Current Clinical Investigations in Myelofibrosis

New era for myelofibrosis treatment with novel agents beyond Janus kinase-inhibitor monotherapy: Focus on clinical development of BCL-XL /BCL-2 inhibition with navitoclax

Myelofibrosis is a heterogeneous myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by chronic inflammation, progressive bone marrow failure, and hepatosplenic extramedullary hematopoiesis. Treatments like Janus kinase inhibitor monotherapy (e.g., ruxolitinib) provide significant spleen and symptom relief but demonstrate limited ability to lead to a durable disease modification. There is an urgent unmet medical need for treatments with a novel mechanism of action that can modify the underlying pathophysiology and affect the disease course of myelofibrosis. This review highlights the role of B-cell lymphoma (BCL) protein BCL-extra large (BCL-XL ) in disease pathogenesis and the potential role that navitoclax, a BCL-extra large/BCL-2 inhibitor, may have in myelofibrosis treatment.

Heat shock protein 90 inhibitors induce cell differentiation via the ubiquitin-dependent aurora kinase A degradation in a MPLW515L mouse model of primary myelofibrosis

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is characterized by immature megakaryocytic hyperplasia, splenomegaly, extramedullary hematopoiesis and bone marrow fibrosis. Our preclinical study had demonstrated that aurora kinase A (AURKA) inhibitor MLN8237 reduced the mutation burden of PMF by inducing differentiation of immature megakaryocytes. However, it only slightly alleviated splenomegaly, reduced tissue fibrosis, and normalized megakaryocytes in PMF patients of the preliminary clinical study. So enhancing therapeutic efficacy of PMF is needed. In this study, we found that AURKA directly interacted with heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) and HSP90 inhibitors promoted the ubiquitin-dependent AURKA degradation. We demonstrated that HSP90 inhibitors 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) and 17-dimethylaminoethylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-DMAG), normalized peripheral blood counts, improved splenomegaly, attenuated extramedullary hematopoiesis, decreased tissue fibrosis and reduced mutant burden in a MPLW515L mouse model of PMF. Importantly, both 17-AAG and 17-DMAG treatment at effective doses in vivo did not influence on hematopoiesis in healthy mice. Collectively, the study demonstrates that HSP90 inhibitors induce cell differentiation via the ubiquitin-dependent AURKA and also are safe and effective for the treatment of a MPLW515L mouse model of PMF, which may provide a new strategy for PMF therapy. Further, we demonstrate that combined therapy shows superior activity in acute megakaryocytic leukemia mouse model than single therapy.

Cancer-associated fibroblasts in acute leukemia

Although the prognosis for acute leukemia has greatly improved, treatment of relapsed/refractory acute leukemia (R/R AL) remains challenging. Recently, increasing evidence indicates that the bone marrow microenvironment (BMM) plays a crucial role in leukemogenesis and therapeutic resistance; therefore, BMM-targeted strategies should be a potent protocol for treating R/R AL. The targeting of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in solid tumors has received much attention and has achieved some progress, as CAFs might act as an organizer in the tumor microenvironment. Additionally, over the last 10 years, attention has been drawn to the role of CAFs in the BMM. In spite of certain successes in preclinical and clinical studies, the heterogeneity and plasticity of CAFs mean targeting them is a big challenge. Herein, we review the heterogeneity and roles of CAFs in the BMM and highlight the challenges and opportunities associated with acute leukemia therapies that involve the targeting of CAFs.

