2
|
Rockall AG, Qureshi M, Papadopoulou I, Saso S, Butterfield N, Thomassin-Naggara I, Farthing A, Smith JR, Bharwani N. Role of Imaging in Fertility-sparing Treatment of Gynecologic Malignancies. Radiographics 2017; 36:2214-2233. [PMID: 27831834 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2016150254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Treatments for gynecologic cancer usually result in loss of fertility due to surgery or radical radiation therapy in the pelvis. In countries with an established screening program for cervical cancer, the majority of gynecologic malignancies occur in postmenopausal women. However, a substantial number of affected women are of childbearing age and have not completed their families. In these younger women, consideration of fertility preservation may be important. This article describes the fertility-sparing treatment options that are currently available and outlines the role of imaging in the selection of eligible patients on the basis of a review of the literature. In the setting of cervical cancer, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is used to delineate the size, position, and stage of the tumor for selection of patients who are suitable for radical trachelectomy. In patients with solitary complex adnexal masses, diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MR imaging sequences are used to categorize the likelihood of invasive or borderline malignancy for consideration of unilateral ovarian resection, with fertility preservation when possible. In patients with endometrial cancer, MR imaging is used to rule out signs of invasive disease before hormone therapy is considered. Imaging is also used at patient follow-up to detect recurrent disease; however, evidence to support this application is limited. In conclusion, imaging is an essential tool in the care of patients with gynecologic malignancies who are considering fertility-preserving treatment options. ©RSNA, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea G Rockall
- From the Department of Radiology, Hammersmith Hospital (A.G.R.), and Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer (A.G.R., N. Bharwani), Imperial College London, England; Department of Radiology, Royal Free NHS Trust, London, England (M.Q.); Departments of Radiology (I.P., N. Butterfield, N. Bharwani), Surgery (S.S.), and Gynecology (A.F., J.R.S.), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England; and Department of Radiology, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, APHP, HUEP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France (I.T.N.)
| | - Mahrukh Qureshi
- From the Department of Radiology, Hammersmith Hospital (A.G.R.), and Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer (A.G.R., N. Bharwani), Imperial College London, England; Department of Radiology, Royal Free NHS Trust, London, England (M.Q.); Departments of Radiology (I.P., N. Butterfield, N. Bharwani), Surgery (S.S.), and Gynecology (A.F., J.R.S.), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England; and Department of Radiology, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, APHP, HUEP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France (I.T.N.)
| | - Ioanna Papadopoulou
- From the Department of Radiology, Hammersmith Hospital (A.G.R.), and Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer (A.G.R., N. Bharwani), Imperial College London, England; Department of Radiology, Royal Free NHS Trust, London, England (M.Q.); Departments of Radiology (I.P., N. Butterfield, N. Bharwani), Surgery (S.S.), and Gynecology (A.F., J.R.S.), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England; and Department of Radiology, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, APHP, HUEP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France (I.T.N.)
| | - Srdjan Saso
- From the Department of Radiology, Hammersmith Hospital (A.G.R.), and Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer (A.G.R., N. Bharwani), Imperial College London, England; Department of Radiology, Royal Free NHS Trust, London, England (M.Q.); Departments of Radiology (I.P., N. Butterfield, N. Bharwani), Surgery (S.S.), and Gynecology (A.F., J.R.S.), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England; and Department of Radiology, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, APHP, HUEP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France (I.T.N.)
| | - Nicholas Butterfield
- From the Department of Radiology, Hammersmith Hospital (A.G.R.), and Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer (A.G.R., N. Bharwani), Imperial College London, England; Department of Radiology, Royal Free NHS Trust, London, England (M.Q.); Departments of Radiology (I.P., N. Butterfield, N. Bharwani), Surgery (S.S.), and Gynecology (A.F., J.R.S.), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England; and Department of Radiology, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, APHP, HUEP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France (I.T.N.)
| | - Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara
- From the Department of Radiology, Hammersmith Hospital (A.G.R.), and Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer (A.G.R., N. Bharwani), Imperial College London, England; Department of Radiology, Royal Free NHS Trust, London, England (M.Q.); Departments of Radiology (I.P., N. Butterfield, N. Bharwani), Surgery (S.S.), and Gynecology (A.F., J.R.S.), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England; and Department of Radiology, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, APHP, HUEP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France (I.T.N.)
| | - Alan Farthing
- From the Department of Radiology, Hammersmith Hospital (A.G.R.), and Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer (A.G.R., N. Bharwani), Imperial College London, England; Department of Radiology, Royal Free NHS Trust, London, England (M.Q.); Departments of Radiology (I.P., N. Butterfield, N. Bharwani), Surgery (S.S.), and Gynecology (A.F., J.R.S.), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England; and Department of Radiology, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, APHP, HUEP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France (I.T.N.)
| | - J Richard Smith
- From the Department of Radiology, Hammersmith Hospital (A.G.R.), and Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer (A.G.R., N. Bharwani), Imperial College London, England; Department of Radiology, Royal Free NHS Trust, London, England (M.Q.); Departments of Radiology (I.P., N. Butterfield, N. Bharwani), Surgery (S.S.), and Gynecology (A.F., J.R.S.), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England; and Department of Radiology, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, APHP, HUEP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France (I.T.N.)
| | - Nishat Bharwani
- From the Department of Radiology, Hammersmith Hospital (A.G.R.), and Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery and Cancer (A.G.R., N. Bharwani), Imperial College London, England; Department of Radiology, Royal Free NHS Trust, London, England (M.Q.); Departments of Radiology (I.P., N. Butterfield, N. Bharwani), Surgery (S.S.), and Gynecology (A.F., J.R.S.), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, England; and Department of Radiology, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, APHP, HUEP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France (I.T.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Novaes HMD, Itria A, Silva GAE, Sartori AMC, Rama CH, de Soárez PC. Annual national direct and indirect cost estimates of the prevention and treatment of cervical cancer in Brazil. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2015; 70:289-95. [PMID: 26017797 PMCID: PMC4418354 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2015(04)12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2014] [Accepted: 01/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the annual direct and indirect costs of the prevention and treatment of cervical cancer in Brazil. METHODS This cost description study used a "gross-costing" methodology and adopted the health system and societal perspectives. The estimates were grouped into sets of procedures performed in phases of cervical cancer care: the screening, diagnosis and treatment of precancerous lesions and the treatment of cervical cancer. The costs were estimated for the public and private health systems, using data from national health information systems, population surveys, and literature reviews. The cost estimates are presented in 2006 USD. RESULTS From the societal perspective, the estimated total costs of the prevention and treatment of cervical cancer amounted to USD $1,321,683,034, which was categorized as follows: procedures (USD $213,199,490), visits (USD $325,509,842), transportation (USD $106,521,537) and productivity losses (USD $676,452,166). Indirect costs represented 51% of the total costs, followed by direct medical costs (visits and procedures) at 41% and direct non-medical costs (transportation) at 8%. The public system represented 46% of the total costs, and the private system represented 54%. CONCLUSION Our national cost estimates of cervical cancer prevention and treatment, indicating the economic importance of cervical cancer screening and care, will be useful in monitoring the effect of the HPV vaccine introduction and are of interest in research and health care management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alexander Itria
- Universidade Federal de Goiás, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Department of Public Health, Goiânia/GO, Brazil
| | - Gulnar Azevedo e Silva
- Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Medicina Social, Rio de Janeiro, RJ/Brazil
| | - Ana Marli Christovam Sartori
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Department of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| | - Cristina Helena Rama
- Secretaria do Estado da Saúde, Hospital e Maternidade Leonor Mendes de Barros, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| | - Patrícia Coelho de Soárez
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Department of Preventive Medicine, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
- E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|