Socio-Economic Disparity is Not Linked to Outcome Following Heart Transplantation in New Zealand

Influence of socioeconomic status on rates of advanced heart failure therapies

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with a lower likelihood of referral for advanced heart failure (HF) evaluation, but it is not known whether it influences rates of advanced HF therapies independently of key hemodynamic measures and comorbidity following advanced HF evaluation in a universal healthcare system.

METHODS

We linked data from a single-center Danish clinical registry of consecutive patients evaluated for advanced HF with patient-level information on socioeconomic status. Patients were divided into groups based on the level of education (low, medium, and high), combined degree of socioeconomic deprivation (low, medium, and high), and household income quartiles. Rates of the combined outcome of left ventricular assist device implantation or heart transplantation (advanced HF therapy) with death as a competing risk were estimated with cumulative incidence functions, and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, central venous pressure, cardiac index, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

We included 629 patients, median age 53 years, of whom 77% were men. During a median follow-up of 5 years, 179 (28%) underwent advanced HF therapy. The highest level of education was associated with higher rates (high vs low, adjusted HR 1.81 95% CI 1.14-2.89, p = 0.01), whereas household income quartile groups (Q4 vs Q1, adjusted HR 1.37 95% CI 0.76-2.47, p = 0.30) or groups of combined socioeconomic deprivation (high vs low degree of deprivation, adjusted HR 0.86 95% CI 0.50-1.46, p = 0.56) were not significantly associated with rates of advanced HF therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a lower level of education might be disfavored for advanced HF therapies and could require specific attention in the advanced HF care center.

The association of socioeconomic deprivation with access and survival after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in New Zealand

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomic deprivation (SED) is a risk factor for reduced survival of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. This study aimed to evaluate access and long-term survival of HSCT recipients.

METHODS

This was a hospital HSCT Registry-based retrospective cohort study. Patients who underwent HSCT from January 2010 to June 2020 were identified. HSCT recipients younger than 16 years of age, patients who reported their residential address as a post office box or the Department of Corrections, and those who left the country after HSCT were excluded from the study. HSCT recipients with the 2018 New Zealand deprivation index (NZDep2018) deciles 8, 9, and 10 were assigned to the higher SED group and those with NZDep2018 deciles from 1 to 7 were allocated to the lower SED group. The total number of New Zealanders in the higher and lower SED strata was obtained from the 2018 Census.

RESULTS

Eight hundred fifty-one HSCT recipients met the eligibility criteria. HSCT recipients from the higher and lower SED strata of the New Zealand population had similar access to HSCT (odds ratio = .9; 95% confidence interval (CI): .77-1.04; p = .155). Mortality in the higher and lower SED groups of HSCT recipients was 9.6/100 person-years (95% CI: 7.7-12/100 person-years) and 8.1/100 person-years (95% CI: 6.9-9.4/100 person-years), respectively. The mortality ratio was 1.2 (95% CI: .9-1.6), p = .098. Both groups had similar survival.

CONCLUSION

New Zealand residents from the higher and lower SED strata have similar access to HSCT. SED is not associated with reduced survival in adult HSCT recipients.

Socioeconomic Disparities in Referral for Invasive Hemodynamic Evaluation for Advanced Heart Failure: A Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Factors determining referral for advanced heart failure (HF) evaluation are poorly studied. We studied the influence of socioeconomic aspects on the referral process in Denmark, which has a taxpayer-funded national health care system.

METHODS

We identified all patients aged 18 to 75 years with a first diagnosis of HF during 2010 to 2018. Hospitalized patients had to be discharged alive and were then followed for the outcome of undergoing a right heart catheterization (RHC) used as a surrogate marker of advanced HF work-up.

RESULTS

Of 36 637 newly diagnosed patients with HF, 680 (1.9%) underwent RHC during the follow-up period (median time to RHC of 280 days [interquartile range, 73-914]). Factors associated with a higher likelihood of RHC included the highest versus lowest household income quartile (HR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.19-2.06]; P=0.001), being diagnosed with HF at a tertiary versus nontertiary hospital (HR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.37-2.05]; P<0.001) and during a hospitalization versus outpatient visit (HR, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.42-1.95]; P<0.001). Level of education, occupational status, and distance to tertiary hospital were not independently associated with RHC. Older age, cancer, and a psychiatric diagnosis were independently associated with a decreased probability of RHC.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher household income, HF diagnosis during hospitalization, and first admission at a tertiary hospital were associated with increased likelihood of subsequent referral for RHC independent of other demographic and clinical variables. Greater attention may be required to ensure timely referral for advanced HF therapies in lower income groups.

Socioeconomic inequality: Accessibility and outcomes after renal transplantation in New Zealand

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomic deprivation (SED) is a risk factor for worse outcomes after renal transplantation (RTx). This study aimed to evaluate access to RTx in different SED strata of the New Zealand population. We also assessed patient survival, acute cellular allograft rejection (AR) and allograft loss.

METHODS

This was an Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplantation and Organ Donation Registries-based retrospective cohort study. Patients who underwent RTx in New Zealand from 2008 to 2018 were identified. Patients younger than 16 years of age and those who left the country after RTx were excluded.

RESULTS

In the higher SED stratum of New Zealanders, the rate of RTx was 53% greater than in the lower SED stratum (odds ratio = 1.53; 95% confidence interval: 1.33-1.76; p < 0.00005).

RESULTS

One hundred and thirteen (23%) patients from the lower SED group and 51 (14.8%) patients from the higher SED group underwent living unrelated RTx, p = 0.0033. In 233 (67.5%) patients from the higher SED group and 265 (53.9%) patients from the lower SED group, transplanted kidneys were from deceased donors RTx, p = 0.0001. The incidence of allograft loss and patient survival were similar in these groups.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrated a lower overall survival in the more socioeconomically deprived patients than in the lower SED group however this was not statistically significant after adjustment for covariates. A larger study is required to determine whether SED is associated with reduced survival.