The odyssey of pacritinib in myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) can present with symptomatic splenomegaly and/or cytopenias including thrombocytopenia. Disease-related thrombocytopenia is a poor prognostic factor with a median overall survival of less than 2 years. Currently approved JAK1/2 inhibitors have not been evaluated in patients with platelets ≤ 50 × 109/L and in fact could potentiate thrombocytopenia because of their combined JAK1/2 inhibitory activity. Pacritinib (PAC), a selective JAK2, fms-like tyrosine kinase 3, interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 multikinase inhibitor was developed to meet this unmet need. PAC was evaluated in 2 randomized phase 3 trials in the frontline setting (PERSIST-1, PAC 400 mg daily vs best available therapy) and second-line setting in patients with MF with platelets ≤ 100 × 109/L (PERSIST-2, PAC 400 mg daily or 200 mg twice daily vs best available therapy). PERSIST-1 met its primary end point; however, the development of PAC hit a brief pause because of a US Food and Drug Administration-mandated clinical hold for excess of bleeding and cardiac events in the PAC 400 mg daily arm in the PERSIST-1 study. Although the PERSIST-2 study was terminated abruptly because of this clinical hold, it met its splenic response end point and demonstrated a trend toward symptom improvement. Subsequent, diligent review of the PERSIST-1 and PERSIST-2 studies did not confirm an excess of severe bleeding or cardiac events on the PAC arm. Additionally, the dose finding PAC203 study endorsed the safety and efficacy of 200 mg twice daily, leading to the approval of PAC for the treatment of patients with MF with platelets ≤ 50 × 109/L.

Pacritinib for the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis and thrombocytopenia

INTRODUCTION

: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a rare myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by a complex symptom profile, cytopenias, splenomegaly, and potential for leukemic progression. Severe thrombocytopenia is common in patients with MF and correlates with poor prognosis; however, until recently, treatment options for these patients were limited. Pacritinib, a potent Janus kinase (JAK) 2/interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 (IRAK1) inhibitor, has demonstrated significant reduction in splenomegaly, improved symptom control, and a manageable safety profile in patients with MF regardless of the severity of thrombocytopenia.

AREAS COVERED

: This review will outline the pacritinib drug profile and summarize key efficacy and safety data, focusing on the 200 mg twice daily dose from phase 2 and 3 studies that formed the basis for the recent US Food and Drug Administration approval of pacritinib in patients with MF and severe thrombocytopenia (platelet counts <50 x 10⁹/L).

EXPERT OPINION

Pacritinib, with its unique mechanism of action targeting both JAK2 and IRAK1, offers patients with MF and severe thrombocytopenia a new treatment option, providing consistent disease and symptom control. Adverse events are easily manageable. Further analyses to identify ideal patient characteristics for pacritinib and other JAK inhibitors along with studies of pacritinib combinations are warranted, including in related myeloid malignancies.

Thrombocytopenia in Patients With Myelofibrosis: Pathogenesis, Prevalence, Prognostic Impact, and Treatment

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell neoplasm, characterized by pathologic myeloproliferation associated with inflammatory and pro-angiogenic cytokine release, that results in functional compromise of the bone marrow. Thrombocytopenia is a disease-related feature of MF, which portends a poor prognosis impacting overall survival (OS) and leukemia free survival. Thrombocytopenia in MF has multiple causes including ineffective hematopoiesis, splenic sequestration, and treatment-related effects. Presently, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curable treatment for MF, which, unfortunately, is only a viable option for a minority of patients. All other currently available therapies are either focused on improving cytopenias or the alleviating systemic symptoms and burdensome splenomegaly. While JAK2 inhibitors have moved to the forefront of MF therapy, available JAK inhibitors are advised against in patients with severe thrombocytopenia (platelets < 50 × 10⁹/L). In this review, we describe the pathogenesis, prevalence, and prognostic significance of thrombocytopenia in MF. We also explore the value and limitations of treatments directed at addressing cytopenias, splenomegaly and symptom burden, and those with potential disease modification. We conclude by proposing a treatment algorithm for patients with MF and severe thrombocytopenia.

Defining disease modification in myelofibrosis in the era of targeted therapy

The development of targeted therapies for the treatment of myelofibrosis highlights a unique issue in a field that has historically relied on symptom relief, rather than survival benefit or modification of disease course, as key response criteria. There is, therefore, a need to understand what constitutes disease modification of myelofibrosis to advance appropriate drug development and therapeutic pathways. Here, the authors discuss recent clinical trial data of agents in development and dissect the potential for novel end points to act as disease modifying parameters. Using the rationale garnered from latest clinical and scientific evidence, the authors propose a definition of disease modification in myelofibrosis. With improved overall survival a critical outcome, alongside the normalization of hematopoiesis and improvement in bone marrow fibrosis, there will be an increasing need for surrogate measures of survival for use in the early stages of trials. As such, the design of future clinical trials will require re-evaluation and updating to incorporate informative parameters and end points with standardized definitions and methodologies.

