1
|
Garofano M, Vecchione C, Calabrese M, Rusciano MR, Visco V, Granata G, Carrizzo A, Galasso G, Bramanti P, Corallo F, Izzo C, Ciccarelli M, Bramanti A. Technological Developments, Exercise Training Programs, and Clinical Outcomes in Cardiac Telerehabilitation in the Last Ten Years: A Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:1534. [PMID: 39120237 PMCID: PMC11311841 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12151534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2024] [Revised: 07/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are associated with very high rates of re-hospitalization and mortality worldwide, so the complexity of these pathologies requires frequent access to hospital facilities. The guidelines also emphasize the importance of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs, which have demonstrated a favorable effect on outcomes, and cardiac telerehabilitation (CTR) could represent an innovative healthcare delivery model. The aim of our review is to study how technologies used in rehabilitation have changed over time and also to understand what types of rehabilitation programs have been used in telerehabilitation. METHODS We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in three electronic databases, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, from January 2015 to January 2024, using relevant keywords. Initially, 502 articles were found, and 79 duplicates were identified and eliminated with EndNote. RESULTS In total, 16 RCTs fulfilled the pre-defined criteria, which were analyzed in our systematic review. The results showed that after CTR, there was a significant improvement in main outcome measures, as well as in relation to technological advances. CONCLUSIONS Moreover, compared to center-based rehabilitation, CTR can offer further advantages, with better cost-effectiveness, the breakdown of geographical barriers, and the improvement of access to treatment for the female population, which is traditionally more socially committed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Garofano
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy; (C.V.); (M.C.); (M.R.R.); (V.V.); (G.G.); (A.C.); (G.G.); (C.I.); (M.C.); (A.B.)
| | - Carmine Vecchione
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy; (C.V.); (M.C.); (M.R.R.); (V.V.); (G.G.); (A.C.); (G.G.); (C.I.); (M.C.); (A.B.)
| | - Mariaconsiglia Calabrese
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy; (C.V.); (M.C.); (M.R.R.); (V.V.); (G.G.); (A.C.); (G.G.); (C.I.); (M.C.); (A.B.)
| | - Maria Rosaria Rusciano
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy; (C.V.); (M.C.); (M.R.R.); (V.V.); (G.G.); (A.C.); (G.G.); (C.I.); (M.C.); (A.B.)
| | - Valeria Visco
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy; (C.V.); (M.C.); (M.R.R.); (V.V.); (G.G.); (A.C.); (G.G.); (C.I.); (M.C.); (A.B.)
| | - Giovanni Granata
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy; (C.V.); (M.C.); (M.R.R.); (V.V.); (G.G.); (A.C.); (G.G.); (C.I.); (M.C.); (A.B.)
| | - Albino Carrizzo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy; (C.V.); (M.C.); (M.R.R.); (V.V.); (G.G.); (A.C.); (G.G.); (C.I.); (M.C.); (A.B.)
| | - Gennaro Galasso
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy; (C.V.); (M.C.); (M.R.R.); (V.V.); (G.G.); (A.C.); (G.G.); (C.I.); (M.C.); (A.B.)
| | - Placido Bramanti
- Faculty of Psychology, University eCampus, 22060 Novedrate, Italy;
| | | | - Carmine Izzo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy; (C.V.); (M.C.); (M.R.R.); (V.V.); (G.G.); (A.C.); (G.G.); (C.I.); (M.C.); (A.B.)
| | - Michele Ciccarelli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy; (C.V.); (M.C.); (M.R.R.); (V.V.); (G.G.); (A.C.); (G.G.); (C.I.); (M.C.); (A.B.)
| | - Alessia Bramanti
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy; (C.V.); (M.C.); (M.R.R.); (V.V.); (G.G.); (A.C.); (G.G.); (C.I.); (M.C.); (A.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zogka PG, Patsaki I, Dimopoulos S, Karatzanos E, Sidiras G, Routsi C, Nanas S. Interprofessional survey of perceived barriers regarding cardiac rehabilitation in Greece. Hellenic J Cardiol 2024; 76:110-112. [PMID: 37678469 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjc.2023.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiota G Zogka
- Clinical Ergospirometry, Exercise and Rehabilitation Laboratory, 1st Critical Care Department, Evangelismos Hospital, School of Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.
| | - Irini Patsaki
- Physiotherapy Department, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece.
