seems to offer better protection and less neurological complications compared to U-SACP, nevertheless further analyses are warranted.

Cardiopulmonary bypass for total aortic arch replacement surgery: A review of three techniques

One treatment for acute type A aortic dissection is to replace the ascending aorta and aortic arch with a graft during circulatory arrest of the lower body, but this is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Maintaining the balance between oxygen supply and demand during circulatory arrest is the key to reducing morbidity and is the primary challenge during body perfusion. The aim of this review is to summarize current knowledge of body perfusion techniques and to predict future development of this field. We present three perfusion techniques based on deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA): DHCA alone, DHCA with selective cerebral perfusion, and DHCA with total body perfusion. DHCA was first developed to provide a clear surgical field, but it may contribute to stroke in 4%–15% of patients. Antegrade or retrograde cerebral perfusion can provide blood flow for the brain during circulatory arrest, and it is associated with much lower stroke incidence of 3%–9%. Antegrade cerebral perfusion may be better than retrograde perfusion during longer arrest. In theory, blood flow can be provided to all vital organs through total body perfusion, which can be implemented via either arterial or venous systems, or by combining retrograde inferior vena caval perfusion with antegrade cerebral perfusion. However, whether total body perfusion is better than other techniques require further investigation in large, multicenter studies. Current techniques for perfusion during circulatory arrest remain imperfect, and a technique that effectively perfuses the upper and lower body effectively during circulatory arrest is missing. Total body perfusion should be systematically compared against selective cerebral perfusion for improving outcomes after circulatory arrest.

Neuroprotection during Open Aortic Arch Surgery: Cerebral Perfusion Methods and Temperature

Neuroprotection is important in open aortic arch surgery because of the dependence of brain tissues on cerebral perfusion. Therefore, several techniques have been developed to reduce cerebral ischemia and improve outcomes in open aortic arch surgery. In this review, I describe various neuroprotective strategies, such as profound and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, selective antegrade cerebral perfusion, retrograde cerebral perfusion, and lower body circulatory arrest; compare their advantages and disadvantages, and discuss their evolution and current status by reviewing relevant literature.

Unsolved issues in acute type A aortic dissection

Surgery for acute type A aortic dissection remains challenging with considerable mortality and morbidity despite the remarkable advances in this field. Particularly, surgical outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection are known to be associated with the hospital volume. The optimal cerebral protective method and extent of surgery have been long-standing controversies in acute type A aortic dissection surgery. Given that data from randomized trial are not available and future trials are also unrealistic, observational data based on large registry or meta-analyses may alternatively provide reliable and reasonable evidence. With regard to neuroprotective methods for arch repair, currently available observational data strongly suggest that there are no overt superiority among unilateral-antegrade cerebral perfusion, bilateral-antegrade cerebral perfusion, and retrograde cerebral perfusion, by which their availabilities are still open in real clinical practices depending on institutional preferences. When deciding the extent of arch repair in acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection, multiple factors should be considered altogether such as aortic anatomic characteristics as well as patient's risk profiles for optimizing early safety and late aortic longevity.

Unilateral versus bilateral anterograde cerebral perfusion in acute type A aortic dissection repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study is to compare the safety and efficacy of unilateral anterograde cerebral perfusion (UACP) and bilateral anterograde cerebral perfusion (BACP) for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD).

METHODS

A systematic review of the MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases (last search: August 7th, 2021) was performed according to the PRISMA statement. Studies directly comparing UACP versus BACP for ATAAD were included. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Eight retrospective cohort studies were identified, incorporating 2416 patients (UACP: 843, BACP: 1573). No statistically significant difference was observed regarding in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR]:1.05 [95% Confidence Interval (95% CI):0.70-1.57]), permanent neurological deficit (PND) (OR: 0.94 [95% CI: 0.52-1.70]), transient neurological deficit (TND) (OR: 1.37 [95% CI: 0.98-1.92]), renal failure (OR: 0.96 [95% CI: 0.70-1.32]), and re-exploration for bleeding (OR: 0.77 [95% CI: 0.48-1.22]). Meta-regression analysis revealed that PND and TND were not influenced by differences in rates of total arch repair, Bentall procedure, and concomitant CABG in UACP and BACP groups. Cardiopulmonary bypass time (Standard Mean Difference [SMD]: -0.11 [95% CI: -0.22, 0.44]), Cross clamp time (SMD: -0.04 [95% CI: -0.38, 0.29]), and hypothermic circulatory arrest time (SMD: -0.12 [95% CI: -0.55, 0.30]) were comparable between UACP and BACP. Intensive care unit stay was shorter in BACP arm (SMD:0.16 [95% CI: 0.01, 0.31]); however, length of hospital stay was shorter in UACP arm (SMD: -0.25 [95% CI: -0.45, -0.06]).

