The Evolution (and Future) of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Oligometastatic Disease

A new approach to combined proton-photon therapy for metastatic cancer patients

Objective.Proton therapy is a limited resource and is typically not available to metastatic cancer patients. Combined proton-photon therapy (CPPT), where most fractions are delivered with photons and only few with protons, represents an approach to distribute proton resources over a larger patient population. In this study, we consider stereotactic radiotherapy of multiple brain or liver metastases, and develop an approach to optimally take advantage of a single proton fraction by optimizing the proton and photon dose contributions to each individual metastasis.Approach.CPPT treatments must balance two competing goals: (1) deliver a larger dose in the proton fractions to reduce integral dose, and (2) fractionate the dose in the normal tissue between metastases, which requires using the photon fractions. Such CPPT treatments are generated by simultaneously optimizing intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans based on their cumulative biologically effective dose (BEDα/β). The dose contributions of the proton and photon fractions to each individual metastasis are handled as additional optimization variables in the optimization problem. The method is demonstrated for two patients with 29 and 30 brain metastases, and two patients with 4 and 3 liver metastases.Main results.Optimized CPPT plans increase the proton dose contribution to most of the metastases, while using photons to fractionate the dose around metastases which are large or located close to critical structures. On average, the optimized CPPT plans reduce the mean brain BED2by 29% and the mean liver BED4by 42% compared to IMRT-only plans. Thereby, the CPPT plans approach the dosimetric quality of IMPT-only plans, for which the mean brain BED2and mean liver BED4are reduced by 28% and 58%, respectively, compared to IMRT-only plans.Significance.CPPT with optimized proton and photon dose contributions to individual metastases may benefit selected metastatic cancer patients without tying up major proton resources.

Long-Term Outcomes and Genetic Predictors of Response to Metastasis-Directed Therapy Versus Observation in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Analysis of STOMP and ORIOLE Trials

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.The initial STOMP and ORIOLE trial reports suggested that metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) in oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC) was associated with improved treatment outcomes. Here, we present long-term outcomes of MDT in omCSPC by pooling STOMP and ORIOLE and assess the ability of a high-risk mutational signature to risk stratify outcomes after MDT. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. High-risk mutations were defined as pathogenic somatic mutations within ATM, BRCA1/2, Rb1, or TP53. The median follow-up for the whole group was 52.5 months. Median PFS was prolonged with MDT compared with observation (pooled hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.66; P value < .001), with the largest benefit of MDT in patients with a high-risk mutation (HR high-risk, 0.05; HR no high-risk, 0.42; P value for interaction: .12). Within the MDT cohort, the PFS was 13.4 months in those without a high-risk mutation, compared with 7.5 months in those with a high-risk mutation (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.25 to 1.11; P = .09). Long-term outcomes from the only two randomized trials in omCSPC suggest a sustained clinical benefit to MDT over observation. A high-risk mutational signature may help risk stratify treatment outcomes after MDT.

MRI-guided Radiotherapy (MRgRT) for treatment of Oligometastases: Review of clinical applications and challenges

PURPOSE

Early clinical results on the application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) coupled with a linear accelerator to deliver MR-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) have demonstrated feasibility for safe delivery of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in treatment of oligometastatic disease. Here we set out to review the clinical evidence and challenges associated with MRgRT in this setting.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We performed a systematic review of the literature pertaining to clinical experiences and trials on the use of MRgRT primarily for the treatment of oligometastatic cancers. We reviewed the opportunities and challenges associated with the use of MRgRT.

RESULTS

Benefits of MRgRT pertaining to superior soft-tissue contrast, real-time imaging and gating, and online adaptive radiotherapy facilitate safe and effective dose escalation to oligometastatic tumors while simultaneously sparing surrounding healthy tissues. Challenges concerning further need for clinical evidence and technical considerations related to planning, delivery, quality assurance (QA) of hypofractionated doses, and safety in the MRI environment must be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

The promising early indications of safety and effectiveness of MRgRT for SBRT-based treatment of oligometastatic disease in multiple treatment locations should lead to further clinical evidence to demonstrate the benefit of this technology.

Characteristics of stereotactic radiotherapy clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov

Background

We aim to analyze the characteristics of stereotactic radiotherapy trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, and to compare completed and stopped early trials to identify predictors of trial failure.

Methods

All interventional stereotactic radiotherapy trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov before Dec 31, 2019 were downloaded. Trial characteristics over time and between different regions were compared by Chi-square test. Binary logistic regression was used to explore characteristics associated with trials stopped early.

Results

A total of 760 trials were included. A higher proportion of trials were about lung cancer (20.4%), prostate cancer (14.7%) and central nervous system (14.6%). Most trials were phase1 and/or 2 trials (63.0%), single group (62.4%), nonrandomized (71.7%), open-label (95.0%) and single center (75.8%). The median sample size was 40 (0–1,716). Only 15.1% and 13.5% were funded by industry and National Institutes of Health (NIH), respectively. 15.4% stopped early with status includes “suspended”, “terminated” and “withdrawn”. Of the 113 “completed” trials, only 28 were published on PubMed. Compared with 2010 to 2014, trials from 2015 to 2019 were more likely to be randomized (20.0% vs. 34.4%; P=0.001), with 2 study arms (27.1% vs. 42.1%; P=0.002), industry-funded (11.0% vs. 19.1%; P=0.028) and conducted in Asia (7.6% to 15.8%; P=0.002). Trials from North America were more oriented toward phase 1 research (24.4% vs. 6.1% for Europe and 6.5% for Asia, P<0.001), nonrandomized (77.7% vs. 56.8% for Europe and 64.1% for Asia, P<0.001). Trials from Asia were more likely to have recruiting status (56.5% vs. 45.5% for Europe and 43.6% for North America, P<0.001). Multivariate regression analysis showed that randomized (OR 8.090, P=0.001), and enrollment patients ≤50 (OR 3.813, P<0.001) were associated with trials stopped early.

Conclusions

Stereotactic radiotherapy trials are predominantly early-phase, small, single arm, nonrandomized and open label. Trials with randomized allocation or enrollment patients ≤50 were more likely to stop early.

Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MRI-guided stereotactic ablative radiation therapy for liver metastasis

Background

MRI-guided radiation therapy can image a target and irradiate it at the same time. Superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) is a liver-specific contrast agent that can selectively visualize liver tumors, even if plain MRI does not depict them. The purpose of this study was to present a proof of concept of SPIO-enhanced MRI-guided radiation therapy for liver tumor.

Case presentation

MRI-guided stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) was planned for a patient with impaired renal function who developed liver metastases after nephroureterectomy for ureteral cancer. Because liver metastasis was not visualized on plain MRI, SPIO-enhanced MRI was performed at 0.35 T using true fast imaging with steady-state free precession (true FISP) pulse sequence and SABR was performed. Liver metastasis was clearly visualized by SPIO-enhanced MRI, and MRI-guided SABR was performed without adverse events.

Conclusion

Even if liver metastasis is not visualized by plain MRI, liver metastasis can be clearly depicted by administering SPIO, and MRI-guided radiation therapy can be performed.

Mitigation on bowel loops daily variations by 1.5-T MR-guided daily-adaptive SBRT for abdomino-pelvic lymph-nodal oligometastases

PURPOSE

We report preliminary dosimetric data concerning the use of 1.5-T MR-guided daily-adaptive radiotherapy for abdomino-pelvic lymph-nodal oligometastases. We aimed to assess the impact of this technology on mitigating daily variations for both target coverage and organs-at-risk (OARs) sparing.

METHODS

A total of 150 sessions for 30 oligometastases in 23 patients were analyzed. All patients were treated with MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for a total dose of 35 Gy in five fractions. For each fraction, a quantitative analysis was performed for PTV volume, V35Gy and D_mean. Similarly, for OARs, we assessed daily variations of volume, D_mean, D_max. Any potential statistically significant change between baseline planning and daily-adaptive sessions was assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, assuming a p value < 0.05 as significant.

RESULTS

Average baseline PTV, bowel, bladder, and single intestinal loop volumes were respectively 8.9 cc (range 0.7-41.2 cc), 1176 cc (119-3654 cc), 95 cc (39.7-202.9 cc), 18.3 cc (9.1-37.7 cc). No significant volume variations were detected for PTV (p = 0.21) bowel (p = 0.36), bladder (p = 0.47), except for single intestinal loops, which resulted smaller (p = 0.026). Average baseline V35Gy and D_mean for PTV were respectively 85.6% (72-98.8%) and 35.6 Gy (34.6-36.1 Gy). We recorded a slightly positive trend in favor of daily-adaptive strategy vs baseline planning for improved target coverage, although not reaching statistical significance (p = 0.11 and p = 0.18 for PTV-V35Gy and PTV-D_mean). Concerning OARs, a significant difference was observed in favor of daily-adapted treatments in terms of single intestinal loop D_max [23.05 Gy (13.2-26.9 Gy) at baseline vs 20.5 Gy (12.1-24 Gy); p value = 0.0377] and D_mean [14.4 Gy (6.5-18 Gy) at baseline vs 13.0 Gy (6.7-17.6 Gy); p value = 0.0003]. Specifically for bladder, the average D_max was 18.6 Gy (0.4-34.3 Gy) at baseline vs 18.3 Gy (0.7-34.3 Gy) for a p value = 0.28; the average D_mean was 7.0 Gy (0.2-16.6 Gy) at baseline vs 6.98 Gy (0.2-16.4 Gy) for a p value = 0.66. Concerning the bowel, no differences in terms of D_mean [4.78 Gy (1.3-10.9 Gy) vs 5.6 Gy (1.4-10.5 Gy); p value = 0.23] were observed between after daily-adapted sessions. A statistically significant difference was observed for bowel D_max [26.4 Gy (7.7-34 Gy) vs 25.8 Gy (7.8-33.1 Gy); p value = 0.0086].