| | - Stavros Dimopoulos
- Clinical Ergospirometry, Exercise and Rehabilitation Laboratory, 1st Critical Care Department, Evangelismos Hospital, School of Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece; ICU Cardiac Surgery Department, Onassis Cardiac Surgery·Center, Greece
| | - Eleftherios Karatzanos
- Clinical Ergospirometry, Exercise and Rehabilitation Laboratory, 1st Critical Care Department, Evangelismos Hospital, School of Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | | | - Christina Routsi
- Clinical Ergospirometry, Exercise and Rehabilitation Laboratory, 1st Critical Care Department, Evangelismos Hospital, School of Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Serafim Nanas
- Clinical Ergospirometry, Exercise and Rehabilitation Laboratory, 1st Critical Care Department, Evangelismos Hospital, School of Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ravn MB, Berthelsen C, Maribo T, Nielsen CV, Pedersen CG, Handberg C. Understanding Facilitators and Challenges to Care Transition in Cardiac Rehabilitation: Perspectives and Assumptions of Healthcare Professionals. Glob Qual Nurs Res 2023; 10:23333936231217844. [PMID: 38107551 PMCID: PMC10722928 DOI: 10.1177/23333936231217844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Cardiac rehabilitation is an essential part of treatment for patients with cardiovascular disease. Cardiac rehabilitation is increasingly organized outside hospital in community healthcare services. However, this transition may be challenging. The aim of this study was to examine assumptions and perspectives among healthcare professionals on how facilitators and challenges influence the transition from hospital to community healthcare services for patients in cardiac rehabilitation. The study followed the Interpretive Description methodology and data consisted of participant observations and focus group interviews. The analysis showed that despite structured guidelines aimed to support the collaboration, improvements could be made. Facilitators and challenges could occur in the collaboration between the healthcare professionals, in the collaboration with the patient, or because of the new reality for patients when diagnosed with cardiovascular disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maiken Bay Ravn
- Aarhus University, Denmark
- DEFACTUM Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Connie Berthelsen
- Zealand University Hospital, Køge and Roskilde, Denmark
- University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Thomas Maribo
- Aarhus University, Denmark
- DEFACTUM Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Claus Vinther Nielsen
- Aarhus University, Denmark
- DEFACTUM Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
- Region Hospital Goedstrup, Denmark
| | | | - Charlotte Handberg
- Aarhus University, Denmark
- National Rehabilitation Center for Neuromuscular Diseases; Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Telerehabilitation Approaches for People with Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2022; 12:jcm12010064. [PMID: 36614865 PMCID: PMC9820837 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12010064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Telerehabilitation (TR) for chronic heart failure (CHF) allows for overcoming distance barriers and reducing exacerbations. However, little is known about TR descriptors, components, and efficacy in CHF. METHODS This work systematically reviewed the TR strategies of randomized controlled trials in people with CHF. A meta-analysis was run to test its effect on exercise capacity and quality of life compared to no rehabilitation (NI) and conventional intervention (CI). RESULTS Out of 6168 studies, 11 were eligible for the systematic review, and 8 for the meta-analysis. TR intervention was individual and multidimensional, with a frequency varying from 2 to 5 times per 8-12 weeks. The TR components mainly included an asynchronous model, monitoring/assessment, decision, and offline feedback. A few studies provided a comprehensive technological kit. Minimal adverse events and high adherence were reported. A large effect of TR compared to NI and a non-inferiority effect compared to CI was registered on exercise capacity, but no effects of TR compared to NI and CI on quality of life were observed. CONCLUSIONS TR for people with CHF adopted established effective strategies. Future interventions may identify the precise TR dose for CHF, technological requirements, and engagement components affecting the patient's quality of life.
Collapse
|
5
|
Palmer K, Bowles KA, Morphet J. The heartache of living with failure: The experience of people with chronic heart failure. Collegian 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.colegn.2022.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
6
|
Daw P, Harrison A, Doherty PJ, van Zanten JJCSV, Dalal HM, Taylor RS, van Beurden SB, McDonagh STJ, Greaves CJ. A pragmatic effectiveness-implementation study comparing trial evidence with routinely collected outcome data for patients receiving the REACH-HF home-based cardiac rehabilitation programme. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2022; 22:270. [PMID: 35710336 PMCID: PMC9202968 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-022-02707-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiac rehabilitation for heart failure continues to be greatly underused worldwide despite being a Class I recommendation in international clinical guidelines and uptake is low in women and patients with mental health comorbidities. METHODS Rehabilitation EnAblement in CHronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF) programme was implemented in four UK National Health Service early adopter sites ('Beacon Sites') between June 2019 and June 2020. Implementation and patient-reported outcome data were collected across sites as part of the National Audit of Cardiac Rehabilitation. The change in key outcomes before and after the supervised period of REACH-HF intervention across the Beacon Sites was assessed and compared to those of the intervention arm of the REACH-HF multicentre trial. RESULTS Compared to the REACH-HF multicentre trial, patients treated at the Beacon Site were more likely to be female (33.8% vs 22.9%), older (75.6 vs 70.1), had a more severe classification of heart failure (26.5% vs 17.7%), had poorer baseline health-related quality of life (MLHFQ score 36.1 vs 31.4), were more depressed (HADS score 6.4 vs 4.1) and anxious (HADS score 7.2 vs 4.7), and had lower exercise capacity (ISWT distance 190 m vs 274.7 m). There appeared to be a substantial heterogeneity in the implementation process across the four Beacon Sites as evidenced by the variation in levels of patient recruitment, operationalisation of the REACH-HF intervention and patient outcomes. Overall lower improvements in patient-reported outcomes at the Beacon Sites compared to the trial may reflect differences in the population studied (having higher morbidity at baseline) as well as the marked challenges in intervention delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION The results of this study illustrate the challenges in consistently implementing an intervention (shown to be clinically effective and cost-effective in a multicentre trial) into real-world practice, especially in the midst of a global pandemic. Further research is needed to establish the real-world effectiveness of the REACH-HF intervention in different populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina Daw