CONCLUSIONS

UACP and BACP had similar results in terms of in-hospital mortality, PND, TND, renal failure, and re-exploration for bleeding rate in patients with ATAAD. ICU stay was shorter in the BACP arm while LOS was shorter in the UACP arm.

Anaesthetic-surgical guide in the treatment of ascending aorta and surgery of the ascending aorta and aortic arch. Consensus document of the Spanish Society of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery and the Sociedad of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy

Aortic pathology is always a challenge for the clinician, and must be diagnosed and treated by a multidisciplinary team due to the technical and technological complexity of the resources used. Ongoing efforts to implement a systematic, protocolized approach involving "Aortic teams" made up of cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, vascular surgeons, anaesthesiologists and radiologists, among others are now leading to improved outcomes. The aim of this consensus document drawn up by the Aortic working groups of the Spanish Society of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy (SEDAR) and the Spanish Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (SECTCV) is to disseminate a set of working protocols. The latest consensus document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) define the concept of "AORTIC TEAM"(1). The aortic team should be closely involved from diagnosis to treatment and finally follow-up, and should be formed of cardiac and vascular surgeons working together with anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, radiologists and geneticists. Treatment of aortic pathologies should be centralised in large centres, because this is the only way to effectively understand the natural course of the disease, provide the entire range of treatment options under one umbrella and treat potential complications. A streamlined emergent care pathway (24/7 availability), adequate transportation and transfer capabilities, as well as rapid activation of the multidisciplinary team must be available. In light of the complexity and constant evolution of therapeutic options, we present this first version of the Anaesthesiology and surgical guidelines for surgery of the ascending aorta and aortic arch. Some questions will no doubt remain unanswered, and future versions will include new techniques that, though implemented in some centres, are still not widely recommended.

OUP accepted manuscript

Consensus regarding optimal cerebral protection strategy in aortic arch surgery is lacking. We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess outcome differences between unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP), bilateral ACP, retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP) and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA). A systematic literature search was performed in Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane and Google Scholar for all papers published till February 2021 reporting on early clinical outcome after aortic arch surgery utilizing either unilateral, bilateral ACP, RCP or DHCA. The primary outcome was operative mortality. Other key secondary endpoints were occurrence of postoperative disabling stroke, paraplegia, renal and respiratory failure. Pooled outcome risks were estimated using random-effects models. A total of 222 studies were included with a total of 43 720 patients. Pooled postoperative mortality in unilateral ACP group was 6.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.3–8.1%], 9.1% (95% CI 7.9–10.4%), 7.8% (95% CI 5.6–10.7%), 9.2% (95% CI 6.7–12.7%) in bilateral ACP, RCP and DHCA groups, respectively. The incidence of postoperative disabling stroke was 4.8% (95% CI 3.8–6.1%) in the unilateral ACP group, 7.3% (95% CI 6.2–8.5%) in bilateral ACP, 6.4% (95% CI 4.4–9.1%) in RCP and 6.3% (95% CI 4.4–9.1%) in DHCA subgroups. The present meta-analysis summarizes the clinical outcomes of different cerebral protection techniques that have been used in clinical practice over the last decades. These outcomes may be used in advanced microsimulation model. These findings need to be placed in the context of the underlying aortic disease, the extent of the aortic disease and other comorbidities.

Prospero registration number: CRD42021246372

METC: MEC-2019-0825

Anaesthetic-surgical guide in the treatment of ascending aorta and surgery of the ascending aorta and aortic arch. Consensus document of the Spanish Society of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery and the Sociedad of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy

Aortic pathology is always a challenge for the clinician, and must be diagnosed and treated by a multidisciplinary team due to the technical and technological complexity of the resources used. Ongoing efforts to implement a systematic, protocolized approach involving "Aortic teams" made up of cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, vascular surgeons, anaesthesiologists and radiologists, among others are now leading to improved outcomes. The aim of this consensus document drawn up by the Aortic working groups of the Spanish Society of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy (SEDAR) and the Spanish Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (SECTCV) is to disseminate a set of working protocols. The latest consensus document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) define the concept of "AORTIC TEAM"(1). The aortic team should be closely involved from diagnosis to treatment and finally follow-up, and should be formed of cardiac and vascular surgeons working together with anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, radiologists and geneticists. Treatment of aortic pathologies should be centralised in large centres, because this is the only way to effectively understand the natural course of the disease, provide the entire range of treatment options under one umbrella and treat potential complications. A streamlined emergent care pathway (24/7 availability), adequate transportation and transfer capabilities, as well as rapid activation of the multidisciplinary team must be available. In light of the complexity and constant evolution of therapeutic options, we present this first version of the Anaesthesiology and surgical guidelines for surgery of the ascending aorta and aortic arch. Some questions will no doubt remain unanswered, and future versions will include new techniques that, though implemented in some centres, are still not widely recommended.

