Assessing Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Ischaemic Heart Disease: Little Things Can Make a Big Difference

Understanding clinical complexity in organ and organizational systems: Challenges local and global

INTRODUCTION

Complexity in healthcare systems has been arbitrarily defined as tasks or systems ranging from complicated to intractable, with a general view of these not being 'simple'. Complexity in healthcare systems in first-world countries has been well elucidated, however, data from third-world countries is still scant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present four cases each from three different organ systems-chronic kidney disease, alcohol use disorder, and heart failure-in the backdrop of our healthcare organization. We present our analysis of the complexities faced clinically and, in our local healthcare system which led to these events.

RESULTS

Analysis of these cases showed that patients with chronic kidney disease had vertebral-spinal pathologies due to poor infection control measures during haemodialysis. All these patients were young with a long history of secondary hypertension. In patients with alcohol use disorder, a common theme of how government regulations and peer pressure promote alcohol use is analysed. In the four patients with unexplained heart failure, vascular health is viewed as a fractal dimension and the various factors affecting vascular health are elaborated.

CONCLUSION

Complexities exist clinically in making a diagnosis, and organizationally, in the variables and nodes dictating patient outcomes. Clinical complexities cannot be simplified but have to be navigated in an optimized way to improve clinical outcomes.

Prognostic value of coronary microvascular dysfunction assessed by coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance in diabetic patients with chronic coronary syndrome

Background

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is common and is associated with unfavorable cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (caIMR) is a recently developed wire- and hyperemic agent-free method to assess CMD. We aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of CMD assessed by caIMR on clinical outcomes in patients with DM and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS).

Methods

CCS patients who underwent coronary angiography between June 2015 to May 2018 were included. Coronary microvascular function was measured by caIMR, and CMD was defined as caIMR ≥ 25U. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the relationship between caIMR and the risk of MACE.

Results

Of 290 CCS patients, 102 patients had DM. Compared with non-diabetic patients, CMD (caIMR ≥ 25U) was higher among DM patients (57.8% vs. 38.3%; p = 0.001). During a mean 35 months follow-up, 40 MACE had occurred. Patients with caIMR ≥ 25 had a higher rate of MACE than patients with caIMR < 25 (20.6% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.002). Of these, the MACE rate was higher among DM patients with caIMR ≥ 25 than those with caIMR < 25 (33.9% vs. 14.0%; p = 0.022). In multivariable Cox analysis, caIMR ≥ 25 was independently associated with MACE in the DM patients but not in non-DM patients (HR, 2.760; 95% CI, 1.066–7.146; P = 0.036).

Conclusion

CMD assessed by caIMR was common and is an independent predictor of MACE among diabetic patients with CCS. This finding potentially enables a triage of higher-risk patients to more intensive therapy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12933-022-01653-y.

Research Progress of Imaging Methods for Detection of Microvascular Angina Pectoris in Diabetic Patients

Diabetes is a complex metabolic disease characterized by hyperglycemia. Its complications are various, often involving the heart, brain, kidney, and other essential organs. At present, the number of diabetic patients in the world is growing day by day. The cardiovascular disease caused by diabetes has dramatically affected the quality of life of diabetic patients. It is the leading cause of death of diabetic patients. Diabetic patients often suffer from microvascular angina pectoris without obstructive coronary artery disease. Still, there are typical ECG ischemia and angina pectoris, that is, chest pain and dyspnea under exercise. Unlike obstructive coronary diseases, nitrate does not affect chest pain caused by coronary microvascular angina in most cases. With the increasing emphasis on diabetic microvascular angina, the need for accurate diagnosis of the disease is also increasing. We can use SPECT, PET, CMR, MCE, and other methods to evaluate coronary microvascular function. SPECT is commonly used in clinical practice, and PET is considered the gold standard for non-invasive detection of myocardial blood flow. This article mainly introduces the research progress of these imaging methods in detecting microvascular angina in diabetic patients.

Impact of Targeted Therapies for Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction as Assessed by the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) has emerged as an important therapeutic target in the contemporary management of ischemic heart disease. However, due to a lack of a reliable traditional "gold standard" test for CMD, optimal treatment remains undefined. The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) is an intra-coronary wire-based technique that provides a more reliable and quantitative assessment of CMD and has been increasingly used as a preferred endpoint for evaluating CMD treatment strategies in recent studies. IMR can help diagnose CMD in angina patients with non-obstructive epicardial coronary disease, predict peri-procedural myocardial infarction in stable patients undergoing coronary stenting, and predict long-term prognosis after acute myocardial infarction. Studies of IMR in the setting of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes are still lacking. This review critically appraises the current published literature evaluating targeted therapies for CMD using IMR as the assessment tool and provides insights into evidence gaps in this important field. The index of microcirculatory resistance has rapidly evolved from a research tool to being the new "gold standard" test for evaluating coronary microvascular dysfunction.