- grid.6572.60000 0004 1936 7486School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT UK
| | - Alexander Harrison
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Patrick J. Doherty
- grid.5685.e0000 0004 1936 9668Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Hasnain M. Dalal
- grid.416116.50000 0004 0391 2873University of Exeter Medical School, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024Primary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter, UK
| | - Rod S. Taylor
- grid.8756.c0000 0001 2193 314XMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit & Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Well Being, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Samantha B. van Beurden
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Sinéad T. J. McDonagh
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024Primary Care Research Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter, UK
| | - Colin J. Greaves
- grid.6572.60000 0004 1936 7486School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Daw P, Withers TM, van Zanten JJCSV, Harrison A, Greaves CJ. A systematic review of provider-and system-level factors influencing the delivery of cardiac rehabilitation for heart failure. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:1267. [PMID: 34814927 PMCID: PMC8611948 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07174-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a longstanding research-to-practice gap in the delivery of cardiac rehabilitation for patients with heart failure. Despite adequate evidence confirming that comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation can improve quality of life and decrease morbidity and mortality in heart failure patients, only a fraction of eligible patients receives it. Many studies and reviews have identified patient-level barriers that might contribute to this disparity, yet little is known about provider- and system-level influences. METHODS A systematic review using narrative synthesis. The aims of the systematic review were to a) determine provider- and system-level barriers and enablers that affect the delivery of cardiac rehabilitation for heart failure and b) juxtapose identified barriers with possible solutions reported in the literature. A comprehensive search strategy was applied to the MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, EThoS and ProQuest databases. Articles were included if they were empirical, peer-reviewed, conducted in any setting, using any study design and describing factors influencing the delivery of cardiac rehabilitation for heart failure patients. Data were synthesised using inductive thematic analysis and a triangulation protocol to identify convergence/contradiction between different data sources. RESULTS Seven eligible studies were identified. Thematic analysis identified nine overarching categories of barriers and enablers which were classified into 24 and 26 themes respectively. The most prevalent categories were 'the organisation of healthcare system', 'the organisation of cardiac rehabilitation programmes', 'healthcare professional' factors and 'guidelines'. The most frequent themes included 'lack of resources: time, staff, facilities and equipment' and 'professional's knowledge, awareness and attitude'. CONCLUSIONS Our systematic review identified a wide range of provider- and system-level barriers impacting the delivery of cardiac rehabilitation for heart failure, along with a range of potential solutions. This information may be useful for healthcare professionals to deliver, plan or commission cardiac rehabilitation services, as well as future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina Daw
- School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK
| | - Thomas M. Withers
- School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK
| | | | | | - Colin J. Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fowokan A, Frankfurter C, Dobrow MJ, Abrahamyan L, Mcdonald M, Virani S, Harkness K, Lee DS, Pakosh M, Ross H, Grace SL. Referral and access to heart function clinics: A realist review. J Eval Clin Pract 2021; 27:949-964. [PMID: 33020996 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Revised: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE, AIM, AND OBJECTIVES Heart failure (HF) clinics are highly effective, yet not optimally utilized. A realist review was performed to identify contexts (eg, health system characteristics, clinic capacity, and siting) and underlying mechanisms (eg, referring provider knowledge of clinics and referral criteria, barriers in disadvantaged patients) that influence utilization (provider referral [ie, of all appropriate and no inappropriate patients] and access [ie, patient attends ≥1 visit]) of HF clinics. METHODS Following an initial scoping search and field observation in a HF clinic, we developed an initial program theory in conjunction with our expert panel, which included patient partners. Then, a literature search of seven databases was searched from inception to December 2019, including Medline; Grey literature was also searched. Studies of any design or editorials were included; studies regarding access to cardiac rehabilitation, or a single specialist for example, were excluded. Two independent reviewers screened the abstracts, and then full-texts. Relevant data from included articles were used to refine the program theory. RESULTS A total of 29 papers from five countries (three regions) were included. There was limited information to support or refute many elements of our initial program theory (eg, referring provider knowledge/beliefs, clinic inclusion/exclusion criteria), but refinements were made (eg, specialized care provided in each clinic, lack of patient encouragement). Lack of capacity, geography, and funding arrangements were identified as contextual factors, explaining a range of mechanistic processes, including patient clinical characteristics and social determinants of health as well as clinic characteristics that help to explain inappropriate and low use of HF clinics (outcome). CONCLUSION Given the burden of HF and benefit of HF clinics, more research is needed to understand, and hence overcome sub-optimal use of HF clinics. In particular, an understanding from the perspective of referring providers is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mark J Dobrow
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lusine Abrahamyan
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Sean Virani
- St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, and Cardiac Services BC, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Karen Harkness
- CorHealth Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Douglas S Lee
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maureen Pakosh
- Library & Information Services, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Heather Ross
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sherry L Grace
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|