A randomized trial comparing axillary versus innominate artery cannulation for aortic arch surgery

BACKGROUND

Cerebral protection remains the cornerstone of successful aortic surgery; however, there is no consensus as to the optimal strategy.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy of innominate to axillary artery cannulation for delivering antegrade cerebral protection during proximal aortic arch surgery.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial (The Aortic Surgery Cerebral Protection Evaluation CardioLink-3 Trial, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02554032), conducted across 6 Canadian centers between January 2015 and June 2018, allocated 111 individuals to innominate or axillary artery cannulation. The primary safety outcome was neuroprotection per the appearance of new severe ischemic lesions on the postoperative diffusion-weighted-magnetic resonance imaging. The primary efficacy outcome was the difference in total operative time. Secondary outcomes included 30-day all-cause mortality and postoperative stroke.

RESULTS

One hundred two individuals (mean age, 63 ± 11 years) were in the primary safety per-protocol analysis. Baseline characteristics between the groups were similar. New severe ischemic lesions occurred in 19 participants (38.8%) in the axillary versus 18 (34%) in the innominate group (P for noninferiority = .0009). Total operative times were comparable (median, 293 minutes; interquartile range, 222-411 minutes) for axillary versus (298 minutes; interquartile range, 231-368 minutes) for innominate (P for superiority = .47). Stroke/transient ischemic attack occurred in 4 (7.1%) participants in the axillary versus 2 (3.6%) in the innominate group (P = .43). Thirty-day mortality, seizures, delirium, and duration of mechanical ventilation were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging assessments indicate that antegrade cerebral protection with innominate cannulation is safe and affords similar neuroprotection to axillary cannulation during aortic surgery, although the burden of new neurological lesions is high in both groups.

Brain Protection in Aortic Arch Surgery: An Evolving Field

Despite advances in cardiac surgery and anesthesia, the rates of brain injury remain high in aortic arch surgery requiring circulatory arrest. The mechanisms of brain injury, including permanent and temporary neurologic dysfunction, are multifactorial, but intraoperative brain ischemia is likely a major contributor. Maintaining optimal cerebral perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest is the key component of intraoperative management for aortic arch surgery. Various brain monitoring modalities provide different information to improve cerebral protection. Electroencephalography gives crucial data to ensure minimal cerebral metabolism during deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, transcranial Doppler directly measures cerebral arterial blood flow, and near-infrared spectroscopy monitors regional cerebral oxygen saturation. Various brain protection techniques, including hypothermia, cerebral perfusion, pharmacologic protection, and blood gas management, have been used during interruption of systemic circulation, but the optimal strategy remains elusive. Although deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and retrograde cerebral perfusion have their merits, there have been increasing reports about the use of antegrade cerebral perfusion, obviating the need for deep hypothermia. With controversy and variability of surgical practices, moderate hypothermia, when combined with unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion, is considered safe for brain protection in aortic arch surgery performed with circulatory arrest. The neurologic outcomes of brain protection in aortic arch surgery largely depend on the following three major components: cerebral temperature, circulatory arrest time, and cerebral perfusion during circulatory arrest. The optimal brain protection strategy should be individualized based on comprehensive monitoring and stems from well-executed techniques that balance the major components contributing to brain injury.

Critical left coronary main trunk stenosis, chronic occluded right coronary artery, left subclavian artery occlusion, severe aortic regurgitation and porcelain aorta in a patient with aortitis

Background

Coronary involvement is rare but can be critical in patients with aortitis. Although cardiac ischemia can be resolved by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), patients complicated with cardiac ischemia, calcified aorta, and valve insufficiency pose difficult problems for surgeons.

Case presentation

A 71-year-old woman was referred to our institution because of unstable angina. She had been previously diagnosed with aortitis and left subclavian artery occlusion. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed severe left coronary main trunk stenosis, right coronary artery occlusion, and porcelain aorta. Ultrasonic echocardiogram showed severe aortic regurgitation. We performed emergent coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement and ascending aorta replacement under hypothermic circulatory arrest.

Conclusions

The technique of circumferential calcified intimal removal and reinforcement with felt strips was effective for secure anastomosis. Unilateral cerebral perfusion from the right subclavian artery enabled good visualization and sufficient time to perform distal anastomosis.