1
|
Dahmen AS, Phuoc VH, Cohen JB, Sexton WJ, Patel SY. Bloodless surgery in urologic oncology: A review of hematologic, anesthetic, and surgical considerations. Urol Oncol 2022; 41:192-203. [PMID: 36470804 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
The urologic oncology patient who refuses blood transfusion can present unique challenges in perioperative blood management. Since blood loss and associated transfusion can be expected in many complex urologic oncology surgeries, a multidisciplinary approach may be required for optimal outcomes. Through collaboration with the hematologist, anesthesiologist, and urologist, various techniques can be employed in the perioperative phases to minimize blood loss and the need for transfusion. We review the risks and benefits of these techniques and offer recommendations specific to the urologic oncology patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron S Dahmen
- Department of Urology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Vania H Phuoc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Jonathan B Cohen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Wade J Sexton
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Sephalie Y Patel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Feitosa MR, Freitas LFD, Filho AB, Nakiri GS, Abud DG, Landell LM, Brunaldi MO, Rocha JJRD, Feres O, Parra RS. Preoperative rectal tumor embolization as an adjunctive tool for bloodless abdominoperineal excision: A case report. World J Clin Oncol 2020; 11:1070-1075. [PMID: 33437668 PMCID: PMC7769720 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i12.1070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Abdominoperineal excision (APE)-related hemorrhage can be challenging due to difficult access to pelvic organs and the risk of massive blood loss. The objective of the present study was to demonstrate the use of preoperative embolization (PE) as a strategy for blood preservation in a patient with a large low rectal tumor with a high risk of bleeding, scheduled for APE.
CASE SUMMARY A 56-year-old man presented to our institution with a one-year history of anal bleeding and rectal tenesmus. The patient was diagnosed with bulky adenocarcinoma limited to the rectum. As the patient refused any clinical treatment, surgery without previous neoadjuvant chemoradiation was indicated. The patient underwent a tumor embolization procedure, two days before surgery performed via the right common femoral artery. The tumor was successfully devascularized and no major bleeding was noted during APE. Postoperative recovery was uneventful and a one-year follow-up showed no signs of recurrence.
CONCLUSION Therapeutic tumor embolization may play a role in bloodless surgeries and increase surgical and oncologic prognoses. We describe a patient with a bulky low rectal tumor who successfully underwent preoperative embolization and bloodless abdominoperineal resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marley Ribeiro Feitosa
- Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Medicine School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14048900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Lucas Fernandes de Freitas
- Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Medicine School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14048900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Antonio Balestrim Filho
- Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Medicine School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14048900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Guilherme Seizem Nakiri
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14048900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Daniel Giansante Abud
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14048900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ligia Magnani Landell
- Department of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Medicine School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14048900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mariângela Ottoboni Brunaldi
- Department of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Medicine School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14048900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Jose Joaquim Ribeiro da Rocha
- Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Medicine School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14048900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Omar Feres
- Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Medicine School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14048900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rogério Serafim Parra
- Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Medicine School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14048900, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Frank SM, Lo BD, Yesantharao LV, Merkel KR, Qin CX, Cho BC, Lee KHK, Wintermeyer TL, Hebbar S, Burkhart RA, Goel R, Gehrie EA. Blood utilization and clinical outcomes in pancreatic surgery before and after implementation of patient blood management. Transfusion 2020; 60:2581-2590. [PMID: 32897635 DOI: 10.1111/trf.16063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the past decade, patient blood management (PBM) programs have been developed to reduce allogeneic blood utilization. This is particularly important in pancreatic surgery, which has historically been associated with high transfusion requirements and morbid event rates. This study investigated blood utilization and clinical outcomes in pancreatic surgery before, during, and after the implementation of PBM. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 3482 pancreatic surgery patients were assessed in a 10-year retrospective cohort study (2009-2019) at a single academic center. Baseline patient characteristics, transfusion practices, postoperative morbidity (infectious, thrombotic, ischemic, respiratory, and renal complications), mortality, and length of stay were compared between patients in the pre-PBM (2009-2013), early-PBM (2014-2016), and mature-PBM (2017-2019) time periods. Multivariable analysis assessed the odds for composite morbidity/mortality. RESULTS Comparing the mature-PBM to pre-PBM cohorts, transfused units per 100 discharged patients decreased by 53% for erythrocytes (155 to 73; P < .0001), 81% for plasma (79 to 15; P < .038), and 75% for platelets (10 to 2.5; P < .005). Clinical outcomes improved as well, with composite morbid event rates decreasing by more than 50%, from 236 in 1438 patients (16.4%) to 85 in 1145 patients (7.4%) (P < .0001). Mortality and length of stay remained unchanged. Compared to the pre-PBM time period, early-PBM was associated with a risk-adjusted decrease in composite morbidity/mortality (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.57-0.93; P = .010), while mature-PBM demonstrated a further incremental decrease (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.33-0.57; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS The implementation of PBM was associated with substantially decreased blood utilization in pancreatic surgery, without negatively impacting clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven M Frank
- Department of Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Health System Blood Management Program, Faculty, The Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Brian D Lo
- Department of Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Lekha V Yesantharao
- Department of Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kevin R Merkel
- Department of Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Caroline X Qin
- Department of Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Brian C Cho
- Department of Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - K H Ken Lee
- Clinical and Value Analytics, The Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Tyler L Wintermeyer
- Clinical and Value Analytics, The Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sachidanand Hebbar
- Department of Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Richard A Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ruchika Goel
- Department of Pathology (Transfusion Medicine), The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Eric A Gehrie
- Department of Pathology (Transfusion Medicine), The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|