CONCLUSIONS

Daily-adaptive MR-guided SBRT reported a significantly improved single intestinal loop sparing for lymph-nodal oligometastases. Also, bowel D_max was significantly reduced with daily-adaptive strategy. A minor advantage was also reported in terms of PTV coverage, although not statistically significant.

Freezing Nodal Disease: Local Control Following Percutaneous Image-Guided Cryoablation of Locoregional and Distant Lymph Node Oligometastases: A 10-Year, Single-Center Experience

PURPOSE

To retrospectively assess the technical feasibility, safety, and oncologic outcomes of percutaneous image-guided cryoablation (PCA) of locoregional and distant lymph node metastases (LNMs).

METHODS

All consecutive patients undergoing PCA of LNMs between February 2009 and December 2019 were identified using a retrospective database search. Every patient was followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and at approximately 3-6-month intervals using computed tomography or positron emission tomography-computed tomography. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate local tumor progression-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Locoregional and distant groups were compared using the Fisher test. Technical success, technique efficacy, complications, and oncologic outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-six metachronous oligometastatic LNMs (median size, 15 mm [interquartile range, 13-15 mm; range, 9-36 mm]) were treated in 37 sessions in 29 patients and defined as locoregional (26/37 sessions) or distant (11/37 sessions). Seventeen patients had undergone prior surgery or radiotherapy. Six patients underwent 8 retreatments for locoregional progression. An additional visceral oligometastasis was treated in 4 of the 11 distant LNM PCA sessions. The technical success and primary technique efficacy rates were 100%. The complication rate was 5.4% (2 transient nerve palsies). At a median follow-up of 23 months, there were 2 instances of local tumor progression (5.6%); the 1-, 2-, and 3-year local tumor progression-free survival was 100%, 94.3%, and 94.3%, respectively. Thirteen (45%) patients demonstrated no disease progression. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival was 96.2%, 90.5%, and 70%, respectively. The patients were free from systemic oncologic therapy following 20 (54%) sessions, with a mean treatment break of 19.1 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The PCA of lymph node oligometastases is feasible and safe, and offers promising local tumor control at midterm follow-up.

Oligometastasis: Past, Present, Future

In this review, we discuss the oligometastatic state, with a focus on its current and future relevance within the field of radiation therapy. We first outline the scope of the problem and the evolving understanding of metastatic disease existing along a spectrum. We then transition to a discussion of the clinical data that led to the formulation of the oligometastatic hypothesis, delving in some detail into the clinical factors associated with improved outcomes in the setting of local therapy-whether surgical or radiotherapeutic. In particular, we highlight the marked limitations of using clinical criteria alone to determine the absence or presence of true extracranial oligometastatic disease. After this, we briefly discuss the radiation therapy literature that has recently demonstrated benefits in cancer-specific outcomes with ablative treatment of oligometastatic disease. We emphasize data in the setting of non-small cell lung cancer and prostate cancer and briefly discuss the importance of our enhanced ability to detect occult metastatic disease with improved imaging technologies. After noting that resulted and ongoing prospective trials of ablative radiation therapy use the most rudimentary of oligometastatic classifiers-number of metastases-as their inclusion criteria, we transition to our core argument: a growing body of preclinical and translational work aims to refine the definition of oligometastatic disease using molecular features. We address genomic, epigenetic, and immunologic features that have, across histology, demonstrated an improved ability to prognosticate when combined with classic clinical correlates of oligometastatic disease. We also discuss studies that suggest particular molecular targets which, when manipulated for therapeutic purposes, have the potential to revert the polymetastatic phenotype to the oligometastatic one. We conclude with what we believe are the repercussions of this work for radiation therapy trials and clinical practice, and the importance of enriching and supporting these inquiries for the future of our field.

Is there a role for locoregional treatment of the primary tumor in de novo metastatic breast cancer in the era of tailored therapies?: Evidences, unresolved questions and a practical algorithm

Improvements in systemic therapies have changed the face of de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC), with a 5-year survival rate exceeding 25 %. Increasing evidence suggests that a subset of patients could benefit from a locoregional treatment (LRT) with prolonged survival, although the diversity of publications on the subject make it difficult to draw any conclusions. In this review, we summarize the available data on retrospective, prospective and current ongoing clinical trials. Since factors such as tumor biology, pattern of metastatic dissemination and the timing of the treatment are closely linked to the therapeutic strategy, we focus on papers which include these aspects. We discuss recent studies indicating that exclusive radiotherapy provides results comparable with those obtained by surgery. We will then discuss the biological rationale for LRT. Finally, we propose a decision-tree to select the optimal candidates for LRT in dnMBC patients.