Peripheral blasts are associated with responses to ruxolitinib and outcomes in patients with chronic-phase myelofibrosis

Background

The presence of peripheral blasts (PB) is a negative prognostic factor in patients with primary and secondary myelofibrosis (MF) and PB ≥4% was associated with a particularly unfavorable prognosis. Ruxolitinib (RUX) is the JAK1/2 inhibitor most used for treatment of MF‐related splenomegaly and symptoms. Its role has not been assessed in correlation with PB.

Methods

In 794 chronic‐phase MF patients treated with RUX, we evaluated the impact of baseline percentage of PB on response (spleen and symptoms responses) and outcome (RUX discontinuation‐free, leukemia‐free, and overall survival). Three subgroups were compared: PB‐0 (no PB, 61.3%), PB‐4 (PB 1%‐4%, 33.5%), and PB‐9 (PB 5%‐9%, 5.2%).

Results

At 3 and 6 months, spleen responses were less frequently achieved by PB‐4 (P = .001) and PB‐9 (P = .004) compared to PB‐0 patients. RUX discontinuation‐free, leukemia‐free, and overall survival were also worse for PB‐4 and PB‐9 patients (P = .001, P = .002, and P < .001, respectively).

Conclusions

Personalized approaches beyond RUX monotherapy may be useful in PB‐4 and particularly in PB‐9 patients.

In 794 chronic‐phase myelofibrosis patients treated with ruxolitinib, the impact of the baseline percentage of peripheral blasts (PB) on response and outcome was evaluated. Three subgroups were compared: PB‐0 (no PB, 61.3%), PB‐4 (PB 1%‐4%, 33.5%), and PB‐9 (PB 5%‐9%, 5.2%). At 3 and 6 months, spleen responses were less frequently achieved by PB‐4 (P = .001) and PB‐9 (P = .004) compared to PB‐0 patients; ruxolitinib discontinuation‐free, leukemia‐free, and overall survival were also worse for PB‐4 and PB‐9 patients (P = .001, P = .002, and P < .001, respectively).

How We Manage Myelofibrosis Candidates for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Moving from indication to transplantation is a critical process in myelofibrosis. Most of guidelines specifically focus on either myelofibrosis disease or transplant procedure, and, currently, no distinct indication for the management of MF candidates to transplant is available. Nevertheless, this period of time is crucial for the transplant outcome because engraftment, non-relapse mortality, and relapse incidence are greatly dependent upon the pre-transplant management. Based on these premises, in this review, we will go through the path of identification of the MF patients suitable for a transplant, by using disease-specific prognostic scores, and the evaluation of eligibility for a transplant, based on performance, comorbidity, and other combined tools. Then, we will focus on the process of donor and conditioning regimens’ choice. The pre-transplant management of splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms, cytopenias, iron overload and transplant timing will be comprehensively discussed. The principal aim of this review is, therefore, to give a practical guidance for managing MF patients who are potential candidates for allo-HCT.

The Power of Extracellular Vesicles in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: "Crafting" a Microenvironment That Matters

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN) are acquired clonal disorders of the hematopoietic stem cells and include Essential Thrombocythemia, Polycythemia Vera and Myelofibrosis. MPN are characterized by mutations in three driver genes (JAK2, CALR and MPL) and by a state of chronic inflammation. Notably, MPN patients experience increased risk of thrombosis, disease progression, second neoplasia and evolution to acute leukemia. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are a heterogeneous population of microparticles with a role in cell-cell communication. The EV-mediated cross-talk occurs via the trafficking of bioactive molecules such as nucleic acids, proteins, metabolites and lipids. Growing interest is focused on EVs and their potential impact on the regulation of blood cancers. Overall, EVs have been suggested to orchestrate the complex interplay between tumor cells and the microenvironment with a pivotal role in "education" and "crafting" of the microenvironment by regulating angiogenesis, coagulation, immune escape and drug resistance of tumors. This review is focused on the role of EVs in MPN. Specifically, we will provide an overview of recent findings on the involvement of EVs in MPN pathogenesis and discuss opportunities for their potential application as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers.